Advanced search
Publication Cover
Economic Systems Research Volume 35, 2023 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
2,613
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Who will dominate the global fossil fuel trade?

Ershad Ostadzadeha Department of Civil, Geological, and Environmental Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, CanadaCorrespondence[email protected] [email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3604-6644View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Amin Elshorbagya Department of Civil, Geological, and Environmental Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada;b Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada;c International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, AustriaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5740-8029View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Marta Tuninettid Department of Environmental, Land, and Infrastructure Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, ItalyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2619-8783View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Francesco Laiod Department of Environmental, Land, and Infrastructure Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, ItalyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3931-1482View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Ahmed Abdelkadera Department of Civil, Geological, and Environmental Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, CanadaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9953-3680View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 354-375 | Received 09 Sep 2021, Accepted 25 Jan 2023, Published online: 24 Feb 2023

References

  • Abdelkader, A., Elshorbagy, A., Tuninetti, M., Laio, F., Ridolfi, L., Fahmy, H., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2018). National water, food, and trade modeling framework: The case of Egypt. Science of the Total Environment, 639, 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.197
  • Aichele, R., & Felbermayr, G. (2015). Kyoto and carbon leakage: An empirical analysis of the carbon content of bilateral trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00438
  • An, H., Zhong, W., Chen, Y., Li, H., & Gao, X. (2014). Features and evolution of international crude oil trade relationships: A trading-based network analysis. Energy, 74, 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.095
  • Anderson, J. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.
  • Bale, C. S., Varga, L., & Foxon, T. J. (2015). Energy and complexity: New ways forward. Applied Energy, 138, 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.057
  • Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Emmerling, J., Fricko, O., Fujimori, S., Hilaire, J., Eom, J., Krey, V., Kriegler, E., Mouratiadou, I., Sytze de Boer, H., van den Berg, M., Carrara, S., Daioglou, V., Drouet, L., Edmonds, J. E., Gernaat, D., Havlik, P., Johnson, N., … van Vuuren, D. P. (2017). Shared socio-economic pathways of the energy sector–quantifying the narratives. Global Environmental Change, 42, 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006
  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 474–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925976
  • Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), 10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
  • Boyandin, I. (2020). Flowmap visualization tool. Retrieved July 9, 2020, from https://flowmap.blue.
  • BP Statistical Review of World Energy. (2019). 68th edition, June, London, UK.
  • Caliendo, L., & Parro, F. (2015). Estimates of the trade and welfare effects of NAFTA. The Review of Economic Studies, 82(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdu035
  • Calvin, K., Bond-Lamberty, B., Clarke, L., Edmonds, J., Eom, J., Hartin, C., Kim, S., Kyle, P., Link, R., Moss, R., McJeon, H., Patel, P., Smith, S., Waldhoff, S., Wise, M., & McJeon, H. (2017). The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality. Global Environmental Change, 42, 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.010
  • Chen, Z. M., & Chen, G. Q. (2011). An overview of energy consumption of the globalized world economy. Energy Policy, 39(10), 5920–5928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.046
  • Cuaresma, J. C. (2017). Income projections for climate change research: A framework based on human capital dynamics. Global Environmental Change, 42, 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.012
  • Dietzenbacher, E., & Hoekstra, R. (2002). The RAS Structural Decomposition Approach. In G.J.D. Hewings, M. Sonis, & D. Boyce (Eds.), Trade, networks and hierarchies. Advances in spatial science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04786-6_10
  • Distefano, T., Tuninetti, M., Laio, F., & Ridolfi, L. (2020). Tools for reconstructing the bilateral trade network: A critical assessment. Economic Systems Research, 32(3), 378–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2019.1703173
  • Duarte, R., Pinilla, V., & Serrano, A. (2018). Factors driving embodied carbon in international trade: A multiregional input–output gravity model. Economic Systems Research, 30(4), 545–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2018.1450226
  • Dumouchel, W., & O'Brien, F. (1992). Integrating a robust option into a multiple regression computing environment. In A. Buja & P. A. Tukey (Eds.), Computing and graphics in statistics (pp. 41–48).
  • EIA Energy Conversion Calculator. (2020). Retrieved November 15, 2020, from https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/units-and-calculators/energy-conversion-calculators.php.
  • Feng, S., Li, H., Qi, Y., Guan, Q., & Wen, S. (2017). Who will build new trade relations? Finding potential relations in international liquefied natural gas trade. Energy, 141, 1226–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.030
  • Fracasso, A., Nguyen, H. T., & Schiavo, S. (2018). The evolution of oil trade: A complex network approach. Network Science, 6(4), 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2018.6
  • Fricko, O., Havlik, P., Rogelj, J., Klimont, Z., Gusti, M., Johnson, N., Kolp, P., Strubegger, M., Valin, H., Amann, M., Ermolieva, T., Forsell, N., Herrero, M., Heyes, C., Kindermann, G., Krey, V., McCollum, D. L., Obersteiner, M., Pachauri, S., … Riahi, K. (2017). The marker quantification of the shared socioeconomic pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century. Global Environmental Change, 42, 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004
  • Fujimori, S., Hasegawa, T., Masui, T., Takahashi, K., Herran, D. S., Dai, H., Hijioka, Y., & Kainuma, M. (2017). SSP3: AIM implementation of shared socioeconomic pathways. Global Environmental Change, 42, 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009
  • Gao, C., Sun, M., & Shen, B. (2015). Features and evolution of international fossil energy trade relationships: A weighted multilayer network analysis. Applied Energy, 156, 542–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.054
  • Geng, J. B., Ji, Q., & Fan, Y. (2014). A dynamic analysis on global natural gas trade network. Applied Energy, 132, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.064
  • Guilhoto, J., Siroën, J. M., & Yücer, A. (2015). The gravity model, global value chain and the Brazilian states. Dauphine Université Paris, Paris.
  • Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., & Yapo, P. O. (1999). Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:2(135)
  • Holz, F., Richter, P. M., & Egging, R. (2015). A global perspective on the future of natural gas: Resources, trade, and climate constraints. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 9(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/reu016
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA). (2020). Retrieved April 12, 2020, from https://iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/researchPrograms/Energy/SSP_Scenario_Database.htmliiasa.ac.
  • Jackson, R., & Murray, A. (2004). Alternative input–output matrix updating formulations. Economic Systems Research, 16(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953531042000219268
  • Ji, Q., Zhang, H. Y., & Fan, Y. (2014). Identification of global oil trade patterns: An empirical research based on complex network theory. Energy Conversion and Management, 85, 856–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.12.072
  • Keilman, N. (2020). Modelling education and climate change. Nature Sustainability, 3(7), 497–498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0515-8
  • Kriegler, E., Bauer, N., Popp, A., Humpenöder, F., Leimbach, M., Strefler, J., Baumstark, L., Bodirsky, B. L., Hilaire, J., Klein, D., Mouratiadou, I., Weindl, I., Bertram, C., Dietrich, J.-P., Luderer, G., Pehl, M., Pietzcker, R., Piontek, F., Lotze-Campen, H., … Edenhofer, O. (2017). Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): an energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. Global Environmental Change, 42, 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015
  • Kumar, S., Kwon, H. T., Choi, K. H., Cho, J. H., Lim, W., & Moon, I. (2011). Current status and future projections of LNG demand and supplies: A global prospective. Energy Policy, 39(7), 4097–4104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.067
  • Lahr, M., & De Mesnard, L. (2004). Biproportional techniques in input–output analysis: Table updating and structural analysis. Economic Systems Research, 16(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953531042000219259
  • Lu, W., Su, M., Zhang, Y., Yang, Z., Chen, B., & Liu, G. (2014). Assessment of energy security in China based on ecological network analysis: A perspective from the security of crude oil supply. Energy Policy, 74, 406–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.037
  • McDougall, R. A. (1999). Entropy theory and RAS are friends. GTAP Working Papers, 6.
  • Mínguez, R., Oosterhaven, J., & Escobedo, F. (2009). Cell-corrected RAS method (CRAS) for updating or regionalizing an input–output matrix. Journal of Regional Science, 49(2), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2008.00594.x
  • Noguera, G. (2012). Trade costs and gravity for gross and value added trade. Job Market Paper, Columbia University.
  • O’Neill, B. C., Kriegler, E., Ebi, K. L., Kemp-Benedict, E., Riahi, K., Rothman, D. S., van Ruijven, B. J., van Vuuren, D. P., Birkmann, J., Kok, K., Levy, M., & Solecki, W. (2017). The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Global Environmental Change, 42, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004
  • Paltsev, S., Jacoby, H. D., Reilly, J. M., Ejaz, Q. J., Morris, J., O’Sullivan, F., Rausch, S., Winchester, N., & Kragha, O. (2011). The future of US natural gas production, use, and trade. Energy Policy, 39(9), 5309–5321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.033
  • Parikh, A. (1979). Forecasts of input–output matrices using the RAS method. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(3), 477–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926084
  • Riahi, K., Van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., O’Neill, B. C., Fujimori, S., Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Dellink, R., Fricko, O., Lutz, W., Popp, A., Cuaresma, J. C., KC, S., Leimbach, M., Jiang, L., Kram, T., Rao, S., Emmerling, J., … Tavoni, M. (2017). The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Global Environmental Change, 42, 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009
  • Ruzzenenti, F., Picciolo, F., & Papandreou, A. (2015). A network analysis of the global energy market: An insight on the entanglement between crude oil and the world economy. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1509.05894.
  • Samir, K. C., & Lutz, W. (2017). The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. Global Environmental Change, 42, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.004
  • Sargento, A. L., Ramos, P. N., & Hewings, G. J. (2012). Inter-regional trade flow estimation through non-survey models: An empirical assessment. Economic Systems Research, 24(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2011.574609
  • Sarker, R., & Jayasinghe, S. (2007). Regional trade agreements and trade in agri-food products: Evidence for the European Union from gravity modeling using disaggregated data. Agricultural Economics, 37(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00227.x
  • Sartori, M., Schiavo, S., Fracasso, A., & Riccaboni, M. (2017). Modeling the future evolution of the virtual water trade network: A combination of network and gravity models. Advances in Water Resources, 110, 538–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.05.005
  • Sharmina, M., McGlade, C., Gilbert, P., & Larkin, A. (2017). Global energy scenarios and their implications for future shipped trade. Marine Policy, 84, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.06.025
  • Shen, Q., & Faraway, J. (2004). An F test for linear models with functional responses. Statistica Sinica, 1239–1257.
  • Stein, M. (1987). Large sample properties of simulations using Latin hypercube sampling. Technometrics, 29(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1987.10488205
  • Sun, M., Zhang, P. P., Shan, T. H., Fang, C. C., Wang, X. F., & Tian, L. X. (2012). Research on the evolution model of an energy supply–demand network. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 391(19), 4506–4516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2012.04.028
  • Tamea, S., Carr, J. A., Laio, F., & Ridolfi, L. (2014). Drivers of the virtual water trade. Water Resources Research, 50(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014707
  • Tarancón, MÁ, & Rio, P. D. (2005). Projection of input–output tables by means of mathematical programming based on the hypothesis of stable structural evolution. Economic Systems Research, 17(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310500034119
  • Toh, M. H. (1998). The RAS approach in updating input–output matrices: An instrumental variable interpretation and analysis of structural change. Economic Systems Research, 10(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319800000006
  • Tuninetti, M., Tamea, S., Laio, F., & Ridolfi, L. (2017). To trade or not to trade: Link prediction in the virtual water network. Advances in Water Resources, 110, 528–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.08.013
  • U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2020). Retrieved November 15, 2020, from https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo.
  • UN Comtrade. (2019). Retrieved November 26, 2019, from https://comtrade.un.org/data.
  • United Nations Statistical Division. (1999). Handbook of input–output table compilation and analysis (Vol. 74). UN.
  • Van Vuuren, D. P., Stehfest, E., Gernaat, D. E., Doelman, J. C., Van den Berg, M., Harmsen, M., de Boer, H. S., Bouwman, L. F., Daioglou, V., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Girod, B., Kram, T., Lassaletta, L., Lucas, P. L., van Meijl, H., Müller, C., van Ruijven, B. J., van der Sluis, S., & Tabeau, A. (2017). Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 42, 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.008
  • Wiebe, K. S., & Lenzen, M. (2016). To RAS or not to RAS? What is the difference in outcomes in multi-regional input–output models? Economic Systems Research, 28(3), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2016.1192528
  • Zelby, L. W., & Groten, B. (1990). Guidelines for the development of a consistent long-range energy policy. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 9(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/44.54423
  • Zhang, H. Y., Ji, Q., & Fan, Y. (2014). Competition, transmission and pattern evolution: A network analysis of global oil trade. Energy Policy, 73, 312–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.020
  • Zhong, W., An, H., Gao, X., & Sun, X. (2014). The evolution of communities in the international oil trade network. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 413, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.06.055

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.