Participatory culture and knowledge sharing among educators and scholars in higher education

References

• Boyd, D. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self (pp. 39–58). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, vol. 2, research designs (pp. 57–71). APA Books.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Hayfield, N. (2022). ‘A starting point for your journey, not a map’: Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(2), 424–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1670765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Rance, N. (2014). How to use thematic analysis with interview data. In A. Vossler & N. Moller (Eds.), The counselling & psychotherapy research handbook (pp. 183–197). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Breckenridge, J., & Derek, J. (2009). Demystifying theoretical sampling in grounded theory research. Grounded Theory Review, 8(2), 113–126. http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2009/06/30/847/
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, wikipedia, second life, and beyond: from production to produsage. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Chedid, M., Caldeira, A., Alvelos, H., & Teixeira, L. (2020). Knowledge-sharing and collaborative behaviour: An empirical study on a Portuguese higher education institution. Journal of Information Science, 46(5), 630–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551519860464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013a). Successful qualitative research. SAGE Publications. Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013b). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120–123. https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/methods-teaching-thematic-analysis
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conole, G. (2013). Designing for learning in an open world. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2014). Teaching crowds - learning and social media. AU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I.: Belief, A. (1975). Intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Grand, A., Holliman, R., Collins, T., Adams, A. (2016). “We muddle our way through”: Shared and distributed expertise in digital engagement with research. Journal of Science Communication, 15(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15040205
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailu, M., & Wu, J. (2021). The use of academic social networking sites in scholarly communication: Scoping review. Science Direct, 5(2), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2020-0050
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2004). The active interview. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 140–161). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jhangiani, R. S. (2017). Open as default: the future of education and scholarship. In R. S. Jhangiani & R. Biswas- Diener (Eds.), Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science (pp. 267–279). Ubiquity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jhangiani, R. S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (Eds.). (2017). Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science. Ubiquity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kluzer, S., & Pujol, P. L. (2018). DigComp into action - Get inspired, make it happen. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, W. W. K., & Chan, A. (2014). Knowledge sharing and social media: Altruism, perceived online attachment motivation, and perceived online relationship commitment. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, W. W. K., & Yuen, A. (2011). Understanding online knowledge sharing: An interpersonal relationship perspective. Computers & Education, 56(1), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimbeni, F. (2020). Empowering university educators for contemporary open and networked teaching. In D. Burgos (Ed.), Radical solutions and open science. lecture notes in educational technology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4276-3_8
   Google Scholar
• Nentwich, M., & König, R. (2014). Academia goes facebook? the potential of social network sites in the scholarly realm. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening science. the evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly. Springer Cham Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Peel, K. L. (2020). A beginner’s guide to applied educational research using thematic analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 25(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.7275/ryr5-k983
   Google Scholar
• Pelaprat, E., & Brown, B. (2012). Reciprocity: Understanding online social relations. First Monday, 17(10). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i10.3324
   Google Scholar
• Quintas-Mendes, A., & Paiva, A. (2023). Digital presence and online identity among digital scholars: A thematic analysis. Social Sciences, 12(7), 379. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070379
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (2017). Net smart: How to thrive online. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive surplus: Creativity and generosity in a connected age. Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. N. (2007). On solid ground: essential properties for growing grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 114–126). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, B. E. (2015). In abundance: Networked participatory practices as scholarship. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 16(3), 318–340. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veletsianos, G. (2016). Social media in academia: Networked scholars. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2012). Networked participatory scholarship: emergent techno-cultural pressures toward open and digital scholarship in online networks. Computers & Education, 58(2), 766–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, M. D. (2016). Examining philosophy of technology using grounded theory methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.2.2481
   Google Scholar
• Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar: How technology is changing academic practice. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar