Raising the Bar for Theories of Categorisation and Concept Learning: The Need to Resolve Five Basic Paradigmatic Tensions

References

• Aiken, H. H. (1951). The Staff of the Computation Laboratory at Harvard University. In Synthesis of electronic computing and control circuits. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, 98(3), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.3.409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2005). Human category learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby, F. G., & O’Brien, J. B. (2007). The effects of positive versus negative feedback on information-integration category learning. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(6), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193923
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ashby, F. G., Queller, S., & Berretty, P. M. (1999). On the dominance of unidimensional rules in unsupervised categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(6), 1178–1199. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207622
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beaucousin, V., Cassotti, M., Simon, G., Pineau, A., Kostova, M., Houdé, O., & Poirel, N. (2011). ERP evidence of a meaningfulness impact on visual global/local processing: When meaning captures attention. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 1258–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1986). The hands and feet of genius. Educational Leadership, 43, 70–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunden, A. G., Wang, T., Griffiths, D. W., & Little, D. R. (2015). Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: Individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordage, G., & Zacks, R. (1984). The structure of medical knowledge in the memories of medical students and general practitioners: Categories and prototypes. Medical Education, 18(6), 406–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1984.tb01295.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, L. E. (1970). Knowing and using concepts. Psychological Review, 77(6), 546–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A Study of Thinking. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(2), 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80069-1
   Google Scholar
• Colreavy, E., & Lewandowsky, S. (2008). Strategy development and learning differences in supervised and unsupervised categorization. Memory & Cognition, 36(4), 762–775. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.4.762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conant, M. B., & Trabasso, T. (1964). Conjunctive and disjunctive concept formation under equal-information conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(3), 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043068
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delaney, P. F., Reder, L. M., Staszewski, J. J., & Ritter, F. E. (1998). The strategy specific nature of improvement: The power law applies by strategy within task. Psychological Science, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doan, C. A. (2018). Connecting unsupervised and supervised categorization behavior from a parainformative perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio University.
   Google Scholar
• Doan, C. A., & Vigo, R. (2016). Constructing and deconstructing concepts: On the nature of category modification and one-dimensional sorting behavior. Experimental Psychology, 63(5), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donkin, C., Newell, B. R., Kalish, M., Dunn, J. C., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2015). Identifying strategy use in category learning tasks: A case for more diagnostic data and models. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 933–948. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, K. M., & Johnston, J. M. (1996). Overlearning, fluency, and automaticity. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393171
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ell, S. W., & Ashby, G. F. (2012). The impact of category separation on unsupervised categorization. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74(2), 466–475. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0238-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ell, S. W., Ashby, G. F., & Hutchinson, S. (2012). Unsupervised category learning with integral-dimension stimuli. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(8), 1537–1562. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.658821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, J. (2000). Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning. Nature, 407(6804), 630–633. https://doi.org/10.1038/35036586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, J. (2003). A catalog of Boolean concepts. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2496(02)00025-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, J. (2006). An algebra of human concept learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50(4), 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2006.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, W. R. (1974). The Processing of Information and Structure. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, W. R., & Felfoldy, G. L. (1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing. Cognitive Psychology, 1(3), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(70)90016-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., & Bub, D. (Eds.). (2010). Perceptual expertise: Bridging Brain and Behavior. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, G. P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2011). Mental models of Boolean concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 63(1), 34–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, G. P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2013). The acquisition of Boolean concepts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(3), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, O., Hayes, B. K., & Newell, B. R. (2012). Feature-based versus category-based induction with uncertain categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 576–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (2003). On the staying power of defenders, analyzers, and prospectors. The Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), 115–118. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2003.11851883
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, J. A., Estes, Z., & Simmons, C. L. (2005). Comparison and contrast in perceptual categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1459–1476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handel, S., & Imai, S. (1972). The free classification of analyzable and unanalyzable stimuli. Perception & Pyschophysics, 12(1), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212854
   Google Scholar
• Haygood, R. C., & Bourne, L. E. (1965). Attribute and rule-learning aspects of conceptual behavior. Psychological Review, 72(3), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heathcote, A., Brown, S., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2000). The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(2), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hélie, S., Waldschmidt, J. G., & Ashby, F. G. (2010). Automaticity in rule-based and information-integration categorization. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(4), 1013–1031. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.4.1013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J. E. (1980). Interaction between global and local levels of a form. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 6(2), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.6.2.222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner, R. (1997). The effect of spatial frequency on global precedence and hemispheric differences. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 59(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211888
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes, H. C., Layton, W. M., Baird, J. C., & Lester, L. S. (1984). Global precedence in visual pattern recognition. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 35(4), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206340
   Google Scholar
• Imai, S., & Garner, W. R. (1965). Discriminability and preference for attributes in free and constrained classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(6), 596–608. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021980
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, K. E., & Mervis, C. B. (1997). Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 126(3), 248–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.3.248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M., Love, B. C., & Maddox, W. T. (2006). Recency effects as a window to generalization: Separating decisional and perceptual sequential effects in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(3), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.316
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joyce, C. A., & Cottrell, G. W. (2004). Solving the visual expertise mystery. In H. Bowman & C. Labiouse. (Eds.), Connectionist Models of Cognition and Perception II (pp. 127-136), Eighth Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop. World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, C. (2012). Exploring the conceptual universe. Psychological Review, 119(4), 685–722. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimchi, R. (1998). Uniform connectedness and grouping in the perceptual organization of hierarchical patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 24(4), 1105–1118. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.24.4.1105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinchla, R. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (1979). The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out.”. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 25(3), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, K. J. (2007). The divergent autoencoder (DIVA) model of category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(4), 560–576. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, K. J., Levering, K. R., Stanton, R. D., Romero, J., & Morris, S. N. (2012). Human learning of elemental category structures: Revisiting the classic result of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961). Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 56(2), 552–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029178
   Google Scholar
• Lagasse, L. L. (1993). Effects of good form and spatial frequency on global precedence. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 53(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211718
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. R., Nosofsky, R. M., Donkin, C., & Denton, S. E. (2013). Logical rules and the classification of integral-dimension stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 801–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, B. C. (2002). Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 829–835. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, B. C., Medin, D. L., & Gureckis, T. M. (2004). SUSTAIN: A network model of category learning. Psychological Review, 111(2), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, M. L., Wong, A. C. N., Gauthier, I., Tanaka, J. W., & Palmeri, T. J. (2007). Unraveling the time-course of perceptual categorization: Does fastest mean first. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1243-1248), 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Nashville, TN: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1993). Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization behavior. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211715
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maddox, W. T., Ashby, F. G., & Bohil, C. J. (2003). Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(4), 650–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. (1979). Local and global processing: The role of sparsity. Memory & Cognition, 7(6), 476–484. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85(3), 207–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., Wattenmaker, W. D., & Hampson, S. E. (1987). Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction. Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 242–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(87)90012-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton, F., & Wills, A. J. (2004). The influence of stimulus properties on category construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton, F., Longmore, C.A., & Wills, A. J. (2008). Processes of overall similarity sorting in free classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 34(3), 676–692. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L., & Ross, B. H. (1994). Predictions from uncertain categorizations. Cognitive Psychology, 27(2), 148–193. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1994.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L., & Ross, B. H. (2010a). Category vs. object knowledge in category-based induction. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L., & Ross, B. H. (2010b). Uncertainty in category-based induction: When do people integrate across categories? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(2), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, D. (1981). The forest revisited: More on global precedence. Psychological Research, 43(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, D., & Norman, J. (1983). Does global precedence reality depend on visual angle? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 9(6), 955–965. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.9.6.955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In Anderson, J.R. (Ed.), Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition (pp. 1–55). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(1), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.10.1.104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 115(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.13.1.87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M., Gluck, M. A., Palmeri, T. J., McKinley, S. C., & Glauthier, P. (1994). Comparing models of rule-based classification learning: A replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961). Memory & Cognition, 22(3), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1996). Learning to classify integral-dimension stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(2), 222–226. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104(2), 266. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M., & Zaki, S. R. (2002). Exemplar and prototype models revisted: Response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(5), 924–940. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.28.5.924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmeri, T. J. (1999). Theories of automaticity and the power law of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(2), 543–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmeri, T. J., & Cottrell, G. W. (2010). Modeling perceptual expertise. In I. Gauthier, M. J. Tarr, & D. Bub (Eds.), Oxford series in visual cognition. Perceptual expertise: Bridging brain and behavior (p. 197–244). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, C., Hayes, B. K., & Newell, B. R. (2011). Noncategorical approaches to feature prediction with uncertain categories. Memory & Cognition, 39(2), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0009-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pape, A. D., Kurtz, K. J., & Sayama, H. (2015). Complexity measures and concept learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 64-65, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Paquet, L., & Merikle, P. M. (1984). Global precedence: The effect of exposure duration. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025953
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pothos, E. M., & Chater, N. (2002). A simplicity principle in unsupervised human categorization. Cognitive Science, 26(3), 303–343. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2603_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pothos, E. M., & Chater, N. (2005). Unsupervised categorization and category learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(4), 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pothos, E. M., & Close, J. (2008). One or two dimensions in spontaneous classification: A simplicity approach. Cognition, 107(2), 581–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pothos, E. M., Edwards, D. J., & Perlman, A. (2011). Supervised versus unsupervised categorization: Two sides of the same coin? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(9), 1692–1713. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.554990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quillian, M. R. (1969). The teachable language comprehender: A simulation program and theory of language. Communications of the ACM, 12(8), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1145/363196.363214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regehr, G., & Brooks, L. R. (1995). Category organization in free classification: The organizing effect of an array of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehder, B., & Hoffman, A. B. (2005a). Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning. Cognitive Psychology, 51(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehder, B., & Hoffman, A. B. (2005b). Thirty-something categorization results explained: Selective attention, eyetracking, and models of category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(5), 811–829. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickard, T. C. (1999). A CMPL alternative account of practice effects in numerosity judgment tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(2), 532–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeder, J. L., & Ashby, F. G. (2016). What is automatized during perceptual categorization? Cognition, 154, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E., Simpson, C., & Miller, R. S. (1976). Structural bases of typicality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 2(4), 491-502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.2.4.491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N., Hovland, C. I., & Jenkins, H. M. (1961). Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 75(13), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093825
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, R. R. (1999). Neuropsychological substrates of category learning (UMI No. AEH9932480). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 60(5–B), 2381.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. D., & Minda, J. P. (2002). Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in category learning. Journal of Experiental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 800–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Taylor, M. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 457–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(91)90016-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, M. H., Joyce, C. A., & Cottrell, G. W. (2008). Why is the fusiform face area recruited for novel categories of expertise? A neurocomputational investigation. Brain Research, 1202, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeemen, T., Vanoverberghe, V., Storms, G., & Ruts, W. (2001). The role of contrast categories in natural language concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 618–643. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigo, R. (2009). Categorical invariance and structural complexity in human concept learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53(4), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2009.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigo, R. (2013). The GIST of concepts. Cognition, 129(1), 138–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigo, R. (2016). Mathematical principles of human conceptual behavior: The structural nature of conceptual representation and processing (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vigo, R., Doan, K. M., Doan, C. A., & Pinegar, S. (2018). On the learning difficulty of visual and auditory modal concepts: Evidence for a single processing system. Cognitive Processing, 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0840-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigo, R., Evans, S. W., & Owens, J. S. (2015). Categorization behaviour in adults, adolescents, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder adolescents: A comparative investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(6), 1058–1072. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.974625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigo, R., Zeigler, D. E., & Halsey, P. A. (2013). Gaze and informativeness during category learning: Evidence for an inverse relation. Visual Cognition, 21(4), 446–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.800931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedell, D. H. (1995). Contrast effects in paired comparisons: Evidence for both stimulus-based and response-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 21(5), 1158–1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.5.1158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinbach, N., & Henik, A. (2011). Phasic alertness can modulate executive control by enhancing global processing of visual stimuli. Cognition, 121(3), 454–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaki, S. R., Nosofsky, R. M., Jessup, N. M., & Unverzagt, F. W. (2003). Categorization and recognition performance of a memory-impaired group: Evidence for single-system models. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9(3), 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617703930050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeigler, D. E., & Vigo, R. (2018). Classification errors and response times over multiple distributed sessions as a function of category structure. Memory & Cognition, 46(7), 1041–1057. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0820-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zotov, V., Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2010). Contrast and assimilation in categorization and exemplar production. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73(2), 621–639. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0036-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar