A stakeholder perspective on process improvement behaviours: delivering the triple bottom line in SMEs

References

• Amundson, S. D. 1998. ”Relationships between theory-driven empirical research in operations management and other disciplines.” Journal of Operations Management 16 (4): 341–359.
   Google Scholar
• Anand, G., P. T. Ward, and M. V. Tatikonda. 2010. “Role of explicit and tacit knowledge in Six Sigma projects: an empirical examination of differential project success.” Journal of Operations Management 28 (4): 303–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquilani, B., C. Silvestri, A. Ruggieri, and C. Gatti. 2017. “A systematic literature review on total quality management critical success factors and the identification of new avenues of research.” The TQM Journal 29 (1): 184–213.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. L. 2007. “Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility.” Academy of Management Review 32 (3): 794–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. J., and F. M. Veloso. 2008. “ISO 9000 practices and financial performance: a technology coherence perspective.” Journal of Operations Management 26 (5): 611–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. J., and M. Tushman. 2002. “Process management and technological innovation: a longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries.” Administrative Science Quarterly 47 (4): 676–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer, H., M. Holweg, M. Kilduff, M. Pagell, R. Schmenner, and C. Voss. 2015. “Making a meaningful contribution to theory.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 35 (9): 1231–1252. doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2015-0119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravorty, S. S. 2009. “Six Sigma failures: an escalation model.” Operations Management Research 2 (1): 44–55. doi: 10.1007/s12063-009-0020-8.
   Google Scholar
• Childe, Stephen J. 2011. “Case studies in operations management.” Production Planning & Control 22 (2): 107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Mast, J., and J. Lokkerbol. 2012. “An analysis of the Six Sigma DMAIC method from the perspective of problem solving.” International Journal of Production Economics 139 (2): 604–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despeisse, M., F. Mbaye, P. D. Ball, and A. Levers. 2012. “The emergence of sustainable manufacturing practices.” Production Planning and Control 23 (5): 354–376. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2011.555425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T., and L. E. Preston. 1995. “The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications.” Academy of management Review 20 (1): 65–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dües, Christina Maria, Kim Hua Tan, and Ming Lim. 2013. “Green as the new Lean: how to use Lean practices as a catalyst to greening your supply chain.” Journal of cleaner production 40:93–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building theory from case study research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkington, J. 1999. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. Edward, Jeffrey S. Harrison, Andrew C. Wicks, Bidhan L. Parmar, and Simone De Colle. 2010. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Handfield, R. B., and S. A. Melnyk. 1998. “The scientific theory-building process: a primer using the case of TQM.” Journal of Operations Management 16 (4): 321–339. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00017-5.
   Google Scholar
• Hasnas, J.. 2013. “Whither stakeholder theory? A guide for the perplexed revisited.” Journal of Business Ethics 112 (1): 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollos, Daniel, Constantin Blome, and Kai Foerstl. 2012. “Does sustainable supplier co-operation affect performance? Examining implications for the triple bottom line.” International Journal of Production Research 50 (11): 2968–2986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, M., J. Lean, and P. A. Smart. 2001. “Improving control through effective performance measurement in SMEs.” Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations 12 (8): 804–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan, D. 2017. “Role of multiple stakeholders and the critical success factor theory for the sustainable supplier selection process.” International Journal of Production Economics 195:391–418. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaynak, H. 2003. “The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance.” Journal of Operations Management 21 (4): 405–435. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6963(03)00004-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, M., J. Antony, R. K. Singh, M. K. Tiwari, and D. Perry. 2006. “Implementing the Lean Sigma framework in an Indian SME: a case study.” Production Planning & Control 17 (4): 407–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, R. L., B. L. MacCarthy, and C. Braziotis. 2017. “Organisational learning in SMEs: a process improvement perspective.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management 37 (7). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2015-0580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, R. L., and P. E. Marzec. 2017. “Continuous, quality and process improvement: disintegrating and reintegrating operational improvement?” Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 28 (3–4): 296–317. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2015.1081812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, R., and B. Lafferty. 2004. “A multilevel case study critique of six sigma: statistical control or strategic change?” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 24 (5): 530–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle, and D. J. Wood. 1997. “Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts.” Academy of management review 22 (4): 853–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moratis, L. 2017. “The credibility of corporate CSR claims: a taxonomy based on ISO 26000 and a research agenda.” Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 28 (1–2): 147–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noke, H., and M. Hughes. 2010. “Climbing the value chain: strategies to create a new product development capability in mature SMEs.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 30 (2): 132–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, W., and C. MacDonald. 2004. “Getting to the bottom of ‘Triple Bottom Line’.” Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2): 243–262 + 345-346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P, Z. Radnor, T. Kinder, and I. Vidal. 2015. “The SERVICE framework: a public service dominant approach to sustainable public services.” British Journal of Management 26 (3): 424–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panwar, R., E. Nybakk, E. Hansen, and J. Pinkse. 2016. “The effect of small firms' competitive strategies on their community and environmental engagement.” Journal of Cleaner Production 129:578–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, T. C. 1995. “Total quality management as competitive advantage: a review and empirical study.” Strategic Management Journal 16 (1): 15–37. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250160105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radnor, H. A. 2001. Researching Your Professional Practice: Doing Interpretive Research, Doing Qualitative Research in Educational Settings. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radnor, Z. J., M. Holweg, and J. Waring. 2012. “Lean in healthcare: the unfilled promise?” Social Science & Medicine 74 (3): 364–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson, D., and M. Terziovski. 1999. “The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance.” Journal of Operations Management 17 (4): 393–409. doi: Doi: 10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00046-1.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. G., K. Linderman, C. Liedtke, and A.S. Choo. 2008. “Six Sigma: definition and underlying theory.” Journal of Operations Management 26 (4): 536–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsuzzoha, A, C. Toscano, L. M. Carneiro, Vikas Kumar, and Petri Helo. 2016. “ICT-based solution approach for collaborative delivery of customised products.” Production Planning & Control 27 (4): 280–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, I., D. McCutcheon, R. Handfield, R. McLachlin, and D. Samson. 2002. “Effective case research in operations management: a process perspective.” Journal of Operations Management 20 (5): 419–433. doi: Doi: 10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00022-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, W. L., and Lydia B. 2016. “Achieving shared triple bottom line (TBL) value creation: toward a social resource-based view (SRBV) of the firm.” Journal of Business Ethics:1–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Bos, R., and D. Bevan. 2011. “Sustainability.” In: Business Ethics and Continental Philosophy, edited by M. Painter-Morland and R. Ten Bos, 285–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, M., and A. Wilkinson. 2007. “The tyranny of corporate slenderness: ‘corporate anorexia’ as a metaphor for our age.” Work, Employment and Society 21 (3): 537–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, C., N. Tsikriktsis, and M. Frohlich. 2002. “Case research in operations management.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22 (2): 195–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, H., D. Chicksand, Z. Radnor, and G. Watson. 2015. “Theoretical perspectives in operations management: an analysis of the literature.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 35 (8): 1182–1206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methodology (Applied Social Research Methods). 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar