Integrating MOOCs in physics preliminary undergraduate education: beyond large size lectures

References

• Acosta, E. S., & Otero, J. J. E. (2014). Automated assessment of free text questions for MOOC using regular expressions. Information Resources Management Journal, 27(2), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Admiraal, W., Huisman, B., & Van de Ven, M. (2014). Self- and peer assessment in massive open online courses. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(3), 119.
   Google Scholar
• Allendoerfer, C., Wilson, D., Plett, M., Bates, R. A., Smith, T. F., & Veilleux, N. M. (2016). Student perceptions of faculty support: Do class size or institution type matter? In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2016–June). New Orleans, Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• Barefoot, B. (2004). Higher education’s revolving door: Confronting the problem of student drop out in US colleges and universities. Open Learning, 19(1), 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T. (2016). Mass instruction or higher learning? The impact of college class size on student retention and graduation. Education Finance and Policy, 1–36. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozkurt, A., Ozdamar Keskin, N., & De Waard, I. (2016). Research trends in massive open online course (MOOC) theses and dissertations: Surfing the Tsunami wave. Open Praxis, 8(3), 203–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brita-Paja, J. L., Gregorio, C., Llana, L., Pareja, C., & Riesco, A. (2018). Introducing MOOC-like methodologies in a face-to-face undergraduate course: A detailed case study. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., Calkins, A., & Siemens, G. (2012). The current and future state of higher education. Retrieved June 7, 2018, from http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/current-and-future-state-higher-education
   Google Scholar
• Canessa, E., Tenze, L., & Salvatori, E. (2013). Attendance to massive open on-line courses: Towards a solution to track on-line recorded lectures viewing. Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 15(1), 36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P.-J., & Chen, Y.-H. (2014). Facilitating MOOCs learning through weekly meet-up. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference - L@S ’14 (pp. 183–184). New York,USA: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2556325.2567872
   Google Scholar
• Cho, M.-H., & Yoo, J. S. (2017). Exploring online students’ self-regulated learning with self-reported surveys and log files: A data mining approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(8), 970–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colvin, K. F., Champaign, J., Liu, A., Zhou, Q., Fredericks, C., & Pritchard, D. E. (2014). Learning in an introductory physics MOOC: All cohorts learn equally, including an on-campus class. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(4), 263–283.
   Google Scholar
• Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2003). Supporting self-regulation in student-centered web-based learning environments. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 40–47. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ723806.
   Google Scholar
• Floratos, N., Guasch, T., & Espasa, A. (2015, April 22). Recommendations on formative assessment and feedback practices for stronger engagement in MOOCs. Open Praxis, 7(2), 141–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., & Siemens, G. (2014, October 3). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 134–176.
   Google Scholar
• Ghislandi, P. M. M. (2016). “The fun they had” or about the quality of MOOC. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(3). doi:10.5072/JE-LKS.V12I3.1178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glance, D. G., Forsey, M., & Riley, M. (2013). The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses. First Monday, 18(5).
   Google Scholar
• Halawa, S., Greene, D., & Mitchell, J. (2014). Dropout prediction in MOOCs using Learner Activity Features. ELearning Papers, (37), 3–11. Retrieved from http://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/en/paper/experiences-and-best-practices-and-around-moocs
   Google Scholar
• Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners’ contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, 83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Li, X. (2015). Learning behavior analysis and prediction based on MOOC data. Jisuanji Yanjiu Yu Fazhan/Computer Research and Development, 52(3), 614–628.
   Google Scholar
• Kali, Y., Levin-Peled, R., & Dori, Y. J. (2009). The role of design-principles in designing courses that promote collaborative learning in higher-education. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1067–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, J. (2014). Digital culture clash: “massive” education in the E-learning and digital cultures MOOC. Distance Education, 35(2), 164–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, C., Wei, K. P., Le, H., Chia, D., Papadopoulos, K., Cheng, J., … Klemmer, S. R. (2013). Peer and self assessment in massive online classes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(6), 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassibille, G., & Navarro Gómez, L. (2008). Why do higher education students drop out? Evidence from Spain. Education Economics, 16(1), 89–105.
   Google Scholar
• Lepp, M., Luik, P., Palts, T., Papli, K., Suviste, R., Säde, M., … Tånisson, E. (2017). Self- and automated assessment in programming MOOCs. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 653, 72–85.
   Google Scholar
• Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Lundqvist, K. Ø., & Williams, S. A. (2015). Who are with us: MOOC learners on a FutureLearn course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 557–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, S., Mangione, G. R., Orciuoli, F., Gaeta, M., & Loia, V. (2013). Automatic generation of assessment objects and remedial works for MOOCs. In 2013 12th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) (pp. 1–8). Antalya, Turkey: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ITHET.2013.6671018
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield, J., Rodwell, J., Curry, L., & Marks, G. (2017). Psychological and demographic predictors of undergraduate non-attendance at university lectures and seminars. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ossiannilsson, E., Altinay, F., & Altinay, Z. (2016). MOOCs as change agents to boost innovation in higher education learning arenas. Education Sciences, 6(4), 25.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Hilliger, I., Alario-Hoyos, C., Kloos, C. D., & Rayyan, S. (2017). H-MOOC framework: Reusing MOOCs for hybrid education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 47–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffaghelli, J. E., Cucchiara, S., & Persico, D. (2015). Methodological approaches in MOOC research: Retracing the myth of proteus. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 488–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, J. L., Klerkx, J., Duval, E., Gago, D., & Rodríguez, L. (2014). Success, activity and drop-outs in MOOCs an exploratory study on the UNED COMA courses. In Proceedins of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge - LAK ’14 (pp. 98–102). New York, USA: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2567574.2567627
   Google Scholar
• Seaton, D. T., Nesterko, S., Mullaney, T., Reich, J., Ho, A., & Chuang, I. (2014). Characterizing video use in the catalogue of MITx MOOCs. In U. Cress (Ed.), eMOOCs2014 (pp. 140–146). Lausanne, Switzerland: Ecole Politechnique Federale de Lausanne & P.A.U. Education. Retrieved from http://www.emoocs2014.eu/sites/default/files/Proceedings-Moocs-Summit-2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2012). MOOCs for the win!. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/03/05/moocs-for-the-win/
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (1994). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ulriksen, L., Madsen, L. M., & Holmegaard, H. T. (2010). What do we know about explanations for drop out/opt out among young people from STM higher education programmes? Studies in Science Education, 46(2), 209–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, N. (2016). Quality teaching in large university classes: Designing online collaboration among learners for deep understanding. University of Trento. Retrieved from http://eprints-phd.biblio.unitn.it/1606/1/20151123_PhD_thesis_Nan_Yang%5Bfinal_version%5D.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yin, K. R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks. 4th London & New York: Sage. doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.582317.
   Google Scholar