Age-related changes in song repertoire size and song type sharing in the Whinchat Saxicola rubetra

References

• Andersson MB. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balsby TJS. 2000. Song activity and variability in relation to male quality and female choice in Whitethroats Sylvia communis. J Avian Biol. 31:56–62.10.1034/j.1600-048X.2000.310108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsby TJS, Hansen P. 2010. Element repertoire: change and development with age in Whitethroat Sylvia communis song. J Ornithol. 151(2):469–476.10.1007/s10336-009-0481-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baselga A. 2013. Multiple site dissimilarity quantifies compositional heterogeneity among several sites, while average pairwise dissimilarity may be misleading. Ecography. 36:124–128.10.1111/more.2013.36.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2014. Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 R package version 10-6.
   Google Scholar
• Beecher M, Brenowitz E. 2005. Functional aspects of song learning in songbirds. Trends Ecol Evol. 20(3):143–149.10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn E, Burgess M, Freeman B, Risely A, Izang A, Ivande S, Hewson C, Cresswell W. 2017. Low and annually variable migratory connectivity in a long-distance migrant: Whinchats Saxicola rubetra may show a bet-hedging strategy. Ibis. 159(4):902–918.10.1111/ibi.2017.159.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan KL, Catchpole CK. 1997. Female choice in the sedge warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus: multiple cues from song and territory quality. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 264:521–526.10.1098/rspb.1997.0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt J. 2001. Syrinx: real time spectrographic recording, analysis, and playback of sounds. [Internet], Seattle: Department of Psychology, University of Washington. Available from: http://www.syrinxpc.com/
   Google Scholar
• Caro SP, Keulen C, Poncin P. 2009. Song repertoires in a western European population of yellowhammers emberiza citrinella. Acta Ornithol. 44:9–16.10.3161/000164509X464830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. 2008. Bird Song. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511754791
   Google Scholar
• Cucco M, Malacarne G. 1999. Is the song of black redstart males an honest signal of status? Condor. 101(3):689–694.10.2307/1370203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucco M, Malacarne G. 2000. Delayed maturation in passerine birds: an examination of plumage effects and some indications of a related effect in song. Ethol Ecol Evol. 12:291–308.10.1080/08927014.2000.9522802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demko AD, Reitsma LR, Staicer CA. 2016. Repertoire structure, song sharing, reproductive success, and territory tenure in a population of Canada Warblers (Cardellina canadensis) in central New Hampshire. Can J Zool. 94(4):283–290.10.1139/cjz-2015-0213
   Google Scholar
• Dowsett-Lemaire F. 1979. The imitative range of the song of the marsh warbler Acrocephalus palustris, with special reference to imitations of African birds. Ibis. 121(4):42–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn A, Zann R. 1996. Undirected song in wild zebra finch flocks: contexts and effects of mate removal. Ethology. 102(4):529–539.
   Google Scholar
• Eens M, Pinxten R, Verheyen R. 1991. Male song as a cue for mate choice in the European starling. Behaviour. 116(3):210–238.10.1163/156853991X00049
   Google Scholar
• Eens M, Pinxten R, Verheyen R. 1992a. No overlap in song repertoire size between yearling and older starlings Sturnus vulgaris. Ibis. 134(1):72–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eens M, Pinxten R, Verheyen R. 1992b. Song learning in captive European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. Anim Behav. 44(6):1131–1143.10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80325-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen A, Slagsvold T, Lampe HM. 2011. Vocal plasticity - are pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca, open-ended learners? Ethology. 117(3):188–198.10.1111/eth.2011.117.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewert D, Kroodsma D. 1994. Song sharing and repertoires among migratory and resident rufous-sided towhees. Condor. 96:190–196.10.2307/1369076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayet AL, Tobias JA, Hintzen RE, Seddon N. 2014. Immigration and dispersal are key determinants of cultural diversity in a songbird population. Behav Ecol. 25(4):744–753.10.1093/beheco/aru047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foote J, Barber C, Yasukawa K. 2007. High level of song sharing in an eastern population of song sparrow (Melospiza melodia). Auk. 124(1):53–62.10.1642/0004-8038(2007)124[53:HLOSSI]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garamszegi LZ, Rosivall B, Hegyi G, Szöllösi E, Török J, Eens M. 2006. Determinants of male territorial behavior in a Hungarian collared flycatcher population: plumage traits of residents and challengers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 60(5):663–671.10.1007/s00265-006-0210-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garamszegi LZ, Török J, Hegyi G, Szöllösi E, Rosivall B, Eens M. 2007. Age-dependent expression of song in the collared flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis. Ethology. 113(3):246–256.10.1111/eth.2007.113.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geberzahn N, Hultsch H, Todt D. 2002. Latent song type memories are accessible through auditory stimulation in a hand-reared songbird. Anim Behav. 64:783–790.10.1006/anbe.2002.3099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil D, Gahr M. 2002. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol Evol. 17(3):133–141.10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02410-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil D, Cobb JLS, Slater PJB. 2001. Song characteristics are age dependent in the willow warbler, Phylloscopus trochilus. Anim Behav. 62(4):689–694.10.1006/anbe.2001.1812
   Google Scholar
• Goslee S, Urban D, Goslee M. 2013. Package ‘ecodist’ R package version 129. http://CRAN.R–project.org/package=ecodist.
   Google Scholar
• Grafen A. 1990. Sexual selection unhandicapped by the fisher process. J Theor Biol. 144(4):473–516.10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80087-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greig-Smith PW. 1982. Song-rates and parental care by individual male stonechats (saxicola torquata). Anim Behav. 30(1):245–252.10.1016/S0003-3472(82)80261-3
   Google Scholar
• Hesler N, Mundry R, Dabelsteen T. 2012. Are there age-related differences in the song repertoire size of Eurasian blackbirds? acta ethologica. 15(2):203–210.10.1007/s10211-012-0127-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijmans R, Williams E, Vennes C. 2014. Geosphere: spherical trigonometry. R package version 1.3-11. http://CRAN.R–project.org/package=geosphere.
   Google Scholar
• Hill C, Campbell S, Nordby J, Burt J. 1999. Song sharing in two populations of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 46(5):34–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huhta E, Alatalo RV. 1993. Plumage colour and male-male interactions in the pied flycatcher. Anim Behav. 45(3):511–518.10.1006/anbe.1993.1062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultsch H, Kopp M. 1989. Early auditory learning and song improvisation in nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos. Anim Behav. 37:510–512.10.1016/0003-3472(89)90099-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultsch H, Todt D. 1981. Repertoire sharing and song-post distance in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 8:183–188.10.1007/BF00299828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanitskii VV, Marova IM, Antipov VA. 2016. Sequential organization in the song of thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia): clustering and sequential order of the song types. Bioacoustics. 26(2):199–215.
   Google Scholar
• Jenni L, Winkler R. 1994. Moult and ageing of European passerines. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juliana M, Saldívar B, Massoni V. 2017. Song structure and syllable and song repertoires of the Saffron Finch (Sicalis flaveola pelzelni) breeding in Argentinean pampas. Bioacoustics. 1–14. doi:10.1080/09524622.2017.1344932.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer S, Sommer C, Scharff C, Kipper S, Mundry R. 2009. Tuning towards tomorrow? Common nightingales Luscinia megarhynchos change and increase their song repertoires from the first to the second breeding season. J Avian Biol. 40(2):231–236.10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04500.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer S, Spiess A, Kipper S, Mundry R, Sommer C, Hultsch H, Todt D. 2006. First-year common nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos) have smaller song-type repertoire sizes than older males. Ethology. 112(12):1217–1224.10.1111/eth.2006.112.issue-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipper S, Kiefer S. 2010. Age-related changes in birds’ singing styles. Adv Study Behav. 41:77–118.10.1016/S0065-3454(10)41003-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koetz A, Westcott D, Congdon B. 2007. Spatial pattern of song element sharing and its implications for song learning in the chowchilla, Orthonyx spaldingii. Anim Behav. 74:1019–1028.10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.11.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroodsma D. 1974. Song learning, dialects, and dispersal in the Bewick’s wren. Ethology. 35(4):352–380.
   Google Scholar
• Kroodsma D. 1982. Learning and the ontogeny of sound signals in birds. Acoust Commun Birds. 2:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kroodsma D, Liu W, Goodwin E, Bedell P. 1999. The ecology of song improvisation as illustrated by North American sedge wrens. Auk. 116(2):373–386.10.2307/4089372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroodsma D, Miller E. 1996. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Ithaca (NY): Cornel University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laiolo P, Tella J. 2007. Erosion of animal cultures in fragmented landscapes. Front Ecol Environ. 5(2):68–72.10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[68:EOACIF]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner S, Catchpole C. 2007. Song and brain development in canaries raised under different conditions of acoustic and social isolation over two years. Dev Neurobiol. 67(11):1478–1487.10.1002/(ISSN)1932-846X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemon R, Perreault S, Weary D. 1994. Dual strategies of song development in American redstarts, Setophaga ruticilla. Anim Behav. 47:317–329.10.1006/anbe.1994.1045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor P, Krebs J. 1989. Song learning in adult great tits (Parus Major): effects of neighbours. Behaviour. 108:139–159.10.1163/156853989X00105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molles L, Vehrencamp S. 1999. Repertoire Size, repertoire overlap, and singing modes in the banded wren (Thryothorus pleurostictus). Auk. 116:677–689.10.2307/4089329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton E. 1987. The effects of distance and isolation on song-type sharing in the Carolina wren. Wilson Bull. 99:601–610.
