Probabilistic forecasting, linearity and nonlinearity hypothesis tests with bootstrapped linear and nonlinear artificial neural network

References

• Aladag, C. H., Egrioglu, E., & Kadilar, C. (2009). Forecasting nonlinear time series with a hybrid methodology. Applied Mathematic Letters, 22, 1467–1470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apolloni, B., Bassis, S., Rota, J., Galliani, G. L., Gioia, M., & Ferrari, L. (2016). A neuro fuzzy algorithm for learning from complex granules. Granular Computing, 1(4), 225–246.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, D., & Mammadov, M. (2014). Time series forecasting using a hybrid neural networks and nonparametric regression model. Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 30(3), 309–322.
   Google Scholar
• Bickel, P. J., Götze, F., & Zwet, W. (1997). Resampling fewer than n observations: Gains. loses and remedies for losses. Statistica Sinica, 7, 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuHamra, S., Smaoui, N., & Gabr, M. (2003). The Box-Jenkins analysis and neural networks: Prediction and time series modeling. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 27, 805–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bühlmann, P. (1997). Sieve bootstrap for time series. Bernoulli, 3(2), 123–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, M., Li, Q., & Lang, G. (2017). Shadowed sets of dynamic fuzzy sets. Granular Computing, 2(2), 85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. M. (1996). A fuzzy reasoning approach for rule-based systems based on fuzzy logics. IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics, 26(5), 769–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. M., & Chang, T. H. (2001). Finding multiple possible critical paths using fuzzy PERT. IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man. And Cybernetics - Part B: Cybernetics, 31(6), 930–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. M., & Chen, C. D. (2011). Handling forecasting problems based on high-order fuzzy logical relationships. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3857–3864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. M., & Chung, N. Y. (2006). Forecasting enrollments using high-order fuzzy time series and genetic algorithms. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 21(5), 485–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. M., & Kao, P. Y. (2013). TAIEX forecasting based on fuzzy time series. particle swarm optimization techniques and support vector machines. Information Sciences, 247, 62–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. M., Wang, N. Y., & Pan, J. S. (2009). Forecasting enrollments using automatic clustering techniques and fuzzy logical relationships. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 11070–11076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C. T., Niu, W. J., Feng, Z. K., Shen, J. J., & Chau, K. W. (2015). Daily reservoir runoff forecasting method using artificial neural network based on quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization. Water, 7, 4232–4246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciucci, D. (2016). Orthopairs and granular computing. Granular Computing, 1(3), 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Cogollo, M. R., & Velásquez, J. D. (2014). Methodological advances in artificial neural networks for time series forecasting. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 12, 764–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deo, R. C., & Sahin, M. (2015). Application of the artificial neural network model for prediction of monthly standardized precipitation and evapotranspiration index using hydro meteorological parameters and climate indices in eastern Australia. Atmospheric Research, 161–162, 65–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (2016). Bridging gaps between several forms of granular computing. Granular Computing, 1(2), 115–126.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the Jackknife. The Annals of Statistics, 7(1), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, D., & Wang, J. A. (2017). Novel application of artificial neural network for wind speed estimation. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 36(5), 415–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germi, M. B., Mirjavadi, M., Namin, A. S. S., & Baziar, A. (2014). A hybrid model for daily peak load power forecasting based on SAMBA and neural network. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 27(2), 913–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glišović, N., Milenković, M., Bojović, N., Švadlenka, L., & Avramović, Z. (2016). A hybrid model for forecasting the volume of passenger flows on Serbian railways. Operational Research, 16(2), 271–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., Zhang, Y., Lan, S., & Wang, H. (2016). A comparative study of artificial neural networks, support vector machines and adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for forecasting groundwater levels near Lake Okeechobee, Florida. Water Resources Management, 30, 375–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajizade, E., Mahootchi, M., Esfahanipour, A., & Massahi, K. M. (2015). A new NN-PSO hybrid model for forecasting Euro/Dollar exchange rate volatility. Neural Computing and Applications.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Jing, B. Y. (1996). On sample re-use methods for dependent data. Journal of the Royal Statistics Society. Series B, 58, 727–738.
   Google Scholar
• Ince, H., & Traffalis, T. B. (2005). A hybrid model for exchange rate prediction. Decisions Support Systems, 42, 1054–1062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on neural networks. Piscataway. 4, 1942-1948. doi: 10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968.
   Google Scholar
• Khashei, M., & Bijari, M. (2012). A new class of hybrid models for time series forecasting. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 4344–4357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi, A., Nahavandi, S., Creighton, D., & Atiya, A. F. (2011). Lower upper bound estimation method for construction of neural network-based prediction intervals. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 22(3), 337–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. K. (2015). A new approach to short-term price forecast strategy with an artificial neural network approach: Application to the Nord Pool. Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, 10(4), 1480–1491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, M., & Thenmozhi, M. (2014). Forecasting stock index returns using ARIMA-SVM. ARIMA-ANN. and ARIMA-random forest hybrid models. International Journal of Banking. Accounting and Finance, 5(3), 284–308.
   Google Scholar
• Künsch, H. R. (1989). The Jackknife and the bootstrap for general stationary observations. The Annals of Statistics, 17(3), 1217–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri, S. N. (2003). Resampling Methods for Dependent Data. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-S., & Tong, L.-I. (2011). Forecasting time series using a methodology based on autoregressive integrated moving average and genetic programming. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24, 66–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, R. Y., & Singh, K. (1992). Moving blocks jackknife and bootstrap capture weak dependence. In R. LePage & L. Billard (Eds.), Exploring the Limits of Bootstrap. New York, NY: Wiley. pp. 225–248.
   Google Scholar
• Livi, L., & Sadeghian, A. (2016). Granular computing. computational intelligence. and the analysis of non-geometric input spaces. Granular Computing, 1(1), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Loia, V., D’Aniello, G., Gaeta, A., & Orciuoli, F. (2016). Enforcing situation awareness with granular computing: A systematic overview and new perspectives. Granular Computing, 1(2), 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., Jiang, C., Hou, Z., & Wang, C. (2006). The formulation of the optimal strategies for the electricity producers based on the particle swarm optimization algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 21(4), 1663–1671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciel, L., Ballini, R., & Gomide, F. (2016). Evolving granular analytics for interval time series forecasting. Granular Computing, 1(4), 213–224.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Pandhiani, M., Muhammed, S., & Bin Shabri, A. (2015). Time series forecasting by using hybrid models for monthly streamflow data. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 9, 2809–2829.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, J., Shah, S., Thakkar, P., & Kotecha, K. (2015). Predicting stock market index using fusion of machine learning techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(4), 2162–2172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, E. N., Scarpin, C. T., & Teixeira Júnior, L. A. (2015). Hybrid wavelet model for time series prediction. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 9, 7431–7438.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G., & Weber, R. (2016). DCC: A framework for dynamic granular clustering. Granular Computing, 1(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Piri, J., Mohammadi, K., Shamshirband, S., & Akib, S. (2016). Assessing the suitability of hybridizing the Cuckoo optimization algorithm with ANN and ANFIS techniques to predict daily evaporation. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(3), art. no. 246, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politis, D. N., & Romano, J. P. (1994). Large sample confidence regions based on subsamples under minimal assumptions. The Annals of Statistics, 22, 2031–2050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, S., Wang, J., Wu, J., & Zhao, G. (2016). A hybrid model based on smooth transition periodic autoregressive and Elman artificial neural network for wind speed forecasting of the Hebei region in China. International Journal of Green Energy, 13(6), 595–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, M. A., Castro, J. R., Castillo, O., & Mendoza, O. (2017). Fuzzy higher type information granules from an uncertainty measurement. Granular Computing, 2(2), 95–103.
   Google Scholar
• Shafaei, M., Adamowski, J., Fakheri-Fard, A., Dinpashoh, Y., & Adamowski, K. A. (2016). Wavelet- SARIMA-ANN hybrid model for precipitation forecasting. Journal of Water and Land Development, 28(1), 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Shao, Y. E., Hou, C.-D., & Lin, C.-S. (2015). Applying artificial neural networks. multiple regression and their hybrid models for predictions of electricity sales in Taiwan. ICIC Express Letters. Part B: Applications, 6(2), 485–490.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., & Eberhart, R. C. (1999, July). Empirical study of particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (pp. 1945–1950). Washington, D.C., USA.
   Google Scholar
• Shukur, O. B., & Lee, M. H. (2015). Daily wind speed forecasting through hybrid KF-ANN model based on ARIMA. Renewable Energy, 76, 637–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P. K., & Kumar, C. A. (2017). Concept lattice reduction using different subset of attributes as information granules. Granular Computing, 2(3), 159–173.
   Google Scholar
• Skowron, A., Jankowski, A., & Dutta, S. (2016). Interactive granular computing. Granular Computing, 1(2), 95–113.
   Google Scholar
• Štěpnička, M., Cortez, P., Donate, J. P., & Štěpničková, L. (2013). Forecasting seasonal time series with computational intelligence: On recent methods and the potential of their combinations. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(6), 1981–1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syau, Y. R., Skowron, A., & Lin, E. B. (2017). Inclusion degree with variable-precision model in analyzing inconsistent decision tables. Granular Computing, 2(2), 65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, F. M., Yu, H. C., & Tzeng, G. H. (2002). Combining neural network model with seasonal time series ARIMA model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69, 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Li, Y., & Li, X. (2017). Approximation performance of the nonlinear hybrid fuzzy system based on variable universe. Granular Computing, 2(2), 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Yang, J., & Xu, J. (2017). Granular computing: From granularity optimization to multi-granularity joint problem solving. Granular Computing, 2(3), 105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Wilke, G., & Portmann, E. (2016). Granular computing as a basis of human-data interaction: A cognitive cities use case. Granular Computing, 1(3), 181–197.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, Y. (2016). A triarchic theory of granular computing. Granular Computing, 1(2), 145–157.
   Google Scholar
• Yolcu, U., Aladag, C. H., & Egrioglu, E. (2013). A new linear & nonlinear artificial neural network model for time series forecasting. Decision Support System Journals, 54, 1340–1347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yolcu, U., Jin, Y., & Egrioglu, E. (2016, December). An ensemble of single multiplicative neuron models for probabilistic prediction. 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (art. no. 7849975). Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, G. (2003). Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model. Neurocomputing, 50, 159–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar