Supporting open innovation with the use of a balanced scorecard approach: a study on deep smarts and effective knowledge transfer to SMEs

References

• Agrawal, A. 2001. “University-to-Industry Knowledge Transfer: Literature Review and Unanswered Questions.” International Journal of Management Reviews 3 (4): 285–302. doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ashaab, A., M. Flores, A. Doultsinou, and A. Magyar. 2011. “A Balanced Scorecard for Measuring the Impact of Industry–University Collaboration.” Production Planning & Control 22 (5–6): 554–570. doi:10.1080/09537287.2010.536626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., R. Putnam, and D. M. Smith. 1985. Action Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Battistella, C., and F. Nonino. 2013. “Exploring the Impact of Motivations on the Attraction of Innovation Roles in Open Innovation Web-based Platforms.” Production Planning & Control 24 (2–3): 226–245. doi:10.1080/09537287.2011.647876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BCHA Annual Report. 2007. Available from: https://www.housingnet.co.uk/download_pdf/13828/. Accessed 15 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• BCHA Annual Report. 2015. Available from: https://bchaorguk.s3.amazonaws.com/Publications/Performance%20Report/BCHA%20Annual%20Report%202014-15.pdf Accessed 15 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Beylier, C., F. Pourroy, F. Villeneuve, and A. Mille. 2009. “A Collaboration-Centred Approach to Manage Engineering Knowledge: A Case Study of an Engineering SME.” Journal of Engineering Design 20 (6): 523–542. doi:10.1080/09544820801898482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bititci, U. S., UTrevor Turner, and C. Begemann. 2000. “Dynamics of Performance Measurement Systems.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management 20 (6): 692–704. doi:10.1108/01443570010321676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., and A. Neely. 2000. “Why Performance Measurement Interventions Succeed and Fail.” Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Performance Measurement, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., A. Pavlov, M. Franco-Santos, L. Lucianetti, and M. Mura. 2013. “Generating Organisational Performance: The Contributing Effects of Performance Measurement and Human Resource Management Practices.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 33 (11/12): 1599–1622. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-07-2010-0200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunswicker, S., and W. Vanhaverbeke. 2015. “Open Innovation in Small and Medium‐sized Enterprises (SMEs): External Knowledge Sourcing Strategies and Internal Organisational Facilitators.” Journal of Small Business Management 53 (4): 1241–1263. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BU Annual Review. 2008. Available from: https://www1.bournemouth.ac.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/annual-review-2008.pdf Accessed 24 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Cagliano, R., F. Caniato, M. Corso, and G. Spina. 2005. “Collaborative Improvement in the Extended Manufacturing Enterprise: Lessons from an Action Research Process.” Production Planning & Control 16 (4): 345–355. doi:10.1080/09537280500063251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. 2006. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 128–152. doi:10.2307/2393553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., A. Goto, A. Nagata, R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh. 2002. “R&D Spillovers, Patents and the Incentives to Innovate in Japan and the United States.” Research Policy 31 (8): 1349–1367. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00068-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D., and T. Brannick. 2014. Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan, P., and D. Coghlan. 2002. “Action Research for Operations Management.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22 (2): 220–240. doi:10.1108/01443570210417515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulter, J., N. S. Baschung, and U. S. Bititci. 2000. “Benchmarking for Small-to Medium-Sized Enterprises.” Production Planning & Control 11 (4): 400–408. doi:10.1080/095372800232135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H. 2006. “Competing on Analytics.” Harvard Business Review 84 (1): 98–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayasindhu, N. 2002. “Embeddedness, Knowledge Transfer, Industry Clusters and Global Competitiveness: A Case Study of the Indian Software Industry.” Technovation 22 (9): 551–560. doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00098-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming, W. E. 1986. Out of the Crisis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Center for Advanced Engineering Study, 510.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. 1970. “Strategies of Multiple Triangulation.” In The Research Act in Sociology: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Method, edited by N. Denzin, 297–313. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• De Wit, J., B. Dankbaar, and G. Vissers. 2007. “Open Innovation: The New Way of Knowledge Transfer?” Journal of Business Chemistry 4 (1): 11–19. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1540589
   Google Scholar
• Dowling Review, 2015. Available from: http://www.raeng.org.uk/policy/dowling-review/the-dowling-review-of-business-university-research Accessed 24 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Durst, S., and I. Runar Edvardsson. 2012. “Knowledge Management in SMEs: A Literature Review.” Journal of Knowledge Management 16 (6): 879–903. doi:10.1108/13673271211276173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq, S., and C. O'Brien. 2015. “An Action Research Methodology for Manufacturing Technology Selection: A Supply Chain Perspective.” Production Planning & Control 26 (6): 467–488. doi:10.1080/09537287.2014.924599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, M., A. Al-Ashaab, and A. Magyar. 2009. “A Balanced Scorecard for Open Innovation: Measuring the Impact of Industry-University Collaboration. Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, M., and M. Bourne. 2003. “Factors That Play a Role in ‘Managing through Measures.” Management Decision 41 (8): 698–710. doi:10.1108/00251740310496215.
   Google Scholar
• Garengo, P., and U. Bititci. 2007. “Towards a Contingency Approach to Performance Measurement: An Empirical Study in Scottish SMEs.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 27 (8): 802–825. doi:10.1108/01443570710763787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gummesson, E. 2000. Qualitative Methods in Management Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H. 2004. Innovation and Diffusion (No. w10212). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, G. 2009. “Moon Shots for Management.” Harvard Business Review 87 (2): 91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEFCE. 2012. “Strengthening the Contribution of English Higher Education Institutions to the Innovation System: Knowledge Exchange and HEIF Funding.” HEFCE. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/whatwedo/knowledgeexchangeandskills/heif/pacec-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Henri, J. F. 2006. “Organisational Culture and Performance Measurement Systems.” Accounting, Organisations and Society 31 (1): 77–103. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2004.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, T., D. Bence, L. Grisoni, N. O’Regan, and D. Wornham. 2011. “Scholarship That Matters: Academic/practitioner Engagement in Business and Management.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10 (1): 40–57. doi:10.5465/amle.10.1.zqr40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., and R. Kaplan. 1987. Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 1992. “The Balanced Scorecard: Measure That Drive Performance.” Harvard Business Review 70 (1): 71–79. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=9161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 1996. “Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System.” Harvard Business Review 74 (1): 75–85. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=9200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., R. McTaggart, and R. Nixon. 2013. The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, E. H., M. A. Allocca, and N. Rahman. 2007. “External Knowledge Accession and Innovation Speed in the Small and Medium Sized Enterprise (SME).” Small Enterprise Research 15 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1080/13215906.2007.11005829.
   Google Scholar
• Knowledge Transfer Partnerships. 2007. Annual Report 06/07, Technology Strategy Board, HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• KTP Annual Report. 2011. Available from: https://static.ktponline.org.uk/assets/2011/pdf/KTP-AR-201011.pdf Accessed 1 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• KTP Annual Report. 2014. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/426670/KTP_Achievements_and_Outcomes__2014_FINAL.pdf Accessed 15 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• KTP Best Practice. 2013. “A Best Practice Approach to Open Innovation.” Available from: http://www.ncub.co.uk/reports/knowledge-transfer-partnerships-a-best-practice-approach-to-open-innovation.html Accessed 15 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• KTP Guidebook. 2013. “KTP Guidebook for KTP Advisers and Offices.” Available from: http://www.open.ac.uk/foi/main/sites/www.open.ac.uk.foi.main/files/files/ecms/human-resources/k/Knowledge-Transfer-Partnership-(KTP)/KTP%20Guidebook%20HRM063.pdf Accessed 15 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kumari, S., A. Singh, N. Mishra, and J. A. Garza-Reyes. 2015. “A Multi-agent Architecture for Outsourcing SMEs Manufacturing Supply Chain.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 36:36–44. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2014.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, D., and W. Swap. 2004. “Deep Smarts” In Managing Knowledge, edited by S. Little and T. Ray, 157–169. London: Sage (First published in Harvard Business Review, Sept Issue, pp. 88–97).
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, U. 2011. “Open Innovation: Past Research, Current Debates, and Future Directions.” Academy of Management Perspectives 25 (1): 75–93. doi:10.5465/AMP.2011.59198451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. F. 2015. “Linking Knowledge Management Orientation to Balanced Scorecard Outcomes.” Journal of Knowledge Management 19 (6): 1224–1249. doi:10.1108/JKM-04-2015-0132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüscher, L. S., and M. W. Lewis. 2008. “Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working through Paradox.” Academy of Management Journal 51 (2): 221–240. doi:10.5465/amj.2008.31767217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, R. L., and K. F. Cross. 1991. Measure up! Yardsticks for Continuous Improvement. London: Blackwell Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Markman, A. B., ed. 2016. Open Innovation: Academic and Practical Perspectives on the Journey from Idea to Market. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, B., and G. Schiuma. 2003. “Business Performance Measurement – Past, Present and Future.” Management Decision 41 (8): 680–687. doi:10.1108/00251740310496198.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, R. G. 1999. “Recent SME Research: A Critical Review.” Small Enterprise Research 7 (1): 68–75. doi:10.5172/ser.7.1.68.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Krahmer, F., and U. Schmoch. 1998. “Science-based Technologies: University–Industry Interactions in Four Fields.” Research Policy 27 (8): 835–851. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00094-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A., M. Gregory, and K. Platts. 1995. “Performance Measurement System Design: A Literature Review and Research Agenda.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 15 (4): 80–116. doi:10.1108/01443579510083622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A., C. Adams, and M. Kennerley. 2002. The Performance Prism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla-Meléndez, A., and A. Garrido-Moreno. 2012. “Open Innovation in Universities: What Motivates Researchers to Engage in Knowledge Transfer Exchanges?” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 18 (4): 417–439. doi:10.1108/13552551211239474.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., and K. Walsh. 2007. “University–Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda.” International Journal of Management Reviews 9 (4): 259–280. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1974. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (First published in 1958).
   Google Scholar
• Quintas, P., P. Lefrere, and G. Jones, 1997. “Knowledge Management: A Strategic Agenda.” Long Range Planning 30 (3): 385–391. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(97)00018-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, J., and M. Polkinghorne, eds. 2007. Applications of Knowledge Transfer to Small and Medium Sized Businesses. UK: Bournemouth University.
   Google Scholar
• Raelin, J. 2006. “Does Action Learning Promote Collaborative Leadership?” Academy of Management Learning & Education 5 (2): 152–168. doi:10.5465/amle.2006.21253780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, F., and A. Rosli, 2015. “Indicators of University–Industry Knowledge Transfer Performance and Their Implications for Universities: Evidence from the United Kingdom.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (10): 1970–1991. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.914914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, A. J., and B. R. Martin, 2001. “The Economic Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research: A Critical Review.” Research Policy 30 (3): 509–532. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00091-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savino, T., A. Messeni Petruzzelli, and V. Albino, 2015. “Search and Recombination Process to Innovate: A Review of the Empirical Evidence and a Research Agenda.” International Journal of Management Reviews 19 (1): 54–75. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S. 2005. “Government Policies to Encourage Economic Development through Entrepreneurship: The Case of Technology Transfer.” In Economic Development through Entrepreneurship, edited by S. Shane, 33–46. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D.S., D. Waldman, and A. Link, 2003. “Assessing the Impact of Organisational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: An Exploratory Study.” Research Policy 32 (1): 27–48. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., and U.S. Bititci, 2017. “Interplay between Performance Measurement and Management, Employee Engagement and Performance.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 37 (9): 1207–1228. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-06-2015-0313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P.C., and M. Goddard, 2002. “Performance Management and Operational Research: A Marriage Made in Heaven?” Journal of the Operational Research Society 53 (3): 247–255. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somekh, B. 1995. “The Contribution of Action Research to Development in Social Endeavours: A Position Paper on Action Research Methodology.” British Educational Research Journal 21 (3): 339–355. doi:10.1080/0141192950210307.
   Google Scholar
• Thursby, J. G., R. Jensen, and M. C. Thursby, 2001. “Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major US Universities.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 26 (1/2): 59–72. doi:10.1023/A:1007884111883.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. 2003. “Do We Really Understand Tacit Knowledge?” In Managing Knowledge, edited by S. Little and T. Ray, 107–125. London: Sage. (First published in The Blackwell Handbook of Organisational Knowledge Management, Easterby-Smith, M. & Lyles, M. (eds.) pp 410–427, Oxford: Blackwell – edited version.)
   Google Scholar
• Valmohammadi, C., and M. Ahmadi, 2015. “The Impact of Knowledge Management Practices on Organizational Performance: A Balanced Scorecard Approach.” Journal of Enterprise Information Management 28 (1): 131–159. doi:10.1108/JEIM-09-2013-0066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WECD. 2015. “KTP Impact Report.” Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/467142/KTP_Report_July_2015_Exec_summary__1-SEP-15_.pdf Accessed 20 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., R. McDermott, and W. M. Snyder. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. F. E. 1991. Participatory Action Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• www.gov.uk. 2016. “Knowledge Transfer Partnerships: What They Are and How to Apply.” Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/knowledge-transfer-partnerships-what-they-are-and-how-to-apply. Accessed 21 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Yew Wong, K. 2005. “Critical Success Factors for Implementing Knowledge Management in Small and Medium Enterprises.” Industrial Management & Data Systems 105 (3): 261–279. doi:10.1108/02635570510590101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., and G. George, 2002. “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualisation, and Extension.” Academy of Management Review 27 (2): 185–203. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4134351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuber-Skerritt, O. 1992. Action Research in Higher Education: Examples and Reflections. London, United Kingdom: Kogan Page Limited.
   Google Scholar