What prevents PROS from making KNOTS? Evidence for nano-researchers

References

• Algieri, B., A. Aquino, and M. Succurro. 2013. “Technology Transfer Offices and Academic Spin-off Creation: The Case of Italy.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 38: 382–400. doi: 10.1007/s10961-011-9241-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., E. E. Lehmann, and M. Wright. 2014. “Technology Transfer in a Global Economy.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 39: 301–312. doi: 10.1007/s10961-012-9283-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrutia, J., M. Gomez, and G. Etxebarria. 2013. “Producción científica en Nanociencias en la CAPV y transferencia: una relación necesaria desde la innovación.” Ekonomiaz 83 (2): 204–233.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R., and I. M. Bodas Freitas. 2008. “Analysing Knowledge Transfer Channels between Universities and Industry: To What Degree Do Sectors Also Matter?” Research Policy 37: 1837–1853. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigliardi, B., F. Galati, G. Marolla, and C. Verbano. 2015. “Factors Affecting Technology Transfer Offices’ Performance in the Italian Food Context.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 27 (4): 361–384. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2014.1002464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., H. Rimes, and J. Youtie. 2015. “The Evolving State-of-the-art in Technology Transfer Research: Revisiting the Contingent Effectiveness Model.” Research Policy 44: 34–49. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2005. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., and M. Perkmann. 2011. “Why Do Academics Engage with Industry? The Entrepreneurial University and Individual Motivations.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 36: 316–339. doi: 10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2016). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
   Google Scholar
• Fogelberg, H., and B. A. Sandén. 2008. “Understanding Reflexive Systems of Innovation: An Analysis of Swedish Nanotechnology Discourse and Organization.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20: 65–81. doi: 10.1080/09537320701726593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilsing, V., R. Bekkers, I. M. Boda-Freitas, and M. Van der Steen. 2011. “Differences in Technology Transfer between Science-based and Development-based Industries: Transfer Mechanisms and Barriers.” Technovation 31: 638–647. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2011.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herstad, S. J., C. Bloch, B. Ebersberger, and E. van de Velde. 2010. “National Innovation Policy and Global Open Innovation: Exploring Balances, Tradeoffs and Complementarities.” Science and Public Policy 37 (2): 113–124. doi: 10.3152/030234210X489590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, N., and K. Miyazaki. 2010. “An Empirical Analysis of Nanotechnology Research Domains.” Technovation 30 (4): 229–237. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Sáez, F., J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, and J. L. Zofío. 2013. “Who Leads Research Productivity Growth? Guidelines for R&D Policy-makers.” Scientometrics 94: 273–303. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0763-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangematin, V., E. Errabi, and C. Gauthier. 2011. “Large Players in the Nanogame: Dedicated Nanotech Subsidiaries or Distributed Nanotech Capabilities?” The Journal of Technology Transfer 36: 640–664. doi: 10.1007/s10961-011-9209-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. 2006. “Are Patenting Scientists the Better Scholars? An Exploratory Comparison of Inventor-authors with their non-Inventing Peers in Nano-science and Technology.” Research Policy 35 (10): 1646–1662. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munari, F., E. Rasmussen, L. Toschi, and E. Villani. 2016. “Determinants of the University Technology Transfer Policy-mix: A Cross-national Analysis of Gap-funding Instruments.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 41: 1377–1405. doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9448-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. L. 2006. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 7th ed. Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Nikulainen, T. 2010. “Identifying Nanotechnological Linkages in the Finnish Economy – an Explorative Study.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22 (5): 513–531. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2010.488054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikulainen, T., and C. Palmberg. 2010. “Transferring Science-based Technologies to Industry—Does Nanotechnology Make a Difference?” Technovation 30: 3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. The Impacts of Nanotechnology on Companies: Policy Insights from Case Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Palmberg, C. 2008. “The Transfer and Commercialisation of Nanotechnology: A Comparative Analysis of University and Company Researchers.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 33: 631–652. doi: 10.1007/s10961-007-9059-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmberg, C., H. Dernis, and C. Miguet. 2009. Nanotechnology: An Overview Based on Indicators and Statistics. OECD, STI Working Paper 2009/7.
   Google Scholar
• Palmberg, C., and T. Nikulainen. 2006. Industrial Renewal and Growth through Nanotechnology? An Overview with Focus on Finland, ETLA Discussion Papers, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA), No. 1020.
   Google Scholar
• Pandza, K., and R. Holt. 2007. “Absorptive and Transformative Capacities in Nanotechnology Innovation Systems.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 24: 347–365. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perex, E., and P. Sandgren. 2008. Nanotechnology in Sweden - an Innovation System Approach to an Emerging Area. VINNOVA Analysis VA 2008:03.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., V. Tartarik, M. McKelvey, E. Autio, A. Broström, P. D’Este, R. Fini, et al. 2013. “Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University–Industry Relations.” Research Policy 42 (2): 423–442. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roco, M. C., B. Harthorn, D. Guston, and P. Shapira. 2011. “Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (9): 3557–3590. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0454-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapira, P., and J. Youtie. 2008. “Emergence of Nanodistricts in the United States: Path Dependency or New Opportunities?” Economic Development Quarterly 22 (3): 187–199. doi: 10.1177/0891242408320968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapira, P., J. Youtie, and L. Kay. 2011. “National Innovation Systems and the Globalization of Nanotechnology Innovation.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 36: 587–604. doi: 10.1007/s10961-011-9212-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, C. M., R. Grinde, and B. Elmslie. 2011. “Nanotechnology as General-purpose Technology: Empirical Evidence and Implications.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 23 (2): 175–192. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2011.543336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., and P. Shapira. 2012. “Partnering with Universities: A Good Choice for Nanotechnology Start-up Firms?” Small Business Economics 38: 197–215. doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9248-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigren-Kristoferson, C., J. Gabrielsson, and F. Kitagawa. 2011. “Mind the gap and Bridge the gap: Research Excellence and Diffusion of Academic Knowledge in Sweden.” Science and Public Policy 38 (6): 481–492. doi: 10.3152/030234211X12960315267859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalewska-Kurek, K., K. Egedova, P.A.T.M. Geurts and H.E. Roosendaal. 2017. “Knowledge Transfer Activities of Scientists in Nanotechnology.” Journal of Technology Transfer. in press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Q., and J. Guan. 2013. “Love Dynamics between Science and Technology: Some Evidences in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology.” Scientometrics 94: 113–132. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0785-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar