Calling behaviour of Elachistocleis matogrosso (Anura, Microhylidae) is associated with habitat temperature and rainfall

References

• Almeida-Gomes M, Van Sluys M, Duarte Rocha CF. 2007. Calling activity of Crossodactylus gaudichaudii (Anura: Hylodidae) in an Atlantic Rainforest area at Ilha Grande, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Belg J Zool. 137(2):203–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arch VS, Narins PM. 2009. Sexual hearing: the influence of sex hormones on acoustic communication in frogs. Hear Res. 252:15–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton K. 2011. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.0.0. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Bellis ED. 1962. The influence of humidity on wood frog activity. Amer Midl Naturalist. 68:139–148.
   Google Scholar
• Both C, Kaefer IL, Santos TG, Cechin STZ. 2008. An austral anuran assemblage in the Neotropics: seasonal occurrence correlated with photoperiod. J Nat Hist. 42:205–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges AS, Dorcas ME. 2000. Temporal variation in anuran calling behavior: implications for surveys and monitoring programs. Copeia. 107:587–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke PN, Alford RA, Schwarzkopf L. 2000. Environmental and social factors influence chorusing behaviour in a tropical frog: examining various temporal and spatial scales. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 49:79–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, Skaug HJ, Mächler M, Bolker BM. 2017. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 9:378–400.
   Google Scholar
• Brouard JP, Manders R, Smith P. 2015. Elachistocleis matogrosso Caramaschi 2010 (Amphibia: Anura: Microhylidae) first records for Paraguay. Cuad Herpetol. 29:97–98.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan BW. 2006. Observed and potential effects of artificial night lighting on anuran amphibians. In: Rich C, Longcore T, editors. Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting. Washington: Island Press; p. 192–220.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practice information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciali P. 2010. Mortalidad en puestas de Elachistocleis bicolor (Microhylidae: Anura), en charcos temporales en Paraguay. Kempffiana. 6:31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Cade BS. 2015. Model averaging and muddle multimodel inferences. Ecol. 96:2370–2382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramaschi U. 2010. Notes on the taxonomic status of Elachistocleis ovalis (Schneider, 1799) and description of five new species of Elachistocleis Parker, 1927 (Amphibia, Anura, Microhylidae). Boletim Do Museu Nacional. 527:1‒30.
   Google Scholar
• Cui JG, Song XY, Fang GZ, Xu F, Brauth SE, Tang YZ. 2011. Circadian rhythm of calling behavior in the Emei music frog (Babina daunchina) is associated with habitat temperature and relative humidity. Asian Herpetol Res. 2:149–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Andrade EVE, Albertim KM, de Moura GJB. 2009. Primeiro registro do uso de Bromeliaceae por Elachistocleis ovalis (Schneider, 1799)(Anura: Microhylidae). Biota Neotropica. 9:257–259.
   Google Scholar
• De Solla SR, Fernie KJ, Barrett GC, Bishop CA. 2006. Population trends and calling phenology of anuran populations surveyed in Ontario estimated using acoustic surveys. Biodivers Conserv. 15:3481–3497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorado-Rodrigues TF, Pansonato A, Strüssmann C. 2018. Anfíbios e répteis da bacia do rio Cuiabá. In: Figueiredo DM, Dores EFGC, Lima ZM, editors. Bacia do rio Cuiabá: uma abordagem socio-ambiental. Cuiabá: UFMT; p. 461‒496.
   Google Scholar
• Dorcas ME, Price SJ, Walls SC, Barichivich WJ. 2009. Auditory monitoring of anuran populations. In: Dodd CK, editor. Amphibian ecology and conservation: a hand book of techniques. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 281–298.
