Australia's regional innovation systems: inter-industry interaction in innovative activities in three Australian territories

References

• Andersen E. (2010[1992]) Approaching National Systems of Innovation from the Production and Linkage Structure. In: B.-A. Lundvall (ed.) National Innovation Systems: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London, Anthem Press, 71–96.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow K.J. (1962) The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155–173. doi: 10.2307/2295952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim B.T. and Coenen L. (2005) Knowledge Bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters. Research Policy, 34, 1173–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim B. and Gertler M. (2005) The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems. In: J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery and R. Nelson (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 291–317.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim B.T. and Isaksen A. (1997) Location, Agglomeration and Innovation: Towards Regional Innovation Systems in Norway? European Planning Studies, 5, 299–330. doi: 10.1080/09654319708720402
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008) ANZSIC06, Correspondence Tables 2006. Cat. No. 1292.0.55.005.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (2010) Research and Experimental Development: All Sector Summary, Australia, 2008–09. Cat. No. 8112.0.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013a) Research and Experimental Development: Businesses, Australia, 2011–12. Cat. No. 8104.0.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013b) Employed Persons by Industry Group (ANZSIC06), Sex, State, Status in Employment, Customised Report.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (2014a) Australian National Accounts: State Accounts, 2012–13. Cat. No. 5220.0.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (2014b) Australian System of National Accounts, Concepts, Sources and Methods. Cat. No. 5216.0.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (2015) Australian National Accounts: Input-Output Tables, 2009–10. Cat. No. 5209.0.55.001.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government Department of Industry and Science (2010) Australian Innovation System Report 2010. http://www.industry.gov.au/Office-of-the-Chief-Economist/Publications/Pages/Australian-Innovation-System.aspx#, accessed 2015/08/06.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government, Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research (2011) Focusing Australia's Publicly Funded Research Review, The States and Territories in Australia's Research System: Their Roles and Intersection with the Commonwealth: Appendix B. http://www.industry.gov.au/research/Documents/AppendixB-StatesAndTerritories-ResearchStrategiesAndPriorities.pdf, accessed 2015/08/06.
   Google Scholar
• Autio E. (1998) Evaluation of RTD in Regional Systems of Innovation. European Planning Studies, 6, 131–140. doi: 10.1080/09654319808720451
   Google Scholar
• Becattini G. 2004[1989] Industrial Districts: A New Approach to Industrial Change. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti S.P. (2005) Centrality and Network Flow. Social Networks, 27, 55–71. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brachert M., Brautzsch H.-U. and Titze M. (2016) Mapping Potentials for Input-Output-Based Innovation Flows in Industrial Clusters – An Application to Germany. Economic Systems Research, 28, 450–466. doi: 10.1080/09535314.2016.1244517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellacci F. (2008) Technological Paradigms, Regimes and Trajectories: Manufacturing and Service Industries in a New Taxonomy of Sectoral Patterns of Innovation. Research Policy, 37, 978–994. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke P. (1992) Regional Innovation Systems: Competitive Regulation in the New Europe. Geoforum, 23, 365–382. doi: 10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke P. (2001) Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 945–974. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.945
   Google Scholar
• Cooke P. (2005) Regionally Asymmetric Knowledge Capabilities and Open Innovation: Exploring ‘Globalisation 2’ – A New Model of Industry Organisation. Research Policy, 34, 1128–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke P., Gomez Uranga M. and Etxebarria G. (1997) Regional Innovation Systems: Institutional and Organisational Dimensions. Research Policy, 26, 475–491. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Mothe J. and Paquet G. (eds.) (1998) Local and Regional Systems of Innovation. New York, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• DeBresson C. (1996) Why Innovative Activities Cluster. In: C. DeBresson (ed.) Economic Interdependence and Innovative Activity. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Doloreux D. and Parto S. (2004) Regional Innovation Systems: A Critical Synthesis. The United Nations University, UNU-INTECH Discussion Papers. http://www.intech.unu.edu/publications/discussion-papers/2004-17.pdf, accessed 2015/08/06.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist C. (2012[1997]) Introduction. In: C. Edquist (ed.) Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London, Routledge, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg J., Mowery D.C. and Verspagen B. (2008) Innovation-systems, Path-dependency and Policy: The Co-evolution of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy and Industrial Structure in a Small, Resource-based Economy. DIME Working paper 2008, http://www.dime-eu.org/files/active/0/FagMowVer.pdf, accessed at 2017/01/30.
   Google Scholar
• Fagiolo G. (2007) Clustering in Complex Directed Networks. Physical Review E, 76, 026107. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.026107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida R. (1995) Toward the Learning Region. Futures, 27, 527–536. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(95)00021-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman L.C. (1978–1979) Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory R. (1993) The Australian Innovation System. In: R. Nelson (ed.) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 324–352.
   Google Scholar
• Harary F., Norman R. and Cartwright D. (1965) Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan S., Bucifal S., Drake P. and Hendrickson L. (2015) Australian Geography of Innovative Entrepreneurship. Research Paper 3/2015. Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Office of the Chief Economist, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Hauknes J. and Knell M. (2009) Embodied Knowledge and Sectoral Linkages: An Input-Output Approach to the Interaction of High- and Low-Tech Industries. Research Policy, 38, 459–469. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman A. (1958) The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howells J. (1999) Regional Systems of Innovation? In: D. Archibugi, J. Howells and J. Michie (eds.) Innovation Policy in a Global Economy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 67–93.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs J. (1969) The Economy of Cities. New York, Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Junius T. and Oosterhaven J. (2003) The Solution of Updating or Regionalizing a Matrix with Both Positive and Negative Entries. Economic Systems Research, 15, 87–96. doi: 10.1080/0953531032000056954
   Google Scholar
• Kalmbach P. and Kurz H. (1985) Internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und Technologieintensität: Eine Anwendung des Subsystem-Ansatzes. IFO-Studien Zeitschrift für empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, 31, 149–168.
   Google Scholar
• Leoncini R. and Montresor S. (2000) Network Analysis of Eight Technological Systems. International Review of Applied Economics, 14, 213–234. doi: 10.1080/02692170050024750
   Google Scholar
• Leoncini R. and Montresor S. (2003) Technological Systems and Intersectoral Innovation Flows. Cheltenham, Edgward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leoncini R., Maggioni M.A. and Montresor S. (1996) Intersectoral Innovation Flows and National Technological Systems: Network Analysis for Comparing Italy and Germany. Research Policy, 25, 415–430. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00843-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maillat D. (1995) Territorial Dynamic, Innovative Milieus and Regional Policy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, 7, 157–165. doi: 10.1080/08985629500000010
   Google Scholar
• Marengo L. and Sterlacchini A. (1990) Intersectoral Technology Flows: Methodological Aspects and Empirical Applications. Metroeconomica, 41, 19–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-999X.1990.tb00455.x
   Google Scholar
• Miller R. and Blair P. (2009) Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, 2nd ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Momigliano F. and Siniscalco D. (1982) Note in Tema di Terziarizzazione e Deindustrializzazione. Moneta e Credito, 35, 143–181.
   Google Scholar
• Montresor S. and Vittucci Marzetti G. (2008) Innovation Clusters in Technological Systems: A Network Analysis of 15 OECD Countries for the Middle '90s. Industry and Innovation, 15, 321–346. doi: 10.1080/13662710802041679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montresor S. and Vittucci Marzetti G. (2009) Applying Social Network Analysis to Input-Output Based Innovation Matrices: An Illustrative Application to Six OECD Technological Systems for the Middle 1990s. Economic Systems Research, 21, 129–149. doi: 10.1080/09535310902940228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan K. (1997) The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal. Regional Studies, 31, 491–503. doi: 10.1080/00343409750132289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson R. (ed.) (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman M.E.J. (2004) Analysis of Weighted Networks. Physical Review E, 70, 056131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onnela J.-P., Saramäki J., Kertész J. and Kaski K. (2005) Intensity and Coherence of Motifs in Weighted Complex Networks. Physical Review E, 71, 065103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.065103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaconstantinou G., Sakurai N. and Wyckoff A. (1998) Domestic and International Product-Embodied R&D Diffusion. Research Policy, 27, 301–314. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00044-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt K. (1984) Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–373. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter M. and Stern S. (2002) National Innovative Capacity. The Global Competitiveness Report, (2001/02)/102-118.
   Google Scholar
• Romer P. M. (1986) Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037. doi: 10.1086/261420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone R. (1961) Input-Output and National Accounts. Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Strohmaier R. (2014) Innovations and Economic Change – The Role of General Purpose Technologies, a Methodological and Empirical Analysis. PhD thesis, University of Graz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra E. (2010) What Is Evolutionary about ‘Regional Systems of Innovation’? Implications for Regional Policy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20, 115–137. doi: 10.1007/s00191-009-0135-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar