Product innovation: testing the relative influence of industry, institutional context and firm factors

References

• Ahuja, G., C.M. Lambert, and V. Tandon. 2008. Moving beyond Schumpeter. Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. The Academy of Management Annals 2, no. 1: 1–98. doi: 10.1080/19416520802211446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, A., and A. Gambardella. 2010. Markets for technology. In The handbook of economics of technical change, ed. B.H. Halland and N. Rosenberg, 642–65. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity, ed. R. Nelson, 609–25. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balkin, D.B., G.D. Markman, and L.R. Gomez-Mejia. 2000. Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation? Academy of Management Journal 43, no. 6: 1118–29. doi: 10.2307/1556340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becheikh, N., R. Landry, and N. Amara. 2006. Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector. A systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003. Technovation 26, no. 5/6: 644–64. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J., and M.I. Nadiri. 1989. Research and development and intra-industry spillovers: An empirical application of dynamic duality. Review of Economic Studies 56, no. 2: 49–269. doi: 10.2307/2297460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bönte, W. 2003. Innovation and employment growth in industrial clusters: Evidence from aeronautical firms in Germany. ERSA conference papers, European Regional Science Association, Jyväskylä, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Broberg, J., A. McKelvie, J.C. Short, D.J. Ketchen, and W.P. Wan. 2013. Political institutional structure influences on innovative activity. Journal of Business Research 66, no. 12: 2574–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, T., and G.M. Stalker. 1994. The Management of innovation Rev. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrer-Borrás, B., and G. Serrano-Domingo. 2007. Innovation and R&D spillover effects in Spanish regions: A spatial approach. Research Policy 36, no. 9: 1357–71. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camisón, C., R. Lapiedra, M. Segarra, and M. Boronat. 2004. A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization Studies 3, no. 25: 331–61. doi: 10.1177/0170840604040039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R., and A. Faggian. 2005. Collective learning and relational capital in local innovation processes. Regional Studies 39, no. 1: 75–87. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., and R. Veugelers. 2006. In search of complementarity in the innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science 52, no. 1: 68–82. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W.M. 2010. Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. In Handbook of the economics of innovation, ed. Hall, B.H. and N. Rosenberg, 129–98. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W.M. and S. Klepper. 1996. A reprise of size and R&D. The Economic Journal 106, no. 437: 925–51. doi: 10.2307/2235365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W.M., and D.A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, no. 1: 128–52. doi: 10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson, and J.P. Walsh. 2002. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48, no. 1: 1–23. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P., B. Hall, and A. Toole. 2000. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D: A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29, nos. 4–5: 497–529. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. 1988. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature 26, no. 3: 1120–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fey, C., and J.M. Birkinshaw. 2005. External knowledge sourcing, governance mode, and R&D performance. Journal of Management 31, no. 4: 597–613. doi: 10.1177/0149206304272346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galende, J., and I. Suárez. 1999. A resource-based analysis of the factors determining a firm's R&D activities. Research Policy 28, no. 8: 891–905. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00029-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geroski, P.A. 1990. Innovation, technological opportunity and market structure. Oxford Economic Papers 42, no. 3: 586–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1992. The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94, no. 1: 29–47. doi: 10.2307/3440244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, S., and O. Hart. 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy 94, no. 4: 691–719. doi: 10.1086/261404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiso, L., P. Sapienza, and L. Zingales. 2004. The role of social capital in financial development. American Economic Review 94, no. 3: 526–56. doi: 10.1257/0002828041464498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J., and N. Wang. 2012. Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external R&D strategies. Research Policy 41, no. 6: 1072–83. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haour, G. 1992. Stretching the knowledge base of the enterprise through contract research. R&D Management 22, no. 2: 177–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, O. and J. Moore. 1990. Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 98, no. 6: 1119–58. doi: 10.1086/261729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, R., and I. Cockburn. 1994. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Special issue, Strategic Management Journal 15, 63–84. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250150906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, A.M., and F.T. Rothaermel. 2011. When are assets complementary? Star scientists, strategic alliances and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal 32, no. 8: 895–909. doi: 10.1002/smj.916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., D. Jacobson, and P.L. Robertson. 2006. Innovativeness and development perspectives – a summary of a European research project. Prometheus 24, no. 1: 3–21. doi: 10.1080/08109020600563762
   Google Scholar
• Hoskisson, R.E., M.A. Hitt, R.A. Johnson, and W. Grossman. 2002. Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal 45, no. 4: 697–716. doi: 10.2307/3069305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A.B. 1989. Characterizing the technological position of firms with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers. Research Policy 18, no. 2: 87–97. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(89)90007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A.B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, no. 3: 577–98. doi: 10.2307/2118401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasabov, E., and R. Delbridge. 2008. Innovation, embeddedness and policy: Evidence from life sciences in three UK regions. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20, no. 2: 185–200. doi: 10.1080/09537320801931671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klevorick, A.K., R.C. Levin, R.R. Nelson, and S.G. Winter. 1995. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24, no. 2: 185–205. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(93)00762-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, S.J., and N. Rosenberg. 1986. An overview of innovation. In The positive sum strategy, ed. R. Landau and N. Rosenberg, 275–305. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landry, R., N. Amara, and M. Lamari. 2002. Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 69, no. 7: 681–701. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00170-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, R.C., W.M. Cohen, and D.C. Mowery. 1985. R&D appropriability, opportunity and market structure: New evidence on some Schumpeterian hypotheses. American Economic Review Proceedings 75, no. 2: 20–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, R.C., A.K. Klevorick, R.S. Nelson, and S.G. Winter. 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3: 783–820. doi: 10.2307/2534454
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. 1992. National innovation system of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Printer Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Mamuneas, T.P. 1999. Spillovers from publicly financed capital in high-tech industries. International Journal of Industrial Organization 17, no. 2: 215–39. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7187(97)00039-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of economics. London: McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D.J., M.J. Fern, and L.B. Cardinal. 2007. The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal 50, no. 2: 308–26. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadiri, I.M. 1993. Innovations and technological spillovers. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, no. 4423. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
   Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., and S. Ghoshal. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy Management Review 23, no. 2: 242–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narula, R. 2001. Choosing between internal and non-internal R&D activities: Some technological and economic factors. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 13, no. 3: 365–87. doi: 10.1080/09537320120088183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R.R. 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific-research. Journal of Political Economy 67, no. 3: 297–306. doi: 10.1086/258177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto, M., and P. Quevedo. 2005. Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers and innovative effort. Technovation 25, no. 10: 1141–57. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. 1994. Innovation and diffusion in small firms – theory and evidence. Small Business Economics 6, no. 5: 327–47. doi: 10.1007/BF01065137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. 2005. Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paananem, M. 2009. Exploring the relationships between knowledge sources in the innovation process: Evidence from Finnish innovators. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 21, no. 6: 711–25. doi: 10.1080/09537320903052707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, F., L. Serrano, and J. Fernández de Guevara. 2008. Estimación del capital social en España: Series temporales por territorios. Madrid: Fundación BBVA and IVIE.
   Google Scholar
• Pisano, G.P. 1990. The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, no. 1: 153–76. doi: 10.2307/2393554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romijn, H., and M. Albaladejo. 2002. Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software companies in southeast England. Research Policy 31, no. 7: 1053–67. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00176-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, F.M. 1965. Firm, size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. American Economic Review 55, no. 5: 1097–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, F.M. and D. Ross. 1990. Industrial market structure and economic performance. Boston, MA: Houghton and Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Schmiedeberg, C. 2008. Complementarities of innovation activities: An empirical analysis of the German manufacturing sector. Research Policy 37, no. 9: 1492–503. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J.A. 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S. 1993. Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing 8, no. 1: 59–73. doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(93)90011-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. 2005. Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science 51, no. 5: 756–70. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souitaris, V. 2002. Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation. Research Policy 31, no. 6: 877–98. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00154-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spithoven, A., B. Clarysse, and M. Knockaert. 2011. Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation 31, no. 1: 10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R., and O. Arndt. 2001. The firm or the region: What determines the innovation behavior of European firms? Economic Geography 77, no. 4: 364–82. doi: 10.2307/3594106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, T.E. 1998. Producer network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formations in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 43, no. 3: 668–98. doi: 10.2307/2393679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, M., and M.A. Youndt. 2005. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal 48, no. 3: 450–63. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, J. 2006. Competition and innovation behavior. Research Policy 35, no. 1: 68–82. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tappeiner, G., C. Hauser, and J. Walde. 2008. Regional knowledge spillovers: Fact or Artifact? Research Policy 37, no. 5: 861–74. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M., W.K. Smith, R. Wood, G. Westerman, and C. O'Reilly. 2010. Organizational designs and innovation streams. Industrial and Corporate Change 19, no. 5: 1331–66. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtq040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veugelers, R. 1997. Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy 26, no. 3: 303–15. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00019-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O.E. 2000. The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature 38, no. 3: 595–613. doi: 10.1257/jel.38.3.595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yli-Renko, H., E. Autio, and H. Sapienza. 2001. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal 22, no. 6/7: 587–613. doi: 10.1002/smj.183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar