Industry eco-innovation strategies for process upgrading: systemic limits of internalising externalities

References

• Andersen, M. 2013. “ The EcoWater Approach Applied to Arla HOCO.” PPt presentation at EcoWater workshop, Arla HOCO, Holstebro, September 20.
   Google Scholar
• Arla Foods. 2011. Environmental Strategy 2020. Accessed March 26, 2014. http://www.arla.com/Sustainability/Environment-strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Arla Foods. 2013. Our Responsibility: Arla Foods’ Corporate Social Responsibility Report. Accessed March 26, 2014. http://www.arla.com/Images/arla.com/PDF/CSR/2012/ENG_2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K., and V. Mykhenko. 2014. “Lisbonizing Versus Financializing Europe? The Lisbon Agenda and the (un)Making of the European Knowledge-Based Economy.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32: 108–128. doi: 10.1068/c1246r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleischwitz, R. 2003. “Cognitive and Institutional Perspectives of Eco-Efficiency.” Ecological Economics 46: 453–467. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00186-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., P. del Río, and T. Könnölä. 2010. “Diversity of Eco-Innovations: Reflections From Selected Case Studies.” Journal of Cleaner Production 18: 1073–1083. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEC. 2010. Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Brussels: Commission of European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. 2011a. A Resource-Efficient Europe: Flagship Initiative Under the Europe 2020 Strategy. Brussels: Commission of European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. 2011b. Innovation for a Sustainable Future: The Eco-Innovation Action Plan (Eco-AP). Brussels: Commission of European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. 2011c. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Energy Efficiency and Repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC SEC(2011) 779 final SEC(2011) 780 final. Brussels: Commission of European Communities. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0370:FIN:EN:PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Chertow, M. 2007. “‘Uncovering’ Industrial Symbiosis.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 11 (1): 11–30. doi: 10.1162/jiec.2007.1110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COWI. 2000. Cleaner Production Assessment in Dairy Processing. Prepared by COWI Consulting Engineers and Planners AS, Denmark, for UNEP Division of Technology, Industry and Economics and Danish EPA. http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/2480-CpDairy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dairy Roadmap. 2013. Dairy Roadmap: Environmental Sustainability Report 2013. http://www.dairyco.org.uk/resources-library/research-development/environment/dairy-roadmap-2013/.
   Google Scholar
• Dairy Supply Chain Forum. 2011. Dairy Roadmap: Our Route towards Environmental Success. Kenilworth: Dairy Supply Chain Forum's Sustainable Consumption and Production Taskforce.
   Google Scholar
• De Marchi, V., E. Di Maria, and S. Micelli. 2013. “Environmental Strategies, Upgrading and Competitive Advantage in Global Value Chains.” Business Strategy and the Environment 22: 62–72. doi: 10.1002/bse.1738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Simone, L., and F. Popoff. 2000. Eco-Efficiency: The Business Link to Sustainable Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2009. “Regulation 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 Setting Emission Performance Standards for new Passenger Cars as Part of the Community's Integrated Approach to Reduce CO2 Emissions From Light-Duty Vehicles.” Official Journal of the European Union L 140: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2011. “Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011 of 25 July 2011 Establishing A Procedure for the Approval and Certification of Innovative Technologies for Reducing CO2 Emissions From Passenger Cars Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council Text with EEA Relevance.” Official Journal of the European Union L 194: 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2012. “Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on Energy Efficiency, Amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and Repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC.” Official Journal of the European Union L 315: 1–56.
   Google Scholar
• EcoWater. 2013. D6.1 Synthesis Report from the 1st Round of Case Study Events. http://environ.chemeng.ntua.gr/ecoWater/UserFiles/files/D6_1_Final%281%29.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EcoWater. 2015a. Deliverable 4.4: Technology Assessment and Scenario Analysis. http://environ.chemeng.ntua.gr/ecoWater/UserFiles/files/D4%204%20Technology%20assessment%20and%20scenario%20analysis.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EcoWater. 2015b. Deliverable 5.2: Cross-Comparison of Case-Study Outcomes. http://environ.chemeng.ntua.gr/ecoWater/UserFiles/files/D5_2%20Cross%20Comparison%20of%20CS%20Outcomes.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EIO. 2011a. Eco-Innovation Challenge: Pathways to A Resource Efficient Europe. Brussels: Eco-Innovation Observatory (EIO). Funded by the European Commission, DG Environment.
   Google Scholar
• EIO. 2011b. Water Innovation: How Eco-Innovation can Contribute to the Sustainability of Europe's Water Resources. Brussels: Eco-Innovation Observatory (EIO). Funded by the European Commission, DG Environment.
   Google Scholar
• EU Council. 2000. An Agenda of Economic and Social Renewal for Europe: (aka Lisbon Agenda). Brussels: European Council, DOC/00/7.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., A. Kumaraswamy, and P. Karnøe. 2010. “Path Dependence or Path Creation?” Journal of Management Studies 47 (4): 760–774. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemeente Amsterdam. 2013. Kennisnemen van de voorgenomenuitbreiding van het Amsterdamsestadswarmtenetnaar de bestaandebouw [Proposed Expansion of Amsterdam's District Heating to Existing Buildings], July 2. http://zoeken.amsterdam.raadsinformatie.nl/cgi-bin/showdoc.cgi/action=view/id=206750/type=pdf/raadsbesluit.189.663.3a.13.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens, H., and K. Meijer. 2014. Causal Loop and Group Model-Building Session: Summary, EcoWater Case Study 6: Cogeneration of Heat and Power, held on 7 November 2013. Amsterdam: Deltares.
   Google Scholar
• Hansesgaard, K. 2013. PPt presentation at EcoWater workshop, Arla HOCO, Holstebro, September 20.
   Google Scholar
• Horbach, J., C. Rammer, and K. Rennings. 2012. “Determinants of Eco-Innovations by Type of Environmental Impact: The Role of Regulatory Push/Pull, Technology Push and Market Pull.” Ecological Economics 78: 112–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huppes, G., R. Kleijn, R. Huele, P. Ekins, B. Shaw, M. Esders, and S. Schaltegger. 2008. Measuring Eco-Innovation: Framework and Typology of Indicators Based on Causal Chains. Final Report of the ECODRIVE Project, CML, University of Leiden. http://www.eco-innovation.eu/wiki/images/Ecodrive_final_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. 2009. Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for A Finite Planet. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, J. 2011. “Consumer Eco-Innovation Adoption: Assessing Attitudinal Factors and Perceived Product Characteristics.” Business Strategy and the Environment 20: 192–210. doi: 10.1002/bse.690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JRC. 2011. International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook: Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European Context. 1st ed. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, K., and V. Oltra. 2011. “Research Insights and Challenges on Eco-Innovation Dynamics.” Industry and Innovation 18 (3): 249–253. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2011.562399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., and J. Rotmans. 2005. “The Management of the Co-Evolution of Technical, Environmental and Social Systems.” In Towards Environmental Innovation Systems, edited by M. Weber and J. Hemmelskemp, 33–55. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., W. Schade, G. Leduc, T. Wiesenthal, B. Schade, and L.T. Espinoza. 2013. “Leaving Fossil Fuels Behind? An Innovation System Analysis of Low Carbon Cars.” Journal of Cleaner Production 48: 176–186. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelsen, O., A. M. Fet, and A. Dahlsrud. 2006. “Eco-Efficiency in Extended Supply Chains: A Case Study of Furniture Production.” Journal of Environmental Management 79 (3): 290–297. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørgaard, R. 2013. PPt presentation at EcoWater workshop, Arla HOCO, Holstebro, September 20.
   Google Scholar
• Nuon. 2014. N.V. Nuon Energy Annual Report 2013: Continued Positioning for Tomorrow's Energy Market. http://www.nuon.com/Global/Nederlands/Financials/Jaarverslagen/Nuon%20Jaarverslag%202013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012. The Future of Eco-Innovation: The Role of Business Models in Green Transformation. http://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/49537036.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Oltra, V., and S.-J. Maïder. 2009. “Sectoral Systems of Environmental Innovation: An Application to the French Automotive Industry.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (4): 567–583. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, A., and M. Miedzinski. 2008. Eco-Innovation: Final Report for Sectoral Innovation Watch. Brussels: Technopolis.
   Google Scholar
• Rennings, K., and C. Rammer. 2011. “The Impact of Regulation-Driven Environmental Innovation on Innovation Success and Firm Performance.” Industry and Innovation 18 (3): 255–283. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2011.561027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk, N. J., H. C. Moll, and A. Uiterkamp. 2007. “Meso-Level Analysis, the Missing Link in Energy Strategies.” Energy Policy 35: 1505–1516. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierzchula, W., S. Bakker, K. Maat, and B. van Wee. 2012. “Technological Diversity of Emerging Eco-Innovations: A Case Study of the Automobile Industry.” Journal of Cleaner Production 37: 211–220. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Caneghem, J., C. Block, P. Cramm, R. Mortier, and C. Vandecasteele. 2010. “Improving Eco-Efficiency in the Steel Industry: The Arcelor Mittal Gent Case.” Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (8): 807–814. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bergh, J., B. Truffer, and G. Kallis. 2011. “Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions: Introduction and Overview.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (1): 1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.010
   Google Scholar
• Verbruggen, A., P. Dewallef, S. Quoilin, and M. Wiggin. 2013. “Unveiling the Mystery of Combined Heat & Power (Cogeneration).” Energy 61: 575–582. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volvo. 2011. Sustainability Report 2010. Göteborg: Volvo Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., and P. Llerena. 2011. “Eco-Innovation Through Integration, Regulation and Cooperation: Comparative Insights From Case Studies in Three Manufacturing sectors.” Industry and Innovation 18 (8): 747–764. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2011.621744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WBCSD. 2000. Eco-Efficiency: Creating More Value with Less Impact. Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• Welford, R. 1998. “Editorial: Corporate Environmental Management, Technology and Sustainable Development: Postmodern Perspectives and the Need for A Critical Research Agenda.” Business Strategy and the Environment 7 (1): 1–12. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199802)7:1<1::AID-BSE132>3.0.CO;2-7
   Google Scholar