Using API Data to Understand Learning in League of Legends: A Mixed Methods Study

References

• Abrams, S. S. (2009). A gaming frame of mind: Digital contexts and academic implications. Educational Media International, 46, 335–347.
   Google Scholar
• Abrams, S. S, & Gerber, H. R. (2013). Achieving through the feedback loop: videogames, authentic assessment, and meaningful learning. English Journal, 1(103), 95–103.
   Google Scholar
• Abrams, S. S, & Gerber, H. R. (in press). Videogames, libraries, and the feedback loop: learning beyond the stacks. Lanham, Maryland: VOYA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53, 86–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilkstein, P., & Worsley, M. (2016). Multimodal learning analytics and educational data mining: Using computational technology to measure complex learning tasks. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 220–238.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, C. (2011). Shifting and multiple spaces in classrooms: An argument for investigating learners’ boundary-making around digital networked texts. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 12(3), 2–23.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., & Bailey, C. (2014). Conceptualising collaboration in hybrid sites: Playing minecraft together and apart in a primary classroom. In C. Burnett, J. Davies, G. Merchant, & J. Rowsell (Eds.), New literacies around the globe: Policy and pedagogy (pp. 50–71). Abingdon Oxon, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2014). Points of view: Reconceptualising literacies through an exploration of adult and child interactions in a virtual world. Journal of Research in Reading, 37, 36–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burroughs, B., & Rama, P. (2015). The eSports trojan horse: Twitch and streaming futures. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 8(2), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Canning, S., & Betrus, A. (2017). The culture of deep learning in eSports: An insider’s perspective. Educational Technology, 57(2), 65–69.
   Google Scholar
• Carron, A., & Spink, K. (1995). The group size-cohesion relationship in minimal groups. Small Group Research, 26(1), 86–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M. (2012). Leet noobs: The life and death of an expert player group in world of warcraft. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Engerman, J. A., & Hein, R. J. (2017). eSports gaming and you. Educational Technology, 57(2), 62–64.
   Google Scholar
• Entertainment Software Association (2017). 2017 Sales, demographic, and usage data: Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. Retrieved from http://www.theesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/!EF2017_Design_FinalDigital.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fields, D. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2009). A connective ethnography of peer knowledge sharing and diffusion in a tween virtual world. International Journal of Computer Supported Learning, 4, 47–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2005). Good video games and good learning. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 85(2), 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, H. R. (2016a). eSports as we Sports: Exploring writing through videogaming. In A. Brown and L. Rodesiler (Eds.). Developing contemporary literacies through sports: A guide for the english classroom. (pp. 211–216).Chicago, IL: NCTE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, H. R. (2016b). Moving through the meta: Tracing informal learning and literacies through (re)mixing social media analytics.Keynote address at the International Council for Educational Media, Kookmin University, Seoul, Korea. 24 September 2016. Retrieved https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFFfLUaQHQU&t=1174s
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, H. R. (2016c). Cross-functional teams: Literacy learning (Re) Considered. Keynote address at the 21stCentury Literacy Institute at Oklahoma State University. Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA. 20 April 2016. Retrieved https://ostate.tv/media/21st+Century+Literacies+Lecture+SeriesA+Dr.+Hannah+Gerber/0_5bt6sm2s
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, H. R. (2017). Esports and streaming: twitch literacies. Journal Of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(3), 343–345.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, H. R., Abrams, S. S., Curwood, J., & Magnifico, A. (2017). Conducting qualitative research of learning on online spaces. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, H. R, Abrams, S. S, Onwuegbuzie, A, & Benge, C. (2014). From mario to fifa: what case study research suggests about games-based learning. Educational Media International, (51)(1), 16–34. doi:10.1080/09523987.2014.889402
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, H. R, & Lynch, T. L. (2017). Into the meta: research methods for moving beyond social media surfacing techniques. Tech Trends, 61(3), 263–272. doi:10.1007/s11528-016-0140-6
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, H. R, & Price, D. P. (2011). 21st century learners, writing, and new media: meetingthe challenge with game controllers. English Journal, 2(101), 68–73.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18(1). doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Google Scholar
• Granito, V., & Rainey, D. (1988). Differences in cohesion between high school and college football teams and starters and nonstarters. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66(2), 471–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. (2012). Econometric analysis (seventh ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, W. A., Garretson, O., & Kerne, A. (2014, April). Streaming on twitch: Fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1315–1324.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, K. R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17(8), 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Guiteirrez, K., Livingstone, S., Peneul, B., Rhodes, J., & Salen, K. S. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Retrieved from https://dmlhub.net/publications/connected-learning-agenda-for-research-and-design/
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1910). Pragmatism, a new name for some old ways of thinking: Popular lectures on philosophy. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Shresthiva, S., Gamber-Thompson, L., Kliger-Vilenchik, N., & Zimmerman, A. M. (2016). By any media necessary: The new youth activism. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B. (2009). Toward a more inclusive “scientific research in education”. Educational Researcher, 38, 449–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Gray, R. (2010). A history of philosophical and theoretical issues for mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. 2nd ed. (pp. 69–94). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B. (2012). Dialectical pluralism and mixed research. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 751–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Tucker, S., & Icenogle, M. L. (2014). Conducting mixed methods research using dialectical pluralism and social psychological strategies. In P. Leavy (Ed.), Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 557–578). New York, NY: Oxford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Stefurnak, T. (2013). Considering the evidence-and-credibility discussion in evaluation through the lens of dialectical pluralism. New Directions for Evaluation, 138, 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B. & Fields, D. A. (2013). Connected play: Tweens in a virtual world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacasa, P. (2013). Learning in real and virtual worlds: Commercial video games as educational tools. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Lammers, J. C. (2012). Is the hangout…the hangout? exploring tensions in an online gaming-related fan site. In E. R. Hayes & S. C. Duncan (Eds.), Learning in video game affinity spaces (pp. 23–50). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Sampling in the “new literacies”. In M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K. (2008). Toward a connective ethnography of online/offline literacy networks. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 33–66). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2008). Qualitative data analysis: A compendium of techniques and a framework for selection for school psychology research and beyond. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 587–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research 4th ed. (pp. 97–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, T. L, & Gerber, H. R. (2018). The ontological imperative when researching in the digital age. International Journal Of Multiple Research Approaches, 10(1), 112–123. doi: 10.29034/ijmra
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, T. L., Gerber, H. R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (in press). Making Big Data Small: Designing Integrated Research for Social Science Researchers.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Magnifico, A. M. (2012). The game of Neopian writing. In E. R. Hayes & S. C. Duncan (Eds.), Learning in video game affinity spaces (pp. 212–234). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L., Carron, A., & Burke, S. (2009). Team building interventions in sport: A meta-analysis. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 53–18.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 272–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). A call for qualitative power analysis. Quality & Quantity 41, 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1997). Some consequences of four incapacities. In L. Menard (Ed.), Pragmatism: A reader (pp. 4–6). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Prapaveiss, H., & Carron, A. (1997). Sacrifice, cohesion, and conformity to norms in sport teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(3), 231–240.
   Google Scholar
• Reitman, J., Cho, A., & Steinkuehler, C. (2018). A landscape analysis of high school esports in the united states. An unpublished manuscript. University of California-Irvine.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, B., & Rohle, T. (2012). Digital methods: Five challenges. In D. M. Berry (Ed.), Understanding digital humanities (pp. 67–84). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W. (2006). How computer games help children learn. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. L. (2012). Raising the stakes: Esports and the professionalization of computer gaming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warman, P. (2017). Newzoo’s 2017 global esports market report: Esports revenues will reach $696 million this year and grow to $1.5 billion by 2020 as brand investment doubles. Retrieved from https://newzoo.com/insights/articles/esports-revenues-will-reach-696-million-in-2017/
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, R., & Gould, D. (2015). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology 6th ed. Champaign, IL, US: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Wijman, T. (2018). Newzoo’s 2018 report: Insight into the $137.9 billion global games market. Retrieved from https://newzoo.com/insights/articles/newzoos-2018-report-insights-into-the-137-9-billion-global-games-market/
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2015). Governing software: Networks, databases and algorithmic power in the digital governance of public education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 83–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar