Organising lexica into analogical grids: a study of a holistic approach for morphological generation under various sizes of data in various languages

References

• Aharoni, R., Johnson, M., & Firat, O. (2019, June). Massively multilingual neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) (pp. 3874–3884). Minneapolis, Minnesota: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N19-1388
   Google Scholar
• Ahlberg, M., Forsberg, M., & Hulden, M. (2015, May–June). Paradigm classification in supervised learning of morphology. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (pp. 1024–1029). Denver, Colorado: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N15-1107
   Google Scholar
• Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2015). Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations (ICLR-15). San Diego: arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0473
   Google Scholar
• Beesley, K. R. (1998, August). Consonant spreading in Arabic stems. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL’98, Montréal. (Vol. I) Association for Computational Linguistics. (pp. 117–123). http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P98-1018
   Google Scholar
• Bentz, C., Ruzsics, T., Koplenig, A., & Samardžić, T. (2016, December). A comparison between morphological complexity measures: Typological data vs. language corpora. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Linguistic Complexity (CL4LC) (pp. 142–153). Osaka, Japan: The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W16-4117
   Google Scholar
• Bergmanis, T., Kann, K., Schütze, H., & Goldwater, S. (2017, August). Training data augmentation for low-resource morphological inflection. In Proceedings of the CoNLL SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflection (pp. 31–39). Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/K17-2002
   Google Scholar
• Chan, E. (2008). Structures and distributions in morphology learning. [Doctoral dissertation], University of Pennsylvania. http://nlp.cs.swarthmore.edu/~richardw/papers/chan2008-structures.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014, October). Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder–decoder for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-2014) (pp. 1724–1734). Doha, Qatar: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D14-1179
   Google Scholar
• Dryer, M., & Eisner, J. (2011). Discovering morphological paradigms from plain text using a Dirichlet process mixture model. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-2011) (pp. 616–627). Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.cs.jhu.edu/~jason/papers/dreyer+eisner.emnlp11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fam, R., & Lepage, Y. (2016). Morphological predictability of unseen words using computational analogy. In Proceedings of the Computational Analogy Workshop at the 24th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR-CA-2016) (pp. 51–60). Atlanta, Georgia: CEUR-WS.org.
   Google Scholar
• Fam, R., & Lepage, Y. (2017, November). A holistic approach at a morphological inflection task. In Proceedings of the 8th Language and Technology Conference (LTC-2017) (pp. 88–92). Poznań, Poland: Fundacja uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.
   Google Scholar
• Ganter, B., & Wille, R. (1999). Formal concept analysis: Mathematical foundations. SpringerVerlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gil, D. (2002). From repetition to reduplication in Riau Indonesian. In Graz reduplication conference (p.s: 2).
   Google Scholar
• Hathout, N. (2008, August). Acquistion of the morphological structure of the lexicon based on lexical similarity and formal analogy. In Proceedings of the 3rd Textgraphs Workshop on Graph-based Algorithms for Natural Language Processing (pp. 1–8). Manchester, UK: Coling 2008 Organizing Committee. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W08-2001
   Google Scholar
• Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine, A., & Callison-Burch, C. (2014, June). Hallucinating phrase translations for low resource MT. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (pp. 160–170). Ann Arbor, Michigan: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W14-1617
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., Schuster, M., Le, Q. V., Krikun, M., Wu, Y., Chen, Z., Thorat, N., Viégas, F., Wattenberg, M., Corrado, G., Hughes, M., & Dean, J. (2017). Google’s multilingual neural machine translation system: Enabling zero-shot translation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5, 339–351. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/Q17-1024
   Google Scholar
• Kann, K., & Schütze, H. (2016, August). Med: The LMU system for the SIGMORPHON 2016 shared task on morphological reinflection. In Proceedings of the 2016 Meeting of SIGMORPHON. Berlin, Germany: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Kann, K., & Schütze, H. (2017, August). The LMU system for the CoNLL-SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task on universal morphological reinflection. In Proceedings of the CoNLL SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflection (pp. 40–48). Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/K17-2003
   Google Scholar
• Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations (ICLR-2015). San Diego: arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980
   Google Scholar
• Kirov, C., Cotterell, R., Sylak-Glassman, J., Walther, G., Vylomova, E., Xia, P., Faruqui, M., Mielke, S. J., McCarthy, A., Kübler, S., Yarowsky, D., Eisner, J., & Hulden, M. (2018, May 7-12). UniMorph 2.0: Universal Morphology. In N. C. C. Chair et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2018). Miyazaki, Japan: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
   Google Scholar
• Kuroda, K. (2016). How are inflectional paradigms represented (in the mind)? Formal concept analysis meets Czech declensional paradigms. In Proceedings of the 22th Annual Conference of the Japanese Association for Natural Language Processing (pp. 849–852). Sendai, Japan: The Association for Natural Language Processing.
