A multi-layer approach to opinion polarity classification using augmented semantic tree kernels

References

• Annesi, P., Croce, D., & Basili, R., (2014). Towards compositional tree kernels. First Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics, Pisa, Italy, 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Antonacopoulos, A., & Hu, J. (2007). Web document analysis. Digital document processing, Major directions and recent advances (pp. 407–419). Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
   Google Scholar
• Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F., (2010). SentiWordNet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In proceedings of the seventh conference on international language resources and evaluation (LREC’10), Valletta, Malta. 2200–2204.
   Google Scholar
• Baeza-Yates, R., & Boldi, P. (2010). Web structure mining. Advanced techniques in web intelligence-1, SCI311 (pp. 113–142). Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
   Google Scholar
• Basili, R., Annesi, P., Castellucci, G., & Croce, D., (2015). A compositional perspective in convolution kernels. Proceedings of the 6th Italian Information Retrieval Workshop, Cagliari, Italy, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bloehdorn, S., & Moschitti, A., (2007). Combined syntactic and semantic kernels for text classification. Advances in Information Retrieval-Proceedings of the 29th European Conference on Information Retrieval, Rome, Italy, Springer LNCS, (4425), 307–318.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, M. (2016). Deriving a typology of web 2.0 learning technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 763–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, A. P. (1997). The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognition, 30(7), 1145–1159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzarossa, M., & Tessera, D. (2015). Modeling and predicting temporal patterns of web content changes. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 56(3), 115–123.
   Google Scholar
• Croce, D., Moschitti, A., & Basili, R., (2011). Structured lexical similarity via convolution kernels on dependency trees. Proceedings of EMNLP, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 1034–1046.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, L., & Wiebe, J., (2015). MPQA 3.0: Entity/event-level sentiment corpus. Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Human Language Technologies, Denver, Colorado, USA. 1323–1328.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Z. (2010). HowNet and its computation of meaning. coling 2010: Demonstration Volume (pp. 53–56). Beijing: World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc. River Edge, NJ, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F., (2006). SentiWordNet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC ’06), Genoa, Italy. 417–422.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, X., & Zhan, J. (2015). Sentiment analysis using product review data. Springer Journal of Big Data, 2(5).
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Gavilanes, M., Álvarez-López, T., Juncal-Martínez, J., Costa-Montenegro, E., & González-Castaño, F. J. (2016). Unsupervised method for sentiment analysis in online texts. Expert Systems with Applications, 58(1), 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Filice, S., Castellucci, G., Croce, D., & Basili, R., (2015). KeLP: A kernel-based learning platform for natural language processing. Proceedings of ACL-IJCNLP 2015 System Demonstrations, Beijing, China. 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Z. (1964). Distributional structure. In. Katz, J. J., Foader, J., J. (Eds). The philosophy of linguistics. Oxford University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Haussler, D., (1999). Convolution kernels on discrete structures. Technical report, UCSC.
   Google Scholar
• Hedman, A. (2008). Using the SMOG formula to revise a health-related document. American Journal of Health Education, 39(1), 61–64.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, R., & Moschitti, A., (2010). Syntactic and semantic structure for opinion expression detection. 14th International Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Uppsala, Sweden. 67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Jovanovic, J., Gasevic, D., Brooks, C., Devedzic, V., Hatala, M., Eap, T., & Richards, G. (2007). Using semantic web technologies to analyze learning content. IEEE Internet Computing, 11(5), 45–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaljahi, R., & Foster, J., (2016). Detecting opinion polarities using kernel methods. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Modeling of People’s Opinions, Personality, and Emotions in Social Media (PEOPLES), Osaka, Japan. 60–69.
   Google Scholar
• Kaljahi, R., & Foster, J. (2017). Any-gram kernels for sentence classification: A sentiment analysis case study (pp. 1–12). eprint arXiv:1712.07004.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Rousseau, F., & Vazirgiannis, M., (2015). Convolutional sentence kernel from word embeddings for short text categorization. In Proceedings of international conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’13), Seattle, Washington, USA. 775–780.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B (2012). Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Loia, V., Pedrycz, W., & Senatore, S. (2007). Semantic web content analysis: A study in proximity-based collaborative clustering. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15(6), 1294–1312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machová, K., & Marhefka, L. (2013). Opinion mining in conversational content within web discussions and commentaries (Vol. 8127, pp. 149–161). Regensburg, Germany: Springer LNCS.
   Google Scholar
• Marini, J. (2000). Document Object Model. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, S. (2000). The Microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the World wide web. Journal and Mass Communications, 77(1), 80–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, F., Wenpeng, L., Zhang,Y., W., Jian, P., Shi, S., & Huang, H., (2017). QLUT at SemEval-2017 Task 2: Word similarity based on word embedding and knowledge base. Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations, Vancouver, Canada. 235–238.
   Google Scholar
• Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space (pp. 1–12).
   Google Scholar
• Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J., (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. NIPS’13 Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - 2, Lake Tahoe, Nevada. 3111–3119.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. (1995). WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 39–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moschitti, A., (2006). Efficient convolution kernels for dependency and constituent syntactic trees. In Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Machine Learning, Berlin, Germany, 318–329.
   Google Scholar
• Moschitti, A., & Quarteroni, S. (2011). Linguistic kernels for answer re-ranking in question answering systems. Information Processing and Management, 47, 825–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammad, A., Wiratunga, N., & Lothian, R. (2016). Contextual sentiment analysis for social media genres. Knowledge-Based Systems, Elsevier. 108(15), 92–101.
   Google Scholar
• Pagi, V., & Wadawadagi, R., (2018). Opinion content extraction from web pages using embedded semantic term tree kernels. In proceedings of international conference on computational intelligence and data engineering. lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies, Vijaywada, India. 9, 345–358
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, N., Katsimpras, G., & Stamatatos, E., (2012). Extracting informative textual parts from web pages containing user-generated content. Proceedings of 12th international conference on knowledge management and knowledge technologies, Graz, Austria. 4, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Piskorski, J., & Yangarber, R., (2012). Information Extraction: Past, present and future. Multi-source, Multilingual Information Extraction and Summarization Part of the series Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing, Springer, 23–49.
   Google Scholar
• Prollochs, N., Feuerriegel, S., & Neumann, D. (2016). Negation scope detection in sentiment analysis: Decision support for news-driven trading. Decision Support Systems, 88, 67–75. Elsevier.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, P. A. R., & Memon, N. (2012). Hybrid model of content extraction. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 78(4), 1248–1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios, S., & Aguilera, F. (2010). Web intelligence on the social web. Advanced techniques in Web intelligence-1, SCI311 (pp. 225–249). Springer Nature, Switzerland AG.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh, I., Moschitti, A., Nakov, P., Marquez, L., & Joty, S., (2014). Semantic kernels for semantic parsing. International Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar. 436–442.
   Google Scholar
• Son, G., Noh, T., Song, H., & Park, S. (2013). An application for plagiarized source code detection based on a parse tree kernel. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(8), 1911–1918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullrich, C., Borau, K., Luo, H., Tan, X., Shen, L., & Shen, R., (2008). Why web 2.0 is good for learning and for research: Principles and prototypes. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Vineel, G., (2009). Web page DOM node characterization and its application to page segmentation. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International conference on Internet multimedia services architecture and applications, IMSAA’09, Bangalore, India.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegand, M., & Klakow, D., (2011). Convolution kernels for subjectivity detection. 18th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics, NEALT Proceedings Series, Riga, Latvia. 11, 254–261.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., & Hoffman, P., (2009). Recognizing contextual polarity: An exploration of features for phrase-level sentiment analysis, Computational Linguistics, 35(3), 399-433.
   Google Scholar