A systematic mapping study on agent mining

References

• Abar, S., Theodoropoulos, G. K., Lemarinier, P., & O’Hare, G. M. (2017). Agent based modelling and simulation tools: A review of the state-of-art software. Computer Science Review, 24, 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdalla, S., Huang, B., & Kechadi, T. (2015). An agent-based negotiation approach for knowledge exchange in cloud service platforms. In Proceedings of ICSDM 2015: IEEE int. conf. on spatial data mining and geographical knowledge services, Fuzhou, China (p. 22–27). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, E., Grislin-Le Strugeon, E., & Mandiau, R. (2012). MAS architecture and knowledge model for vehicles data communication. Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal, 1(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.14201/ADCAIJ2012112331
   Google Scholar
• Akoka, J., Comyn-Wattiau, I., & Laoufi, N. (2017). Research on big data – a systematic mapping study. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 54(Part 2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2017.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Anjewierden, A., Gijlers, H., Saab, N., & De Hoog, R. (2011). Brick: mining pedagogically interesting sequential patterns. In EDM 2011 - proceedings of the 4th int. conf. on educational data mining, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (pp. 341–342).
   Google Scholar
• Bagga, P., Hans, R., & Sharma, V. (2017). A biological immune system (BIS) inspired Mobile Agent Platform (MAP) security architecture. Expert Systems with Applications, 72, 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.10.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakar, N. A., & Selamat, A. (2018). Agent systems verification: Systematic literature review and mapping. Applied Intelligence, 48(5), 1251–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1112-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basili, V. R., Caldiera, G., & Rombach, H. D. (1994). The goal question metric approach. In Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, (Vol. 1, pp. 528–532), ISBN 0-471-54004-8. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, B., Müller, J., & Odell, J. (2001). Agent UML: A formalism for specifying multiagent software systems. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 11(3), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218194001000517
   Google Scholar
• Belabed, I., Talibi Alaoui, M., El Miloud, J., & Belabed, A. (2020). Association rules algorithms for data mining process based on multi agent system. In: Boumerdassi S., Renault É., Mühlethaler P. (eds) Machine Learning for Networking. MLN 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (Vol. 12081 pp. 431–443). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45778-5_30.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D., & Mgbemena, C. (2018). Data-driven agent-based exploration of customer behavior. Simulation, 94(3), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549717743106
   Google Scholar
• Benjemmaa, A., Ltifi, H., & Ayed, M. (2020). Design of remote heart monitoring system for cardiac patients. In: Barolli L., Takizawa M., Xhafa F., Enokido T. (eds) Advanced Information Networking and Applications. AINA 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, (Vol. 926 pp. 963–976). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15032-7_81
   Google Scholar
• Bloembergen, D., Tuyls, K., Hennes, D., & Kaisers, M. (2015). Evolutionary dynamics of multi-agent learning: A survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 53, 659–697. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.4818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (1999). Swarm intelligence: From natural to artificial systems. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Bonisoli, A., Gerevini, A. E., Saetti, A., & Serina, I. (2018). A privacy-preserving model for multi-agent propositional planning. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 30(4), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2018.1456786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boo, V. K., & Anthony, P. (2012). Agent for mining of significant concepts in DBpedia. In: Lukose D., Ahmad A.R., Suliman A. (eds) Knowledge Technology. KTW 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, (Vol 295 pp. 313–322). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32826-8_32
   Google Scholar
• Brungger, R. R., Kadar, C., & Pletikosa, I. (2016). Design of an agent-based model to predict crime (WIP). In 48th summer computer simulation conference, SCSC 2016@SummerSim, Montreal, Canada (Vol. 48, p. 392–397). The Society for Modeling and Simulation International.
   Google Scholar
• Burkov, A., & Chaib-Draa, B. (2014). Repeated games for multiagent systems: A survey. Knowledge Engineering Review, 29(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026988891300009X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, L., Luo, C., & Zhang, C. (2007). Agent-mining interaction: An emerging area. In V. Gorodetsky, C. Zhang, V. A. Skormin, & L. Cao (Eds.), Autonomous intelligent systems: Multi-agents and data mining (pp. pp. 60–73). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, L. (2017a June).Data science: A comprehensive overview. ACM Comput. Surv, 50(3), 43: 1–43:42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3076253
   Google Scholar
• Cao, L. (2017b, July). Data science: Challenges and directions. Communications of the ACM, 60(8), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1145/3015456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, L., Weiss, G., & Yu, P. S. (2012). A brief introduction to agent mining. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, 25(3), 419–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-011-9191-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasquel, J., & Lomazova, I. (2019). Modelling and validation of trading and multi-agent systems: An approach based on process mining and petri nets. In 1st international conference on process mining (ICPM 2019), Aachen, Germany (Vol. 2432). CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, R. M., de Castro Andrade, R. M., Marc¸al de Oliveira, K., de Sousa Santos, I., & Bezerra, C. I. M. (2017). Quality characteristics and measures for human–computer interaction evaluation in ubiquitous systems. Software Quality Journal, 25(3), 743–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-016-9320-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemchem, A., Alin, F., & Krajecki, M. (2018). Deep learning and data mining classification through the intelligent agent reasoning. In Proceedings - 2018 IEEE 6th international conference on future internet of things and cloud workshops, W-FiCloud 2018, Barcelona, Spain (p. 13–20).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., & Chen, X. (2017). Scheduling optimization in restricted channels based on the agent technology and bayesian network. In X. Yan, M. Zhong, M. Lu, C. Wu, Z. Qiu, & Z. Hu (Eds.), 2017 4th international conference on transportation information and safety, ICTIS 2017, Banff, Canada -proceedings (pp. 291–295). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Hao, Y., Rakthanmanon, T., Zakaria, J., Hu, B., & Keogh, E. (2015). A general framework for never-ending learning from time series streams. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 29(6), 1622–1664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-014-0388-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crockett, K., Latham, A., & Whitton, N. (2017). On predicting learning styles in conversational intelligent tutoring systems using fuzzy decision trees. Int. J. Of Human- Computer Studies, 97, 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.08.005. January.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Andreagiovanni, M., Baiardi, F., Lipilini, J., Ruggieri, S., & Tonelli, F. (2018). Sequential pattern mining for ICT risk assessment and prevention. In: Cerone A., Roveri M. (eds) Software Engineering and Formal Methods. SEFM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (Vol. 10729 pp. 25–39). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74781-1_2 .
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, J. C., Giannella, C., Bhargava, R., Kargupta, H., & Klusch, M. (2005). Distributed data mining and agents. Eng. Appl. Of AI, 18(7), 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2005.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Deloach, S., Wood, M., & Sparkman, C. (2001). Multiagent systems engineering. Int. J. Of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 11(3), 231–258. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218194001000542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Nuovo, A., Acampora, G., & Schlesinger, M. (2017, March). Cognitive agents and robots for human-centered systems special issue. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2017.2670787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, V., & Gupta, S. (2020). Personalized recommender agent for e-commerce products based on data mining techniques. In: Thampi S. et al. (eds) Intelligent Systems, Technologies and Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, (Vol. 910 pp. 77–90). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6095-4_6.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., Rashid, A., & Rayson, P. (2015, September). A systematic survey of online data mining technology intended for law enforcement. ACM Comput. Surv, 48(1), 15:1–15: 54. https://doi.org/10.1145/2811403
   Google Scholar
• Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Smyth, P. (1996). From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI Magazine, 17(3), 37–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Z., Zhu, S., Wu, J., & Guo, H. (2019). Theory and method of time-varying computational experiments for the fully mechanized mining process in an artificial system environment. IEEE Access, 7, 168162–168174. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2954591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619
   Google Scholar
• Foo, Y. S. E., Gooi, H. B., & Chen, S. X. (2015, January). Multi-agent system for distributed management of microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 30(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2322622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier-Viger, P., He, G., Cheng, C., Li, J., Zhou, M., Lin, J.-W., & Yun, U. (2020). A survey of pattern mining in dynamic graphs. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery,10(2), e1372. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1372
   Google Scholar
• Fu, J., Tanner, H. G., & Heinz, J. (2015). Concurrent multi-agent systems with temporal logic objectives: Game theoretic analysis and planning through negotiation. IET Control Theory and Applications, 9(3), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cta.2014.0611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, W., Lin, J. C.-W., Chao, H.-C., & Zhan, J. (2017 nov/dec). Data mining in distributed environment: A survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 7(6), e1216. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes, H. M., Barddal, J. P., Enembreck, F., & Bifet, A. (2017). A survey on ensemble learning for data stream classification. ACM Computing Surveys, 50(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3054925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, X., Liu, L., Fong, S., Xu, Q., Wen, T., & Liu, Z. (2019). Comparative research of swam intelligence clustering algorithms for analyzing medical data. IEEE Access, 7, 137560–137569. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2881020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorodetsky, V. (2013). Agents and distributed data mining in smart space: Challenges and perspectives. In L. Cao, Y. Zeng, A. Symeonidis, V. Gorodetsky, P. Yu, & M. Singh (Eds.), Agents and data mining interaction. ADMI 2012 (Vol. 7607, pp. 153–165). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gorunescu, F. (2011). Data mining. concepts, models and techniques Vol. 12. [Intelligent Systems Reference Library]. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbert, M., & López, P. (2011). The world’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science, 332(6025), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horling, B., & Lesser, V. (2004). A survey of multi-agent organizational paradigms. Knowledge Engineering Review, 19(4), 281–316. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888905000317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hortensius, R., Hekele, F., & Cross, E. S. (2018, December). The perception of emotion in artificial agents. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 10(4), 852–864. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2018.2826921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal, M., Saleem, Y., Naseer, K., & Kim, M. (2018). Multimedia based student-teacher smart interaction framework using multi-agents in elearning. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(4), 5003–5026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4615-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isern, D., & Moreno, A. (2016). A systematic literature review of agents applied in healthcare. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0376-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izquierdo, J., Montalvo, I., Campbell, E., & Pérez-García, R. (2016). A hybrid, auto-adaptive and rule-based multi-agent approach using evolutionary algorithms for improved searching. Engineering Optimization, 48(8), 1365–1377. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2015.1107434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahani, A., Akhavan, P., Jafari, M., & Fathian, M. (2016, May). Conceptual model for knowledge discovery process in databases based on multi-agent system. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 46(2), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-01-2015-0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, N., Sycara, K., & Wooldridge, M. (1998). A roadmap of agent research and development. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, 1(1), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010090405266
   Google Scholar
• Kato, T., Takahashi, H., & Kinoshita, T. (2017, June). Multiagent-based autonomic and resilient service provisioning architecture for the internet of things. Int. J. Of Computer Science and Network Security, 17(6), 36–58. http://paper.ijcsns.org/07_book/201706/20170606.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Baylor, A. L. (2016, March). Research-based design of pedagogical agent roles: A review, progress, and recommendations. Int. J. Of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0055-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering ( Tech. Rep. No. EBSE 2007–001). Keele University and Durham University Joint Report.
   Google Scholar
• Kolajo, T., Daramola, O., & Adebiyi, A. (2019). Big data stream analysis: A systematic literature review. Journal of Big Data, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0210-7
   Google Scholar
• Kozak, J., & Boryczka, U. (2016). Collective data mining in the ant colony decision tree approach. Information Sciences, 372, 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, G., Shih, A., Hattingh, D., & Van Niekerk, T. (2011). Intelligent machine agent architecture for adaptive control optimization of manufacturing processes. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(4), 783–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu, S., & Garg, M. L. (2017). Web mining intelligent agents (WEBMINTEL) system. Int. J. Of Advanced Science and Technology, 104, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijast.2017.104.01
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J., Burattin, A., Davis, C., Hjardem-Hansen, R., & Villadsen, J. (2019). A data driven agent elicitation pipeline for prediction models. In: Di Francescomarino C., Dijkman R., Zdun U. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, (Vol. 362 pp. 570–582). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37453-2_46 .
   Google Scholar
• Le, T., & Vo, B. (2016). The lattice-based approaches for mining association rules: A review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 6(4), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitão, P., & Karnouskos, S. (2015). Industrial agents: Emerging applications of software agents in industry. Elsevier B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, R., & Bihn, M. (2018). Artificial intelligent agent for autonomous prediction and dynamic feedback for high performance athletes. In Proceedings of 2017 international conference on computational science and computational intelligence, CSCI 2017, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (p. 755–759).
   Google Scholar
• Li, C.-T., & Lin, S.-D. (2012). EvaPlanner: An evacuation planner with social-based flocking kinetics. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Beijing, China (p. 1568–1571). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., & Ni, J. (2007). Deploying mobile agents in distributed data mining. In: Washio T. et al. (eds) Emerging Technologies in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (Vol. 4819 pp. 322–331). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77018-3_33
   Google Scholar
• Liao, S.-H., Chu, P.-H., & Hsiao, P.-Y. (2012). Data mining techniques and applications – A decade review from 2000 to 2011. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), 11303–11311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. C.-W., Hong, T.-P., Fournier-Viger, P., Liu, Q., Wong, J.-W., & Zhan, J. (2017). Efficient hiding of confidential high-utility itemsets with minimal side effects. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 29(6), 1225–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2017.1328462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Kong, X., Zhou, X., Wang, L., Zhang, D., Lee, I., Xu, B., & Xia, F. (2019). Data mining and information retrieval in the 21st century: A bibliographic review. Computer Science Review, 34, 100193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2019.100193
   Google Scholar
• Luviano, D., & Yu, W. (2017). Continuous-time path planning for multi-agents with fuzzy reinforcement learning. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 33(1), 491–501. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-161822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes, P. (1994). Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/176789.176792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud, M., Ahmad, M. S., & Mohd Yusoff, M. Z. (2016). Development and implementation of a technique for norms-adaptable agents in open multi-agent communities. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 29(6), 1519–1537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-016-5036-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariscal, G., Marbán, O., & Fernández, C. (2010). A survey of data mining and knowledge discovery process models and methodologies. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 25(2), 137–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888910000032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, D., Baesens, B., & Fawcett, T. (2011). Editorial survey: Swarm intelligence for data mining. Machine Learning, 82(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-010-5216-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matei, O., Di Orio, G., Jassbi, J., Barata, J., & Cenedese, C. (2016). Collaborative data mining for intelligent home appliances. In: Afsarmanesh H., Camarinha-Matos L., Lucas Soares A. (eds) Collaboration in a Hyperconnected World. PRO-VE 2016. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, (Vol. 480 pp. 313–323). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45390-3_27 .
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlan, B., & Hexmoor, H. (2011). Emergent command and control architecture for dynamic agent communities. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 23(4), 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528130701664608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meidan, A., García-García, J. A., Ramos, I., & Escalona, M. J. (2018, June). Measuring software process: A systematic mapping study. ACM Comput. Surv, 51(3), 58:1–58: 32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3186888
   Google Scholar
• Melgoza-Gutiérrez, J., Guerra-Hernández, A., & Cruz-Ramírez, N. (2014). Collaborative data mining on a bdi multi-agent system over vertically partitioned data. In Proceedings of special session 2014 13th mexican international conference on artificial intelligence: Advances in artificial intelligence, MICAI 2014, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Mexico (pp. 215–220). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., Hadfi, R., & Ito, T. (2016). Multiagent social influence detection based on facial emotion recognition. In: Bajo J. et al. (eds) Highlights of Practical Applications of Scalable Multi-Agent Systems. The PAAMS Collection. PAAMS 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, (Vol. 616 pp. 148–160). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39387-2_13.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad, Y., & Nishida, T. (2010, August). Using physiological signals to detect natural interactive behavior. Applied Intelligence, 33(1), 79–92. SI. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-010-0241-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, J. P., & Fischer, K. (2014). Application impact of multi-agent systems and technologies: A survey. In O. Shehory & A. Sturm (Eds.), Agent-oriented software engineering: Reflections on architectures, methodologies, languages, and frameworks (pp. 27–53). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Munoz, S., Araque, O., Llamas, A., & Iglesias, C. (2018). A cognitive agent for mining bugs reports, feature suggestions and sentiment in a mobile application store. In Proceedings - 2018 int. conf. on big data innovations and applications, Innovate-Data 2018, Barcelona, Spain (pp. 17–24).
   Google Scholar
• Naili, M., Bourahla, M., & Naili, M. (2019). Stability-based model for evacuation system using agent-based social simulation and monte carlo method. Int. J. Of Simulation and Process Modelling, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSPM.2019.097702
   Google Scholar
• Nair, R., Tambe, M., Yokoo, M., Pynadath, D., & Marsella, S. (2003). Taming decentralized POMDPs: Towards efficient policy computation for multiagent settings. In IJCAI international joint conference on artificial intelligence, Acapulco, Mexico (pp. 705–711). Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Neto, H., & Julia, R. (2018). ACE-RL-checkers: Decision-making adaptability through integration of automatic case elicitation, reinforcement learning, and sequential pattern mining. Knowledge and Information Systems, 57(3), 603–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-018-1175-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngai, E. W., Xiu, L., & Chau, D. C. (2009). Application of data mining techniques in customer relationship management: A literature review and classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 2592–2602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwana, H. S. (1996). Software agents: An overview. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(3), 205–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026988890000789X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai, M., Mcculloch, M., Gorman, J. D., Pai, N., Enanoria, W., Kennedy, G., … Kennedy, G. (2004). Clinical research methods systematic reviews and meta-analyses: An illustrated, step-by-step guide. The National Medical Journal of India, 17(2), 86–95. http://archive.nmji.in/Issue%2017-2%20PDF/Systematic-reviews-and-meta-analyses.pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. C., & Nandi, G. C. (2016). Convergence of knowledge, nature and computations: A review. Soft Computing, 20(1), 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1510-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, S., & Wooldridge, M. (2002). Game theory and decision theory in multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, 5(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015575522401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, J., Cerezo, E., Seron, F. J., & Rodriguez, L.-F. (2016, Oct). A cognitive-affective architecture for ECAs. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, 18(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bica.2016.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In G. Visaggio & M. T. Baldassarre (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th int. conf. on evaluation and assessment in software engineering (EASE’08), Bari, Italy (Vol. 17). BCS Learning & Development Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, K., & Gencel, C. (2013). Worldviews, research methods, and their relationship to validity in empirical software engineering research. In Proc. of the 2013 joint conf. of the 23nd int. w. on software measurement (IWSM) and the 8th int. conf. on software process and product measurement, Ankara, Turkey (pp. 81–89). Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., & Kuzniarz, L. (2015). Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information and Software Technology, 64, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisarev, I., Kotova, E., Pisarev, A., & Stash, N. (2019). Development of scenarios for automatic processing and data mining in a multi-agent environment. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE conference of russian young researchers in electrical and electronic engineering, ElConRus 2019,St. Petersburg and Moscow,Russia (pp. 630–633).
   Google Scholar
• Ponte, B., De La Fuente, D., Pino, R., & Rosillo, R. (2015). Real-time water demand forecasting system through an agent-based architecture. Int. J. Of Bio-Inspired Computation, 7(3), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIC.2015.069559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portmann, E., Meier, A., Cudre-Mauroux, P., & Pedrycz, W. (2015, June). FORA - A fuzzy set based framework for online reputation management. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 269, 90–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2014.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portugal, I., Alencar, P., & Cowan, D. (2018). The use of machine learning algorithms in recommender systems: A systematic review. Expert Systems with Applications, 97, 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poslad, S. (2007). Specifying protocols for multi-agent systems interaction. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, 2(4), 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/1293731.1293735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruengkarn, R., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2017). A review of data mining techniques and applications. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, 21(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.20965/jaciii.2017.p0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qadori, H. Q., Zulkarnain, Z. A., Hanapi, Z. M., & Subramaniam, S. (2017). Multi-mobile agent itinerary planning algorithms for data gathering in wireless sensor networks: A review paper. Int. J. Of Distributed Sensor Networks, 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147716684841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, Z., Wan, T., Dong, Y., & Du, Y. (2015). Evolutionary collective behavior decomposition model for time series data mining. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 26, 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.09.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. S., Mahmud, M. A., Than Oo, A., & Pota, H. (2017, April). Multi-agent approach for enhancing security of protection schemes in cyber-physical energy systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(2), 436–447. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2016.2612645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, A. S., & Georgeff, M. P. (1995, 12–14 June). BDI agents: From theory to practice. In V. Lesser & L. Gasser (Eds.), Proceedings of the first international conference on multiagent systems (ICMAS’95) (pp. 312–319). San Francisco, CA: AAAI Press/MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Recamonde-Mendoza, M., & Bazzan, A. L. (2016). Social choice in distributed classification tasks: Dealing with vertically partitioned data. Information Sciences, 332, 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, D., Bilgin, A., & Ranjbartabar, H. (2018). Users’ perceptions of empathic dialogue cues: A data-driven approach to provide tailored empathy. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on intelligent virtual agents, IVA 2018, Sydney, Australia (p. 35–42).
   Google Scholar
• Ropero, J., Gomez, A., Carrasco, A., & Leon, C. A fuzzy logic intelligent agent for information extraction: Introducing a new fuzzy logic-based term weighting scheme. (2012). Expert Systems with Applications, 39(4), 4567–4581. MAR. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosé, C. P., & Ferschke, O. (2016). Technology support for discussion based learning: From computer supported collaborative learning to the future of massive open online courses. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 660–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0107-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousset, A., Herrmann, B., Lang, C., & Philippe, L. (2016, November). A survey on parallel and distributed multi-agent systems for high performance computing simulations. Computer Science Review, 22, 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2016.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samper Zapater, J. J., Llido Escriva, D. M., Soriano Garcia, F. R., & Martinez Dura, J. J. (2015). Semantic web service discovery system for road traffic information services. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(8), 3833–3842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Pedro, M. O. C. Z., Baker, R. S. J. D., & Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2011). Detecting carelessness through contextual estimation of slip probabilities among students using an intelligent tutor for mathematics. I In: Biswas G., Bull S., Kay J., Mitrovic A. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (Vol. 6738 pp. 304–311). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_40
   Google Scholar
• Shan, M., Worrall, S., Masson, F. R., & Nebot, E. M. (2014). Using delayed observations for long-term vehicle tracking in large environments. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(3), 967–981. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2013.2292934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehory, O., & Sturm, A. (2014). Agent-oriented software engineering: Revisiting the state of the art. In O. Shehory & A. Sturm (Eds.), Agent-oriented software engineering (pp. 13–26). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Sherief, A. (2017). Mining dynamics: Using data mining techniques to analyze multi-agent learning. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 26(4), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2016-0136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoham, Y., & Leyton-Brown, K. (2008). Multiagent systems: Algorithmic, game-theoretic, and logical foundations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silla Jr., C., & Freitas, A. (2011). A survey of hierarchical classification across different application domains. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 22(1–2), 31–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-010-0175-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreeja, N., & Sankar, A. (2016). A hierarchical heterogeneous ant colony optimization based approach for efficient action rule mining. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 29, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2016.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Symeonidis, A. L., Chatzidimitriou, K. C., Athanasiadis, I. N., & Mitkas, P. A. (2007). Data mining for agent reasoning: A synergy for training intelligent agents. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 20(8), 1097–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2007.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangod, K., & Kulkarni, G. (2020). Secure communication through multiagent system-based diabetes diagnosing and classification. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 29(1), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2017-0353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanudas, B., Sreelal, S., Cyril Raj, V., Purnesh Sairam, A., Gajmoti, V., & Joshi, P. (2019). A novel architecture for an integrated enterprise network security system. International Journal of Security and Networks, 14(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSN.2019.098919
   Google Scholar
• Tounsi, Y., Anoun, H., & Hassouni, L. (2020). CSMAS: Improving multi-agent credit scoring system by integrating big data and the new generation of gradient boosting algorithms. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on networking, information systems & security. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Uschold, M., & Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2), 93–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888900007797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidhya, K. A., & Geetha, T. V. (2017). Rough set theory for document clustering: A review. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 32(3), 2165–2185. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-162006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vimala, S., Khanaa, V., & Nalini, C. (2019). A study on supervised machine learning algorithm to improvise intrusion detection systems for mobile ad hoc networks. Cluster Computing, 22(S2), 4065–4074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2686-x
   Google Scholar
• Wieringa, R., Maiden, N., Mead, N., & Rolland, C. (2005, December). Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: A proposal and a discussion. Requirements Engineering, 11(1), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-005-0021-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, M. (2009). An introduction to multiagent systems (2nd edition ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, J., Tekin, C., Zhang, S., & van der Schaar, M. (2015). Distributed multi-agent online learning based on global feedback. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 63(9), 2225–2238. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2015.2403288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, J., & Jarvis, S. (2018). Mining association rules for admission control and service differentiation in e-commerce applications. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 8(3), e1241. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakopcic, C., Rahman, N., Atahary, T., Taha, T., Beigh, A., & Douglass, S. (2019). High speed cognitive domain ontologies for asset allocation using loihi spiking neurons. In Proceedings of the international joint conference on neural networks, Budapest, Hungary (Vol. 2019- July).
   Google Scholar
• Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N. R., & Wooldridge, M. (2003). Developing multiagent systems: The gaia methodology. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 12(3), 317–370. https://doi.org/10.1145/958961.958963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamzami, N., & Schiffauerova, A. (2017, June). The impact of individual collaborative activities on knowledge creation and transmission. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1385–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2350-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, Z.-H., Zhang, J., Li, Y., & Chung, -H.-H. (2009). Adaptive particle swarm optimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 39(6), 1362–1381. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2009.2015956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, T.-Y., Zang, Y.-C., Zhu, J.-H., & Wang, Q.-X. (2019). Nig-ap: A new method for automated penetration testing. Frontiers of Information Technology and Electronic Engineering, 20(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1800532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, A. (2020). Method evaluation, parameterization, and result validation in unsupervised data mining: A critical survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(2), e1330. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar