Consumption and production-based CO₂ pricing policies: macroeconomic trade-offs and carbon leakage

References

• Anthoff, D., S. Rose, R. S. J. Tol and S. Waldhoff (2011) Regional and Sectoral Estimates of the Social Cost of Carbon: An Application of FUND. Economics Discussion Papers, No 2011-18, Kiel Institute for the World Economy. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2011-18
   Google Scholar
• Arto, I., J. M. Rueda-Cantuche and G. P. Peters (2014) Comparing the GTAP-MRIO and WIOD Databases for Carbon Footprint Analysis. Economic Systems Research, 26, 327–353. doi: 10.1080/09535314.2014.939949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attanasio, O. and G. Weber (1995) Is Consumption Growth Consistent with Intertemporal Pptimization? Evidence from the Consumer Expenditure Survey. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 1121–1157. doi: 10.1086/601443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batabyal, A., W. Nordhaus and J. Boyer (2001) Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming. Journal of Range Management, 54, 312–312. doi:10.2307/4003253.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, M., N. Rivers, R. Wigle and H. Yonezawa (2015) Carbon tax and Revenue Recycling: Impacts on Households in British Columbia. Resource and Energy Economics, 41, 40–69. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeters, S. and L. Savard (2013) The Labour Market in Computable General Equilibrium Models, Chapter 26. In: P. Dixon and D. W. Jorgenson (eds.) Handbook of CGE Modeling Vol. 1. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, North Holland (Elsevier), 1645–1718.
   Google Scholar
• Brännlund, R., T. Ghalwash, and J. Nordström (2007) Increased Energy Intensity and the Rebound Effect: Effects on Consumption and Emissions. Energy Economics, 29, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2005.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burniaux, J.-M. and J. Oliveira Martin (2000) Carbon Emission Leakages: A General Equilibrium View, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No 242, OECD Paris, May.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., W. Kang, M. J. Sajid, and M. Cao (2018) Measuring China’s Carbon Emissions Based on Final Consumption. Energy Procedia, 152, 853–862. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.09.190
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, K. and M. Schröder (1991) Demand for Durable and Nondurable Goods, Environmental Policy and Consumer Welfare. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 6, 271–286. doi: 10.1002/jae.3950060305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPB Netherlands & CAPP (2013) Study on the Impacts of Fiscal Devaluation. Taxation Papers 36, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• De Mooji, R. and M. Keen (2012) “Fiscal Devaluation” and Fiscal Consolidation: The VAT in Troubled Times. IMF Working Paper, WP12/85.
   Google Scholar
• Deaton, A. and J. Muellbauer (1980) An Almost Ideal Demand System. American Economic Review, 70, 312–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Maria, C., T.O. Michielsen and E. van der Werf (2013) Carbon Leakage. In: Jason F. Shogren (eds.) Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics. Waltham, Elsevier, 255–259. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-375067-9.00166-2
   Google Scholar
• Dissou, Y. and M.S. Siddiqui (2014) Can Carbon Taxes Be Progressive? Energy Economics, 42, 88–100. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y. and J. Whalley (2009) How Large are the Impacts of Carbon Motivated Border Tax Adjustments. NBER Working Paper Series, 15613. doi:10.3386/w15613
   Google Scholar
• Eichner, T. and R. Pethig (2015) Unilateral Climate Policy with Production-Based and Consumption-Based Carbon Emission Taxes. Environmental and Resource Economics, 61, 141–163. doi: 10.1007/s10640-014-9786-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. and D. Fullerton (2014) Can a Unilateral Carbon Tax Reduce Emissions Elsewhere? Resource and Energy Economics, 36, 6–21. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J., I. Foster, S. Kortum, T. Munson, F. Perez Cervantes, and D. Weisbach (2010) Trade and Carbon Taxes. American Economic Review, 100, 465–469. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.2.465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011) Impact Assessment. A Roadmap for Moving to a Competitive Low Carbon Economy in 2050. Commission Staff Working Document COM (2011) 112.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018) A Clean Planet for All - A European Long-term Strategic Vision for a Prosperous, Modern, Competitive and Climate Neutral Economy. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank, COM(2018) 773, Brussels, November 28.
   Google Scholar
• Farhi, E., G. Gopinath and O. Itskoki (2014) Fiscal Devaluations. Review of Economic Studies, 81, 725–760. doi: 10.1093/restud/rdt036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feehan, J.P. (2018) The Long-run Price Elasticity of Residential Demand for Electricity: Results from a Natural Experiment. Utilities Policy, 51, 12–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2018.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felder, S., and R. Schleiniger (2002) Environmental Tax Reform: Efficiency and Political Feasibility. Ecological Economics, 42, 107–116. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00109-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folmer, K. (2009) Why Do Macro Wage Elasticities Diverge? CPB Memorandum, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpb:memodm:224 (accessed December 10, 2018)
   Google Scholar
• Greening, L.A., D.L. Greene and C. Difiglio (2000) Energy Efficiency and Consumption – the Rebound Effect – a Survey. Energy Policy, 28, 389–401. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00021-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulder, L.H. (1995) Environmental Taxation and the Double Dividend: A Reader’s Guide. International Tax Public Finance, 2, 157–183. doi: 10.1007/BF00877495
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R.E. (1978) Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent-Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Political Economy, 86, 971–987. doi: 10.1086/260724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havranek, T., Z. Irsova and K. Janda (2012) Demand for Gasoline Is More Price-Inelastic Than Commonly Thought. Energy Economics, 34, 201–207. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, Ch. (2006) The Marginal Impact of CO2 from PAGE2002: An Integrated Assessment Model Incorporating the IPCC’s Five Reasons for Concern. Integrated Assessment, 6, 19–56.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchner, M., M. Sommer, C. Kettner-Marx, D. Kletzan-Slamanig, K. Köberl and K. Kratena (2018) CO2 Tax Scenarios for Austria. Impacts on Household Income Groups, CO2 Emissions, and the Economy. WIFO Working Papers, 61.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchner, M., M. Sommer, K. Kratena, D. Kletzan-Slamanig, C. Kettner-Marx (2019) CO2 Taxes, Equity and the Double Dividend – Macroeconomic Model Simulations for Austria. Energy Policy, 126, 295–314. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmann, A. and R. Tichler (2006) Welche Faktoren Beeinflussen den Treibstoffverbrauch in Österreich? Working Paper, 2006, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität, Linz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Kratena, K. (2017) General Equilibrium Analysis. In: T. ten Raa (ed.) Handbook of Input–Output Analysis. Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar, 355–371.
   Google Scholar
• Kratena, K. (2018) Indirect Emissions and Socio-Economic Impacts of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Electricity in Europe, Chapter 2. In: O. De Juán, M. Lenzen, and M.-A. Cadarso, eds., Environmental and Economic Impacts of Decarbonization, Part I. Electricity Generation: Towards a Cleaner Mix. Input–Output Studies on the Consequences of the 2015 Paris Agreement, Oxon, U.K., Routledge, 41–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kratena, K. and G. Streicher (2009) Macroeconomic Input–Output Modelling – Structures, functional Forms and Closure Rules, Working Papers in Input–Output Economics, WPIOX 09-009, unpublished paper presented at the 17th International Input–Output Conference in Sao Paulo, Brazil, Available online from http://iioa.org/conferences/17th/papers/1068331070_090529_153721_WP1_SAOPAOLO.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kratena, K. and G. Streicher (2014) FIDELIO’s ADAGIO: A Family of Regional Econometric Input–Output Models. In: E. Schmidt and S. Vogel (ed.) The Common Agricultural Policy in the 21st Century. Vienna, Universität fur Bodenkultur Wien, pp. 131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Kratena, K., G. Streicher, S. Salotti, M. Sommer, and J. Valderas Jaramillo (2017) FIDELIO 2: Overview and Theoretical Foundations of the Second Version of the Fully Interregional Dynamic Econometric Long-term Input–Output Model for the EU-27, JRC Technical Reports No. JRC105900, EUR 28503 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Kratena, K., G. Streicher, U. Temurshoev, A.F. Amores, I. Arto, I. Mongelli, F. Neuwahl, J.M. Rueda-Cantuche and V. Andreoni (2013) FIDELIO 1: Fully Interregional Dynamic Econometric Long-term Input–Output Model for the EU-27. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports No. EUR 25985 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Labandeira, X., J.M. Labeaga and X. López-Otero (2017) A Meta-Analysis on the Price Elasticity of Energy Demand. Energy Policy, 102, 549–568. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijesen, M.G. (2007) The Real-Time Price Elasticity of Electricity. Energy Economics, 29, 249–258. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2006.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, B. and J. Whalley (2008) Carbon Motivated Tax Adjustments: Old Wine in Green Bottles? NBER Working Paper 14025. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14025.
   Google Scholar
• Luengo-Prado, M.J. (2006) Durables, Nondurables, Down Payments and Consumption Excesses. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53, 1509–1539. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAusland, C. and N. Najjar (2015) Carbon Footprint Taxes. Environmental and Resource Economics, 61, 37–70. doi: 10.1007/s10640-013-9749-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, B. and N. Rivers (2015) British Columbia’s Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax: A Review of the Latest “Grand Experiment” in Environmental Policy. Energy Policy, 86, 674–683. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltsev, S.V. (2001) The Kyoto Protocol: Regional and Sectoral Contributions to the Carbon Leakage. Energy Journal, 22(4), 53–79. doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol22-No4-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinn, H. (2008) Public Policies against Global Warming: A Supply Side Approach. International Tax and Public Finance, 15, 360–394. doi: 10.1007/s10797-008-9082-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer, M. and K. Kratena (2017) The Carbon Footprint of European Households and Income Distribution, Ecological Economics 136, 62–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steininger, K.W., P. Karstensen, G.P. Peters, R. Strohmaier and E. Velázquez (2018) Austria’s Consumption-based Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Identifying Sectoral Sources and Destinations. Global Environmental Change, 48, 226–242. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2013) The Real World of Cost-Benefit Analysis: Thirty-Six Questions (and Almost as Many Answers). Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 13–11. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2199112.
   Google Scholar
• Tol, Richard S. J. (2009) The Economic Effects of Climate Change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(2), 29–51. doi: 10.1257/jep.23.2.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank and Ecofys (2017) Carbon Pricing Watch 2017. World Bank Other Operational Studies, 26565, The World Bank. https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wboper/26565.html
   Google Scholar
• Yamazaki, A. (2017) Jobs and Climate Policy: Evidence From British Columbia’s Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 83, 197–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar