Counterintuitive effects of online feedback in middle school math: results from a randomized controlled trial in ASSISTments

References

• Baek, J. M., Wickstrom, M. H., Tobias, J. M., Miller, A. L., Safak, E., Wessman-Enzinger, N., & Kirwan, J. V. (2017). Preservice teachers’ pictorial strategies for a multistep multiplicative fraction problem. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 45, 1–14.10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers’ understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 132–144.10.2307/749140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroody, A. (1987). Children’s mathematical thinking. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, J. L., & Koedinger, K. R. (2012). Are diagrams always helpful tools? Developmental and individual differences in the effect of presentation format on student problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 492–511.10.1111/bjep.2012.82.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., Underhill, R. G., Jones, D., & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 194–222.10.2307/749118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Crehan, K., Babbit, B., & Pierce, T. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(2), 99–111.10.1111/ldrp.2003.18.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C. K., & Slaven, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113.10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R. S., & Todd, J. B. (2003). Effects of web-based multimedia homework with immediate rich feedback on student learning in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(11), 1338–1343.10.1021/ed080p1338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSS-M). (2010). National governors association center for best practices & council of chief state school officers. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Fendel, D. M. (1987). Understanding the structure of elementary mathematics. Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. M. (2010). Using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence to teach subtraction with regrouping to students at risk for failure. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 195–207.10.1177/0741932508327467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyfe, E. R., DeCaro, M. S., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2015). When feedback is cognitively-demanding: The importance of working memory capacity. Instructional Science, 43(1), 73–91.10.1007/s11251-014-9323-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Gan, M. (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In R. Mayer & P. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 249–271). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Education Sciences. (2009). IES practice guide – assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for Elementary and Middle Schools. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practice_guides/rti_math_pg_042109.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, B. R. J., Louwerse, J., Straatemeier, M., Van der Ven, S. H. G., Klinkenberg, S., & Van der Maas, H. L. J. (2013). The influence of experiencing success in math on math anxiety, perceived math competence, and math performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 190–197. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, L., Miller, M. D., & Mercer, C. D. (1999). The effects of concrete to semi-concrete to abstract instruction in the acquisition and retention of fraction concepts and skills. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23–31.10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, K., Heffernan, N., Heffernan, C., Goldman, S., Pellegrino, G. & Soffer, D. (2013). Estimating the Effect of Web-Based Homework. In H. Lane, K. Yacef, J. Motow, & P. Pavlik (Eds.), The artificial intelligence in education conference (pp. 824–827). Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). Effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koedinger, K. R., Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Trade-offs between grounded and abstract representations: Evidence from algebra problem solving. Cognitive Science, 32(2), 366–397.10.1080/03640210701863933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larken, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–99.10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2008). What do students need to learn about division of fractions? Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13, 546–552.
   Google Scholar
• Mendicino, M., Razzaq, L., & Heffernan, N. T. (2009). A comparison of traditional homework to computer-supported homework. Journal for Research on Technology Education, 41(3), 331–359.10.1080/15391523.2009.10782534
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, C. D., Jordan, L., & Miller, S. P. (1996). Constructivistic math instruction for diverse learners. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11, 147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, R., Gallagher, L., Krumm, A., Mislevy, J., & Hafter, A. (2014). Research on the use of khan academy in schools. Menlo Park, CA: SRI Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D. M., Hsieh, Y. J., & Allen, G. D. (2006). The impact of web-based assessment and practice on students’ mathematics learning attitudes. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(3), 251–279.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D. M., & Kulm, G. (2005). Using web-based practice to enhance mathematics learning and achievement. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(3), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Osana, H. P., & Royea, D. A. (2011). Obstacles and challenges in preservice teachers’ explorations with fractions: A view from a small-scale intervention study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(4), 333–352.10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Pass, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, S. K., Mercer, C. D., & O’Shea, L. (1988). Teaching learning disabled students place value using the concrete to abstract sequence. Learning Disabilities Research, 4, 52–56.
   Google Scholar
• Razzaq, L., Patvarczki, J., Almeida, S. F., Vartak, M., Feng, M., Heffernan, N. T., & Koedinger, K. R. (2009). The ASSISTment builder: Supporting the Life cycle of tutoring system content creation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2(2), 157–166.10.1109/TLT.2009.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffert, S., & Hilzensauer, W. (2008). On the way towards personal learning environments: Seven crucial aspects. eLearning Papers (9), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, D. A. (2008). How the brain learns mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stampfer, E., & Koedinger, K. R. (2013). When seeing isn’t believing: Influences of prior conceptions and misconceptions. In M. Knauff, N. Sebanz, M. Pauen, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1384–1389). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Cooper, H. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on K-12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 970–987.10.1037/a0032447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness: What the research tells us. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education, practice and direction (pp. 13–45). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312.10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
   Google Scholar
• Tirosh, D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of children’s conceptions: The case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 5–25.10.2307/749817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2009). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory in health professional education: Design principles and strategies. Medical Education, 44(1), 85–93.10.1111/med.2009.44.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzel, B., Mercer, C. D., & Miller, D. M. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning difficulties: An investigation of an explicit instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(2), 121–131.10.1111/ldrp.2003.18.issue-2
   Google Scholar