A Tasmanian devil call encodes identity and decreases agonistic behaviour

References

• Anderson C,Franks NR. 2001. Teams in animal societies. Behav. Ecol. 12(5):534–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogun OS, Akingbade TJ,Oguntunde PE. 2015. An assessment of the performance of discriminant analysis and the logistic regression methods in classification of mode of delivery of an expectant mother. Math. Theor. and Mod. 5(5):147–153.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard C, Burk T. 1979. Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of “individual recognition”. J Theor Biol. 81:65–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beecher MD. 1989. Signalling systems for individual recognition: an information theory approach. Anim Behav. 38:248–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekoff M. 1977. Social communication in canids: evidence for the evolution of a stereotyped mammalian display. Science. 197:1097–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blount BG. 1985. “Girney” vocalisations among Japanese macaque females: context and function. Primates. 26:424–435.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JL. 1983. Cooperation: a biologist’s dilemma. Adv Study Behav. 13:1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchman OLK, Guiler ER. 1977. Behaviour and ecology of the Tasmanian devil, Sarcophilus harrisii. In: Stonehouse B, Gilmore D, editors. The biology of marsupials. London: Macmillan; p. 155–168.
   Google Scholar
• Burke CJ, Kisko TM, Pellis SM, Euston DR. 2017. Avoiding escalation from play to aggression in adult male rats: the role of ultrasonic calls. Behav Processes. 144:72–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell MC, Caldwell DK, Tyack PL. 1990. Review of the signature-whistle hypothesis for the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin. In: Leatherwood S, Reeves RR, editors. The bottlenose dolphin. New York: Academic Press; p. 199–234.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin C. 1872. The expression of emotions in man and animals. London, England: John Murray, Albemarle St.
   Google Scholar
• Davis KL 2014. Social organisation and communication in Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii) [Masters Thesis]. Macquarie University.
   Google Scholar
• Déaux ÉC, Clarke JA. 2013. Dingo (Canis lupus dingo) acoustic repertoire: form and contexts. Behaviour. 150:75–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugatkin LA. 1997. Cooperation among animals: an evolutionary perspective. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg JF, Collins LR, Wemmer C. 1975. Communication in the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) and a survey of auditory communication in the marsupialia. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 37:379–399.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitch WT, Neubauer J, Herzel H. 2002. Calls out of chaos: the adaptive significance of nonlinear phenomena in mammalian vocal production. Anim Behav. 63(3):407–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green S. 1975. Variation in vocal pattern with social situation in the Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata): a field study. In: Rosenblum L, editor. Primate behaviour. New York: Academic Press; p. 1–102.
   Google Scholar
• Gros-Louis J. 2006. Acoustic analysis and contextual description of food-associated calls in white-faced capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus). Int J Primatol. 27:273–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros-Louis J, Perry S, Fichtel C, Wikberg E, Gilkenson H, Wofsy S, Fuentes A. 2008. Vocal repertoire of Cebus capucinus: acoustic structure, context, and usage. Int J Primatol. 29:641–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamede RK, Bashford J, McCallum H, Jones M. 2009. Contact networks in a wild TasmanianTdevil (Sarcophilus harrisii) population: using social network analysis to reveal seasonal variability in social behaviour and its implications for transmission of devil facial tumour disease. Ecol Lett. 12:1147–1157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamede RK, McCallum H, Jones M. 2013. Biting injuries and transmission of Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease. J Anim Ecol. 82:182–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward MW, Somers M. 2009. Reintroduction of top-order predators: using science to restore one of the drivers of biodiversity. Chapter 1. In: Hayward MW, Somers M, editors. Reintroduction of top-order predators. Oxford (UK): John Wiley & Sons. p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg CJ, Hockley J, eds. 2013. DPIPWE/ZAA husbandry guidelines for Tasmanian devil, Sarcophilus harrisii. 3rd ed. Australia: Zoo and Aquarium Association.
   Google Scholar
• Insley SJ. 2000. Mother-offspring vocal recognition in northern fur seals is mutual but asymmetrical. Anim Behav. 61:129–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2018. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2018-1. [accessed 2018 Jul 30]. http://www.iucnredlist.org.
   Google Scholar
• Janik VM, Slater PJB. 1998. Context-specific use suggests that bottlenose dolphin signature whistles are cohesion calls. Anim Behav. 56:829–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin L, Yang S, Kimball RT, Xie L, Yue X, Luo B, Sun K, Fen J. 2015. Do pups recognize maternal calls in pomona leaf-nosed bats, Hipposideros pomona? Anim Behav. 100:200–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laiolo P. 2010. The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation. Biol Conserv. 143(7):1635–1645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengagne T, Lauga J, Jouventin P. 1997. A method of independent time and frequency decomposition of bioacoustic signals: inter-individual recognition in four species of penguins. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. 32:885–891.
   Google Scholar
• Leuchtenberger C, Sousa-Lima R, Ribas C, Magnusson WE, Mourão G. 2016. Giant otter alarm calls as potential mechanisms for individual discrimination and sexual selection. Bioacoustics. 25(3):279–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lönnstedt OM, Ferrari MC, Chivers DP. 2014. Lionfish predators use flared fin displays to initiate cooperative hunting. Biol Lett. 10(6):20140281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiprasert D, Kitbumrungrat K. 2012. Comparison multinomial logistic regression and discriminant analysis in predicting the stage of breast cancer. Int. J. Comp. Sci. Net. Sec. 12(4):44.
   Google Scholar
• Marler P. 1977. The evolution of communication. In: Sebeok TA, editor. How animals communicate. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; p. 45–70.
   Google Scholar
• Mathevon N, Koralek A, Weldele M, Glickman SE, Theunissen FE. 2010. What the hyena’s laugh tells: sex, age, dominance and individual signature in the giggling call of Crocuta crocuta. BMC Ecol. 10(1):9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maurello MA, Clarke JA, Ackley RS. 2000. Signature vocalisations of the white-nosed coati, Nasua narica. J Mammal. 81:415–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton ES. 1977. On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. Am Nat. 111(981):855–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pemberton D. 1990. Social organisation and behaviour of the Tasmanian devil, Sarcophilus harrisii [Doctoral thesis]. Hobart (Tasmania): University of Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton D, Renouf D. 1993. A field study of communication and social behaviour of the Tasmanian devil at feeding sites. Aust J Zool. 41:507–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press SJ, Wilson S. 1978. Choosing between logistic regression and discriminant analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 73(364):699–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pye RJ, Woods GM, Kreiss A. 2016. Devil facial tumor disease. Vet Pathol. 53(4):726–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyecroft SB, Pearse AM, Loh R, Swift K, Belov K, Fox N, Noonan E, Hayes D, Hyatt A, Wang L, et al. 2007. Towards a case definition for devil facial tumour disease: what is it? EcoHealth. 4(3):346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robisson P, Aubin R, Bremond J-C. 1993. Individuality in the voice of the emperor penguin Aptenodytes forsteri: adaptation to a noisy environment. Ethology. 94:279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayigh LS, Tyack PL, Wells RS, Scott MD. 1990. Signature whistles of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus: stability and mother-offspring comparisons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2:247–260.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe LL, Hill A, Cherry MI. 2013. Individual recognition in a wild cooperative mammal using contact calls. Anim Behav. 86(5):893–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal RR,Rohlf FJ. 2012. Biometry, fourth ed. New York (NY): Freeman & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Suter SM, Giordano M, Nietlispach S, Apollonio M, Passilongo D. 2017. Non-invasive acoustic detection of wolves. Bioacoustics. 26(3):237–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibbetts EA, Dale J. 2007. Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends Ecol Evol. 22:529–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilden I, Herzel H, Peters G, Tembrock G. 1998. Subharmonics, biphonation, and deterministic chaos in mammal vocalization. Bioacoustics. 9:171–196.
   Google Scholar