What drives technology transitions? An integration of different approaches within transition studies

References

• Alkemade, F., M. P. Hekkert, and S. O. Negro. 2011. “Transition Policy and Innovation Policy: Friends or Foes?” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (1): 125–129. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.009
   Google Scholar
• Alkemade, F., and R. A. Suurs. 2012. “Patterns of Expectations for Emerging Sustainable Technologies.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (3): 448–456. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, N. 1976. “Transcription of Bacteriophage ϕX174 in Vitro: Analysis with Restriction Enzymes.” Journal of Molecular Biology 108 (4): 771–779. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(76)80116-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., S. Jacobsson, B. Carlsson, S. Lindmark, and A. Rickne. 2008. “Analyzing the Functional Dynamics of Technological Innovation Systems: A Scheme of Analysis.” Research Policy 37 (3): 407–429. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, S., K. Davidson, and W. Saman. 2013. “The Impact of Niche Green Developments in Transforming the Building Sector: The Case Study of Lochiel Park.” Energy Policy 62: 646–655. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettini, Y., R. R. Brown, F. J. de Haan, and M. Farrelly. 2015. “Understanding Institutional Capacity for Urban Water Transitions.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 94: 65–79. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., B. Truffer, and L. Coenen. 2014. “Why Space Matters in Technological Innovation Systems—Mapping Global Knowledge Dynamics of Membrane Bioreactor Technology.” Research Policy 43 (1): 138–155. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B., and R. Stankiewicz. 1991. “On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological Systems.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1 (2): 93–118. doi: 10.1007/BF01224915
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., P. Benneworth, and B. Truffer. 2012. “Toward a Spatial Perspective on Sustainability Transitions.” Research Policy 41 (6): 968–979. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Lucia, L., and K. Ericsson. 2014. “Low-carbon District Heating in Sweden–Examining a Successful Energy Transition.” Energy Research & Social Science 4: 10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Elzen, B., F. W. Geels, and K. Green, eds. 2004. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Everett, M., and S. P. Borgatti. 2005. “Ego Network betweenness.” Social Networks 27 (1): 31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2002. “Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-Level Perspective and a Case-Study.” Research Policy 31 (8): 1257–1274. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2004. “From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems: Insights About Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory.” Research Policy 33 (6): 897–920. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2005. “Processes and Patterns in Transitions and System Innovations: Refining the Co-Evolutionary Multi-Level Perspective.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72 (6): 681–696. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., and J. Schot. 2007. “Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways.” Research Policy 36 (3): 399–417. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., and J. Schot. 2010. “The Dynamics of Transitions: A Socio-Technical Perspective.” In Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, edited by J. Grin, J. Rotmans, and J. Schot, 11–104. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., J. Rotmans, and J. Schot. 2010. Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., R. A. Suurs, S. O. Negro, S. Kuhlmann, and R. E. Smits. 2007. “Functions of Innovation Systems: A New Approach for Analysing Technological Change.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74 (4): 413–432. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogma, R. 2002. Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogma, R., R. Kemp, J. Schot, and B. Truffer. 2002. Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogma, R., M. Weber, and B. Elzen. 2005. “Integrated Long-Term Strategies to Induce Regime Shifts Towards Sustainability: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management.” In Towards Environmental Innovation Systems, 209–236. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Huttunen, K., J. Pirttilä, and R. Uusitalo. 2013. “The Employment Effects of Low-Wage Subsidies.” Journal of Public Economics 97: 49–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, S., and A. Johnson. 2000. “The Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technology: An Analytical Framework and Key Issues for Research.” Energy Policy 28 (9): 625–640. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00041-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, S., and K. Karltorp. 2013. “Mechanisms Blocking the Dynamics of the European Offshore Wind Energy Innovation System–Challenges for Policy Intervention.” Energy Policy 63: 1182–1195. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, S., and V. Lauber. 2006. “The Politics and Policy of Energy System Transformation—Explaining the German Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technology.” Energy Policy 34 (3): 256–276. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1980. “Mental Models in Cognitive Science.” Cognitive Science 4 (1): 71–115. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0401_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., and D. Loorbach. 2006. Chapter 5. Transition Management: A Reflexive Governance Approach. Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., D. Loorbach, and J. Rotmans. 2007. “Transition Management as a Model for Managing Processes of Co-Evolution Towards Sustainable Development.” The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 14 (1): 78–91. doi: 10.1080/13504500709469709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R. P. M., A. Rip, and J. Schot. 2001. “Constructing Transition Paths Through the Management of Niches.” In Path Dependence and Creation, edited by R. Garud, and P. Karnoe, 269–299. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma. 1998. “Regime Shifts to Sustainability Through Processes of Niche Formation: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10 (2): 175–198. doi: 10.1080/09537329808524310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F. 2012. “Using the Multi-Level Perspective on Socio-Technical Transitions to Assess Innovation Policy.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (2): 298–310. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kueffer, C., E. Underwood, G. Hirsch Hadorn, R. Holderegger, M. Lehning, C. Pohl, M. Schirmer, et al. 2012. “Enabling Effective Problem-Oriented Research for Sustainable Development.” Ecology and Society 17 (4). doi:10.5751/ES-05045-170408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. 2010. “Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework.” Governance 23 (1): 161–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., and J. Rotmans. 2010. “The Practice of Transition Management: Examples and Lessons from Four Distinct Cases.” Futures 42 (3): 237–246. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., R. Raven, and B. Truffer. 2012. “Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and its Prospects.” Research Policy 41 (6): 955–967. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., and B. Truffer. 2008. “Technological Innovation Systems and the Multi-Level Perspective: Towards an Integrated Framework.” Research Policy 37 (4): 596–615. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. 2009. “What About the Politics? Sustainable Development, Transition Management, and Long Term Energy Transitions.” Policy Sciences 42 (4): 323–340. doi: 10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H. 1999. Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. Hartland, VT: Sustainability Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Moallemi, E. A., A. Ahamdi, A. Afrazeh, and N. B. Moghaddam. 2014. “Understanding Systemic Analysis in the Governance of Sustainability Transition in Renewable Energies: The Case of Fuel Cell Technology in Iran.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 33: 305–315. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. 2000. “Causal Inference Without Counterfactuals: Comment.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 95 (450): 428–431.
   Google Scholar
• Quitzau, M. B., B. Hoffmann, and M. Elle. 2012. “Local Niche Planning and its Strategic Implications for Implementation of Energy-Efficient Technology.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (6): 1049–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, R. P. 2006. “Towards Alternative Trajectories? Reconfigurations in the Dutch Electricity Regime.” Research Policy 35 (4): 581–595. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, R. 2007. “Niche Accumulation and Hybridisation Strategies in Transition Processes Towards a Sustainable Energy System: An Assessment of Differences and Pitfalls.” Energy Policy 35 (4): 2390–2400. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and R. Kemp. 1998. Technological Change. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G. 1990. Frontiers of Social Theory: The New Syntheses. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., R. Kemp, and M. Van Asselt. 2001. “More Evolution than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy.” Foresight 3 (1): 15–31. doi: 10.1108/14636680110803003
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and F. W. Geels. 2008. “Strategic Niche Management and Sustainable Innovation Journeys: Theory, Findings, Research Agenda, and Policy.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 (5): 537–554. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., R. Hoogma, and B. Elzen. 1994. “Strategies for Shifting Technological Systems: The Case of the Automobile System.” Futures 26 (10): 1060–1076. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90073-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., and A. Haxeltine. 2012. “Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30 (3): 381–400. doi: 10.1068/c10222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slayton, R., and G. Spinardi. 2016. “Radical Innovation in Scaling Up: Boeing’s Dreamliner and the Challenge of Socio-Technical Transitions.” Technovation 47: 47–58. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2007. “Translating Sustainabilities between Green Niches and Socio-Technical Regimes.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19 (4): 427–450. doi: 10.1080/09537320701403334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., A. Stirling, and F. Berkhout. 2005. “The Governance of Sustainable Socio-Technical Transitions.” Research Policy 34 (10): 1491–1510. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., J. P. Voß, and J. Grin. 2010. “Innovation Studies and Sustainability Transitions: The Allure of the Multi-Level Perspective and its Challenges.” Research Policy 39 (4): 435–448. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suedfeld, P., and P. Tetlock. 1977. “Integrative Complexity of Communications in International Crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 21 (1): 169–184. doi: 10.1177/002200277702100108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unruh, G. C. 2002. “Escaping Carbon Lock-in.” Energy Policy 30 (4): 317–325. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00098-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bosch, S., and J. Rotmans. 2008. Deepening, Broadening and Scaling up: A Framework for Steering Transition Experiments. Knowledge Centre for Sustainable System Innovations and Transitions (KCT). Delft: Rotterdam University.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J. P. 2014. “Performative Policy Studies: Realizing ‘Transition Management’.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 27 (4): 317–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, S. E. 2015. “Are Theories of Conflict Improving? Using Propositional Analysis to Determine the Structure of Conflict Theories Over the Course of a Century.” Emergence: Complexity and Organization 17 (4): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, S. E. 2016. “The Science of Conceptual Systems: A Progress Report.” Foundations of Science 21 (4): 579–602. doi: 10.1007/s10699-015-9425-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, S. E., and V. Valentinov. 2016. “The Imperviance of Conceptual Systems: Cognitive and Moral Aspects.” Kybernetes 45 (9): 1437–1451. doi: 10.1108/K-04-2016-0072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, S. E., and V. Valentinov. 2017. “What Is Sustainable Theory? A Luhmannian Perspective on the Science of Conceptual Systems.” Foundations of Science 22 (4): 733–747. doi:10.1007/s10699-016-9496-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B., and S. E. Wallis. 2015. “Using Integrative Propositional Analysis for Evaluating Entrepreneurship Theories.” SAGE Open 5 (3): 1–9. doi:10.1177/2158244015604190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar