Institutionalising Industry 4.0: a Delphi study of institutional change readiness for the fourth industrial revolution in an emerging economy

References

• Abdul-Hamid, A. Q., M. H. Ali, L. H. Osman, and M. L. Tseng. 2021. “The Drivers of Industry 4.0 in a Circular Economy: The Palm Oil Industry in Malaysia.” Journal of Cleaner Production 324: 129216. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129216.
   Google Scholar
• Abzug, R., and S. Mezias. 1993. “The Fragmented State and Due Process Protections in Organizations: The Case of Comparable Worth.” Organization Science 4 (3): 433–453. doi:10.1287/orsc.4.3.433.
   Google Scholar
• Akins, R. B., H. Tolson, and B. R. Cole. 2005. “Stability of Response Characteristics of a Delphi Panel: application of Bootstrap Data Expansion.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 5 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-37.
   Google Scholar
• AlMalki, H. A., and C. M. Durugbo. 2022. “Investigating Institutional Readiness for Industry 4.0 Education: Towards an Inclusive Innovation Model.” Asian Journal of Technology Innovation: 1–27. doi:10.1080/19761597.2022.2056492.
   Google Scholar
• AlMalki, H. A., and C. M. Durugbo. 2023a. “Evaluating Critical Institutional Factors of Industry 4.0 for Education Reform.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 188: 122327. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122327.
   Google Scholar
• AlMalki, H. A., and C. M. Durugbo. 2023b. “Systematic Review of Institutional Innovation Literature: Towards a Multi-Level Management Model.” Management Review Quarterly 73 (2): 731–785. doi:10.1007/s11301-022-00259-8.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, J., and A. Bilfeldt. 2017. “Transforming Welfare Institutions through Social Innovation and Action Research in Denmark (Transformando instituciones de bienestar a través de la innovación socialy la investigaciónacción en Dinamarca).” International Journal of Action Research 13 (3): 201–220. doi:10.3224/ijar.v13i3.02.
   Google Scholar
• Antony, J., M. Sony, and O. McDermott. 2023. “Conceptualizing Industry 4.0 Readiness Model Dimensions: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Method Study.” The TQM Journal 35 (2): 577–596. doi:10.1108/TQM-06-2021-0180.
   Google Scholar
• Armenakis, A. A., and S. G. Harris. 2009. “Reflections: Our Journey in Organizational Change Research and Practice.” Journal of Change Management 9 (2): 127–142. doi:10.1080/14697010902879079.
   Google Scholar
• Armenakis, A. A., S. G. Harris, and K. W. Mossholder. 1993. “Creating Readiness for Organizational Change.” Human Relations 46 (6): 681–703. doi:10.1177/001872679304600601.
   Google Scholar
• Arranz, N., M. F. Arroyabe, and J. C. Fernandez de Arroyabe. 2019. “Obstacles of Innovation and Institutional Support in the Cooperation Agreements: The Spanish Case.” European Journal of Innovation Management 23 (4): 696–712. doi:10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0275.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., J. M. Wittmayer, R. Kemp, and A. Haxeltine. 2017. “Game-Changers and Transformative Social Innovation.” Ecology and Society 22 (4): 41. doi:10.5751/ES-09897-220441.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., and L. De Propris. 2019. “6. Industry 4.0, Regional Disparities and Transformative Industrial Policy.” Regional Studies Policy Impact Books 1 (2): 67–78. doi:10.1080/2578711X.2019.1621102.
   Google Scholar
• Bakir, C., and A. Gunduz. 2017. “When, Why and How Institutional Change Takes Place: A Systematic Review and a Future Research Agenda on the Importance of Policy Entrepreneurship in Macroeconomic Bureaucracies.” Policy and Society 36 (4): 479–503. doi:10.1080/14494035.2017.1369676.
   Google Scholar
• Barasa, L., J. Knoben, P. Vermeulen, P. Kimuyu, and B. Kinyanjui. 2017. “Institutions, Resources, and Innovation in East Africa: A Firm Level Approach.” Research Policy 46 (1): 280–291. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.008.
   Google Scholar
• Barrie, J., G. Zawdie, and E. Joao. 2019. “Assessing the Role of Triple Helix System Intermediaries in Nurturing an Industrial Biotechnology Innovation Network.” Journal of Cleaner Production 214: 209–223. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.287.
   Google Scholar
• Basl, J., and P. Doucek. 2019. “Metamodel for Evaluating Enterprise Readiness in the Context of Industry 4.0.” Information 10 (3): 89. (doi:10.3390/info10030089.
   Google Scholar
• Beiderbeck, D., N. Frevel, H. A. von der Gracht, S. L. Schmidt, and V. M. Schweitzer. 2021. “Preparing, Conducting, and Analyzing Delphi Surveys: Cross-Disciplinary Practices, New Directions, and Advancements.” MethodsX 8: 101401. doi:10.1016/j.mex.2021.101401.
   Google Scholar
• Bibby, L., and B. Dehe. 2018. “Defining and Assessing Industry 4.0 Maturity Levels–Case of the Defence Sector.” Production Planning & Control 29 (12): 1030–1043. doi:10.1080/09537287.2018.1503355.
   Google Scholar
• Bilbao-Ubillos, J., V. Camino-Beldarrain, and G. Intxaurburu-Clemente. 2021. “Industry 4.0, Proximity Constraints and New Challenges for Industrial Policy.” European Planning Studies 29 (2): 329–345. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1753660.
   Google Scholar
• Biurrun, A. 2022. “New Evidence toward Solving the Puzzle of Innovation and Inequality. The Role of Institutions.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 31 (8): 729–750. doi:10.1080/10438599.2020.1853659.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K., and K. Lakhani. 2016. “Innovation Experiments: Researching Technical Advance, Knowledge Production, and the Design of Supporting Institutions.” Innovation Policy and the Economy 16 (1): 135–167. doi:10.1086/684988.
   Google Scholar
• Brem, A., and A. Radziwon. 2017. “Efficient Triple Helix Collaboration Fostering Local Niche Innovation Projects – A Case from Denmark.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 123: 130–141. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Buhr, D. 2015. Social Innovation Policy for Industry 4.0. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Division for Social and Economic Policies.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Y. 2014. “Implementing the Triple Helix Model in a non-Western Context: An Institutional Logics Perspective.” Triple Helix 1 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1186/s40604-014-0001-2.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Y. 2015. “What Contextual Factors Shape ‘Innovation in Innovation’? Integration of Insights from the Triple Helix and the Institutional Logics Perspective.” Social Science Information 54 (3): 299–326. doi:10.1177/0539018415583527.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Y., and M. Amaral. 2021. “The Triple Helix Model and the Future of Innovation: A Reflection on the Triple Helix Research Agenda.” Triple Helix 8 (2): 217–229. doi:10.1163/21971927-12340004.
   Google Scholar
• Castelo-Branco, I., F. Cruz-Jesus, and T. Oliveira. 2019. “Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness in Manufacturing: Evidence for the European Union.” Computers in Industry 107: 22–32. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.01.007.
   Google Scholar
• Castellano, S., I. Khelladi, and S. Ivanaj. 2021. “Entrepreneurial Intensity and Firm Performance: The Role of Institutional Ambidexterity.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 68 (2): 350–359. doi:10.1109/TEM.2019.2901500.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. H., A. A. Egbetokun, and D. K. Chen. 2015. “Brokering Knowledge in Networks: institutional Intermediaries in the Taiwanese Biopharmaceutical Innovation System.” International Journal of Technology Management 69 (3/4): 189–209. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2015.072978.
   Google Scholar
• Chirumalla, K. 2021. “Building Digitally-Enabled Process Innovation in the Process Industries: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach.” Technovation 105: 102256. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102256.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M. 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, N. 2002. “Innovation Systems, Institutional Change and the New Knowledge Market: implications for Third World Agricultural Development.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 11 (4–5): 353–368. doi:10.1080/10438590200000004.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, G. 1950. “The Comparison of Percentages in Matched Samples.” Biometrika 37 (3–4): 256–266. doi:10.1093/biomet/37.3-4.256.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, A., D. Schleuter, and M. Kircher. 2015. “An Approach to Qualify Human Resources Supporting the Migration of SMEs into an Industry 4.0-Compliant Company Infrastructure.” In Proceedings of IECON 2015 Yokohama, 003761–003766. Yokohama: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Corsi, C., and A. Prencipe. 2019. “High-Tech Entrepreneurial Firms’ Innovation in Different Institutional Settings. Do Venture Capital and Private Equity Have Complementary or Substitute Effects?” Industry and Innovation 26 (9): 1023–1074. doi:10.1080/13662716.2018.1561358.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. 1951. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.” Psychometrika 16 (3): 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.
   Google Scholar
• Culot, G., G. Orzes, M. Sartor, and G. Nassimbeni. 2020. “The Future of Manufacturing: A Delphi-Based Scenario Analysis on Industry 4.0.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 157: 120092. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120092.
   Google Scholar
• d‘Agostino, G., and M. Scarlato. 2019. “Knowledge Externalities, Innovation and Growth in European Countries: The Role of Institutions.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 28 (1): 82–99. doi:10.1080/10438599.2018.1429536.
   Google Scholar
• Dalkey, N., and O. Helmer. 1963. “An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts.” Management Science 9 (3): 458–467. doi:10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R., T. Coole, and A. Smith. 2017. “Review of Socio-Technical Considerations to Ensure Successful Implementation of Industry 4.0.” Procedia Manufacturing 11: 1288–1295. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.256.
   Google Scholar
• de Almeida Borges, P., L. P. de Araújo, L. A. Lima, G. F. Ghesti, and T. Souza Carmo. 2020. “The Triple Helix Model and Intellectual Property: The Case of the University of Brasilia.” World Patent Information 60: 101945. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2019.101945.
   Google Scholar
• de la Mothe, J. 2004. “The Institutional Governance of Technology, Society, and Innovation.” Technology in Society 26 (2–3): 523–536. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2004.01.009.
   Google Scholar
• De Rozario, P. 2016. “The Innovation Dilemma in the Financial Industry: French Domestic Credit Institutions.” Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability 11: 161–177.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, P. H., and K. M. Weaver. 2011. “Institutional Readiness and Small to Medium‐Sized Enterprise Alliance Formation.” Journal of Small Business Management 49 (1): 126–148. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00318.x.
   Google Scholar
• Domlyn, A., and A. Wandersman. 2019. “Community Coalition Readiness for Implementing Something New: Using a Delphi Methodology.” Journal of Community Psychology 47 (4): 882–897. doi:10.1002/jcop.22161.
   Google Scholar
• Durugbo, C. M., Z. Al-Balushi, A. Anouze, and O. Amoudi. 2020. “Critical Indices and Model of Uncertainty Perception for Regional Supply Chains: Insights from a Delphi-Based Study.” Supply Chain Management 25 (5): 549–564. doi:10.1108/SCM-10-2019-0373.
   Google Scholar
• Durugbo, C. M., O. Amoudi, Z. Al-Balushi, and A. L. Anouze. 2021a. “Wisdom from Arabian Networks: A Review and Theory of Regional Supply Chain Management.” Production Planning & Control 32 (15): 1265–1281. doi:10.1080/09537287.2020.1796144.
   Google Scholar
• Durugbo, C. M., A. L. Anouze, O. Amoudi, and Z. Al-Balushi. 2021b. “Competitive Priorities for Regional Operations: A Delphi Study.” Production Planning & Control 32 (15): 1295–1312. doi:10.1080/09537287.2020.1805809.
   Google Scholar
• Durugbo, C. M., and Z. Al-Balushi. 2022. “Supply Chain Management in Times of Crisis: A Systematic Review.” Management Review Quarterly : 1–54. doi:10.1007/s11301-022-00272-x.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. 1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies Institutions and Organizations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 1998. “The Endless Transition: A "Triple Helix" of University-Industry-Government Relations.” Introduction. Minerva 36 (3): 203–208.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and C. Zhou. 2006. “Triple Helix Twins: innovation and Sustainability.” Science and Public Policy 33 (1): 77–83. doi:10.3152/147154306781779154.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and C. Zhou. 2018. “Innovation Incommensurability and the Science Park.” R&D Management 48 (1): 73–87. doi:10.1111/radm.12266.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1937. “The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 32 (200): 675–701. doi:10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522.
   Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, A. 2016. Industry 4.0: The Industrial Internet of Things. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Glasersfeld, E. 2005. “Aspects of Constructivism.” In Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice, edited by C. T. Fosnot, Second Edition, 2–7. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gökalp, E., U. Şener, and P. E. Eren. 2017, October. “Development of an Assessment Model for Industry 4.0: Industry 4.0-MM.” In International Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, 128–142. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M., and D. Urbano. 2017. “The Impact of Triple Helix Agents on Entrepreneurial Innovations’ Performance: An inside Look at Enterprises Located in an Emerging Economy.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 119: 294–309. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.015.
   Google Scholar
• Hage, J., and J. Hollingsworth. 2000. “A Strategy for the Analysis of Idea Innovation Networks and Institutions.” Organization Studies 21 (5): 971–1004. doi:10.1177/0170840600215006.
   Google Scholar
• Harder, A., T. Place, and D. Scheer. 2010. “Towards a Competency-Based Extension Education Curriculum: A Delphi Study.” Journal of Agricultural Education 51 (3): 44–52. doi:10.5032/jae.2010.03044.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, M., T. Pentek, and B. Otto. 2016. “Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios.” Proceedings of 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences HICSS, Koloa, January 5–8, 3928–3937. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2016.488.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Trasobares, A., and J. Murillo-Luna. 2020. “The Effect of Triple Helix Cooperation on Business Innovation: The Case of Spain.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 161: 120296. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120296.
   Google Scholar
• Honti, G., T. Czvetkó, and J. Abonyi. 2020. “Data Describing the Regional Industry 4.0 Readiness Index.” Data in Brief 33: 106464. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.106464.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskisson, R., M. Hitt, R. Johnson, and W. Grossman. 2002. “Conflicting Voices: The Effects of Institutional Ownership Heterogeneity and Internal Governance on Corporate Innovation Strategies.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (4): 697–716. doi:10.5465/3069305.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, B., J. Hong, Q. Chen, X. Shi, and Y. Zhou. 2019. “Do Academia-Industry R&D Collaborations Necessarily Facilitate Industrial Innovation in China? The Role of Technology Transfer Institutions.” European Journal of Innovation Management 22 (5): 717–746. doi:10.1108/EJIM-09-2018-0195.
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Robotics. 2021. Highlights. Accessed 3 February 2022. https://ifr.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova, A., and L. Leydesdorf. 2014. “Rotational Symmetry and the Transformation of Innovation Systems in a Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 86: 143–156. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.022.
   Google Scholar
• Ivascu, L. 2020. “Measuring the Implications of Sustainable Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0.” Processes 8 (5): 585. doi:10.3390/pr8050585.
   Google Scholar
• James, D., and H. Etzkowitz. 2007. “The Triple Helix of Innovation: Towards a University-Led Development Strategy for Africa.” ATDF Journal 4 (2): 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Janahi, N. A., C. M. Durugbo, and O. R. Al‐Jayyousi. 2022. “Critical Network Factors for Eco‐Innovation in Manufacturing: A Delphi Study from a Triple Helix Perspective.” Business Strategy and the Environment. doi:10.1002/bse.3320.
   Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., M. Smets, R. Bednarek, G. Burke, and P. Spee. 2013. “Institutional Ambidexterity: Leveraging Institutional Complexity in Practice.” In Institutional Logics in Action, Part B (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 39 Part B), edited by M. Lounsbury and E. Boxenbaum, 37–61. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Jazdi, N. 2014. “Cyber Physical Systems in the Context of Industry 4.0.” Paper presented at IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, May 22–24. doi:10.1109/AQTR.2014.6857843.
   Google Scholar
• Judd, R. C. 1972. “Use of Delphi Methods in Higher Education.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 4 (2): 173–186. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(72)90013-3.
   Google Scholar
• Jules, T. D. (Ed.). 2016. The Global Educational Policy Environment in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Gated, Regulated and Governed. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kattan, B. 2017. “Powered by Education, East Asia is Getting Ready for the Fourth Industrial Revolution.” Retrieved March 7, 2019, from http://blogs.worldbank.org/education/education-eastasia-fourth-industrial-revolution.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, M. G. 1948. Rank Correlation Methods. London: Griffin.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, R., and D. Whybark. 1994. “Barriers to the Management of International Operations.” Journal of Operations Management 11 (4): 385–396. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(97)90006-1.
   Google Scholar
• Kooijman, M., M. Hekkert, P. Van Meer, E. Moors, and H. Schellekens. 2017. “How Institutional Logics Hamper Innovation: The Case of Animal Testing.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 118: 70–79. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.003.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, P. S., and A. Bausch. 2018. “Managerial Social Networks and Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Bonding and Bridging Effects across Institutional Environments.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 35 (6): 865–889. doi:10.1111/jpim.12450.
   Google Scholar
• Lasi, H., P. Fettke, H.-G. Kemper, T. Feld, and M. Hoffmann. 2014. “Industry 4.0.” Business & Information Systems Engineering 6 (4): 239–242. doi:10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., G. G. Moon, and Y. K. Kwon. 2019. “Implementing Liberal Arts Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: lessons and Implications for Korea’s Higher Education Policy.” International Review of Public Administration 24 (4): 282–294. doi:10.1080/12294659.2019.1700646.
   Google Scholar
• Lele, U., and S. Goswami. 2017. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Agricultural and Rural Innovation, and Implications for Public Policy and Investments: A Case of India.” Agricultural Economics 48 (S1): 87–100. doi:10.1111/agec.12388.
   Google Scholar
• Lerman, L. V., W. Gerstlberger, M. F. Lima, and A. G. Frank. 2021. “How Governments, Universities, and Companies Contribute to Renewable Energy Development? A Municipal Innovation Policy Perspective of the Triple Helix.” Energy Research & Social Science 71: 101854. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101854.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and I. Ivanova. 2016. “Open Innovation” and “Triple Helix” Models of Innovation: Can Synergy in Innovation Systems Be Measured?” Journal of Open Innovation Technological Marketing Complex 2 (3): 1–12. doi:10.1186/s40852-016-0039-7.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and G. Zawdie. 2010. “The Triple Helix Perspective of Innovation Systems.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22 (7): 789–804. doi:10.1080/09537325.2010.511142.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., H. Etzkowitz, I. Ivanova, and M. Meyer. 2017. “The Measurement of Synergy in Innovation Systems: redundancy Generation in a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations.” In Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators, edited by Wolfgang Glänzel, Henk F. Moed, Ulrich Schmoch, and Mike Thelwall. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., Y. Sheng, and X. Yan. 2020. “Empirical Research on the Level of Institutional Innovation in the Development of China’s High-Tech Industry.” IEEE Access. 8: 115800–115811. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3003932.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., and J. Xing. 2020. “Why is Collaborative Agglomeration of Innovation so Important for Improving Regional Innovation Capabilities? A Perspective Based on Collaborative Agglomeration of Industry-University-Research Institution.” Complexity 2020: 1–21. doi:10.1155/2020/7049606.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., L. He, and Y. Zhao. 2020. “The Triple Helix System and Regional Entrepreneurship in China.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 32 (7–8): 508–530. doi:10.1080/08985626.2019.1666168.
   Google Scholar
• Linstone, H. A., and M. Turoff. 2002. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, J., M. Oliveira, J. Lopes, and U. Zaman. 2021. “Networks, Innovation and Knowledge Transfer in Tourism Industry: An Empirical Study of SMEs in Portugal.” Social Sciences 10 (5): 159. doi:10.3390/socsci10050159.
   Google Scholar
• Luengo-Valderrey, M., J. Pando-García, I. Periáñez-Cañadillas, and A. Cervera-Taulet. 2020. “Analysis of the Impact of the Triple Helix on Sustainable Innovation Targets in Spanish Technology Companies.” Sustainability 12 (8): 3274. doi:10.3390/su12083274.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, C. G., M. Winroth, D. Carlsson, P. Almström, V. Centerholt, and M. Hallin. 2019. “Industry 4.0 Readiness in Manufacturing Companies: challenges and Enablers towards Increased Digitalization.” Procedia CIRP 81: 1113–1118. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.262.
   Google Scholar
• Manyika, J., S. Lund, M. Chui, J. Bughin, J. Woetzel, P. Batra, R. Ko, and S. Sanghvi. 2017. Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained: Workforce Transitions in a Time of Automation. New York: McKinsey Global Institute, 150.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G., S. Siebert, and I. Robson. 2018. “Conformist Innovation: An Institutional Logics Perspective on How HR Executives Construct Business School Reputations.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 29 (13): 2027–2053. doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1239118.
   Google Scholar
• McNemar, Q. 1947. “Note on the Sampling Error of the Difference between Correlated Proportions or Percentages.” Psychometrika 12 (2): 153–157. doi:10.1007/BF02295996.
   Google Scholar
• Megnigbeto, E. 2018. “Modelling the Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relationships with Game Theory: Core, Shapley Value and Nucleolus as Indicators of Synergy within an Innovation System.” Journal of Informetrics 12 (4): 1118–1132. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.005.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W. 1977. “The Effects of Education as an Institution.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (1): 55–77. doi:10.1086/226506.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. A., and J. M. Booker. 2001. Eliciting and Analyzing Expert Judgment. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, U. 2019. “The Emergence of an Envisioned Future. Sensemaking in the Case of “Industrie 4.0” in Germany.” Futures 109: 130–141. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2019.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Moeuf, A., S. Lamouri, R. Pellerin, S. Tamayo-Giraldo, E. Tobon-Valencia, and R. Eburdy. 2020. “Identification of Critical Success Factors, Risks and Opportunities of Industry 4.0 in SMEs.” International Journal of Production Research 58 (5): 1384–1400. doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1636323.
   Google Scholar
• Mohsen, K., S. Saeed, A. Raza, S. Omar, and M. Muffatto. 2021. “Does Using Latest Technologies Impact New Venture Innovation? A Contingency-Based View of Institutional Environments.” Journal of Small Business Management 59 (4): 852–886. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12534.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. 2011. “Institutional Innovation: Re-Invigorating the University through Transdisciplinary Engagement.” TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 9 (2): 598–609. doi:10.31269/triplec.v9i2.198.
   Google Scholar
• Morrar, R., H. Arman, and S. Mousa. 2017. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0): A Social Innovation Perspective.” Technology Innovation Management Review 7 (11): 12–20. doi:10.22215/timreview/1117.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, V., N. Rosenbusch, and A. Bausch. 2013. “Success Patterns of Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Institutional Factors.” Journal of Management 39 (6): 1606–1636. doi:10.1177/0149206313484516.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, N., A. Zabala, J. Huge, T. O. Nyumba, B. Adem Esmail, and W. J. Sutherland. 2018. “Comparison of Techniques for Eliciting Views and Judgements in Decision-Making.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9 (1): 54–63. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12940.
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, R., and R. Agnihotri. 2022. “Digital Selling: organizational and Managerial Influences for Frontline Readiness and Effectiveness.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 50 (4): 800–821. doi:10.1007/s11747-021-00836-5.
   Google Scholar
• Nhamo, G., C. Nhemachena, and S. Nhamo. 2020. “Using ICT Indicators to Measure Readiness of Countries to Implement Industry 4.0 and the SDGs.” Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 22 (2): 315–337. doi:10.1007/s10018-019-00259-1.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, P., J. R. Holm, and E. Lorenz. 2021. “Work Policy and Automation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution.” In Globalisation, New and Emerging Technologies, and Sustainable Development: The Danish Innovation System in Transition, edited by J. L. Christensen, B. Gregersen, J. R. Holm, & E. Lorenz, 189–207. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Okoli, C., and S. D. Pawlowski. 2004. “The Delphi Method as a Research Tool: An Example, Design Considerations and Applications.” Information & Management 42 (1): 15–29. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Pacchini, A. P. T., W. C. Lucato, F. Facchini, and G. Mummolo. 2019. “The Degree of Readiness for the Implementation of Industry 4.0.” Computers in Industry 113: 103125. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.103125.
   Google Scholar
• Park, W. 2020. “Invisible College within Triple Helix and Social Network Studies in the Age of Big Data.” Quality & Quantity 54 (1): 193–195. doi:10.1007/s11135-020-00967-x.
   Google Scholar
• Penprase, B. 2018. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Higher Education.” In Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, edited by N. Gleason. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Piccarozzi, M., B. Aquilani, and C. Gatti. 2018. “Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review.” Sustainability 10 (10): 3821. doi:10.3390/su10103821.
   Google Scholar
• Pinho, J. 2017. “Institutional Theory and Global Entrepreneurship: exploring Differences Between Factor- versus Innovation-Driven Countries.” Journal of International Entrepreneurship 15 (1): 56–84. doi:10.1007/s10843-016-0193-9.
   Google Scholar
• Pique, J. M., J. Berbegal-Mirabent, and H. Etzkowitz. 2018. “Triple Helix and the Evolution of Ecosystems of Innovation: The Case of Silicon Valley.” Triple Helix 5 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1186/s40604-018-0060-x.
   Google Scholar
• Poloz, S. S. 2021. “Technological Progress and Monetary Policy: Managing the Fourth Industrial Revolution.” Journal of International Money and Finance 114: 102373. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2021.102373.
   Google Scholar
• Polzin, F., P. Von Flotow, and L. Klerkx. 2016. “Addressing Barriers to Eco-Innovation: Exploring the Finance Mobilization Functions of Institutional Innovation Intermediaries.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 103: 34–46. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Prasetio, A., B. Aboobaider, and A. Ahmad. 2021. “Assessing Impact of Triple Helix Variables to Knowledge Transfer Variable and Innovation Systems.” Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education 12 (4): 1690–1700.
   Google Scholar
• Psycharis, S. 2005. “Presumptions and Action Affecting an e-Learning Adoption by the Educational System. Implementation Using Virtual Private Networks.” European Journal of Open and Distance Learning 2: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, R. 2017. “Universities and Economic Development in Lagging Regions: ‘Triple Helix’ Policy in Wales.” Regional Studies 51 (7): 982–993. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1171306.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, J. W., A. N. Spiegel, and R. H. Bruininks. 1995. “Future Directions in Education and Inclusion of Students with Disabilities: A Delphi Investigation.” Exceptional Children 61 (6): 553–576. doi:10.1177/001440299506100605.
   Google Scholar
• Raffaelli, R., and M. Glynn. 2015. “Institutional Innovation: Novel, Useful, and Legitimate.” In The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship, edited by Christina E. Shalley, Michael A. Hitt, and Jing Zhou. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rajnai, Z., I. Kocsis, and B. Fregan. 2018. “Risks of Industry 4.0 and Digitization.” Műszaki Tudományos Közlemények 9 (1): 87–90. doi:10.33894/mtk-2018.09.17.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, M. 2007. “Redefining Firm Competencies, Innovation and Labour Mobility: A Case Study in Telecommunication Services.” Industry & Innovation 14 (3): 325–347. doi:10.1080/13662710701369288.
   Google Scholar
• Ranga, M., and H. Etzkowitz. 2013. “Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society.” Industry and Higher Education 27 (4): 237–262. doi:10.5367/ihe.2013.0165.
   Google Scholar
• Reefke, H., and D. Sundaram. 2018. “Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Decision Models for Transformation and Maturity.” Decision Support Systems 113: 56–72. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2018.07.002.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, D., S. De Leeuw, and W. Dullaert. 2016. “Factors Affecting Global Inventory Prepositioning Locations in Humanitarian Operations—a Delphi Study.” Journal of Business Logistics 37 (1): 59–74. doi:10.1111/jbl.12112.
   Google Scholar
• Rodima-Taylor, D., M. F. Olwig, and N. Chhetri. 2012. “Adaptation as Innovation, Innovation as Adaptation: An Institutional Approach to Climate Change.” Applied Geography 33 (1): 107–111. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.011.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 1983. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rojko, A. 2017. “Industry 4.0 Concept: Background and Overview.” International Journal of Mobile Technology 11 (5): 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbusch, N., M. Gusenbauer, I. Hatak, M. Fink, and K. Meyer. 2019. “Innovation Offshoring, Institutional Context, and Innovation Performance: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Management Studies 56 (1): 203–233. doi:10.1111/joms.12407.
   Google Scholar
• Ruttan, V. W., and Y. Hayami. 1984. “Toward a Theory of Induced Institutional Innovation.” The Journal of Development Studies 20 (4): 203–223. doi:10.1080/00220388408421914.
   Google Scholar
• Samaranayake, P., K. Ramanathan, and T. Laosirihongthong. 2017, December. “Implementing Industry 4.0—a Technological Readiness Perspective.” In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 529–533. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Santaguida, P., L. Dolovich, D. Oliver, L. Lamarche, A. Gilsing, L. E. Griffith, J. Richardson, D. Mangin, M. Kastner, and P. Raina. 2018. “Protocol for a Delphi Consensus Exercise to Identify a Core Set of Criteria for Selecting Health Related Outcome Measures (HROM) to Be Used in Primary Health Care.” BMC Family Practice 19 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1186/s12875-018-0831-5.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill. 2012. Research Methods for Business Students. 6th edition. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Sawang, S., Y. Zhou, and X. Yang. 2017. “Does Institutional Context Matter in Building Innovation Capability?” International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development 9 (2): 153–168. doi:10.1504/IJTLID.2017.084933.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 1997. “Managing Delphi Surveys Using Nonparametric Statistical Techniques.” Decision Sciences 28 (3): 763–774. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01330.x.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, A., A. Ziaee Bigdeli, C. Galera Zarco, and T. Baines. 2019. “Capturing the Benefits of Industry 4.0: A Business Network Perspective.” Production Planning & Control 30 (16): 1305–1321. doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1612111.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, A., S. Erol, and W. Sihn. 2016. “A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises.” Procedia CIRP 52: 161–166. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. 2017. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What it Means and How to Respond.” Accessed 20 August 2020. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. 2006. Institutions and Organisations. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Shayganmehr, M., A. Kumar, J. A. Garza-Reyes, and M. A. Moktadir. 2021. “Industry 4.0 Enablers for a Cleaner Production and Circular Economy within the Context of Business Ethics: A Study in a Developing Country.” Journal of Cleaner Production 281: 125280. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125280.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. L., and S. Bagchi-Sen. 2010. “Triple Helix and Regional Development: A Perspective from Oxfordshire in the UK.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22 (7): 805–818. doi:10.1080/09537325.2010.511143.
   Google Scholar
• Sony, M., and S. Naik. 2019. “Key Ingredients for Evaluating Industry 4.0 Readiness for Organizations: A Literature Review.” Benchmarking: An International Journal 27 (7): 2213–2232. doi:10.1108/BIJ-09-2018-0284.
   Google Scholar
• Sony, M., and S. Naik. 2020. “Critical Factors for the Successful Implementation of Industry 4.0: A Review and Future Research Direction.” Production Planning & Control 31 (10): 799–815. doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1691278.
   Google Scholar
• Stentoft, J., K. Adsbøll Wickstrøm, K. Philipsen, and A. Haug. 2021. “Drivers and Barriers for Industry 4.0 Readiness and Practice: empirical Evidence from Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturers.” Production Planning & Control 32 (10): 811–828. doi:10.1080/09537287.2020.1768318.
   Google Scholar
• Subrahmanya, M. B. 2019. “Role of the Triple Helix in the Ecosystems for Tech Start-Ups in India: A Gap Analysis.” Global Business and Economics Review 21 (3/4): 450–473. doi:10.1504/GBER.2019.099391.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Y., X. Hu, C. Petti, and M. Thürer. 2019. “Institutional Incentives and Pressures in Chinese Manufacturing Firms’ Innovation.” Management Decision 58 (5): 812–827. doi:10.1108/MD-08-2018-0933.
   Google Scholar
• Tumbas, S., N. Berente, and J. Vom Brocke. 2018. “Digital Innovation and Institutional Entrepreneurship: Chief Digital Officer Perspectives of Their Emerging Role.” Journal of Information Technology 33 (3): 188–202. doi:10.1057/s41265-018-0055-0.
   Google Scholar
• Turja, T., S. Taipale, M. Kaakinen, and A. Oksanen. 2020. “Care Workers’ Readiness for Robotization: Identifying Psychological and Socio-Demographic Determinants.” International Journal of Social Robotics 12 (1): 79–90. doi:10.1007/s12369-019-00544-9.
   Google Scholar
• Ustundag, A., and E. Cevikcan. 2017. Industry 4.0: Managing the Digital Transformation. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zolingen, S. J., and C. A. Klaassen. 2003. “Selection Processes in a Delphi Study about Key Qualifications in Senior Secondary Vocational Education.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 70 (4): 317–340. doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(02)00202-0.
   Google Scholar
• Veiga, P. M., S. J. Teixeira, R. Figueiredo, and C. I. Fernandes. 2020. “Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Competitiveness: A Public Institution Love Triangle.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 72: 100863. doi:10.1016/j.seps.2020.100863.
   Google Scholar
• Viale, R., and A. Pozzali. 2010. “Complex Adaptive Systems and the Evolutionary Triple Helix.” Critical Sociology 36 (4): 575–594. doi:10.1177/0896920510365923.
   Google Scholar
• Vrchota, J., M. Mařiková, P. Řehoř, L. Rolínek, and R. Toušek. 2020. “Human Resources Readiness for Industry 4.0.” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 6 (1): 3. doi:10.3390/joitmc6010003.
   Google Scholar
• Waldorff, S. 2013. “Accounting for Organizational Innovations: Mobilizing Institutional Logics in Translation.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 29 (3): 219–234. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2013.03.010.
   Google Scholar
• Walinga, J. 2008. “Toward a Theory of Change Readiness: The Roles of Appraisal, Focus, and Perceived Control.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 44 (3): 315–347. doi:10.1177/0021886308318967.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., and Z. Huang. 2020. “Research on the Synergetic Innovation between Pharmaceutical Enterprises and Scientific Research Institutions Based on the Quantum Game.” IEEE Access. 8: 63718–63724. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976544.
   Google Scholar
• Wankhede, V. A., and S. Vinodh. 2023. “Benchmarking Industry 4.0 Readiness Evaluation Using Fuzzy Approaches.” Benchmarking 30 (1): 281–306. doi:10.1108/BIJ-08-2021-0505.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, A., and J. Gardner. 2019. “Aligning Technology and Institutional Readiness: The Adoption of Innovation.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 31 (10): 1229–1241. doi:10.1080/09537325.2019.1601694.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. J. 2020. “A Theory of Organizational Readiness for Change.” In Handbook on Implementation Science, edited by Per Nilsen, and Sarah A. Birken, 215–232. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wijiharjono, N. 2021. “The Triple Helix and the Innovation Capability: A Conceptual Framework for Creative Economic Marketing.” AGREGAT: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis 5 (1): 56–77.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhill, J. 2010. “Capacities for Institutional Innovation: A Complexity Perspective.” Journal Compilation 41 (3): 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. 2019. In Focus. Accessed 7 June 2020. https://www.weforum.org/focus.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., C. Wang, J. Hong, P. Piperopoulos, and S. Zhuo. 2016. “Internationalization and Innovation Performance of Emerging Market Enterprises: The Role of Host-Country Institutional Development.” Journal of World Business 51 (2): 251–263. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2015.09.002.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, J., and Y. Yang. 2021. “IoT-Based Model for Intelligent Innovation Practice System in Higher Education Institutions.” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40 (2): 2861–2870. doi:10.3233/JIFS-189326.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L. D., E. L. Xu, and L. Li. 2018. “Industry 4.0: State of the Art and Future Trends.” International Journal of Production Research 56 (8): 2941–2962. doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, G. 2018. “The Cost of Institutional Innovation in the Absence of an External Governance Mechanism—A Case Study on the ‘Alibaba Partnership.” China Journal of Accounting Studies 6 (4): 498–526. doi:10.1080/21697213.2019.1612192.
   Google Scholar
• Zanello, G., X. Fu, P. Mohnen, and M. Ventresca. 2016. “The Creation and Diffusion of Innovation in Developing Countries: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Economic Surveys 30 (5): 884–912. doi:10.1111/joes.12126.
   Google Scholar
• Zutin, G. C., G. F. Barbosa, P. C. de Barros, E. B. Tiburtino, F. L. F. Kawano, and S. B. Shiki. 2022. “Readiness Levels of Industry 4.0 Technologies Applied to Aircraft Manufacturing-A Review, Challenges and Trends.” The International Journal, Advanced Manufacturing Technology 120 (1–2): 927–943. doi:10.1007/s00170-022-08769-1.
   Google Scholar