134
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

Identifying nanotechnological linkages in the Finnish economy – an explorative study

Pages 513-531 | Published online: 16 Jun 2010

References

  • Abernathy , W. J. and Clark , K. B. 1985 . Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction . Research Policy , 14 ( 1 ) : 3 – 22 .
  • Bozeman , B. , Laredo , P. and Mangematin , V. 2007 . Understanding the emergence and deployment of ‘nano’ S&T . Research Policy , 36 ( 6 ) : 807 – 12 .
  • Bresnahan , T. F. and Trajtenberg , M. 1995 . General purpose technologies: ‘Engines of growth’? . Journal of Econometrics , 65 ( 1 ) : 83 – 108 .
  • Cantwell , J. and Iammarino , S. 2000 . Multinational corporations and the location of technological innovation in the UK regions . Regional Studies , 34 ( 4 ) : 317 – 32 .
  • Carlsson , B. and Eliasson , G. 2003 . Industrial dynamics and endogenous growth . Industry and Innovation , 10 ( 4 ) : 435 – 55 .
  • Christensen , C. M. and Bower , J. L. 1996 . Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms . Strategic Management Journal , 17 ( 3 ) : 197 – 218 .
  • Cohen , W. M. and Levinthal , D. A. 1989 . Innovation and learning – the two faces of R&D . Economic Journal , 99 ( 397 ) : 569 – 96 .
  • Cohen , W. M. and Levinthal , D. A. 1990 . Absorptive-capacity – a new perspective on learning and innovation . Administrative Science Quarterly , 35 ( 1 ) : 128 – 52 .
  • David , P. A. 1990 . The dynamo and the computer – an historical-perspective on the modern productivity paradox . American Economic Review , 80 ( 2 ) : 355 – 61 .
  • Fogelberg , H. and Sanden , B. A. 2008 . Understanding reflexive systems of innovation: An analysis of Swedish nanotechnology discourse and organization . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , 20 ( 1 ) : 65 – 81 .
  • Granstrand , O. 1998 . Towards a theory of the technology-based firm . Research Policy , 27 ( 5 ) : 465 – 89 .
  • Griliches , Z. 1990 . Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey . Journal of Economic Literature , 28 ( 4 ) : 1661 – 707 .
  • Helpman, E., and M. Trajtenberg. 1994. A time to sow and a time to reap: Growth based on general purpose technologies. CIAR Working Paper 32
  • Hill , C. W.L. and Rothaermel , F. T. 2003 . The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation . Academy of Management Review , 28 ( 2 ) : 257 – 74 .
  • Hullman, A. 2006. The economic development of nanotechnology – An indicator based analysis. European Commission, DG Research, Unit “Nano S&T-Convergent Science and Technologies”. ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/nanoarticle_hullman_nov2006.pdf
  • Igami, M., and T. Okazaki. 2007. Capturing nanotechnology's current state of development via analysis of patents. STI Working Paper, 2007/4, OECD, Paris
  • Lee , R. and Jose , P. D. 2008 . Self-interest, self-restraint and corporate responsibility for nanotechnologies: Emerging dilemmas for modern managers . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , 20 ( 1 ) : 113 – 25 .
  • Lipsey , R. G. , Carlaw , K. I. and Bekar , C. T. 2005 . Economic transformations: General purpose technologies and long-term economic growth , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
  • Loveridge , D. , Dewick , P. and Randles , S. 2008 . Converging technologies at the nanoscale: The making of a new world? . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , 20 ( 1 ) : 29 – 43 .
  • Luukkonen , T. and Palmberg , C. 2007 . Living up to the expectations set by ICT? The case of biotechnology commercialisation in Finland . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , 19 ( 3 ) : 329 – 49 .
  • Meyer , M. 2000 . “ Hurdles on the way to commercialising novel technologies – The case of nanotechnology ” . Helsinki University of Technology, Institute of Strategy and International Business . Working Paper Series, 2000: 1
  • Meyer , M. 2005 . “ Nanotechnology in Sweden: Tracking patenting activity and links between nanotech firms and Swedish science ” . Helsinki Knowledge Flows Report IVA
  • Meyer , M. and Persson , O. 1998 . Nanotechnology-interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application . Scientometrics , 42 ( 2 ) : 195 – 205 .
  • Mitchell , W. 1989 . Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents’ entry into emerging industrial subfields . Administrative Science Quarterly , 34 ( 2 ) : 208 – 30 .
  • Mitchell , W. 1991 . Dual clocks: Entry order influences on incumbent and newcomer market share and survival when specialized assets retain their value . Strategic Management Journal , 12 ( 2 ) : 85 – 100 .
  • Nikulainen , T. 2007 . “ What makes a gatekeeper? – Insights from the Finnish nanocommunity ” . DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies . Druid Working Paper 07-03
  • Nikulainen, T., M. Pajarinen, and C. Palmberg. 2005. Patents and technological change – a review with focus on the FEPOCI database. ETLA Discussion paper, 984. Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Helsinki
  • Palmberg , C. 2008 . The transfer and commercialization of nanotechnology – a comparative analysis of university and company researchers . The Journal of Technology Transfer , 33 ( 6 ) : 631 – 52 .
  • Palmberg , C. and Nikulainen , T. 2006 . “ Industrial renewal and growth through nanotechnology? – An overview with focus on Finland. ETLA ” . DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies . Discussion paper, 1020
  • Palmberg , C. , Pajarinen , M. and Nikulainen , T. 2007 . “ Transferring science-based technologies to industry – does nanotechnology make a difference? ” . Helsinki : Research Institute of the Finnish Economy . ETLA Discussion paper, 1064
  • Pavitt , K. 1984 . Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory . Research Policy , 13 ( 6 ) : 343 – 73 .
  • Rothaermel , F. T. and Boeker , W. 2008 . Old technology meets new technology: Complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation . Strategic Management Journal , 29 ( 1 ) : 47 – 77 .
  • Rothaermel , F. T. and Hill , C. W.L. 2005 . Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: A longitudinal study of industry and firm performance . Organization Science , 16 ( 1 ) : 52 – 70 .
  • Rothaermel , F. T. and Thursby , M. 2007 . The nanotech versus the biotech revolution: Sources of productivity in incumbent firm research . Research Policy , 36 ( 6 ) : 832 – 49 .
  • Schmidt , J. C. 2008 . Tracing interdisciplinarity of converging technologies at the nanoscale: A critical analysis of recent nanotechnosciences . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , 20 ( 1 ) : 45 – 63 .
  • Shea , C. M. 2005 . Future management research directions in nanotechnology: A case study . Journal of Engineering and Technology Management , 22 ( 3 ) : 185 – 200 .
  • Soete , L. 1987 . The impact of technological innovation on international trade patterns: The evidence reconsidered . Research Policy , 16 ( 2–4 ) : 101 – 30 .
  • Stephan , P. E. 1996 . The economics of science . Journal of Economic Literature , 34 ( 3 ) : 1199 – 235 .
  • Teece , D. J. 1986 . Profiting from technological innovation – implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public-policy . Research Policy , 15 ( 6 ) : 285 – 305 .
  • Teece , D. J. 2006 . Reflections on ‘profiting from innovation’ . Research Policy , 35 ( 8 ) : 1131 – 46 .
  • Throne-Holst , H. and Sto , E. 2008 . Who should be precautionary? Governance of nanotechnology in the risk society . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , 20 ( 1 ) : 99 – 112 .
  • Tripsas , M. 1997 . Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry . Strategic Management Journal , 18 ( 1 ) : 119 – 42 .
  • Tushman , M. L. and Anderson , P. 1986 . Technological discontinuities and organizational environments . Administrative Science Quarterly , 31 ( 3 ) : 439 – 465 .
  • Wood , S. , Geldart , A. and Jones , R. 2008 . Crystallizing the nanotechnology debate . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , 20 ( 1 ) : 13 – 27 .
  • Youtie , J. , Iacopetta , M. and Graham , S. 2008 . Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: Can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? . The Journal of Technology Transfer , 33 ( 3 ) : 315 – 29 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.