Constructing an open access economy-wide database for bioeconomy impact assessment in the European Union member states

References

• Aguiar, A., Narayanan, B., & McDougall, R. (2016). An overview of the GTAP 9 data base. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 1(1), 181–208. https://doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.010103AF
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aislabie, C., & Gordon, M. (1990). Input-output in Practice: Sector Disaggregation in Regional Input-Output Tables. Economic Systems Research, 2(4), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319000000030
   Google Scholar
• Alcántara, V. (1995). Economía y contaminación atmosférica: hacia un nuevo enfoque desde el análisis input–output [Doctoral thesis]. University of Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Alcántara, V., & Padilla, E. (2003). Key sectors in final energy consumption: an input–"output application to the Spanish case. Energy Policy, 31(15), 1673–1678. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00233-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Martinez, M. T., & López-Cobo, M. (2018). WIOD SAMs adjusted with Eurostat data for the EU-27. Economic Systems Research, 30(4), 521–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2018.1448758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrera-Lozano, M., Mainar-Causapé, A., & Vallés, J. (2015). Disaggregation of sectors in Social Accounting Matrices using a customized Wolsky method. Applied Economics Letters, 22(13), 1020–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2014.995357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, J., Paula, L., Dodd, T., Németh, S., Nanou, C., Mega, V., & Campos, P. (2018). EU ambition to build the world’s leading bioeconomy—Uncertain times demand innovative and sustainable solutions. New Biotechnology, 40, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breisinger, C., Thomas, M., & Thurlow, J. (2009). Social accounting matrices and multiplier analysis. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
   Google Scholar
• Britz, W., & Witzke, P. (2014). CAPRI model documentation. Retrieved October 18, 2017 from http://www.capri-model.org/docs/capri_documentation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Budzinski, M., Bezama, A., & Thrän, D. (2017). Monitoring the progress towards bioeconomy using multi-regional input-output analysis: The example of wood use in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camia, A., Robert, N., Jonsson, R., Pilli, R., García-Condado, S., López-Lozano, R., van der Velde, M., Ronzon, T., Gurría, P., M’Barek, R., Tamosiunas, S., Fiore, G., Araujo, R., Hoepffner, N., Marelli, L., & Giuntoli, J. (2018). Biomass production, supply, uses and flows in the European Union. First results from an integrated assessment. EUR 28993 EN, Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Cardenete, M. A., & Sancho, F. (2006). Missing links in key sector analysis. Economic Systems Research, 18(3), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310600844409
   Google Scholar
• Carus, M., Carrez, D., Kaeb, H., Ravenstijn, J., & Venus, J. (2011). Level Playing Field for Biobased Chemistry and Materials. Nova Institute Policy Paper 2011-07-29, Huerth, Germany, July 2011. Retrieved December 2017, from http://bio-based.eu/download/?did=878&file=0.
   Google Scholar
• Carus, M., & Dammer, L. (2018). The Circular Bioeconomy—Concepts, Opportunities, and Limitations. Industrial Biotechnology, 14(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2018.29121.mca
   Google Scholar
• Dietzenbacher, E. (1992). The measurement of interindustry linkages: Key sectors in the Netherlands. Economic Modelling, 9(4), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-9993(92)90022-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R., Timmer, M., & de Vries, G. (2013).  The construction of World Input–Output Tables in the WIOD Project. Economic Systems Research, 25(1), 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.761180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietzenbacher, E., & van der Linden, J. (1997).  Sectoral and spatial linkages in The EC production structure. Journal of Regional Science, 37(2), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC, European Commission. (2012). Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions, 2012. European Commission, DG Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• EC, European Commission. (2013). Sistema Europeo de Cuentas Nacionales y Regionales de la Unión Europea 2010. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC, European Commission. (2018). A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe : strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. Updated Bioeconomy Strategy, https://doi.org/10.2777/478385
   Google Scholar
• EC, European Commission. (2019a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The European Council, the Council, The European and Economic Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – the European Green Deal, COM/2019/640 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN.
   Google Scholar
• EC, European Commission. (2019b). The Circular Economy Action Plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circulareconomy/pdf/new_circular_economy_action_plan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EC, European Commission. (2019c). The EU agricultural outlook for markets and income 2019-2030. DG Agriculture and Rural Development. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, N., Haddad, S., Börner, J., & Britz, W. (2018). Land use mediated GHG emissions and spillovers from increased bioplastic consumption. Environmental Research Letters, 13(12), 125005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaeafb
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2008a). Eurostat Manual of Supply, Use and Input-Output Tables. Eurostat Methodologies and Working papers. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2008b). NACE Rev.2 Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community, Methodologies and working papers.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2008c). CPA 2008 - Statistical Classification of Products by Activity.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2016a). Non-financial transactions (nasa_10_nf_tr). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/nasa_10_nf_tr_esms.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2016b). Supply, use and Input-output tables (naio_10). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/naio_10_esms.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2016c). Economic Accounts for Agriculture (aact_eaa01). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/aact_esms.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2016d). Labour Force Survey (lfs_egan22d). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Labour_market.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsche, U., & Iriarte, L. (2014). Sustainability Criteria and Indicators for the Bio-Based Economy in Europe: State of Discussion and Way Forward. Energies, 7(11), 6825–6836. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7116825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes-Saguar, P., Mainar-Causapé, A., & Ferrari, E. (2017). The Role of Bioeconomy Sectors and Natural Resources in EU Economies: A Social Accounting Matrix-Based Analysis Approach. Sustainability, 9(12), 2383. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1977). Bioeconomics, a New Look at the Nature of Economic Activity. In L. Junker (Ed.), The Political Economy of Food and Energy (pp. 105–134). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A. (1958). Input-output approach to an allocative system. Economica, 25(97), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/2550694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. (1958). The strategy of economic development. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iraizoz, B. (2006). ¿Es determinante el método en la identificación de los sectores clave de una economía? Una aplicación al caso de las tablas Input-Output de Navarra. Estadística Española, 48, 551–585.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Research Centre (JRC). (2017). Jobs and Turnover in the European Union Bioeconomy. http://datam.jrc.ec.europa.eu/datam/public/pages/datasets.xhtml.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. (1976). The measurement of Hirschmanian linkages. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(2), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, D., Pratt, E., & Warner, M. E. (2007). Role of Services in Regional Economy Growth. Growth and Change, 38(3), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2007.00377.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., Gallego, B., & Wood, R. (2009). Matrix balancing under conflicting information. Economic Systems Research, 21(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310802688661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., Kanemoto, K., Moran, D., & Geschke, A. (2012). Mapping the structure of the world economy. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(15), 8374–8381. https://doi.org/10.1021/es300171x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., Moran, D. D., Geschke, A., & Kanemoto, K. (2014). A non-sign-preserving RAS variant. Economic Systems Research, 26(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2014.897933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K., & Geschke, A. (2013). Building Eora: A Global Multi-regional Input-Output Database at High Country and Sector Resolution. Economic Systems Research, 25(1), 20–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2013.769938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontief, W. (1941). The Structure of American Economy, 1919–1929: An Empirical Application of Equilibrium Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, P., & Pooley, S. (2001). Regional economic impacts of reduction in fisheries production: a supply driven approach”. Marine Resource Economics, 16(4), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.16.4.42629336
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, S., Legault, J., & Guan, D. (2012). Disaggregating input-output models with incomplete information. Economic Systems Research, 24(4), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.689954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M'barek, R., Philippidis, G., Suta, C., Vinyes, C., Caivano, A., Ferrari, E., Ronzon, T., Sanjuan-Lopez, A., & Santini, F. (2014). Observing and analysing the bioeconomy in the EU: Adapting data and tools to new questions and challenges. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 3, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.172417
   Google Scholar
• Mainar-Causapé, A., McDonald, S., & Ferrari, E. (2018). Social accounting matrices: basic aspects and main steps for estimation, JRC Technical Reports EUR 29297 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2760/010600.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, K., & Kautto, N. (2013). The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview. Sustainability, 5(6), 2589–2608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall, R. A. (1999). Entropy Theory and RAS are Friends, GTAP Working Paper, 300, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R., & Blair, P. (2009). Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M., Perez-Dominguez, I., & Gay, S. H. (2009). Construction of social accounting matrices for the EU27 with a Disaggregated agricultural sector (AgroSAM). JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, JRC 53558, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/construction-social-accounting-matrices-eu-27-disaggregated-agricultural-sector-agrosam.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). The Bioeconomy to 2030. Designing a Policy Agenda. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, S. F., Hagens, J. E., Dankbaar, B., & Smits, A. J. M. (2014). Visions of Sustainability in Bioeconomy Research. Sustainability, 6(3), 1222–1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6031222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippidis, G., Sanjuán, A. I., Ferrari, E., & M’barek, R. (2014). Employing social accounting matrix multipliers to profile the bioeconomy in the EU member states: is there a structural pattern? Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(4), 913–926. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014124-6192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippidis, G., & Sanjuán-López, A. I. (2018). A re-examination of the structural diversity of biobased activities and regions across the EU. Sustainability, 10(11), 4325. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyatt, G., & Round, J. (1979). Accounting and fixed-price multipliers in a social accounting matrix framework. The Economic Journal, 89(356), 850–873. https://doi.org/10.2307/2231503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyatt, G., & Round, J. (1985). Social accounting matrices: A basis for planning. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Pyatt, G., & Thorbecke, E. (1976). Planning techniques for a better future. Ginebra, International Labour Office.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, P. (1956). Studies in inter-sectorial Relations. Holanda, North-Holland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S., Cattaneo, A., & El-Said, M. (2001). Updating and estimating a social accounting matrix using cross entropy methods. Economic Systems Research, 13(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310120026247
   Google Scholar
• Ronzon, T., Piotrowski, S., M’Barek, R., & Carus, M. (2017). A systematic approach to understanding and quantifying the EU’s bioeconomy. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 6, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.276283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, S. (1977). Approaches to Identifying Key Sectors Empirically by Means of Input-Output Analysis. Journal of Development Studies, 14(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220387708421663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonis, M., Guilhoto, J. M., Hewings, G. J. D., & Martins, E. B. (1995). Linkages, Key Sectors, and Structural Change: Some New Perspectives. The Developing Economics, 33, 233–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spekreijse, J., Lammens, T., Parisi, C., Ronzon, T., & Vis, M. (2019). Insights into the European market of bio-based chemicals. Analysis based on ten key product categories. EUR 29581 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/549564.
   Google Scholar
• Stadler, K., Wood, R., Bulavskaya, T., Södersten, C.-J., Simas, M., Schmidt, S., Usubiaga, A., Acosta-Fernández, J., Kuenen, J., Bruckner, M., Giljum, S., Lutter, S., Merciai, S., Schmidt, J. H., Theurl, M. C., Plutzar, C., Kastner, T., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K.-H.,…Tukker, A. (2018). EXIOBASE 3: Developing a Time Series of Detailed Environmentally Extended Multi-Regional Input-Output Tables. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22(3), 502–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, R. (1947). Measurement of national income and the construction of social accounts. Ginebra, United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Swinnen, J., & Weersink, A. (2013). Challenges and policy options in the global bio-economy: introduction and overview. Agricultural Economics, 44(4-5), 379–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmer, M., ed. (2012) TheWorld Input–Output Database (WIOD): Contents, Sources and Methods.WIODWorking Paper Number 10. http://www.wiod.org/publications/papers/wiod10.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Temurshoev, U., & Oosterhaven, J. (2010). On Input-Output Linkage Measures. Working Papers in Input-Output Economics, WPIOX, 10-02.
   Google Scholar
• Vallecillo, S., La Notte, A., Kakoulaki, G., Roberts, N., Kamberaj, J., Dottori, F., Feyen, L., Rega, C., & Maes, J. 2019. Ecosystem services accounting. Part II-Pilot accounts for crop and timber provision, global climate regulation and flood control, EUR 29731 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2019, ISBN 978-92-76-02905-2. https://doi.org/10.2760/631588, JRC116334.
   Google Scholar
• Van Berkel, J., & Delahaye, R. (2019). Material Flow Monitor 2016 – Technical Report, CBS, Statistics Netherlands, The Hague, February 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Vis, M., Mantau, U., & Allen, B. (eds.) (2016). CASCADES: Study on the optimised cascading use of wood. No. 394/PP/ENT/RCH/14/7689. Final Report. Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Wenz, L., Willner, S. N., Radebach, A., Bierkandt, R., Steckei, J. C., & Levermann, A. (2015). Regional and sectoral disaggregation of multi-regional input-output tables - a flexible algorithm. Economic Systems Research, 27(2), 194–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2014.987731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The White House USA. (2012). National Bioeconomy Blueprint. The White House. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/national_bioeconomy_blueprint_april_2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wiebe, K., & Lenzen, M. (2016). To RAS or not to RAS? What is the difference in outcomes in multi-regional input-output models? Economic Systems Research, 28(3), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2016.1192528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woltjer, G. B., Kuiper, M. H., & Rutten, M. (2014). The MAGNET Model: Module Description, Manual / LEI. LEI Wageningen UR Report 14-057. The Hague.
   Google Scholar