Next generation entrepreneur: innovation strategy through Web 2.0 technologies in SMEs

REFERENCES

• Adebanjo, D., and R. Michaelides. 2010. Analysis of Web 2.0 enabled e-clusters: A case study. Technovation 30 4: 238–48. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, D., and R. Burrows. 2007. Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: some initial considerations. Sociological Research Online 12, 5. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/17.html doi: 10.5153/sro.1560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., K. Maton, and L. Kervin. 2008. The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology 39 5: 775–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blinn, N., N. Lindermann, K. Faks, and M. Nuttgens. 2009. WEB 2.0 in SMEs networks – a design science approach considering multi-perspective requirements. In Value creation in e-business management, 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2009, San Francisco, CA, USA, August 6–9, M.L. Nelson, M.J. Shaw and T.J. Strader, 271–283. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, N., T. Magedanz, and H. Stein. 2007. Service creation & delivery for SME based on SOA/IMS. In MNCNA ’07. Palm Beach – CA, USA, November 2007. Copyrights ACM 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Brabham, D.C. 2008. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases convergence. The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14 1: 75–90. doi: 10.1177/1354856507084420
   Google Scholar
• Bughin, J., A.H. Byers, and M. Chui. 2011. How social technologies are extending the organization. McKinsey, December. mckinseyquarterly.com
   Google Scholar
• Bughin, J., and M. Chui. 2010. The rise of the networked enterprise: Web 2.0 finds its payday. McKinsey, December. mckinseyquarterly.com
   Google Scholar
• Bughin, J., and J. Manyika. 2007. How businesses are using Web 2.0: A McKinsey Global Survey. McKinsey, September. mckinseyquarterly.com
   Google Scholar
• Buyya, R., C.S. Yeo, S. Venugopal, J. Broberg, and I. Brandic. 2009. Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: Vision, type, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility. Future Generation Computer Systems 25 6: 599–616. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Consoli, D., and P.P. Patrucco. 2008. Innovation platform and the governance of knowledge: Evidence from Italy and the UK. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 17, 7–8: 699–716. doi: 10.1080/10438590701785694
   Google Scholar
• Down, S., and J. Reveley. 2004. Generational encounters and the social formation of entrepreneurial identity: ‘Young guns’ and ‘old farts’. Organization 11 2: 233–50. doi: 10.1177/1350508404030381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M., and M.E. Graebner. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal 50 1: 25–32. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission, Directorate General INFSO. 2010. Summary of the outcome of previous consultations in the area of ‘ICT for governance and policy modeling’. Position Paper, mimeograph.
   Google Scholar
• Gassmann, O., E. Enkel, and H. Chesbrough. 2010. The future of open innovation. R&D Management 40 3: 213–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, A. 2007. Can web 2.0 be used effectively inside organisations? Bilgi Dünyas 8 1: 123–39.
   Google Scholar
• Giustini, D. 2006. How Web 2.0 is changing medicine. The British Medical Journal 333 7582: 1283–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39062.555405.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J. 2002. Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy 31 3: 477–92. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00120-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, S. 2007. Does your enterprise need Web 2.0? Ovum PLC Report.
   Google Scholar
• Howells, J., D. Gagliardi, and K. Malik. 2008. The growth and management of R&D outsourcing: Evidence from UK pharmaceuticals. R&D Management 38 2: 205–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiponen, A., and J. Byma. 2009. If you cannot block, you better run: Small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies. Research Policy 38 9: 1478–88. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, A.Y., S. Massini, and C. Peeters. 2009. Why are companies offshoring innovation? The emerging global race for talent. Journal of International Business Studies 40 6: 901–25. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2008.92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindermann, N., S. Valcarcel, M. Schaarschmidt, and H. von Kortzfleisch. 2009. SME2.0: Roadmap towards Web 2.0 – Based open innovation in SME-networks – A case study based research framework. In Information systems – Creativity and innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises, Dhillon, G.B.C. Stahl, and R. Baskerville, 28–41. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, S. 2008. A dynamic perspective on next-generation offshoring: The global sourcing of science and engineering talent. The Academy of Management perspectives 22 3: 35–54. doi: 10.5465/AMP.2008.34587994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M.L. 2004. Technochange management: Using IT to drive organizational change. Journal of Information Technology 19 1: 4–20. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R.M., K. Barzilai-Nahon, and N. Lou. 2008. The organizational impact of digital natives: How organizations are responding to the next generation of knowledge workers. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on management of technology, Dubai, 2008, IAMOT 2008.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, A. 2009. Enterprise 2.0: New collaborative tools for your organization's toughest challenges. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, J. 1998. Building operations management theory through case and field research. Journal of Operations Management 16 4: 441–54. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00023-0
   Google Scholar
• Mergel, I.A., C.M. Schweik, and J.E. Fountain. 2009. The transformational effect of Web 2.0 technologies on government. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1412796 (accessed August 2, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2002. Proposed Standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, T. 2005. WEB 2.0, TTI/ Vanguard, Dec 2005. http://www.ttivanguard.com/ttivanguard_cfmfiles/pdf/dc05/dc05session4003.pdf (accessed August 2, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, T. 2007. What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. MPRA, Paper No. 4578.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9 5: 1–6. doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. 2008. Young minds, fast timers, Edutopia, June. http://www.edutopia.org/ikid-digital-learner-technology-2008 (accessed August 2, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, D., and C. Nelson. 2008. Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the Schools 25, 3–4: 211–25. doi: 10.1080/07380560802370997
   Google Scholar
• Stocker, A., G. Dösinger, A. Us Saeed, and C. Wagner. 2007. The three pillars of corporate web 2.0: A model for definition. Proceedings of Triple-I‘07 conference, September 5–7 in Graz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. 2005. The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Tether, B. 2002. Who cooperates for innovation, and why. An empirical analysis. Research Policy 31 6: 947–67. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C., and A. Sheth. 2011. Web wisdom: An essay on how Web 2.0 and semantic web can foster a global knowledge society. Computers in Human Behavior 27 4: 1285–93. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M., D. Budgen, and P. Brereton. 2003. Turning software into a service. Computer 36 10: 38–44. doi: 10.1109/MC.2003.1236470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, C., N. Tskiriktsis, and M. Frohlich. 2002. Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22 2: 195–219. doi: 10.1108/01443570210414329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, M., and G.R. Gangadharan. 2010. Modeling the mashup ecosystem: Structure and growth. R&D Management 40 1: 40–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wijaya, S., M. Spruit, W. Scheper, and J. Versendaal. 2011. Web 2.0-based webstrategies for three different types of organizations. Computers in Human Behavior 27 4: 1399–407. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, B.W., O. Schilke, and S. Ullrich. 2010. Strategic development of business models: Implications of the web 2.0 for creating value on the internet. Long Range Planning 43, 2–3: 272–90. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2010.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. 2003. Case study research: design and methods. applied social research methods series. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar