A linear space adjustment by mapping data into an intermediate space and keeping low level data structures

References

• Agaian, S. S., Madhukar, M., & Chronopoulos, A. T. (2018). A new acute leukaemia-automated classification system. CMBBE: Imaging & Visualization, 6(3), 303–314.
   Google Scholar
• Bache, K., & Lichman, M. (2013). UCI machine learning repository. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml.
   Google Scholar
• Baktashmotlagh, M., Harandi, M., Lovell, B., & Salzmann, M. (2013). Unsupervised domain adaptation by domain invariant projection. In International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 769–776). Sydney, NSW, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., & Gool, L. V. (2008). Speeded-up robust features (SURF). Computer Vision Image Understanding, 110(3), 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beijbom, O. (2012). Domain adaptation for computer vision applications (Tech. Rep). University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, R., Krishnan, N. C., & Panchanathan, S. (2011). Topology preserving domain adaptation for addressing subject based variability in SEMG signal. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Computational Physiology, 2011 (pp. 4–9). Stanford, CA, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, S., Balakrishnan, S., & Gopalan, R. (2013). DLID: Deep learning for domain adaptation by interpolating between domains. Appeared in the proceedings of the ICML 2013, Workshop on Representation Learning, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ciliberto, C., Mroueh, Y., Poggio, T. A., & Rosasco, L. (2015). Convex learning of multiple tasks and their structure. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2015), Lille, France, 6-11 July 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, W., Yang, Q., Xue, G. R., & Yu, Y. (2007). Boosting for transfer learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 193–200). Corvalis, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Duan, L., Xu, D., & Tsang, I. W. H. (2012a). Domain adaptation from multiple sources: A domain-dependent regularization approach. IEEE Transaction Neural Network Learning System, 23(3), 504–518. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2011.2178556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, L., Xu, D., Tsang, I. W. H., & Luo, J. (2012b). Visual event recognition in videos by learning from web data. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 34(9), 1667–1680. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2011.265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando, B., Habrard, A., Sebban, M., & Tuytelaars, T. (2013). Unsupervised visual domain adaptation using subspace alignment. In International Conference in Computer Vision (pp. 2960–2967). Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, B., Shi, Y., Sha, F., & Grauman, K. (2012). Geodesic flow kernel for unsupervised domain adaptation. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 2066–2073). Providence, RI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gopalan, R., Li, R., & Chellappa, R. (2011). Domain adaptation for object recognition: An unsupervised approach. In International Conference in Computer Vision (pp. 999–1006). Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, A., & Jebara, T. (2009). Transformation learning via kernel alignment. In International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (pp. 301–308). Miami Beach, Florid.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, T., Salvador, G., & Francisco, H. (2015). Self-labeled techniques for semi-supervised learning: Taxonomy, software and empirical study. Knowledge and Information Systems, 42(2), 245–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-013-0706-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhuo, I. H., Liu, D., Lee, D. T., & Chang, S. F. (2012). Robust visual domain adaptation with low-rank reconstruction. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 2168–2175). Providence, RI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, W., Zavesky, E., Chang, S. F., & Loui, A. (2008). Cross-domain learning methods for high-level visual concept classification. In International Conference on Image Processing (pp. 161–164). San Diego, California.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantari, A., Kamsin, A., Shamshirband, S., Gani, A., Alinejad-Rokny, A., & Chronopoulos, A. T. (2018). Computational intelligence approaches for classification of medical data: State-of-the-art, future challenges and research directions. Neurocomputing, 276(2018), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.01.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koby, C., Michael, K., & Jeniifer, W. (2008). Learning from multiple sources. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 1757–1774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulis, B., Saenko, K., & Darrell, T. (2011). What you saw is not what you get: Domain adaptation using asymmetric kernel transforms. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 1785–1792). Colorado Springs, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M., & Wang, J. (2015). Learning transferable features with deep adaptation networks. CoRR abs/1502.02791.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, S. J., Tsang, I., Kwok, J., & Yang, Q. (2011). Domain adaptation via transfer component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 22(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2010.2091281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010). A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(10), 1345–1359. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2009.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, S. J., Zheng, V. W., Yang, Q., & Hu, D. H. (2008, July). Transfer learning for wifi-based indoor localization. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Transfer Learning for Complex Task of the 23rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Pezeshki, A., Scharf, L. L., & Chong, E. K. (2010). The geometry of linearly and quadratically constrained optimization problems for signal processing and communications. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 347(5), 818–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2010.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajasekar, V., & Er, M. J. (2016). A novel progressive learning technique for multi-class classification. Neurocomputing, 207(2016), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajasekar, V., Er, M. J., Dave, M., Pratama, M., & Wu, S. (2017). A novel online multi-label classifier for high-speed streaming data applications. Evolving Systems, 8(4), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12530-016-9162-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saenko, K., Kulis, B., Fritz, M., & Darrell, T. (2010). Adapting visual category models to new domains. In European Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 213–226). Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Samanta, S., & Das, S. (2013). Domain adaptation based on eigen-analysis and clustering for object categorization. In International Conference on Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, LNCS (pp. 245–253). York, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, X., Fan, W., & Ren, J. (2008). Actively transfer domain knowledge. In European Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 342–357). Antwerp, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., & Sha, F. (2012). Information-theoretical learning of discriminative clusters for unsupervised domain adaptation. In ICML02. Edinburgh, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Sugiyama, M., Nakajima, S., Kashima, H., Bünau, P. V., & Kawanabe, M. (2007). Direct importance estimation with model selection and its application to covariate shift adaptation. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 1962–1965). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Tzeng, E., Hoffman, J., Zhang, N., Saenko, K., & Darrell, T. (2014). Deep domain confusion: Maximizing for domain invariance. CoRR abs/1412.3474.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, C., Pan, R., & Li, J. (2011). Bi-weighting domain adaptation for cross-language text classification. In International joint conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1535–1540). Barcelona, Catalonia.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, K., Kou, L., & Zhang, D. (2018). Learning domain-invariant subspace using domain features and independence maximization. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 48(1), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2016.2633306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Yan, R., & Hauptmann, A. G. (2007). Cross-domain video concept detection using adaptive SVMs. In International conference on Multimedia (pp. 188–197). Augsburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Zhang, L., Feng, X., & Zhang, D. (2014). Sparse representation based fisher discrimination dictionary learning for image classification. International Journal of Computer Vision, 109(3), 209–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaroslav, G., Evgeniya, U., Hana, A., Pascal, G., Hugo, L., François, L., Mario, M., & Victor, L. (2016). Domain-adversarial training of neural networks. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17, 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, W., Lou, Q., Vang, Y. S., & Xie, X. (2017). Deep multi-instance networks with sparse label assignment for whole mammogram classification. 20th International Conference, Quebec City, QC, Canada, September 11-13, 2017, pp. 603–611.
   Google Scholar