   Google Scholar
• Mountjoy J, Lemon R. 1995. Extended song learning in wild European starlings. Anim Behav. 49(2):357–366.10.1006/anbe.1995.0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordby JC, Campbell SE, Beecher MD. 2002. Adult song sparrows do not alter their song repertoires. Ethology. 108(1):39–50.10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00752.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nottebohm F, Nottebohm M. 1978. Relationship between song repertoire and age in the Canary, Serinus canarius. Ethology. 46(3):298–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmero AM, Espelosín J, Laiolo P, Illera JC. 2013. Information theory reveals that individual birds do not alter song complexity when varying song length. Anim Behav. 87:153–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne K, Payne R. 1985. Large scale changes over 19 years in songs of humpback whales in Bermuda. Ethology. 68(2):89–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne R. 1983. The social context of song mimicry: Song-matching dialects in indigo buntings (Passerina cyanea). Anim Behav. 31:788–805.10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80236-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne R, Payne L, Doehlert S. 1988. Biological and cultural success of song memes in indigo buntings. Ecology. 69(1):104–117.10.2307/1943165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Granados C, Osiejuk T, López-Iborra GM. 2016. Habitat fragmentation effects and variations in repertoire size and degree of song sharing among close Dupont’s Lark Chersophilus duponti populations. J Ornithol. 157:471–482.10.1007/s10336-015-1310-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petruskova T, Osiejuk TS, Petrusek A, Dufty AM. 2010. Geographic variation in songs of the Tree Pipit (Anthus trivialis) at two spatial scales. Auk. 127(2):274–282.10.1525/auk.2009.09077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poesel A, Kunc HP, Foerster K, Johnsen A, Kempenaers B. 2006. Early birds are sexy: male age, dawn song and extrapair paternity in blue tits, Cyanistes (formerly Parus) caeruleus. Anim Behav. 72(3):531–538.10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.10.022
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera-Gutierrez HF, Matthysen E, Adriaensen F, Slabbekoorn H. 2010. Repertoire sharing and song similarity between great tit males decline with distance between forest fragments. Ethology. 116(10):951–960.10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01813.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder D, Wiley R. 1983. Communication with shared song themes in tufted titmice. Auk. 100:414–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwager VG, Güttinger R. 1984. Der Gesangsaufbau von Braunkehlchen (Saxicola rubetra) und Schwarzkehlchen(S. torquata) im Vergleich [Comparison of Whinchat’s and Stonechat’s songs (Saxicola rubetra, S. torquata)]. Journal für Ornithologie. 125:261–278.10.1007/BF01640476
   Google Scholar
• Searcy W, Yasukawa K. 1990. Use of the song repertoire in intersexual and intrasexual contexts by male red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 27(2):123–128.10.1007/BF00168455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethi VK, Bhatt D, Kumar A. 2011. Song repertoire size of the Pied Bushchat Saxicola caprata. Curr Sci. 100(3):302–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethi VK, Bhatt D, Kumar A. 2012. Dawn singing behavior of a tropical bird species, the Pied Bush Chat Saxicola caprata. J Appl Nat Sci. 4(2):241–246.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi VK, Bhatt D, Kumar A. 2014. Song sharing in the pied bush chat (Saxicola caprata). Belg J Zool. 144(2):67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shitikov DA, Vaytina TM, Gagieva VA, Fedchuk DV. 2015. Breeding success affects site fidelity in a Whinchat Saxicola rubetra population in abandoned fields. Bird Study. 62(1):96–105.10.1080/00063657.2014.988120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater PJB. 1989. Bird song learning: causes and consequences. Ethol Ecol Evol. 1:19–46.10.1080/08927014.1989.9525529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa-López JR, Mennill DJ. 2013. Vocal behaviour of the island-endemic Cozumel Wren (Troglodytes aedon beani): Song structure, repertoires, and song sharing. J Ornithol. 155(2):337–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson L. 1992. Identification guide to the European passerines. Stockholm: Märstatryck.
   Google Scholar
• Todt D, Hultsch H. 1998. How songbirds deal with large amounts of serial information: retrieval rules suggest a hierarchical song memory. Biol Cybern. 79:487–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas-Castro LE. 2015. Spatial pattern of syllable sharing in white-throated thrushes: implications for song learning and dispersal behaviours. Behaviour. 152(6):775–795.10.1163/1568539X-00003253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehrencamp S. 2001. Is song–type matching a conventional signal of aggressive intentions? R Soc London. 268:1637–1642.10.1098/rspb.2001.1714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegrzyn E, Leniowski K. 2010. Syllable sharing and changes in syllable repertoire size and composition within and between years in the great reed warbler, Acrocephalus arundinaceu. J Ornithol. 151(2):255–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson PL, Towner MC, Vehrencamp SL. 2000. Survival and song-type sharing in a sedentary subcpecies of the Song Sparrow. Condor. 102(2):355–363.10.1650/0010-5422(2000)102[0355:SASTSI]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahavi A. 1975. Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol. 53(1):205–214.10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeigler HP, Marler P. 2008. Neuroscience of birdsong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar