How humans solve the frame problem

References

• Baillargeon, R. (2008). Innate ideas revisited: For a principle of persistence in infants' physical reasoning. Perspectives in Psychology Science, 3, 2–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baars, B. J. (1997). In the theater of consciousness: Global workspace theory, a rigorous scientific theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4, 292–309.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 248–254.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S. (2008). Autism, hypersystemizing, and truth. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 64–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10(1), 147–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, P., & Bergstrom, B. (2008). Evolutionary perspectives on religion. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 111–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, T. W., Pan, J. S., & Bertenthal, B. I. (2011). Infants' understanding of actions performed by mechanical devices. Cognition, 121, 1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bubic, A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Schubotz, R. I. (2010). Prediction, cognition and the brain. Frontiers in Psychology – Human Neuroscience, 4, 25. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2007). The brain's default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Bullot, N. (2009). Toward a theory of the empirical tracking of individuals: Cognitive flexibility and the functions of attention in integrated tracking. Philosophical Psychology, 22, 353–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullot, N. J., & Rysiew, P. (2007). A study in the cognition of individuals' identity: Solving the problem of singular cognition in object and agent tracking. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 276–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, L. (1952). On the tunnel effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 121–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabeza, R., Ciaramelli, E., Olson, I. R., & Moscovitch, M. (2008). Parietal cortex and episodic memory: An attentional account. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(8), 613–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, C. S., & van Veen, V. (2007). Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 367–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catmur, C., Gillmeister, H., Bird, G., Liepelt, R., Brass, M., & Heyes, C. (2008). Through the looking glass: Counter-mirror activation following incompatible sensorimotor learning. European Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 1208–1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catmur, C., Walsh, V., & Heyes, C. (2007). Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system. Current Biology, 17, 1527–1531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (2009). The mirror neuron system. Archives of Neurology, 66, 557–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchino, J. B., Aslin, R. N., & Rakison, D. H. (2011). Correspondences between what infants see and know about causal and self-propelled motion. Cognition, 118(2), 171–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colzato, L., Raffone, A., & Hommel, B. (2006). What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 705–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colzato, L. S., van Wouwe, N. C., & Hommel, B. (2007). Feature binding and affect: Emotional modulation of visuo-motor integration. Neuropsychologia, 45, 440–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008). The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58(3), 306–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespi, B., & Badcock, C. (2008). Psychosis and autism as diametrical disorders of the social brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 241–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., & Naccache, L. (2001). Toward a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79, 1–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., & Changeaux, J.-P. (2004). Neural mechanisms for access to consciousness. In M.Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 1145–1157). New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, B. M. (2011). Neurology of widely embedded free will. Cortex, 47, 1160–1165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eichenbaum, H., Yonelinas, A. R., & Ranganath, C. (2007). The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 123–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, A., Burke, M., Fiehler, K., Bien, S., & Rosler, F. (2007). How moving objects become animated: The human mirror system assimilates non-biological movement patterns. Social Neuroscience, 3, 368–387.
   Google Scholar
• Fields, C. (2011a). Trajectory recognition as the basis for object individuation: A functional model of object file instantiation and object-token encoding. Frontiers in Psychology – Perception Science, 2, 49. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00049.
   Google Scholar
• Fields, C. (2011b). From “Oh, OK” to “Ah, yes” to “Aha!”: Hyper-systemizing and the rewards of insight. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1159–1167.
   Google Scholar
• Fields, C. (2011c). Implementation of structure-mapping inference by event-file binding and action planning: A model of tool-improvisation analogies. Psychological Research, 75, 129–142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fields, C. (2012a). The very same thing: Extending the object token concept to incorporate causal constraints on individual identity. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8, 234–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, C. (2012b). Motion as manipulation: Implementation of force-motion analogies by event-file binding and action planning. Cognitive Processing, 13, 231–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flombaum, J. I., Scholl, B. J., & Santos, L. R. (2008). Spatiotemporal priority as a fundamental principle of object persistence. In B.Hood & L.Santos (Eds.), The origins of object knowledge (pp. 135–164). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A. (2000). The mind doesn't work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A. (2008). The language of thought revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, K. M. & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (Eds.). (1996). The robot's dilemma revisited: The frame problem in artificial intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain's concepts: The role of sensory-motor systems in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, T., & Scholl, B. J. (2010). Are objects required for object files? Roles of segmentation and spatiotemporal continuity in computing object persistence. Visual Cognition, 18, 82–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzola, V., & Keysers, C. (2009). The observation and execution of actions share motor and somatosensory voxels in all tested subjects: Single-subject analyses of unsmoothed fMRI data. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1239–1255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (2002). Mental models, Psychology of. In N. J.Smelser & P. B.Bates (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 9683–9687). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Gerhardstein, P., Schroff, G., Dickerson, K., & Adler, S. A. (2009). The development of object recognition through infancy. In B. C.Glenyn & R. P.Zini (Eds.), New directions in developmental psychobiology (pp. 79–115). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Hayes-Roth, F., Waterman, D., & Lenat, D. (1983). An overview of expert systems. In F.Hayes-Roth, D.Waterman & D.Lenat (Eds.), Building expert systems (pp. 3–29). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, L. A., & Carbuto, M. (2008). Remembering what we did: How source misattributions arise from verbalization, mental imagery, and pictures. In M. R.Kelley (Ed.), Applied memory (pp. 213–234). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Heyes, C. (2010). Where do mirror neurons come from?Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(4), 575–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingworth, A., & Franconeri, S. L. (2009). Object correspondence across brief occlusion is established on the basis of both spatiotemporal and surface feature cues. Cognition, 113, 150–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2007). Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Psychological Research, 71, 42–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, T. L. (2010). Auditory imagery: Empirical findings. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 302–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children “intuitive theists”? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15(5), 295–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48, 805–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. J. (2006). Auditory neuroscience: Activating the cortex without sound. Current Biology, 16(11), R410–R411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kolodner, J. L. (1992). An introduction to case-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 6, 3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., & Ganis, G. (2006). The case for mental imagery. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2009). The “Aha!” moment: The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(4), 210–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kounios, J., Fleck, J. I., Green, D. L., Payne, L., Stevenson, J. L., Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2007). The origins of insight in resting-state brain activity. Neuropsychologia, 46, 281–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kounios, J., Frymiare, J. L., Bowden, E. M., Fleck, J. I., Subramaniam, K., Parrish, T. B., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2006). The prepared mind: Neural activity prior to problem presentation predicts subsequent solution by sudden insight. Psychological Science, 17, 882–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenat, D., & Guha, R. V. (1990). Building large knowledge-based systems: Representation and inference in the CYC project. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Concepts and categories: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 27–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., & Hayes, P. J. (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In D.Michie & B.Meltzer (Eds.), Machine intelligence, Vol. 4, (pp. 463–502). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, D. (1987). We've been framed: Or, why AI is innocent of the frame problem. In Z. W.Pylyshyn (Ed.), The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence (pp. 113–122). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, A., Furman, O., Navon, I., & Dudai, Y. (2009). Subjective versus documented reality: A case study of long-term real-life autobiographical memory. Learning & Memory, 16, 142–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell, K. J., & Johnson, M. K. (2000). Source monitoring: Attributing mental experiences. In E.Tulving & F. I. M.Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 179–195). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moulton, S. T., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2009). Imagining predictions: Mental imagery as mental emulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1273–1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassi, J. J., & Callaway, E. M. (2009). Parallel processing strategies of the primate visual system. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 360–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1963). GPS: A program that simulates human thought. In E. A.Feigenbaum & J.Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought (pp. 109–133). New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, S., & Bruno, M. (2010). Intuitions about personal identity: An empirical study. Philosophical Psychology, 23(3), 293–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1997). How the Mind Works. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Z. W. (Ed.). (1987). The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Z. (2009). Perception, representation, and the world: The FINST that binds. In D.Dedrick & L.Trick (Eds.), Computation, cognition, and pylyshyn (pp. 3–48). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ranganath, C. (2010). A unified framework for the functional organization of the medial temporal lobes and the phenomenology of episodic memory. Hippocampus, 20, 1263–1290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rips, L., Blok, S., & Newman, G. (2006). Tracing the identity of objects. Psychological Review, 133(1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Matelli, M. (2003). Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 146–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolls, E. T., & Grabenhorst, F. (2008). The orbitofrontal cortex and beyond: From affect to decision-making. Progress in Neurobiology, 86, 216–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosset, E. (2008). It's no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations. Cognition, 108, 771–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, R. (2010). Classical computationalism and the many problems of cognitive relevance. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 41(3), 280–293.
   Google Scholar
• Saxe, R., Carey, S., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Understanding other minds: Linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 87–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl, B. J. (2007). Object persistence in philosophy and psychology. Mind & Language, 22(5), 563–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl, B., & Tremoulet, P. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Prediction of external events with our motor system: Towards a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 211–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubotz, R. I., & van Cramon, D. Y. (2004). Sequences of abstract nonbiological stimuli share ventral premotor cortex with action observations and imagery. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(24), 5467–5474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergent, C., Baillet, S., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nature Neuroscience, 8(10), 1391–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, M. P. (2009). The frame problem. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frameproblem/, [Accessed Nov. 27, 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, M. P., & Baars, B. J. (2005). Applying global workspace theory to the frame problem. Cognition, 98(2), 157–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J., & Ambinder, M. S. (2005). Change blindness: Theory and consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(1), 44–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people in a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 644–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, J. S., Henson, R. N. A., Gilbert, S. J., & Fletcher, P. C. (2008). Separable forms of reality monitoring supported by anterior prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 447–457.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smallwood, J., Brown, K., Baird, B., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Cooperation between the default mode network and the frontal-parietal network in the production of an internal train of thought. Brain Research, 1428, 60–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, D., Yoachim, C., Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A., & Blumenthal, E. (2007). The blicket within: Preschooler's inferences about insides and causes. Journal of Cognitive Development, 8(2), 159–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spapé, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2010). Actions travel with their objects: Evidence for dynamic event files. Psychological Research, 74, 50–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Treisman, A. (2006). Object tokens, binding and visual memory. In H. D.Zimmer, A.Mecklinger & U.Lindenberger (Eds.), Handbook of binding and memory: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 315–338): Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uncapher, M., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Posterior parietal cortex and episodic encoding: Insights from fMRI, subsequent memory effects and dual-attention theory. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 91(2), 139. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2008.10.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, M., Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2009). Processing in the anterior temporal lobes: A meta-analysis of the functional neuroimaging literature. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1083–1094.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. D., Shannon, B. J., Kahn, I., & Buckner, R. L. (2005). Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 445–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, M. (2008). Cognition in context: Phenomenology, situated cognition and the frame problem. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 16(3), 323–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F. (2007). Sortal concepts, object individuation, and language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(9), 400–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. P., Aly, M., Wang, W.-C., & Koen, J. D. (2010). Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions. Hippocampus, 20, 1178–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer, H. D., & Ecker, U. K. D. (2010). Remembering perceptual features unequally bound in object and episodic tokens: Neural mechanisms and their electrophysiological correlates. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(7), 1066–1079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmigrod, S., & Hommel, B. (2010). Temporal dynamics of unimodal and multimodal feature binding. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 72(1), 142–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar