Ecologies of user knowledge: linking user insight in organisations to specific projects

References

• Abrell, T., A. Benker, and M. Pihlajamaa. 2017. “User Knowledge Utilization in Innovation of Complex Products and Systems: An Absorptive Capacity Perspective.” Creativity and Innovation Management 27 (2): 169–182. doi: 10.1111/caim.12244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akera, A. 2007. “Constructing a Representation for an Ecology of Knowledge Methodological Advances in the Integration of Knowledge and its Various Contexts.” Social Studies of Science 37: 413–441. doi: 10.1177/0306312706070742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. 1995. “User Representations: Practices, Methods and Sociology.” In Managing Technology in Society, edited by A. Rip, T. J. Misa, and J. Schot, 167–184. London: Cassel Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Benker, A. 2015. “Design for Usability of Complex Medical Devices: Leading a Technology-Push Innovation Towards User Acceptance.” Journal of Design, Business & Society 1 (1): 29–42. doi: 10.1386/dbs.1.1.29_1
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, H., and K. Holtzblatt. 1998. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, K., F. Kensing, and J. Simonsen. 2004. Participatory IT Design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogers, M., A. Afuah, and B. Bastian. 2010. “Users as Innovators: A Review, Critique, and Future Research Directions.” Journal of Management 36: 857–875. doi: 10.1177/0149206309353944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellion, G., and S. K. Markham. 2013. “Perspective: New Product Failure Rates: Influence of Argumentum ad Populum and Self-Interest.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 30 (5): 976–979. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.01009.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, R., P. Saviotti, and V. Walsh. 1987. Economics and Technological Change. New Jersey: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Curedale, R. A. 2013. Service Design: 250 Essential Methods. Topanga, CA: Design Community College Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. 1989. The Research Act. A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Earthy, J. 1998. Usability Maturity Model: Human Centredness Scale. INUSE Project Deliverable D5.1.4(s). Version 1.2. London: Lloyd's Register of Shipping.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, W. D., and M. C. Salzman. 1998. “Damaged Merchandise? A Review of Experiments That Compare Usability Evaluation Methods.” Human–Computer Interaction 13: 203–261. doi: 10.1207/s15327051hci1303_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannukainen, P., S. Mäkinen, and S. Hyysalo. 2017. “Organisational Adoption of the Lead User Method: A Follow-up Study on Intensions Versus Actions.” International Journal of Business Excellence 12 (4): 508–536. doi: 10.1504/IJBEX.2017.085016
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, S., N. Berente, and K. Lyytinen. 2009. “Requirements in the 21st Century: Current Practice and Emerging Trends.” In Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective, 44–87. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., and P. Repo. 2007. “User Involvement and Entrepreneurial Action.” Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments 3 (2): 167–187. doi: 10.17011/ht/urn.2007279
   Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S. 2010. Health Technology Development and Use: From Practice-Bound Imaginations to Evolving Impacts. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S., T. Elgaard Jensen, and N. Oudshoorn. 2016. The New Production of Users: Changing Innovation Collectives and Involvement Strategies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S., P. Repo, P. Timonen, L. Hakkarainen, and E. Heiskanen. 2015. “Diversity and Change of User Driven Innovation Modes in Companies.” International Journal of Innovation Management 20 (2): 1650023-1–1650023-33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, C., C. Steyaert, and F. Überbacher. 2013. “Anticipating Intended Users: Prospective Sensemaking in Technology Development.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 25 (9): 1027–1043. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.832749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, N. E., M. Hertzum, and B. E. John. 1998. “The Evaluator Effect in Usability Tests.” In CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 255–256. Los Angeles: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffries, R., D. Wixon, E. L.-C. Law, E. Hvannberg, and G. Cockton. 2007. Maturing Usability: Quality in Software, Interaction and Value. London: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, T., and M. Petersen. 2016. “Straddling, Betting and Passing: The Configuration of User Involvement in Cross-Sectorial Innovation Projects.” In The New Production of Users: Changing Innovation Collectives and Involvement Strategies, 136–159. New York: Routldge.
   Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, L., and M. Molin. 2003. “Consumers as Co-Developers: Learning and Innovation Outside the Firm.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15 (3): 363–383. doi: 10.1080/09537320310001601531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. 2013. “How Social Media Changes User-Centred Design-Cumulative and Strategic User Involvement with Respect to Developer–User Social Distance.” Doctoral dissertation. Aalto University, Espoo.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., S. Hyysalo, S. Mäkinen, P. Helminen, K. Savolainen, and L. Hakkarainen. 2014a. “From Recipes to Meals … and Dietary Regimes: Method Mixes as key Emerging Topic in Human-Centred Design.” In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational, 343–352. Helsinki: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., H. Mozaffar, G. M. Campagnolo, S. Hyysalo, N. Pollock, and R. Williams. 2014b. “­­The Managed Prosumer: Evolving Knowledge Strategies in the Design of Information Infrastructures.” Information, Communication and Society 17 (7): 795–813. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.830635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, K. 2008. “Dynamics of Type-Based Scenarios of Use: Opening Processes in Early Phases of Interactive Television and Electronic Marketplaces.” Science Studies 21 (2): 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kotro, T. 2005. “Hobbyist Knowing in Product Development: Desirable Objects and Passion for Sports in Suunto Corporation.” Academic Dissertation. National Consumer Research Center and University of Art and Design Helsinki, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton, D. 1995. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molich, R., A. D. Thomsen, B. Karyukina, L. Schmidt, M. Ede, W. van Oel, and M. Arcuri. 1999. “Comparative Evaluation of Usability Tests.” In CHI’99 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 83–84. Pittsburgh: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mozaffar, H. 2016. “User Communities as Multifunctional Spaces: Innovation, Collective Voice, Demand Articulation, Peer Informing and Professional Identity (and More).” In The New Production of Users: Changing Innovation Collectives and Involvement Strategies, edited by S. Hyysalo, T. Elgaard Jensen, and N. Oudshoorn, 219–246. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, M. J., and S. Kuhn. 1993. “Participatory Design.” Communications of the ACM 36 (6): 24–28. doi: 10.1145/153571.255960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, E., and G. Bakke. 2001. “Implementing the Lead User Method in a High Technology Firm: A Longitudinal Study of Intentions Versus Actions.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 18 (6): 388–395. doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00111-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. 2000. “Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organisations.” Organization Science 11 (4): 404–428. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, N., and T. Pinch. 2003. How Users Matter? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Piller, F., and J. West. 2014. Firms, Users, and Innovation: An Interactive Model of Coupled Open Innovation. New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, N., and R. Williams. 2008. Software and Organizations: The Biography of the Packaged Enterprize System, or, how SAP Conquered the World. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C., and V. Ramaswamy. 2004. The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value with Customers. Boston: Harward Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J., Y. Rogers, and H. Sharp. 2002. Interaction Design - Beyond Human Computer Interaction. Hoboken, NJ: John Viley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S., and J. Robertson. 2006. Mastering the Requirements Process. 2nd ed. London: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M. N., C. C. Seepersad, and K. Hölttä-Otto. 2011. “The Characteristics of Innovative, Mechanical Products.” Journal of Mechanical Design 133 (2): 021009-1–021009-9. doi: 10.1115/1.4003409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharrock, W., and B. Anderson. 1994. “The User as a Scenic Feature of the Design Space.” Design Studies 15 (1): 5–18. doi: 10.1016/0142-694X(94)90036-1
   Google Scholar
• Standish Group. 2015. CHAOS Report 2015. Boston: The Standish Group International.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. 1995. Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Turnhout, K., A. Bennis, S. Craenmehr, R. Holwerda, M. Jacobs, R. Niels, L. Zaad, S. Hoppenbrouwers, D. Lenior, and R. Bakker. 2014. “Design Patterns for Mixed-Method Research in HCI.” In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational, 361–370. Helsinki: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. 2016. Free Innovation. Cambride, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wardlaw, J. 2016. “Introducing User-Centred Design: A Longitudinal Study of a Healthcare Informatics Organisation.” Doctoral dissertation. University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R., R. Slack, and J. Stewart. 2005. Social Learning in Technological Innovation: Experimenting with Information and Communication Technologies. Cheltenham: Edgar Algar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. 1991. “Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials.” In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination, edited by John Law, 58–99. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woolrych, A., K. Hornbæk, E. Frøkjær, and G. Cockton. 2011. “Ingredients and Meals Rather Than Recipes: a Proposal for Research That Does Not Treat Usability Evaluation Methods as Indivisible Wholes.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 27: 940–970. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2011.555314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar