Exploring local projects for sustainable energy in system transition: local perceptions of success

References

• Anderson, W., and J. Robinson. 2011. Warmer Bath: A Guide to Improving the Energy Efficiency of Traditional Homes in the City of Bath. Bath: Centre for Sustainable Energy and Bath Preservation Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1978. A Realist Theory of Science. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Bomberg, E., and N. McEwen. 2012. “Mobilizing Community Energy.” Energy Policy 51: 435–444. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. 2003. “Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment.” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12: 105–109. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.01242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Climate-KIC. 2015. “Climate-KIC Projects” Accessed July 7, 2015. http://www.climate-kic.org/projects/#Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Darby, S. 2006. The Effectiveness of Feedback on Energy Consumption. A review for DEFRA of the Literature on Metering, Billing and Direct Displays. Oxford: Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Directgov. 2011. “Environment and Greener Living: Climate Change.” Accessed October 24, 2011. http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Environmentandgreenerliving/Thewiderenvironment/Climatechange/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Dóci, G., E. Vasileiadou, and A. C. Petersen. 2015. “Exploring the Transition Potential of Renewable Energy Communities.” Futures 66: 85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essletzbichler, J. 2010. “Renewable Energy Technology and Path Creation: A Multi-scalar Approach to Energy Transition in the UK.” European Planning Studies 20: 791–816. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.667926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU. 2011. Smart Grids: From Innovation to Deployment. Brussels: EU.
   Google Scholar
• Farla, J., J. Markard, R. P. J. M. Raven, and L. Coenen. 2012. “Sustainability Transitions in the Making: A Closer Look at Actors, Strategies and Resources.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79: 991–998. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12: 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankfurt School of Finance and Management GmbH (in collaboration with Bloomberg New Energy Finance) 2012. Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2002. “Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-Level Perspective and a Case-Study.” Research Policy 31: 1257–1274. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2006. “The Hygienic Transition from Cesspools to Sewer Systems (1840–1930): The Dynamics of Regime Transformation.” Research Policy 35: 1069–1082. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2014. “Regime Resistance Against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective.” Theory Culture and Society 36 (3): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., and J. Schot. 2007. “Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways.” Research Policy 36: 399–417. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, T., M. Nye, and J. Burgess. 2013. “Keeping Energy Visible? Exploring how Householders Interact with Feedback from Smart Energy Monitors in the Longer Term.” Energy Policy 52: 126–134. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkey, D., and J. Webb. 2014. “District Energy Development in Liberalised Markets: Situating UK Heat Network Development in Comparison with Dutch and Norwegian Case Studies.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 26 (10): 1228–1241. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2014.971001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., M. Jalas, J. Rinkinen, and P. Tainio. 2015. “The Local Community as a “Low-Carbon Lab”: Promises and Perils.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 14: 149–164. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., M. Johnson, S. Robinson, E. Vadovics, and M. Saastamoinen. 2010. “Low-Carbon Communities as a Context for Individual Behavioural Change.” Energy Policy 38 (12): 7586–7595. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., O. Mont, and K. Power. 2014. “A Map is not a Territory - Making Research More Helpful for Sustainable Consumption Policy.” Journal of Consumer Policy 37: 27–44. doi: 10.1007/s10603-013-9247-8
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., and S. Marvin. 2012. “Mediating Low-Carbon Urban Transitions? Forms of Organization, Knowledge and Action.” European Planning Studies 20: 421–439. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.651804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holscher, K. 2015. “From Niche to Mainstream - how to Spread Sustainable Practices.” Dutch Research Institute for Transitions. Accessed July 7, 2015. http://www.drift.eur.nl/?p=9284.
   Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S., J. K. Juntunen, and S. Freeman. 2013. “Internet Forums and the Rise of the Inventive Energy User.” Science and TEchnology Studies 26 (1): 25–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ieromonachou, P., S. Potter, and J. Warren. 2007. “Analysing Road Pricing Implementation Processes in the UK and Norway.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 7 (1): 15–38.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, ed. 2014. Summary for Policymakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ison, R. 2010. Systems Practice: How to Act in a Climate-Change World. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jalas, M., H. Kuusi, and E. Heiskanen. 2014. “Self-Building Courses of Solar Heat Collectors as Sources of Consumer Empowerment and Local Embedding of Sustainable Energy Technology.” Science and Technology Studies 27 (1): 76–96.
   Google Scholar
• Judson, E. P., S. Bell, H. Bulkeley, G. Powells, and S. Lyon. 2015. “The Co-Construction of Energy Provision and Everyday Practice: Integrating Heat Pumps in Social Housing in England.” Science and Technology Studies 28 (3): 26–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, R. A. 2010. “Seeing with Clarity: Undertaking Observational Research.” In Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, edited by I. Hay, 3rd ed, 241–258. Canada: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., and D. Loorbach. 2003. “Governance for Sustainability through Transition Management.” Paper for the EAEPE 2003 Conference, November 7–10, 2003, Maastricht UNESCAP (2001). Regional Platform on Sustainable Development for Asia and the Pacific, 3rd Revision.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma. 1998. “Regime Shifts to Sustainability Through Processes of Niche Formation: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 10: 175–198. doi: 10.1080/09537329808524310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkham, P. 2003. Birmingham. Sheffield: Geographical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1992. “Where are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by W. Bijker, and J. Law, 225–258. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., and J. Rotmans. 2006. “Managing Transitions for Sustainable Development.” In Understanding Industrial Transformation, edited by X. Olsthoorn, and A. Wieczorek, 187–206. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., and J. Rotmans. 2010. “The Practice of Transition Management: Examples and Lessons from Four Distinct Cases.” Futures 42: 237–246. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, H. 2005. “Supply and Demand for Low Energy Housing in the UK: Insights from a Science and TEchnology Studies Approach.” Housing Studies 20: 815–829. doi: 10.1080/02673030500214118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A. F. D. 2006. “S Leinn Fhèin am Fearann” (The land is ours): Re-Claiming Land, Re-Creating Community, North Harris, Outer Hebrides, Scotland.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24: 577–598. doi: 10.1068/d398t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maréchal, K. 2010. “Not Irrational but Habitual: The Importance of “Behavioural Lock-in” in Energy Consumption.” Ecological Ecnomics 69: 1104–1114. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyborg, S. 2015. “Pilot Users and Their Families: Inventing Flexible Practices in the Smart Grid.” Science and Technology Studies 28 (3): 54–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna, C. C. R., and F. W. Geels. 2012. “Multi-Dimensional Struggles in the Greening of Industry: A Dialectic Issue Lifecycle Model and Case Study.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79: 999–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullinger, M., H. Lovell, and J. Webb. 2014. “Influencing Household Energy Practices: A Critical Review of UK Smart Metering Standards and Commercial Feedback Devices.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26: 1144–1162. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2014.977245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and R. Kemp. 1998. “Technological Change.” In Human Choice and Climate Change: Resources and Technology, edited by S. Rayner, and E. Malone, 327–399. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “2.3 Planning Problems are Wicked.” Polity 4: 155–169.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., R. Kemp, and M. van Asselt. 2001. “More Evolution than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy.” Foresight 3: 15–31. doi: 10.1108/14636680110803003
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., and N. Longhurst. 2016. “What Influences the Diffusion of Grassroots Innovations for Sustainability? Investigating Community Currency Niches.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 28: 1–23. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2015.1063603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 1998. “Gaps, Barriers and Conceptual Chasms: Theories of Technology Transfer and Energy in Buildings.” Energy Policy 26: 1105–1112. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00065-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2003. “Converging Conventions of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience.” Jornal of Consumer Policy 26: 395–418. doi: 10.1023/A:1026362829781
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., and G. Walker. 2007. “CAUTION! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice and Sustainable Transition Management.” Environment & Planning A 39: 763–770. doi: 10.1068/a39310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2007. “Emerging in Between: The Multi-Level Governance of Renewable Energy in the English Regions.” Energy Policy 35: 6266–6280. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth, P., and H. Rohracher. 2010. “‘Energy Regions’: The Transformative Power of Regional Discourses on Socio-Technical Futures.” Research Policy 39: 449–458. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinardi, G., and R. Slayton. 2015. “Greener Aviation Take-off (Delayed): Analysing Environmental Transitions with the Multi-Level Perspective.” Science and Technology Studies 28 (1): 28–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Torriti, J., M. G. Hassan, and M. Leach. 2010. “Demand Response Experience in Europe: Policies, Programmes and Implementation.” Energy 35: 1575–1583. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unruh, G. C. 2000. “Understanding Carbon Lock-in.” Energy Policy 28: 817–830. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbong, G., and F. Geels. 2007. “The Ongoing Energy Transition: Lessons from a Socio-Technical, Multi-Level Analysis of the Dutch Electricity System (1960–2004).” Energy Policy 35: 1025–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkamp, M. J., R. P. J. M. Raven, and L. M. M. Royakkers. 2011. “Strategic Niche Management of Social Innovations: The Case of Social Entrepreneurship.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 23: 667–681. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2011.585035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M. Y. 2016. “Meso-Level Factors in Technological Transitions: The Development of TD-SCDMA in China.” Research Policy 45: 546–559. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar