Social media: How the next generation can practice argumentation

References

• Achieve. (2013). Next generation science standards. Retrieved from www.nextgenscience.org
   Google Scholar
• Asterhan, C. S., & Bouton, E. (2017). Teenage peer-to-peer knowledge sharing through social network sites in secondary schools. Computers & Education, 110, 16–34.10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asterhan, C., & Rosenberg, H. (2015). The promise, reality and dilemmas of secondary school teacher–student interactions in Facebook: The teacher perspective. Computers & Education, 85, 134–148.10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ault, M., Craig-Hare, J., Frey, B., Ellis, J. D., & Bulgren, J. (2015). The effectiveness of reason racer, a game designed to engage middle school students in scientific argumentation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47, 21–40. doi:10.1080/15391523.2015.967542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. & Bell, M. (2006). Play and sociability in there: Some lessons from online games for collaborative virtual environments. In R. Schroeder (Ed.), Avatars at work and play (pp. 227–245). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bulgren, J. A., & Ellis, J. D. (2012). Argumentation and evaluation intervention in science classes: Teaching and learning with Toulmin. In M. S. Kline (Ed.), Perspectives on scientific argumentation: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 135–154). New York, NY: Springer Publishing.10.1007/978-94-007-2470-9
   Google Scholar
• Bulgren, J. A., & Ellis, J. D. (2015a). The argumentation and evaluation guide: Encouraging NGSS-based critical thinking. Science Scope, 38, 78–85.
   Google Scholar
• Bulgren, J. A., & Ellis, J. D. (2015b). The Scientific argumentation routine. The University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning: 1122 West Campus Road, Room 517, Lawrence, KS 566045-3101.
   Google Scholar
• Bulgren, J., Ellis, J., & Marquis, J. (2014). The use and effectiveness of an argumentation and evaluation intervention in science classes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 82–97. doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9452-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, J., Parker, K., & Fontana, A. (2011). Developing an interactive social media based learning environment. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 8, 323–334.
   Google Scholar
• Chromey, K. J., Duchsherer, A., Pruett, J., & Vareberg, K. (2016). Double-edged sword: Social media use in the classroom. Educational Media International, 53(1), 1–12.10.1080/09523987.2016.1189259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, M. (2005). Socratic circles: Fostering critical and creative thinking in middle and high school. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
   Google Scholar
• Craig-Hare, J., & Ault, M. (2011, March). Teaching Scientific Argumentation through Games: A Design-Based Approach. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4082–4087). Nashville, TN: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B. B., Ellis, J. D., Bulgren, J. A., Craig-Hare, J., & Ault, M. (2015). Development of a test of scientific argumentation. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 19, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1992). The social mind: Language, ideology, and social practice. New York, NY: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Routledge/Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analyzis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., Gibbins, T., & Menzer, M. (2015). Re-thinking scientific literacy out-of-school: Arguing science issues in a niche Facebook application. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 593–604. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, A., & Joung, S. (2007). Scaffolding collaborative argumentation in asynchronous discussions with message constraints and message labels. Computers & Education, 48, 427–445.10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joiner, R., Jones, S., & Dohery, J. (2008). Two studies examining argumentation in asynchronous computer mediated communication. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 31, 243–255.10.1080/17437270802416848
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N., Blackey, H., Fitzgibbon, K., & Chew, E. (2010). Get out of MySpace! Computers & Education, 54, 776–782.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., Clark, D., & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87, 517–538.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. S. (2011). Science learning and instruction: Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, G., Gutwin, C., Mandryk, R., & Nacke, L. (2012). I’m just here to play games: Social dynamics and sociality in an online game site. In J. Grudin, G. Mark, & J. Riedl (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 549–558). Seattle, WA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, S. D. (2014). Using disruptive technologies to make digital connections: Stories of media use and digital literacy in secondary classrooms. Educational Media International, 51, 109–123.10.1080/09523987.2014.924661
   Google Scholar
• Polite, V., & Adams, A. (1997). Critical thinking and values clarification through Socratic seminars. Urban Education, 32, 256–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., & McLaren, B. M. (2010). Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 43–102.10.1007/s11412-009-9080-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soller, A., Martínez, A., Jermann, P., & Muehlenbrock, M. (2005). From mirroring to guiding: A review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, 15, 261–290.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, K. D., & Jan, M. (2007). Mad City Mystery: Developing scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 5–29.10.1007/s10956-006-9037-z
   Google Scholar
• Steinkuehler, C., & Chmiel, M. (2006). Fostering scientific habits of mind in the context of online play. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning Sciences (pp. 723–729). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840005
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning. Upper Saddle Ridge, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tsovaltzi, D., Puhl, T., Judele, R., & Weinberger, A. (2014). Group awareness support and argumentation scripts for individual preparation of arguments in Facebook. Computers & Education, 76, 108–118.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, J. (2016). Adolescents’ Dialogic Composing With Mobile Phones. Journal of Literacy Research, 48, 164–191. doi:10.1177/1086296X16660655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar