The dynamics of university-industry-government relationships in Nanoscience: investigating the Triple-Helix differences between Iran and Switzerland

References

• Akhondzadeh, S. 2013. “Iranian Science Shows World’s Fastest Growth: Ranks 17th in Science Production in 2012.” Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology 5 (3): 139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arora, S. K., A. L. