Skills and wills: the keys to identify the right team in collaborative innovation platforms

References

• Abbate, T., and R. Coppolino. 2011. Knowledge creation through knowledge brokers: Some anecdotal evidence. Journal of Management Control 22: 359–71. doi: 10.1007/s00187-011-0144-5
   Google Scholar
• Abramowicz, W., E. Bukowska, J. Dzikowski, A. Filipowska, and M. Kaczmarek. 2011. Semantically enabled experts finding system-ontologies, reasoning approach and web interface design. ADBIS 2: 157–66.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, A., L. Becchetti, C. Castillo, A. Gionis, and S. Leonardi. 2010. Power in unity: Forming teams in large-scale community systems. Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management, Toronto, ON, Canada, 599–608. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, A., L. Becchetti, C. Castillo, A. Gionis, and S. Leonardi. 2012. Online team formation in social networks. Proceedings of the 21st international conference on world wide web, Lyon, France, 839–48. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bakici, T., E. Admirall, and J. Wareham. 2010. The underlying mechanisms of open innovation intermediaries. Paper presented at the R&D management conference, June 30–July 02, University of Manchester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Baykasoglu, A., T. Dereli, and S. Das. 2007. Project team selection using fuzzy optimization approach. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal 38: 155–85. doi: 10.1080/01969720601139041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayus, B.L. 2013. Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Science 59: 226–44. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berio, G., and M. Harzallah. 2005. Knowledge management for competence management. Journal of Universal Knowledge Management 1: 21–8.
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist, K., and J. Levy. 2006. Collaboration capability–a focal concept in knowledge creation and collaborative innovation in networks. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy 2: 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K.J., N. Lacetera, and K.R. Lakhani. 2011 Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Science 57: 843–63. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D.C. 2008. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving an introduction and cases. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14: 75–90. doi: 10.1177/1354856507084420
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., and D. Liu. 2012. Comparing strategies for winning expert-rated and crowd-rated crowdsourcing contests: First findings. Proceeding of the 18th Americas conference on information systems, Seattle, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H.W. 2006. Open business models. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen, T.H. 2013. External knowledge sourcing from innovation cooperation and the role of absorptive capacity: Empirical evidence from Norway and Sweden. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 25: 57–70. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.751009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colucci, S., T. Di Noia, E. Di Sciascio, F.M. Donini, M. Mongiello, and M. Mottola. 2003. A formal approach to ontology-based semantic match of skills descriptions. Journal of Universal Computer Science 9: 1437–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva, F.Q., A.C.C. França, T.B. Gouveia, C.V. Monteiro, and M. Suassuna. 2011. An empirical study on the use of team building criteria in software projects. Empirical software engineering and measurement (ESEM), 2011 international symposium, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Diener, K., and F. Piller. 2009. The market for open innovation increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of the innovation process. The market for open innovation: The RWTH open innovation accellerator survey. Aachen: RWTH Aachen University – Technology & Innovation Management Group.
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, C., F. Skopik, D. Schall, and S. Dustdar. 2011. Interaction mining and skill-dependent recommendations for multi-objective team composition. Data & Knowledge Engineering 70: 866–91. doi: 10.1016/j.datak.2011.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner, W., J.M. Leimeister, and H. Krcmar. 2009. Community engineering for innovations: The ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R&D Management 39: 342–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, L., I. Petrick, and E. Trauth. 2012. Hanging with the right crowd: Matching crowdsourcing need to crowd characteristics. Proceeding of the 18th Americas conference on information systems, Seattle, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Fantoni, G., R. Apreda, D. Gabelloni, and G. Montelisciani. 2012. You solve, I learn: A novel approach to e-learning in collaborative crowdsourcing. Proceedings of the 18th international conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE), Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Fantoni G., R. Apreda, P. Valleri, A. Bonaccorsi, and M. Manenti. 2009. IPR tracking system in collaborative environments. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on concurrent enterprising (ICE), Leiden, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Fazel-Zarandi, M., M.S. Fox, and E. Yu. 2013. Ontologies in expertise finding systems: Modeling, analysis, and design. In Ontology-based applications for enterprise systems and knowledge management, ed. Robert Colomb, Mohammad Nazir Ahmad, and Mohd Syazwan Abdullah, 158–77. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Ferragina, P., and U. Scaiella. 2010. TAGME: On-the-fly annotation of short text fragments (by wikipedia entities). Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, Toronto, ON, Canada, 1625–8.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, E.L., and R.G. Askin. 2005. Forming effective worker teams with multi-functional skill requirements. Computers & Industrial Engineering 48: 593–608. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2004.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabelloni, D., G. Montelisciani, and G. Fantoni. 2013. Implementing collaborative crowdsourcing in different design problems. Proceedings of the 19th international conference on engineering design (ICED’13), Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Gajewar, A., and A.D. Sarma. 2011. Multi-skill collaborative teams based on densest subgraphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1102.3340.
   Google Scholar
• Gaston, M., J. Simmons, and M. DesJardins. 2004. Adapting network structures for efficient team formation. Proceedings of the AAAI 2004 fall symposium on artificial multi-agent learning, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S.L., R.N. Nagel, and K. Preiss. 1995. Agile competitors and virtual organizations: Strategies for enriching the customer. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A., & R.I. Sutton. 2000. Building an innovation factory. Harvard Business Review 78: 157–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillebrand, B., and W.G. Biemans. 2003. The relationship between internal and external cooperation: Literature review and propositions. Journal of Business Research 56: 735–43. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00258-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzy, B., E. Turgut, T. Holzmann, and K. Sailer. 2013. Innovation intermediaries: A process view on open innovation coordination. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 25: 295–309. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.764982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzy, B.R., & K. Crowston. 2008. Competency rallying for technical innovation – the case of the ‘Virtuelle Fabrik’. Technovation 28: 679–92. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang, D., X. Li, and C.X. Ling. 2011. A new search engine integrating hierarchical browsing and keyword search. Proceedings of the twenty-second international joint conference on artificial intelligence, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, vol. 3, 2464–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, A., P. Gutheim, P. Narula, D. Rolnitzky, T. Parikh, and B. Hartmann. 2012. MobileWorks: Designing for quality in a managed crowdsourcing architecture. IEEE Internet Computing 16: 28–35. doi: 10.1109/MIC.2012.72
   Google Scholar
• Kurtzberg, T.R. 2005. Feeling creative, being creative: An empirical study of diversity and creativity in teams. Creativity Research Journal 17: 51–65. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1701_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappas, T., K. Liu, and E. Terzi. 2009. Finding a team of experts in social networks. Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Paris, France, 467–76.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Vega, H., and W. Vanhaverbeke. 2009. Connecting open and closed innovation markets: A typology of intermediaries. MPRA. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/27017/1/henry_lopez-vega_2_.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, C.D., P. Raghavan, and H. Schütze. 2008. Introduction to information retrieval, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, III, E.F., K.B. Kahnb, and G. Barczaka. 2001. An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management 18: 110–20. doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(00)00073-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowshowitz, A. 1997. Virtual organization. Communications of the ACM 40: 30–7. doi: 10.1145/260750.260759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osiński, S., and D. Weiss. 2005. Carrot2: Design of a flexible and efficient web information retrieval framework. In Advances in web intelligence, eds. P.S. Szczepaniak, J. Kacprzyk, and A. Niewiadomski, 439–44. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Pisano, G.P., and R. Verganti. 2008. Which kind of collaboration is right for you? Harvard Business Review 86, no. 12: 78–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podgorelec, V., L. Pavlič, and M. Heričko. 2006. Using semantic web technologies for project team building. Proceedings of international conference on knowledge management in organizations KMO-2006, Maribor, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Roxas, S.A., G. Piroli, and M. Sorrentino. 2011. Efficiency and evaluation analysis of a network of technology transfer brokers. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 23: 7–24. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2011.537085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, G., O.F. Rana, N.J. Avis, and C. Dingfang. 2007. Ontology-based semantic matchmaking approach. Advances in Engineering Software 38: 59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, N. 1993. A common Lisp API and facilitator for ABSI. Technical report: Report-Logic-93-4. Stanford, CA: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. 2004. The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business economies, societies and nations. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Terwiesch, C., and Y. Xu. 2008. Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Science 54: 1529–43. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1080.0884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsekouras, G., D. Kanellou, and N. Rai. 2013. Redefining learning networks through ICT capabilities: Representations, behaviours and intermediation strategies. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 25: 257–79. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.764985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuković, M., and R. Vaculín. 2010. Towards adaptive crowdsourcing for complex decisions. Proceeding of workshop on large-scale idea management and deliberation, Marseille, France.
   Google Scholar
• Wi, H., S. Oh, J. Mun, and M. Jung. 2009. A team formation model based on knowledge and collaboration. Expert Systems with Applications 36: 9121–34. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.12.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen, M.C., I. King, and K.S. Leung. 2011. A survey of crowdsourcing systems. Proceedings of 2011 IEEE international conference of privacy, security, risk, and trust, Boston, MA, 766–73.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, S.X., X.M. Xie, and C.M. Tam. 2010. Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation 30: 181–94. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar