Inbound open innovation in SMEs: indicators, non-financial outcomes and entry-timing

References

• Bae, Y., and H. Chang. 2012. “Efficiency and Effectiveness Between Open and Closed Innovation: Empirical Evidence in South Korean Manufacturers.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (10): 967–980. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.724164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barge-Gil, A. 2010. “Cooperation-based Innovators and Peripheral Cooperators: An Empirical Analysis of their Characteristics and Behavior.” Technovation 30 (3): 195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barge-Gil, A. 2013. “Open Strategies and Innovation Performance.” Industry and Innovation 20 (7): 585–610. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2013.849455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, W., and J. Dietz. 2004. “R&D Cooperation and Innovation Activities of Firms – Evidence for the German Manufacturing Industry.” Research Policy 33 (2): 209–223. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belderbos, R., M. Carree, and B. Lokshin. 2004. “Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance.” Research Policy 33: 1477–1492. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, M., and S. Kock. 2000. “Coopetition in Business Networks – to Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously.” Industrial Marketing Management 29 (5): 411–426. doi: 10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00067-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borooah, V. K. 2002. Logit and Probit: Ordered and Multinomial Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, W., and M. Christen. 2008. “Disentangling Pioneering Cost Advantages and Disadvantages.” Marketing Science 27 (4): 699–716. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1070.0324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelli, R., D. Czarnitzki, and K. Kraft. 2014. “Sources of Spillovers for Imitation and Innovation.” Research Policy 43 (1): 115–120. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G., and R. A. Zeller. 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, C. J., and E. C. Shiu. 2015. “The Inconvenient Truth of the Relationship Between Open Innovation Activities and Innovation Performance.” Management Decision 53 (3): 625–647. doi: 10.1108/MD-03-2014-0163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. 2006. Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H., and A. K. Crowther. 2006. “Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries.” R & D Management 36 (3): 229–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, Y. H., and K. P. Hung. 2010. “Exploring Open Search Strategies and Perceived Innovation Performance From the Perspective of Inter-Organizational Knowledge Flows.” R&D Management 40 (3): 292–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. F., M. H. Olesen, and J. S. Kjaer. 2005. “The Industrial Dynamics of Open Innovation – Evidence From the Transformation of Consumer Electronics.” Research Policy 34 (10): 1533–1549. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-González, J., P. López-Sáez, J. E. Navas-López, and M. Delgado-Verde. 2015. “Open Search Strategies and Firm Performance: The Different Moderating Role of Technological Environmental Dynamism.” Technovation 35: 32–45. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L., and D. M. Gann. 2010. “How Open is Innovation?” Research Policy 39 (6): 699–709. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodgson, M., D. Gann, and A. Salter. 2006. “The Role of Technology in the Shift Towards Open Innovation: The Case of Procter & Gamble.” R & D Management 36 (3): 333–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00429.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. A Recovery on the Horizon? Annual Report on European SMEs 2012/2013. Luxembourg: European Union Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2013. Key Figures on Europe 2013 Digest of the Online Eurostat Yearbook. Luxembourg: European Union Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• Faems, D., M. De Visser, P. Andries, and B. Van Looy. 2010. “Technology Alliance Portfolios and Financial Performance: Value-enhancing and Cost-increasing Effects of Open Innovation.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 27 (6): 785–796. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00752.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faems, D., B. Van Looy, and K. Debackere. 2005. “Interorganizational Collaboration and Innovation: Toward a Portfolio Approach.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 22 (3): 238–250. doi: 10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00120.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenz, M., and G. Ietto-Gillies. 2009. “The Impact on Innovation Performance of Different Sources of Knowledge: Evidence From the UK Community Innovation Survey.” Research Policy 38 (7): 1125–1135. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullerton, A. S. 2009. “A Conceptual Framework for Ordered Logistic Regression Models.” Sociological Methods & Research 38: 306–347. doi: 10.1177/0049124109346162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassmann, O., E. Enkel, and H. Chesbrough. 2010. “The Future of Open Innovation.” R&D Management 40 (3): 213–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannopoulou, E., A. Yström, S. Ollila, T. Fredberg, and M. Elmquist. 2010. “Implications of Openness: A Study into (All) the Growing Literature on Open Innovation.” Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 5 (3): 162–180. doi: 10.4067/S0718-27242010000300012
   Google Scholar
• Grimpe, C., and W. Sofka. 2009. “Search Patterns and Absorptive Capacity: Low-and High-technology Sectors in European Countries.” Research Policy 38 (3): 495–506. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S., J. Chen, Y. Wang, L. Ning, D. Sutherland, Z. Zhou, and Y. Zhou. 2015. “External Heterogeneity and Its Impact on Open Innovation Performance.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 27 (2): 182–197. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2014.957664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizingh, E. K. R. E. 2011. “Open Innovation: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.” Technovation 31 (1): 2–9. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschbaum, R. 2005. “Open Innovation in Practice.” Research Technology Management 48 (4): 24–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., and A. Salter. 2006. “Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U.K. Manufacturing Firms.” Strategic Management Journal 27 (2): 131–150. doi: 10.1002/smj.507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiponen, A., and C. E. Helfat. 2010. “Innovation Objectives, Knowledge Sources, and the Benefits of Breadth.” Strategic Management Journal 31 (2): 224–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévesque, M., M. Minniti, and D. Shepherd. 2013. “How Late Should Johnny-Come-Lately Come?” Long Range Planning 46 (4): 369–386. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, U. 2008. “Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 55 (1): 148–157. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2007.912932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, U. 2015. “A Note on Outbound Open Innovation and Firm Performance.” R&D Management 45 (5): 606–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. B., and S. Asaba. 2006. “Why Do Firms Imitate Each Other?” Academy of Management Review 31 (2): 366–385. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.20208686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. B., and D. B. Montgomery. 1988. “First-mover Advantages.” Strategic Management Journal 9 (S1): 41–58. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250090706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. B., and D. B. Montgomery. 1998. “First-mover (dis)Advantages: Retrospective and Link with the Resource-based View.” Strategic Management Journal 19: 1111–1125. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(1998120)19:12<1111::AID-SMJ21>3.0.CO;2-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. B., and D. B. Montgomery. 2013. “Conundra and Progress: Research on Entry Order and Performance.” Long Range Planning 46 (4–5): 312–324. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, J. H., S. Roper, and J. R. Bryson. 2011. “Openness, Knowledge, Innovation and Growth in UK Business Services.” Research Policy 40 (10): 1438–1452. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. 1985. “How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?” The Journal of Industrial Economics 34 (2): 217–223. doi: 10.2307/2098683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, S., M. U. Kalwani, and W. T. Robinson. 2006. “Market Pioneer and Early Follower Survival Risks: A Contingency Analysis of Really New Versus Incrementally New Product-Markets.” Journal of Marketing 70 (1): 15–33. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.2006.70.1.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto, M. J., and L. Santamaría. 2007. “The Importance of Diverse Collaborative Networks for the Novelty of Product Innovation.” Technovation 27 (6): 367–377. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2005. Oslo Manual, 3rd Edition: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Parida, V., M. Westerberg, and J. Frishammar. 2012. “Inbound Open Innovation Activities in High-Tech SMEs: The Impact on Innovation Performance.” Journal of Small Business Management 50 (2): 283–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragatz, G. L., R. B. Handfield, and K. J. Petersen. 2002. “Benefits Associated with Supplier Integration into New Product Development Under Conditions of Technology Uncertainty.” Journal of Business Research 55 (5): 389–400. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00158-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, R., and R. J. DeFillippi. 1990. “Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage.” Academy of Management Review 15 (1): 88–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. T., and S. Min. 2002. “Is the First to Market the First to Fail? Empirical Evidence for Industrial Goods Businesses.” Journal of Marketing Research 39 (1): 120–128. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.39.1.120.18938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, M. D., and S. Gopalakrishnan. 2000. “The Institutionalization of Knowledge Transfer Activities Within Industry–University Collaborative Ventures.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 17: 299–319. doi: 10.1016/S0923-4748(00)00027-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisodiya, S. R., J. L. Johnson, and Y. Grégoire. 2013. “Inbound Open Innovation for Enhanced Performance: Enablers and Opportunities.” Industrial Marketing Management 42 (5): 836–849. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spithoven, A., W. Vanhaverbeke, and N. Roijakkers. 2013. “Open Innovation Practices in SMEs and Large Enterprises.” Small Business Economics 41 (3): 537–562. doi: 10.1007/s11187-012-9453-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torkkeli, M., C. Kock, and P. Salmi. 2009. “The Open Innovation Paradigm: A Contingency Perspective.” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management 2 (1): 176–207. doi: 10.3926/jiem.2009.v2n1.p176-207
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, K. H. 2009. “Collaborative Networks and Product Innovation Performance: Toward a Contingency Perspective.” Research Policy 38 (5): 765–778. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Vrande, V., J. P. J. De Jong, W. Vanhaverbeke, and M. De Rochemont. 2009. “Open Innovation in SMEs: Trends, Motives and Management Challenges.” Technovation 29 (6–7): 423–437. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Vrande, V., C. Lemmens, and W. Vanhaverbeke. 2006. “Choosing Governance Modes for External Technology Sourcing.” R & D Management 36: 347–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00434.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhaverbeke, W., J. West, and H. Chesbrough. 2014. “Surfing the New Wave of Open Innovation Research.” In New Frontiers in Open Innovation, edited by H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West, 281–294. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. 1986. “Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts.” Management Science 32 (7): 791–805. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J., and M. Bogers. 2014. “Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 31 (4): 814–831. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J., A. Salter, W. Vanhaverbeke, and H. Chesbrough. 2014. “Open Innovation: The Next Decade.” Research Policy 43 (5): 805–811. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachary, M. A., P. T. Gianiodis, G. T. Payne, and G. D. Markman. 2015. “Entry-timing Enduring Lessons and Future Directions.” Journal of Management 41 (5): 1388–1415. doi: 10.1177/0149206314563982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang, J., C. Zhang, P. Yang, and Y. Li. 2014. “How Open Search Strategies Align with Firms’ Radical and Incremental Innovation: Evidence from China.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26 (7): 781–795. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2014.899345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, S. X., X. M. Xie, and C. M. Tam. 2010. “Relationship Between Cooperation Networks and Innovation Performance of SMEs.” Technovation 30 (3): 181–194. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar