Incumbent organisations shaping emerging technological fields: cases of solar photovoltaic and electric vehicle charging

References

• Apajalahti, E. -L. , R. Lovio , and E. Heiskanen . 2015. “From Demand Side Management (DSM) to Energy Efficiency Services. A Finnish Case Study.” Energy Policy 81: 76–85.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J. , B. Leca , and E. Boxenbaum . 2009. “How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship.” The Academy of Management Annals 3: 65–107. doi: 10.1080/19416520903053598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A. , C. Berggren , T. Magnusson , and M. Hobday . 2013. “Technological Discontinuities and the Challenge for Incumbent Firms: Destruction, Disruption or Creative Accumulation?” Research Policy 43: 1210–1224. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biomeri . 2009. “Ministry of Employment and the Economy. Electric Vehicles in Finland [Sähköajoneuvot Suomessa].” Working Group memo 6.8.2009. Accessed 3 March 2015. https://www.tem.fi/files/24099/Sahkoajoneuvot_Suomessa-selvitys.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R. , J. Pinkse , and A. Kolk . 2014. “Business Models for Sustainable Technologies: Exploring Business Model Evolution in the Case of Electric Vehicles.” Research Policy 43: 284–300. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, M. , K. Brown , K. Konrad , and H. van Lente . 2006. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18: 285–298. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budde, B. , F. Alkemade , and M. Hekkert . 2015. “On the Relation Between Communication and Innovation Activities: A Comparison of Hybrid Electric and Fuel Cell Vehicles.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 14: 45–59. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2013.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M. 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail . Boston : Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyerson, R. , and A. Pilkington . 2005. “Gales of Creative Destruction and the Opportunistic Incumbent: The Case of Electric Vehicles in California.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17: 391–408. doi: 10.1080/09537320500357160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. , and J. A. Martin . 2000. “Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?” Strategic Management Journal 21: 1105–1121. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. 2013. “Understanding Stability and Change in Fields.” American Sociological Review 61: 656–673. doi: 10.2307/2096398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. , and D. McAdam . 2012. A Theory of Fields . New York : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentelsaz, L. , E. Garrido , and J. P. Maicas . 2014. “Incumbents, Technological Change and Institutions: How the Value of Complementary Resources Varies Across Markets.” Strategic Management Journal 36: 1778–1801. doi: 10.1002/smj.2319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granqvist, N. 2007. “Nanotechnology and Nanolabeling – Essays on the Emergence of New Technological Fields.” PhD diss., A-317, Helsinki School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R. , R. Suddaby , and C. R. Hinings . 2002. “Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields.” The Academy of Management Journal 45: 58–80. doi: 10.2307/3069285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C. , I. Palmer , and N. Phillips . 2000. “Discourse as a Strategic Resource.” Human Relations 83: 1227–1248. doi: 10.1177/0018726700539006
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. , and F. Rothaermel . 2003. “The Performance of Incumbent Firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation.” Academy of Management Review 28: 257–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockerts, K. , and R. Wüstenhagen . 2010. “Greening Goliaths Versus Emerging Davids – Theorizing About the Role of Incumbents and New Entrants in Sustainable Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Business Venturing 25: 481–492. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L. , J. Tan , and M. Thursby . 2010. “Incumbent Firm Invention in Emerging Fields: Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry.” Strategic Management Journal 32: 55–75. doi: 10.1002/smj.866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A. 1999. “Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data.” Academy of Management Review 24: 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development.” Strategic Management Journal 13: 111–125. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250131009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M. , M. Ventresca , and P. M. Hirsch . 2003. “Social Movements, Field Frames and Industry Emergence: A Cultural-Political Perspective on US Recycling.” Socio-Economic Review 1: 71–104. doi: 10.1093/soceco/1.1.71
   Google Scholar
• Nissilä, H. , T. Lempiälä , and R. Lovio . 2014. “Constructing Expectations for Solar Technology Over Multiple Field-configuring Events: A Narrative Perspective.” Science & Technology Studies 27: 54–75.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, M. 2013. “German Utilities and Distributed PV: How to Overcome Barriers to Business Model Innovation.” Renewable Energy 55: 456–466. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinkinen, J. 2010. “Traffic in the Media: Competing Visions from Electric Cars to a Car Free Future [in Finnish].” The Finnish Environment Institute Publication Series 21|2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rothaermel, F. , and C. Hill . 2005. Technological Discontinuities and Complementary Assets: A Longitudinal Study of Industry and Firm Performance.” Organization Science 16: 52–70. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruef, A. , and J. Markard . 2010. “What Happens After a Hype? How Changing Expectations Affected Innovation Activities in the Case of Stationary Fuel Cells.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22: 317–338. doi: 10.1080/09537321003647354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations . First edition. London : Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1942/1954. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy . Fourth Edition with a New Chapter. London : George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2007. “Translating Sustainabilities Between Green Niches and Socio-technical Regimes.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19: 427–450. doi: 10.1080/09537320701403334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sood, A. , and G. Tellis . 2011. “Demystifying Disruption: A New Model for Understanding and Predicting Disruptive Technologies.” Marketing Science 30: 339–354. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1100.0617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. , G. Pisano , and A. Shuen . 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal 18: 509–533. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temmes, A. , R.-S. Räsänen , J. Rinkinen , and R. Lovio . 2013. “The Emergence of Niche Protection Through Policies: The Case of Electric Vehicles Field in Finland.” Science & Technology Studies 26: 37–62.
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L. , and P. Anderson . 1986. “Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments.” Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 439–465. doi: 10.2307/2392832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unruh, G. 2000. “Understanding Carbon Lock-in.” Energy Policy 28: 817–830. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Merkerk, R. , and D. Robinson . 2006. “Characterizing the Emergence of a Technological Field: Expectations, Agendas and Networks in Lab-on-a-Chip Technologies.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18: 411–428. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wijk, J. , W. Stam , T. Elfring , C. Zietsma , and F. De Hond . 2013. “Activists and Incumbents Structuring Change: The Interplay of Agency, Culture, and Networks in Field Evolution.” Academy of Management Journal 56: 358–386. doi: 10.5465/amj.2008.0355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2012. Applications of Case Study Research . Third edition. Thousand Oaks : SAGE.
   Google Scholar