Towards multi-system sociotechnical transitions: why simulate

References

• Ansah, J.P., R.L. Eberlein, S.R. Love, M.A. Bautista, J.P. Thompson, R. Malhotra, and D.B. Matchar. 2014. Implications of long term care capacity response policies for an aging population: A simulation analysis. Health Policy 116, no. 1: 105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W.B. 1994. Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banse, M., H. van Meijl, A. Tabeau, G. Woltjer, F. Hellmann, and P.H. Verburg. 2011. Impact of EU biofuels policies on world agricultural production and land use. Biomass and Bioenergy 35: 2385–90. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnacle, M., E. Robertson, S. Galloway, J. Barton, and G. Ault. 2013. Modelling generation and infrastructure requirements for transition pathways. Energy Policy 52: 60–75. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J., and D.N. Clark. 2007. Resource-based theory: Creating and sustaining competitive advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. 2011. Environment versus growth – A criticism of “degrowth” and a plea for ‘a-growth’. Ecological Economics. 70, no. 5: 881–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, N., A. Haxeltine, L. Whitmarsh, J. Kohler, M. Schilperoord, and J. Rotmans. 2008. Modelling socio technical transition patterns and pathways. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 11, no. 3: 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, R.M., and B. Obel. 2011. Computational modelling for what-is, what-might-be, and what-should-be studies-and triangulation. Organisation Science 22, no. 5: 1195–202. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappin, E.J.L., and M.R. Afman. 2013. An agent-based model of transitions in consumer lighting: Policy impacts from the E.U. phase-out of incadescents. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 7: 16–36. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2012.11.005
   Google Scholar
• Cilliers, P. 1998. Complexity and postmodernism-understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., P. Benneworth, and B. Truffer. 2012. Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy 41: 968–79. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, M., C. Gonzalez, and J.D. Sterman. 2009. Why don't well-educated adults understand accumulation? A challenge to researchers, educators, and citizens. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 108, no. 1: 116–30. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosbie, T., and S. Guy. 2008. En'lightening’ energy use: The co-evolution of household lighting practices. International Journal of Technology Management 9, no. 2/3: 220–235.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J.P., K.M. Eisenhardt, and C.B. Bingham. 2007. Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review 32, no. 2: 480–99. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.24351453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolfsma, W., and L. Leydesdorff. 2009. Lock-in and break out from technological trajectories: Modeling and policy implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76: 932–41. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation. 2012. Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/business/reports
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2007. Cereals: Council approves zero set-aside rate for autumn 2007 and spring 2008 sowings. Brussels, press release IP/07/1402.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, A., M. Valente, and P. Janssen. 2010. Exploring domestic micro-cogeneration in the Netherlands an agent based demand model for technology diffusion. Energy Policy 38, no. 6: 2763–2775. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, J.W. 1961. Industrial dynamics. Waltham, MA: Pegasus Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J.W. 1969. Urban dynamics. Waltham, MA: Pegasus Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J.W. 1971. World dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Wright-Allen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J.W., N.J. Mass, and J. Ryan. 1976. The system dynamics national model: Understanding socioeconomic behavior and policy alternatives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 9: 51–68. doi: 10.1016/0040-1625(76)90044-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouquet, R., and P.J.G. Pearson. 2012. Past and prospective energy transitions: Insights from history. Energy Policy 50: 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., L.R. Izquierdo, and P. Zeppini. 2012. Branching innovation, recombinant innovation and endogenous technological transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 4: 25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2012.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., and P. Karnoe, eds. 2001. Path dependence and creation. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31: 1257–74. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W. 2004. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33: 897–920. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W. 2005. The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 17: 445–76. doi: 10.1080/09537320500357319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W. 2007. Feelings of discontent and the promise of middle range theory for STS: Examples from technology dynamics. Science Technology and Human Values 32, no. 6: 627–51. doi: 10.1177/0162243907303597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W. 2010. Ontologies, sociotechnical transitions (to sustainability) and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy 39: 495–510. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W. 2011. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1, no. 1: 24–40. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W., M.P. Hekkert, and S. Jacobsson. 2008. The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 20, no. 5: 521–36. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W., and J. Schot. 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36: 399–417. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genus, A., and A.M. Coles. 2008. Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Research Policy 37: 1436–45. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffarzadegan, N., J. Lyneis, and G.P. Richardson. 2011. How small system dynamics models can help the public policy process. System Dynamics Review 27, no. 1: 22–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gram-Hansen, K. 2009. Standby consumption in households analyzed with a practice theory approach. Journal of Industrial Ecology 14, no. 1: 150–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00194.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gram-Hansen, K. 2013. Efficient technologies or user behavior, which is the more important when reducing households’ energy consumption? Energy Efficiency 6: 447–457. doi: 10.1007/s12053-012-9184-4
   Google Scholar
• Haasnoot, M., J.H. Kwakkel, W.E. Walker, and J. Maat. 2013. Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Global Environmental Change 23: 485–98. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, M., E. Shove, and D. Southerton. 2005. Explaining showering: A discussion of the material, conventional and temporal dimensions of practice. Sociological Research Online 10, no. 2. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/2/hand.html doi: 10.5153/sro.1100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, M., and S. Pilgrim. 2011. The new competition for land: Food, energy and climate change. Food Policy 36: s40–s50. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, P.S., and B. Elzen. 2010. Exploring system innovation in the electricity system through sociotechnical scenarios. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 22, no. 6: 653–70. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2010.496282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer, J., G. Hirsch, and B. Milstein. 2007. Chronic illness in a complex health economy: The perils and promises of downstream and upstream reforms. System Dynamics Review 23, no. 2–3: 313–343. doi: 10.1002/sdr.379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, B., M. Mellor, and G. O'Brien. 2005. Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development 13: 38–52. doi: 10.1002/sd.244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Z., J. Cao, and L.J. Hong. 2012. Robust simulation of global warming policies using the DICE model. Management Science 58, no. 12: 2190–2206. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2013. Summary for policymakers. In Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, [T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iveroth, E., and F. Bengtsson. 2014. Changing behavior towards sustainable practices using information technology. Journal of Environmental Management 139, no. 15: 59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jick, T. 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly 24: 602–11. doi: 10.2307/2392366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. 2001. The “can you trust it?” Problem of simulation science in the design of socio-technical systems. Complexity 6, no. 2: 34–40. doi: 10.1002/cplx.1017
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. 2008. Science and policy in designing complex futures. Futures 40: 520–536. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2007.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, U. 2012. Mapping and navigating transitions – The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development. Research Policy 41, no. 6: 996–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, M.L., and C. Shapiro. 1985. Network externalities, competition and compatibility. American Economic Review 75, no. 3: 424–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, M.L., and C. Shapiro. 1986. Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of Political Economy 94, no. 4: 822–41. doi: 10.1086/261409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., and H. van Lente. 2011. The dual challenge of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1: 121–24. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma. 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 10, no. 2: 175–98. doi: 10.1080/09537329808524310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, J., L. Whitmarsh, B. Nykvist, M. Schilperoord, N. Bergman, and A. Haxeltine. 2009. A transitions model for sustainable mobility. Ecological Economics 68: 2985–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopainsky, B., and L.F. Luna Reyes. 2008. Closing the loop: Promoting synergies with other theory building approaches to improve system dynamics practice. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 25: 471–86. doi: 10.1002/sres.913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel, J.H., and E. Pruyt. 2013. Exploratory modelling and analysis an approach for model based foresight under deep uncertainty. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80: 419–31. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review 24, no. 4: 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurisden, E.H., and U. Jørgensen. 2010. Sustainable transition of electronic products through waste policy. Research Policy 39: 486–94. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leighty, W., J.M. Ogden, and C. Yang. 2012. Modeling transitions in the California light-duty vehicles sector to achieve deep reductions in transportation greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy 44: 52–67. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C.E. 1959. The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review 19, no. 2: 79–88. doi: 10.2307/973677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loch, C.H., and B.A. Huberman. 1999. A punctuated equilibrium model of technology diffusion. Management Science 45, no. 2: 160–77. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.45.2.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lolopolito, A., P. Morone, and R. Taylor. 2013. Emerging innovation niches: An agent based model. Research Policy 42: 1225–1238. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, F.H. 1998. New product diffusion models in innovation management – a system dynamics perspective. System Dynamics Review 14, no. 4: 285–308. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199824)14:4<285::AID-SDR153>3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMeekin, A., and D. Southerton. 2012. Sustainability transitions and final consumption practices and sociotechnical systems. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 24, no. 4: 345–61. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.663960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows D.H. 2008. Thinking in systems: A primer. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D.H., D.L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W.W. Behrens. 1972. The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R.K. 1968. Social theory and social structure. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H.J., and S.E. Page. 2007. Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milling, P.M. 2001. Understanding and managing innovation processes. System Dynamics Review 18, no. 1: 73–86. doi: 10.1002/sdr.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, M., and M. Morrison. 1999. Models as mediating instrument. In Models as mediators, eds. M. Morgan and M. Morrison, 10–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Musango, J.K., A.C. Brent, and A.M. Bassi. 2014. Modelling the transition towards a green economy in South Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 87: 257–273. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.022
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. 1995. Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. Journal of Economic Literature 33: 48–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., K. Shrader-Frechette, and K. Belitz. 1994. Verification, validation and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263, no. 5147: 641–46. doi: 10.1126/science.263.5147.641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papachristos, G. 2011. A system dynamics model of socio-technical regime transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1, no. 2: 202–33. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Papachristos, G., A. Sofianos, and E. Adamides. 2013. System interactions in socio-technical transitions: Extending the multi-level perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 7: 53–69. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2013.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Rahmandad, H., N.P. Repenning, and J.D. Sterman. 2009. Effect of feedback delays on learning. System Dynamics Review 25, no. 4: 309–38. doi: 10.1002/sdr.427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, R. 2007. Niche accumulation and hybridisation strategies in transition processes towards a sustainably energy system: An assessment of differences and pitfalls. Energy Policy 35: 2390–400. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, K. 2005. The hegemony of the physical sciences: An exploration in complexity thinking. Futures 37: 615–53. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2004.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, G.P. 2011. Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 27, no. 3: 219–43. doi: 10.1002/sdr.462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røpke, I., T.H. Christensen, and J.O. Jensen. 2010. Information and communication technologies – A new round of household electrification. Energy Policy 38: 1764–1773. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., and R. Kemp. 2008. Detour ahead: A response to Shove and Walker about the perilous road of transition management. Environment and Planning A 40: 1006–14. doi: 10.1068/a4004let
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., R. Kemp, and M. van Asselt. 2001. More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight 3: 15–31. doi: 10.1108/14636680110803003
   Google Scholar
• Saeed, K. 1998. Towards sustainable development: Essays on system analysis of national policy. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Safarzynska, K., and J. van den Bergh. 2010. Demand–supply coevolution with multiple increasing returns: Policy analysis for unlocking and systems transitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77, no. 2: 297–317. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 1992. Method in social science: A realist approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwaninger, M., and S. Grosser. 2008. System dynamics as model based theory building. System Dynamics Review 25: 447–65.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2012. The shadowy side of innovation: Unmaking and sustainability. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 24, no. 4: 363–75. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.663961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., and G. Walker. 2007. Caution! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A 39: 763–770. doi: 10.1068/a39310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., and G. Walker. 2010. Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy 39: 471–76. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siggelkow, N. 2007. Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal 50, no. 1: 20–24. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and A. Stirling. 2010. The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecology and Society 15, no. 1: 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., A. Stirling, and F. Berkhout. 2005. The governance of sustainable sociotechnical transitions. Research Policy 34: 1491–510. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., J.P. Voß, and J. Grin. 2010. Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy 39: 435–48. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderholm, K. 2012. Governing socio-technical transitions: Historical lessons from the implementation of centralized water and sewer systems in Northern Sweden 1900–1950. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 7: 37–52. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2013.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J.D. 1989a. Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 43, no. 3: 301–35. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90041-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman, J.D. 1989b. Modelling managerial behaviour: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Science 35, no. 3: 321–39. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.3.321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman, J.D. 1994. Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynamics Review 10: 291–330. doi: 10.1002/sdr.4260100214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman, J.D. 2000. Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modelling for a complex world. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J.D. 2008. Risk communication on climate: Mental models and mass balance. Science 322: 532–33. doi: 10.1126/science.1162574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steward, F. 2012. Transformative innovation policy to meet the challenge of climate change: Sociotechnical networks aligned with consumption and end-use as new transition arenas for a low-carbon society or green economy. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 24, no. 4: 331–43. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.663959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y. 2010. Air-conditioning Australian households: The impact of dynamic peak pricing. Energy Policy 39, no. 1: 7312–7321. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sustainable Development Commission. 2009. Prosperity without growth? The transition to a sustainable economy.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie. 1998. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tilman, D., R. Socolow, J.A. Foley, J. Hill, E Larson, L. Lynd, S. Pacala, J. Reilly, T. Searchinger, C. Somerville, and R. Williams. 2009. Beneficial biofuels – The food, energy and environment trilemma. Science 325: 270–71. doi: 10.1126/science.1177970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truffer, B., J.P. Voß, and K. Konrad. 2008. Mapping expectations for system transformations. Lessons from sustainability foresight in German utility sectors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75: 1360–72. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnheim, B., and F.W. Geels. 2012, Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: Lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913–1997). Energy Policy 50: 35–49. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. 2010. World urbanization prospects, the 2009 revision: Highlights. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Unruh, G.C. 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28: 817–30. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unruh, G.C. 2002. Escaping carbon lock in. Energy Policy 30: 317–25. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00098-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A.H. 1992. Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note. Strategic Management Journal 13: 169–88. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250131013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vooren, A., F. Alkemade, and M.P. Hekkert. 2012. Effective public resource allocation to escape lock in: The case of infrastructure dependent vehicle technologies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2: 98–117. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2012.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Verspagen, B. 2009. The use of modeling tools for policy in evolutionary environments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76: 453–61. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vespignani, A. 2011. Modelling dynamical processes in complex socio-technical systems. Nature 8: 32–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., and E. Shove. 2007. Ambivalence, sustainability and the governance of socio-technical transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 9, no. 3–4: 213–25. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622840
   Google Scholar
• Watson, M. 2012. How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport system. Journal of Transport Geography 24: 488–496. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K.E. 1989. Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review 14, no. 4: 516–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetten, D.A. 1989. What constitutes a theoretical contribution. Academy of Management Review 14, no. 4: 490–95. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1989.4308371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winsberg, E. 2006. Models of success versus the success of models: Reliability without truth. Synthese 152: 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s11229-004-5404-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yucel, G., and C. van Daalen. 2012. A simulation based analysis of transition pathways for the Dutch electricity system. Energy Policy 42: 557–68. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagonel, A.A., J.W. Rohrbaugh, G.P. Richardson, and D.F. Andersen. 2004. Using simulation models to address “what if” questions about welfare reform. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23, no. 4: 890–901. doi: 10.1002/pam.20054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar