Alternative view on niche development: situated learning on policy communities, power and agency

References

• Allen, A. 2008. The Politics of Ourselves: Power, Autonomy and Gender in Contemporary Critical Theory. New York: Colombia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and H. Willmott. 2002. “Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing the Appropriate Individual.” Journal of Management Studies 39 (5): 619–644. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1970. On Violence. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Baber, Z. 1991. “Beyond the Structure/Agency Dualism: An Evaluation of Giddens Theory of Structuration.” Sociological Inquiry 61 (2): 219–230. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1991.tb00276.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, A. 2009. “The Discursive Dimensions of a Decent Deal: How Nuclear Energy Evolved from Environmental Energy to Climate Remedy in the Parliament of Finland.” In The Renewal of Nuclear Power in Finland, edited by M. Kojo and T. Litmanen, 91–125. Eastbourne: Palmgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1991. The Social Construction of Reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. St Ives plc: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Blackler, F. 1995. “Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation.” Organization Studies 16 (6): 1021–1046. doi:10.1177/017084069501600605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caniëls, M., and H. Romijn. 2008. “Strategic Niche Management: Towards a Policy Tool for Sustainable Development.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 (2): 245–266. doi:10.1080/09537320701711264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. 2004. “Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge across Boundaries.” Organization Science 15 (5): 555–568. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contu, A., and H. Willmott. 2003. “Re-embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory.” Organization Science 14 (3): 283–296. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.3.283.15167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. 1957. “The Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science 2 (3): 201–215. doi:10.1002/bs.3830020303.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. 2012. “Why Should We Care about the Definition of Power?” Journal of Political Power 5 (1): 119–135. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.661917.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2007. DG Competition Report on Energy Sector Inquiry. (No. SEC(2006) 1724). http://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/energy/inquiry/full_report_part2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2014. “The EU Directives.” http://eur-lex.europa.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2014. “Renewable Electricity Statistics.” http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., and J. Gehman. 2012. “Metatheoretical Perspectives on Sustainability Journeys: Evolutionary, Relational and Durational.” Research Policy 41 (6): 980–995. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2014. “Regime Resistance against Low-carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective.” Theory, Culture & Society 31 (5): 21–40. doi:10.1177/0263276414531627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gestrin, C. 2003. Införande av klimatpeng (in Swedish), Introduction of Climate Penny. Written Question (KK 229/2003). www.eduskunta.fi.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., and H. van de Graaf. 1996. “Implementation as Communicative Action: An Interpretive Understanding of the Interactions between Policy Makers and Target Groups.” Policy Sciences 29 (4): 291–319. doi: 10.1007/BF00138406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grin, J., J. Rotmans, and J. Schot. 2011. Transitions to Sustainable Development. New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. Routledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. 2010. “Power: A ‘Family Resemblance’ Concept.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 13 (4): 419–438. doi:10.1177/1367549410377152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 1995. “Structure and Agency.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, edited by D. Marsh and G. Stoker, 189–208. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C. 2000. De-facing Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. 2008. “On Inclusion and Network Governance: The Democratic Disconnect of Dutch Energy Transitions.” Public Administration 86 (4): 1009–1031. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00738.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogma, R., R. Kemp, J. Schot, and B. Truffer. 2002. Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jamasb, T., and M. Pollit. 2005. Electricity Market Reform in the European Union: Review of Progress toward Liberalization & Integration. (No. 05–003). MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kortelainen, J. 1999. “The River as an Actor-network: The Finnish Forest Industry Utilization of Lake and River Systems.” Geoforum 30 (3): 235–247. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00019-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronsell, A. 2013. “Gender and Transition in Climate Governance.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 7: 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2012.12.003.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. 1991. “Situating Learning in Communities of Practice.” In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, edited by L. Resnick, J. Levine, and S. Teasley, 63–82. Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. 2003. “The Politics of Liberalisation: Privatisation and Regulation-for-competition in Europe's and Latin America's Telecoms and Electricity Industries.” European Journal of Political Research 42 (5): 705–740. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilja, K., K. Räsänen, and R. Tainio. 1992. “A Dominant Business Recipe: The Forest Sector in Finland.” In European Business Systems: Firms and Market in Their National Contexts, edited by R. Whitley, 137–154. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, H. 2007. “The Governance of Innovation in Socio-technical Systems: The Difficulties of Strategic Niche Management in Practice.” Science and Public Policy 34 (1): 35–44. doi:10.3152/030234207X190540.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. 1974. Power: A Radical View. Hong Kong: MacMillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. 1977. Essays in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., and M. Smith. 2000. “Understanding Policy Networks: Towards a Dialectical Approach.” Political Studies 48 (1): 4–21. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Employment and the Economy. 2001. “Energy Policy.” www.tem.fi/.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Employment and the Economy. 2002. Uusiutuvilla energialähteillä tuotetun sähkön edistämiskeinot. (In Finnish). Methods to support electricity from renewable energy sources. Report no. 5/2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Employment and the Economy. 2005. “Energy and Climate Policy.” www.tem.fi/.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Employment and the Economy. 2008. “Energy and Climate Policy.” www.tem.fi/.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Employment and the Economy. 2013. “Energy and Climate Policy.” www.tem.fi/.
   Google Scholar
• Parliament. 2013. “ Votes about Construction Permissions for Nuclear Reactors (in Finnish).” www.eduskunta.fi.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1963. “On the Concept of Political Power.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 107: 232–262.
   Google Scholar
• Pesch, U. 2015. “Tracing Discursive Space: Agency and Change in Sustainability Transitions.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 90 (12): 379–388. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulliainen, E. 1987. Ämnar regeringen vidta åtgärder för att effektivera arbetet med att utveckla vindkraften? (in Swedish), Is the Government Taking Actions for Development of Wind Energy. Written Question (KK 38/1987). www.eduskunta.fi.
   Google Scholar
• Ratinen, M., and P. D. Lund. 2014. “Growth Strategies of Incumbent Utilities as Contextually Embedded: Examples from Denmark, Germany, Finland and Spain.” Technology in Society 38: 81–92. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.02.005.
   Google Scholar
• Ratinen, M., F. Malmgren, and G. Tallgren. 2011. Vindkraftföreningen r.f.: 30 år för och mot vind. (in Swedish) Wind Energy Association, 30 Years for and against the Wind. History of the Finnish-Swedish Wind Energy Association. http://Www.vindkraft.fi.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, R. 2006. “Towards Alternative Trajectories? Reconfigurations in the Dutch Electricity Regime.” Research Policy 35 (4): 581–595. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and R. Kemp. 1998. “Technological Change.” In Human Choice and Climate Change, edited by S. Rayner and E. Malone, 327–399. Columbus: Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruostetsaari, I. 2009. “Governance and Political Consumerism in Finnish Energy Policy-making.” Energy Policy 37 (1): 102–110. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruostetsaari, I. 2010. “Changing Regulation and Governance of Finnish Energy Policy Making: New Rules but Old Elites?” Review of Policy Research 27 (3): 273–297. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00442.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and F. Geels. 2008. “Strategic Niche Management and Sustainable Innovation Journeys: Theory, Findings, Research Agenda, and Policy.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 (5): 537–554. doi:10.1080/09537320802292651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., R. Hoogma, and B. Elzen. 1994. “Strategies for Shifting Technological Systems: The Case of the Automobile System.” Futures 26 (10): 1060–1076. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(94)90073-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., and G. Walker. 2007. “CAUTION! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice and Sustainable Transition Management.” Environment and Planning A 39: 763–770. doi: 10.1068/a39310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., and G. Walker. 2010. “Governing Transitions in the Sustainability of Everyday Life.” Research Policy 39 (4): 471–476. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2007. “Translating Sustainabilities between Green Niches and Socio-technical Regimes.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19 (4): 427–450. doi:10.1080/09537320701403334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., A. Stirling, and F. Berkhout. 2005. “The Governance of Sustainable Socio-technical Transitions.” Research Policy 34 (10): 1491–1510. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. 2000. “Case Studies.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 435–454. Thousands Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. 2014a. “Energy Sources by Share of Total Energy Consumption.” www.statistics.fi.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. 2014b. “Energy Consumption by Sector.” www.statistics.fi.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2010. “Multicriteria Diversity Analysis: A Novel Heuristic Framework for Appraising Energy Portfolios.” Energy Policy 38 (4): 1622–1634. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varho, V., and P. Tapio. 2005. “Wind Power in Finland up to the Year 2025—’Soft’ Scenarios Based on Expert Views.” Energy Policy 33 (15): 1930–1947. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbong, G., F. Geels, and R. Raven. 2008. “Multi-niche Analysis of Dynamics and Policies in Dutch Renewable Energy Innovation Journeys (1970–2006): Hype-cycles, Closed Networks and Technology-focused Learning.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 (5): 555–573. doi:10.1080/09537320802292719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VTT. 2014. “Wind Energy Statistics.” www.vtt.fi.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiskerke, J. 2003. “On Promising Niches and Constraining Sociotechnical Regimes: The Case of Dutch Wheat and Bread.” Environment and Planning A 35: 429–448. doi: 10.1068/a3512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 1989. The Case Study Research Design and Methods. Newsbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar