Implementation and impact of performance measures in two SMEs in Central Scotland

References

• Adair CE Sipson L Birdsell JM Omelchuk K Casebeer AL Gardiner HP Newman WS Beckie A Clelland S Hayden KA Beausejour P. Performance Measurement Systems in Health and Mental Health Services: Models, Practices and Effectiveness 2003 Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
   Google Scholar
• Ansoff I The New Corporate Strategy 1988 John Wiley New York
   Google Scholar
• Badham , R , Garrety , K and Kirsch , C . 2001 . Humanistic redesign and technological politics in organizations . Journal of Organizational Change Management , 14 ( 1 ) : 50 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battista P Verhun D Customer relationship management Available online at: www.ifac.org (accessed 21 April 2002). This article first appeared in CMA Management in May 2000
   Google Scholar
• Bititci US Carrie AS Integrated Performance Measurement Systems: Structures and Relationships 1998 (EPSRC Final Research Report, Grant No. GR/K 48174: Swindon)
   Google Scholar
• Bititici , US and Nudurupati , SS . 2002 . Using performance measurement to drive continuous improvement . Manufacturing Engineer , 81 ( 5 ) : 230 – 235 .
   Google Scholar
• Bititci , US , Nudurupati , SS , Turner , TJ and Creighton , S . 2002 . Web enabled performance measurement system: management implications . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 22 ( 11 ) : 1273 – 1287 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bititci , US , Turner , TJ and Ball , PD . 1999 . The viable business structure for managing agility . International Journal of Agile Management Systems , 1 ( 3 ) : 190 – 199 .
   Google Scholar
• Bititci , US , Turner , T and Begemann , C . 2000 . Dynamics of performance measurement systems . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 20 ( 6 ) : 692 – 704 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne M Implementation Issues Hand Book of Performance Measurement 2001 GEE Publishing London
   Google Scholar
• Bourne M Neely A Why performance measurement interventions succeed and fail Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Performance Measurement 2000 Cambridge pp. 165–173
   Google Scholar
• Bourne , M and Wilcox , M . 1998 . Translating strategy into action . Manufacturing Engineer , 77 ( 3 ) : 109 – 112 .
   Google Scholar
• Bourne , M , Mills , J , Wilcox , M , Neely , A and Platts , K . 2000 . Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 20 ( 7 ) : 754 – 771 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coch , L and French , J . 1948 . Overcoming resistance to change . Human Relations , 1 ( 4 ) : 512 – 532 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross , KF and Lynch , RL . 1988–89 . The SMART way to define and sustain success . National Productivity Review , 9 ( 1 ) : 23 – 33 .
   Google Scholar
• Davenport TH Information Ecology 1997 Oxford University Press Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Dixon JR Nanni AJ Vollman TE The New Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations for World Class Competition 1990 Dow Jones-Irwin Homewood IL
   Google Scholar
• Donovan M Performance measurement: connecting strategy, operations and actions Available online at: http://www.rmdonovan.com/pdf/perform_99_4.pdf, (accessed 21 April 2002)
   Google Scholar
• Eccles RG The performance measurement manifesto Harvard Business Review 1991 January–February 131 137
   Google Scholar
• EFQM Excellence Model 1999 Availabe online at: EFQM Publications, www.efqm.org
   Google Scholar
• Feeny D Plant R IT: a vehicle for project success Mastering Information Management edited by D. Marchand, T. Davenport and T. Dickson pp. 22–26 2000 Financial Times/Prentice Hall London
   Google Scholar
• Ghalayini , AM and Noble , JS . 1996 . The changing basis of performance measurement . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 16 ( 8 ) : 63 – 80 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gummesson Qualitative Methods in Management Research 2000 Sage London
   Google Scholar
• Holloway , J . 2001 . Investigating the impact of performance measurement . International Journal of Business Performance Management , 3 ( 2/3/4 ) : 167 – 180 .
   Google Scholar
• Hope J Fraser R Measuring performance in the new organisational model Management Accounting 1998 June 22 23
   Google Scholar
• Hudson M Bennet JP Smart A Bourne M Performance measurement in planning and control in SMEs global Production Management edited by K. Mertins, O. Krause and B. Schallock 1999 Kluwer Academic Boston MA
   Google Scholar
• IFAC Information Technology Committee Managing information technology planning for business impact No. 2, January 1999. Available online at, www.ifac.org
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan RS Norton DP The balanced scorecard — measures that drive performance Harvard Business Review 1992 January–February 71 79
   Google Scholar
• Kennerley , M and Neely , A . 2003 . Measuring performance in changing business environment . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 23 ( 2 ) : 213 – 229 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennerley , M and Neely , A . 2002 . A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 22 ( 11 ) : 1222 – 1245 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotter J Schlessinger L Sathe V Organization 1979 Irwin Homewood IL
   Google Scholar
• Lebas M Euske K A conceptual and operational delineation of performance Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice edited by A. Neely pp. 65–79 2002 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
   Google Scholar
• Lewin , K . 1947 . Frontiers in group dynamics . Human Relations , 1 : 5 – 41 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin K Field Theory in Social Science 1951 Harper & Row London
   Google Scholar
• McLeod M Turner T Crawford G Reid A Using OEE to Improve Performance of a Fast Moving Food Company 2003 Proceedings IFIP WG 5.7 Workshop, Implementation and Impact of Performance Measures pp. 169–182 Bergamo
   Google Scholar
• McNurry R The problem of resistance to change in industry Changing Organizational behavior edited by A. Bartlett and T. Kayser 1973 Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs NJ
   Google Scholar
• Macrossan W Human Factors and Productivity: Social Aspects of Computer Integrated Manufacture 1998 Internal Course Material 54316, edited by A.S. Carrie DMEM, University of Strathclyde UK
   Google Scholar
• Marchand D Kettinger W Rollins J Company performance and IM: the view from the top Mastering Information Management edited by D. Marchand, T. Davenport and T. Dickson pp. 10–16 2000 Financial Times/Prentice Hall London
   Google Scholar
• Markus ML How workers react to new technology Mastering Information Management edited by D. Marchand, T. Davenport and T. Dickson pp. 233–238 2000 Financial Times/Prentice Hall London
   Google Scholar
• Marr B Neely A Balanced Scorecard Software Report 2002 A business review publication from Cranfield School of Management with contributions by Gartner, Inc., CT
   Google Scholar
• Martinez V Understanding value creation: the value matrix and the value cube PhD thesis, University of Strathclyde 2003
   Google Scholar
• Martinez V Bititci US The Value Matrix 2000 IFIP WG 5.7 Conference Proceedings, International Conference on Integrated Production Management pp. 209–217 Tromso
   Google Scholar
• Maskell B Performance measurement for world class manufacturing Management Accounting 1989 May 48 50
   Google Scholar
• Meekings A Unlocking the potential of performance measurement: a practical implementation guide Public Money and Management 1995 October–December 5 12
   Google Scholar
• Nakajima S Introduction to TPM 1988 Productivity Press Cambridge MA
   Google Scholar
• Neely A Adams C The performance prism perspective Journal of Cost Management 2001 January/February 7 15
   Google Scholar
• Neely A Austin R Measuring performance: the operations perspective Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice edited by A. Neely pp. 41–50 2002 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
   Google Scholar
• Neely A Mills J Gregory M Richards H Platts K Bourne M Getting the Measure of Your Business 1996 University of Cambridge, Manufacturing Engineering Group Mill Lane Cambridge
   Google Scholar
• Neely , A , Mills , J , Platts , K , Richards , H , Gregory , M and Bourne , M . 2000 . Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 20 ( 9–10 ) : 1119 – 1145 .
   Google Scholar
• Nudurupati SS Bititci US 2000 Review of performance management information systems (PerforMIS) Internal Report Centre for Strategic Manufacturing (DMEM: University of Strathclyde)
   Google Scholar
• Nudurupati SS Bititci US Implementation and impact of IT performance measurement IFIP 3rd International Workshop Bergamo Italy 19–20 June 2003
   Google Scholar
• Nudurupati SS Bititci US A review of performance measurement: the role of IT and change management Unpublished paper, CSM 2004
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski , WJ . 1996 . Improvising organisational transformation over time: a situated change perspective . Information Systems Research , 7 ( 1 ) : 63 – 92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande S Neuman R Cavanagh R. George M The Six Sigma Way 2000 McGraw Hill New York
   Google Scholar
• Porter ME Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance 1985 Free Press New York
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad CK Krishnan MS The dynamic synchronization of strategy and information technology MIT Sloan Management Review 2002 Summer 24 33
   Google Scholar
• Sayles L Straus G Human Behaviour in Organizations 1966 Prentice Hall London
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer RS Thomson HA Successful change programs begin with results Harvard Business Review 1992 January–February 80 89
   Google Scholar
• Schein , EH . 1996 . Three cultures of management: the key to organizational learning . Sloan Management Review , Fall : 9 – 20 .
   Google Scholar
• Schneiderman , AM . 1999 . Why balanced scorecards fail . Journal of Strategic Performance Measurement , Special Edition : 6 – 11 .
   Google Scholar
• Simons R Davila A How high is your return on management? Harvard Business Review 1998 January–February 71 80
   Google Scholar
• Suri R Quick Response Manufacturing. A Company Wide Approach to Reducing Lead Times 1998 Productivity Press Cambridge MA
   Google Scholar
• Turner , TJ , Martinez , V and Bititci , US . 2004 . Managing the value delivery process . International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management , 34 ( 3–4 ) : 302 – 318 .
   Google Scholar
• Turner TJ McAlinden N Bititci US Using First Pass Yield to Improve Performance of an SME 2003 Proceedings IFIP WG 5.7 Workshop, Implementation and Impact of Performance Measures Bergamo pp. 25–36
   Google Scholar
• Turner , TJ , Mendibil , K , Bititci , US , Daisley , P and Breen , THJ . 2002 . Improving the reliability of the customer order fulfilment process in a product identification company . International Journal of Production Economics , 78 : 99 – 107 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell , D and Sohal , S . 1998 . Resistance: a constructive tool for change management . Management Decision , 36 ( 8 ) : 543 – 548 .
   Google Scholar
• Waddington T Engineer your supply chain to cope with demand uncertainties Control Magazine 2001 December 14 18
   Google Scholar
• White D Bednar D Organizational behavior 1991 Allyn & Bacon Boston MA
   Google Scholar
• Wight O The Oliver Wight ABCD Check List 4th edn 1993 John Wiley New York
   Google Scholar
• Woods A Performance organizer, JIT Software Ltd, Tidworth, Hampshire. Document emailed on 6 July 2001
   Google Scholar