   Google Scholar
• Langlais, P., & Yvon, F. (2008). Scaling up Analogical Learning. In Coling 2008: Companion volume: Posters Manchester, UK (pp. 51–54. Coling 2008 Organizing Committee. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C08-2013
   Google Scholar
• Lepage, Y. (1998). Solving analogies on words: An algorithm. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational linguistics (COLING-1998) (Vol. 1, pp. 728–734).
   Google Scholar
• Lepage, Y. (2014). Analogies between binary images: Application to Chinese characters. In H. Prade & G. Richard, Eds. Computational approaches to analogical reasoning: Current trends (pp. 25–57). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54516-0_2.
   Google Scholar
• Levenshtein, V. (1966, February). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics-doklady, 10(8), 707–710.
   Google Scholar
• Luong, T., Pham, H., & Manning, C. D. (2015, September). Effective approaches to attention based neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-2015) (pp. 1412–1421). Lisbon, Portugal: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://aclweb.org/anthology/D15-1166
   Google Scholar
• Makarov, P., Ruzsics, T., & Clematide, S. (2017, August). Align and copy: UZH at SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task for morphological reinflection. In Proceedings of the CoNLL SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflection (pp. 49–57). Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/K17-2004
   Google Scholar
• Mansion, J. E. (1981). Harrap’s new shorter French and English dictionary. George G. Harrap Co. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Neubig, G., & Hu, J. (2018, October-November). Rapid adaptation of neural machine translation to new languages. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-2018) (pp. 875–880). Brussels, Belgium: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D18-1103
   Google Scholar
• Neuvel, S., & Singh, R. (2001). Vive la différence ! What morphology is about. Folia Linguistica, 35(3–4), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2001.35.3–4.313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuvel, S., & Fulop, S. A. (2002, July). Unsupervised learning of morphology without morphemes. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Morphological and Phonological Learning (pp. 31–40). Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W02-0604
   Google Scholar
• Nicolai, G., Hauer, B., Motallebi, M., Najafi, S., & Kondrak, G. (2017, August). If you can’t beat them, join them: The University of Alberta system description. In Proceedings of the CoNLL SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflection (pp. 79–84). Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/K17-2008
   Google Scholar
• Salimans, T., & Kingma, D. P. 2016. Weight normalization: A simple reparameterization to accelerate training of deep neural networks. In D. D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, U. V. Luxburg, I. Guyon, & R. Garnett, Eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29 901–909. Curran Associates, Inc. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/6114-weight-normalization-a-simple-reparameterization-to-accelerate-training-of-deep-neural-networks.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Silfverberg, M., Wiemerslage, A., Liu, L., & Mao, L. J. (2017, August). Data augmentation for morphological reinflection. In Proceedings of the CoNLL SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflection (pp. 90–99). Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/K17-2010
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R. (Ed.). (2000). The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics-200. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R., & Ford, A. (2000). In praise of Sakatayana: Some remarks on whole word morphology. In R. Singh (Ed.), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics-2000 Sage (pp. 303–310).
   Google Scholar
• Stroppa, N., & Yvon, F. (2005, June). An analogical learner for morphological analysis. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL– 2005) (pp. 120–127). Ann Arbor, Michigan: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W05/W05-0616
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. A., & Fischer, M. J. (1974, January). The string-to-string correction problem. Journal of the Association of Computing Machinery, 21(1), 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1145/321796.321811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintner, S. (2014). Natural language processing of semitic languages. I. Zitouni (Ed.), Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45358-8_2
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C. (2016). The price of linguistic productivity: How children learn to break the rules of language. The MIT Press. https://www.universitypressscholarship.com/10.7551/mitpress/9780262035323.001.0001/upso-9780262035323
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., & Neubig, G. (2017). Morphological inflection generation with multispace variational encoder-decoders. In Proceedings of the CoNLL SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflection (pp. 58–65). Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/K17-2005
   Google Scholar
• Zoph, B., Yuret, D., May, J., & Knight, K. (2016, November). Transfer learning for low resource neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-2016) (pp. 1568–1575). Austin, Texas: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D16-1163
   Google Scholar