   Google Scholar
• Dormann FC, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, García Marquéz JR, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão PJ,, et al. 2013. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography. 36:27–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duellman WE, Trueb L. 1994. Biology of Amphibians. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elgue E, Maneyro RE. 2017. Reproductive biology in an Uruguayan population of Elachistocleis bicolor (Guérin-Meneville, 1838) (Anura, Microhylidae). Cuadernos de Herpetol. 31:5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding AH, Bell JF. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv. 24:38–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottsberger B, Gruber E. 2004. Temporal partitioning of reproductive activity in a neotropical anuran community. J Trop Ecol. 20:271–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra V, Llusia D, Gambale PG, de Morais AR, Márquez R, Bastos RP. 2018. The advertisement calls of Brazilian anurans: Historical review, current knowledge and future directions. PloS One. 13:e0191691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henzi SP, Dyson ML, Piper SE, Passmore NE, Bishop P. 1995. Chorus attendance by male and female painted reed frogs (Hyperolius marmoratus): environmental factors and selection pressures. Funct Ecol. 9:485–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iop S, Caldart VM, Santos TG, Cechin SZ. 2012. What is the role of heterogeneity and spatial autocorrelation of ponds in the organization of frog communities in southern Brazil. Zool Stud. 51:1094–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DH, Batie RD. 2001. Surveys of calling amphibians in North Dakota. Prairie Nat. 33:227–247.
   Google Scholar
• Junk WJ, Nunes Da Cunha C, Wantzen KM, Petermann P, Strüssmann C, Marques MI, Adis J. 2006. Biodiversity and its conservation in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Aquat Sci. 68:278‒309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotiaho JS. 2001. Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Biol Rev. 76:365–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemckert F, Penman T, Mahony MJ. 2013. Relationship of calling intensity to micrometeorology in pond breeding frogs from central eastern New South Wales. Proc Int Acad Ecol Environ Sci. 3:170–180.
   Google Scholar
• Lichstein JW, Simons TR, Shriner SA, Franzreb KE. 2002. Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecol Monogr. 72:445–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llusia D, Márquez R, Beltrán JF, Moreira C, Do Amaral JP. 2013. Environmental and social determinants of anuran lekking behavior: intraspecific variation in populations at thermal extremes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 67:493–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofts B. 1974. Reproduction. In: Lofts B, editor. Physiology of the amphibia, vol II. New York: Academic Press; p. 107–218.
   Google Scholar
• López JA, Antoniazzi CE, Lorenzón R, Ghirardi R. 2017. Spatio-temporal patterns of foraging and feeding behavior of Elachistocleis bicolor (Anura: Microhylidae). Caldasia. 39:345–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Nally R. 2002. Multiple regression and inference in ecology and conservation biology: Further comments on identifying important predictor variables. Biodivers Conserv. 11:1397–1401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinho P, De TC, Bang DL, Teixeira BFDV, Azarak PA, Campos CEC, Giaretta AA. 2018. Advertisement calls, intraspecific variation and species diagnosis of six Brazilian species of Elachistocleis (Anura: Microhylidae: Gastrophryninae). Zootaxa. 4521:357‒375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martori R, Aun L, Birri A, Rozzi Giménez C, Heredia E. 2010. Reproducción comparada de tres especies de anuros sintópicos de una localidad del sudeste de Córdoba. Cuadernos de Herpetología. 18:43–59.
   Google Scholar
• Mazerolle MJ, Bailey LL, Kendall WL, Royle JA, Converse SJ, Nichols JD. 2007. Making great leaps forward: accounting for detectability in herpetological field studies. J Herpetol. 41:672–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne R, Bennett L, Hoyle M. 2013. Weather variability permitted within amphibian monitoring protocol and affects on calling Hylidae. Environ Monit Asses. 185:8879–8889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narins PM. 2001. Ectothermys last stand: hearing in the heat and cold. In: Ryan MJ, editor. Anuran communication. Washington DC: Smithsonian Inst. Press; p. 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Navas CA. 1996. The effect of temperature on the vocal activity of tropical anurans: a comparison of high and low-elevation species. J Herpetol. 30:488–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navas CA, Gomes FR, De Domenico EA. 2016. Physiological ecology and conservation of anuran amphibians. In: Vieira AD, Bevier CR, de Carvalho EE, editors. Amphibian and reptile adaptations to the environment: interplay between physiology and behavior. Boca Raton FL: Taylor and Francis Group; p. 155–188.
   Google Scholar
• Oseen KL, Wassersug RJ. 2002. Environmental factors influencing calling in sympatric anurans. Oecologia. 133:616–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina OE, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Corrada-Bravo CJ, Aide TM. 2013. Variable response of anuran calling activity to daily precipitation and temperature: implications for climate change. Ecosphere. 4:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansonato A, Mott T, Strüssmann C. 2011. Anuran amphibians’ diversity in a northwestern area of the Brazilian Pantanal. Biota Neotropica. 11:77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansonato A, Mudrek JR, Nunes CA, Strüssmann C. 2018. Advertisement calls of topotypes of Elachistocleis matogrosso (Anura: Microhylidae). Salamandra. 54:92–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plenderleith TL, Stratford D, Lollback GW, Chapple DG, Reina RD, Hero JM. 2018. Calling phenology of a diverse amphibian assemblage in response to meteorological conditions. Int J Biometeorol. 62:873–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pough FH, Taigen TL, Stewart MM, Brussard PF. 1983. Behavioral modification of evaporative water loss by a Puerto Rican frog. Ecol. 64:244–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prado C, Uetanabaro M, Haddad C. 2005. Breeding activity patterns, reproductive modes, and habitat use by anurans (Amphibia) in a seasonal environment in the Pantanal, Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia. 26:211–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues DJ, Lopes FS, Uetanabaro M. 2003. Padrão reprodutivo de Elachistocleis bicolor (Anura, Microhylidae) na Serra da Bodoquena, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia, Série Zool. 93:365‒371.
   Google Scholar
• Royle JA. 2004. Modeling abundance index data from anuran calling surveys. Conserv Biol. 18:1378–1385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan MJ, Tuttle MD, Taft LK. 1981. The costs and benefits of frog chorusing behavior. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 8:273–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saenz D, Fitzgerald LA, Baum KA, Conner RN. 2006. Abiotic correlates of anuran calling phenology: The importance of rain, temperature, and season. Herpetol Monogr. 20:64–82. doi:10.1655/0733-1347(2007)20[64:ACOACP]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheele BC, Pasmans F, Skerratt LF, Berger L, Martel A, Beukema W, Acevedo AA, Burrowes PA, Carvalho T, Catenazzi A, et al. 2019. Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity. Science. 29:1459–1463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sing T, Sander O, Beerenwinkel N, Lengauer T. 2005. ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics. 21:3940–3941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steelman CK, Dorcas ME. 2010. Anuran calling survey optimization: developing and testing predictive models of anuran calling activity. J Herpetol. 44:61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues AS, Fischman DL, Waller RW. 2004. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science. 306:1783–1786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo LF, Martins IA, Bruschi DP, Passos MA, Alexandre C, Haddad CFB. 2015. The anuran calling repertoire in the light of social context. Acta Ethol. 18:87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk P, Lewis ER, Wit HP. 1990. Temperature effects on auditory nerve fiber response in the American bullfrog. Hear Res. 44:231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Sluys M, Marra RV, Boquimpani-Freitas L, Rocha CFD. 2012. Environmental factors affecting calling behavior of sympatric frog species at an Atlantic Rain Forest area, Southeastern Brazil. J Herpetol. 46:41–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables WN, Ripley BD. 2002. Modern applied statistics. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh C, Mac Nally R. 2008. hier.part: hierarchical partitioning. R package version 1.0.3. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Wells KD. 1977. The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav. 25:666–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong BB, Cowling ANN, Cunningham RB, Donnelly CF, Cooper PD. 2004. Do temperature and social environment interact to affect call rate in frogs (Crinia signifera)? Austral Ecol. 29:209–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi A, Kelley DB. 2002. Hormonal mechanisms of acoustic communication. In: Megela-Simmons A, Popper AN, Fay RR, editors. Acoustic Communication. New York: Springer Verlag; p. 275–323.
   Google Scholar