Absolute order-of-magnitude reasoning applied to a social multi-criteria evaluation framework

References

• Agell, N., Sánchez, M., Prats, F., & Roselló, L. (2012). Ranking multi-attribute alternatives on the basis of linguistic labels in group decisions. Information Sciences, 209, 49–60. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2012.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aras, H., Erdoğmu¸, S., & Koç, E. (2004). Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using analytic hierarchy process. Renewable Energy, 29, 1383–1392. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2003.12.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cables, E., García-Cascales, M. S., & Lamata, M. T. (2012). The LTOPSIS: An alternative to TOPSIS decision-making approach for linguistic variables. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 2119–2126. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalina, T., Virgone, J., & Blanco, E. (2011). Multi-source energy systems analysis using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology. Renewable Energy, 36, 2245–2252. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2011.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, N. B., Parvathinathan, G., & Breeden, J. B. (2008). Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. Journal of environmental management, 87, 139–153. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherubini, F., & Strømman, A. H. (2011). Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresource Technology, 102, 437–451. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, J., Qi, J., Chi, J., Chen, S., Yang, J., Ju, L., & Chen, B. (2010). Integrated water resource security evaluation of Beijing based on GRA and TOPSIS. Frontiers of Earth Science in China, 4, 357–362. doi:10.1007/s11707-010-0120-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doukas, H., Karakosta, C., & Psarras, J. (2010). Computing with words to assess the sustainability of renewable energy options. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 5491–5497. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1980). Fuzzy sets and systems: Theory and applications. New York, NY: Academic press.
   Google Scholar
• Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Forbus, K. D. (1984). Qualitative process theory. Artificial Intelligence, 24, 85–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamboa, G., & Munda, G. (2007). The problem of windfarm location: A social multi-criteria evaluation framework. Energy Policy, 35, 1564–1583. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goumas, M., & Lygerou, V. (2000). An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 123, 606–613. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00093-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2000). Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115, 67–82. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00024-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, T.-Y., Lu, S.-T., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 573–584. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1992). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 374. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jing, Y.-Y., Bai, H., & Wang, J.-J. (2012). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for CCHP systems driven by different energy sources. Energy Policy, 42, 286–296. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C. (2008). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: Theory and applications with recent developments. In Cengiz Kahraman (Ed.), Springer Optimization and its Applications (Vol. 16). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., & Kaya, I. (2010). Selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design: The case of Turkey. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 16, 82–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. H., Chen, H. H., & Kang, H.-Y. (2009). Multi-criteria decision making on strategic selection of wind farms. Renewable Energy, 34, 120–126. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2008.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, KFR. (2007). Evaluating environmental sustainability: an integration of multiple-criteria decision-making and fuzzy logic. Environmental management, 39, 721–736. doi:10.1007/s00267-005-0395-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosadeghi, R., Warnken, J., Tomlinson, R., & Mirfenderesk, H. (2015). Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 54–65. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munda, G. (2004). Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences. European Journal of Operational Research, 158, 662–677. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00369-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munda, G. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis and sustainable development. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 78, 953–986.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto-Morote, A., Ruz-vila, F., & Canovas-rodriguez, F. (2010). Selection of a trigeneration system using a fuzzy AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach. International Journal of Energy research, 35, 781–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohekar, S., & Ramachandran, M. (2004). Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planningA review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8, 365–381. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polatidis, H., Haralambopoulos, D., Munda, G., & Vreeker, R. (2006). Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 1, 181–193. doi:10.1080/009083190881607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, B., & Slowiński, R. (2013). Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 1, 69–97.
   Google Scholar
• San Cristóbal, J. (2011). Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in spain: The Vikor method. Renewable Energy, 36, 498–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Cristóbal, J. (2012). A goal programming model for the optimal mix and location of renewable energy plants in the north of Spain. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 4461–4464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapia García, J., del Moral, M., Martínez, M., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2012). A consensus model for group decision making problems with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 10022–10030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travé-Massuyès, L., Prats, F., Sánchez, M., & Agell, N. (2005). Relative and absolute order-of-magnitude models unified. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 45, 323–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J.-J., Jing, Y.-Y., Zhang, C.-F., Shi, G.-H., & Zhang, X.-T. (2008). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system. Energy Policy, 36, 3823–3832. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J.-J., Jing, Y.-Y., Zhang, C.-F., & Zhao, J.-H. (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 2263–2278. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. (2010). Near-shore wind powerProtected seascapes, environmentalists attitudes, and the technocratic planning perspective. Land Use Policy, 27, 195–203. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, T.-M., & Huang, Y.-L. (2014). Factors in determining wind farm location: Integrating GQM, fuzzy DEMATEL, and ANP. Renewable Energy, 66, 159–169. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, H., & Levenglick, A. (1978). A consistent extension of Condorcet's election principle. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 35, 285–300. doi:10.1137/0135023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Information Sciences, 8, 199–249. doi:10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar