Implementation and impact of IT-supported performance measurement systems

References

• Bierbusse , P and Siesfeld , T . 1998 . Measures that matter . Journal of Strategic Performance Measurement , 1 ( 2 ) : 6 – 11 .
   Google Scholar
• Bititci US Carrie AS Integrated Performance Measurement Systems: Structures and Relationships 1998 (EPSRC Final Research Report, Grant No. GR/K 48174: Swindon)
   Google Scholar
• Bititci , US , Nudurupati , SS , Turner , TJ and Creighton , S . 2002 . Web enabled performance measurement system: management implications . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 22 ( 11 ) : 1273 – 1287 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bititci , US , Turner , T and Begemann , C . 2000 . Dynamics of performance measurement systems . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 20 ( 6 ) : 692 – 704 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bititci , U and Nudurupati , S . 2002 . Using performance measurement to drive continuous improvement . Manufacturing Engineer , 81 ( 5 ) : 230 – 235 .
   Google Scholar
• Bourne M Neely A Why performance measurement interventions succeed and fail Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Performance Measurement 2000 Cambridge UK pp. 165–173
   Google Scholar
• Bourne , M and Wilcox , M . 1998 . Translating strategy into action . Manufacturing Engineer , 77 ( 3 ) : 109 – 112 .
   Google Scholar
• Bourne , M , Mills , J , Wilcox , M , Neely , A and Platts , K . 2000 . Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 20 ( 7 ) : 754 – 771 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coch , L and French , J . 1948 . Overcoming resistance to change . Human Relations , 1 ( 4 ) : 512 – 532 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlan , P and Coughlan , D . 2002 . Action research for operations management . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 22 ( 2 ) : 220 – 240 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross , KF and Lynch , RL . 1988–89 . The SMART way to define and sustain success . National Productivity Review , 9 ( 1 ) : 23 – 33 .
   Google Scholar
• Davenport TH Information Ecology 1997 Oxford University Press Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Dixon JR Nanni AJ Vollmann TE The New, Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations for World Class Competition 1990 Dow Jones-Irwin Homewood IL
   Google Scholar
• Eccles RG The performance measurement manifesto Harvard Business Review 1991 January–February 131 137
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald L Johnston R Brignall TJ Silvestro R Voss C Performance Measurement in Service Industries 1991 CIMA London
   Google Scholar
• Ghalayini , AM and Noble , JS . 1996 . The changing basis of performance measurement . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 16 ( 8 ) : 63 – 80 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway , J . 2001 . Investigating the impact of performance measurement . International Journal of Business Performance Management , 3 ( 2/3/4 ) : 167 – 180 .
   Google Scholar
• Hope J Fraser R Measuring performance in the new organisational model Management Accounting 1998 June 22 23
   Google Scholar
• Hudson M Bennet JP Smart A Bourne M Performance measurement in planning and control in SME's Global Production Management edited by K. Mertins, O. Krause and B. Schallock 1999 Kluwer Academic Boston MA
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan RS Norton DP The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance Harvard Business Review 1992 January–February 71 79
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan RS Norton DP Translating strategy into Action: The Balanced Scorecard 1996 Harvard Business School Press Boston MA
   Google Scholar
• Keegan DP Eiler RG Jones CR Are your performance measures obsolete? Management Accounting 1989 June 45 50
   Google Scholar
• Kennerley , M and Neely , A . 2003 . Measuring performance in changing business environment . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 23 ( 2 ) : 213 – 229 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchand D Kettinger W Rollins J Company performance and IM: the view from the top Mastering Information Management edited by D. Marchand, T. Davenport and T. Dickson pp. 10–16 2000 Financial Times/Prentice Hall London
   Google Scholar
• Marr B Neely A Balanced Scorecard Software Report 2002 InfoEdge Stamford CT
   Google Scholar
• Meekings A Unlocking the potential of performance measurement: a practical implementation guide Public Money and Management 1995 October–December 5 12
   Google Scholar
• Neely , A . 1999 . The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next? . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 19 ( 2 ) : 205 – 228 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely A Research priorities 2002 Centre for Business Performance Cranfield University Available online at:, http://www.som.cranfield.ac.uk/som/cbp/
   Google Scholar
• Neely A Adams C The performance prism perspective Journal of Cost Management 2001 January/February 7 15
   Google Scholar
• Neely A Mills J Gregory M Richards H Platts K Bourne M Getting the Measure of Your Business 1996 University of Cambridge Manufacturing Engineering Group, Mill Lane Cambridge
   Google Scholar
• Nudurupati SS Management and business implications of IT-supported performance measurement system PhD thesis University of Strathclyde Glasgow 2003
   Google Scholar
• Nudurupati SS Bititci US Review of performance management information systems (PerforMIS) Internal Report 2001 Centre for Strategic Manufacturing, DMEM University of Strathclyde Glasgow
   Google Scholar
• Nudurupati SS Bititci US Maddocks S Web enabled performance measurement systems Conference Proceedings–PMA Conference 2002 World Trade Center Boston MA 17 19 July 2002
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad CK Krishnan MS The dynamic synchronisation of strategy and information technology MIT Sloan Management Review 2002 Summer 24 33
   Google Scholar
• Schneiderman , AM . 1999 . Why balanced scorecards fail . Journal of Strategic Performance Measurement , Special Edition : 6 – 11 .
   Google Scholar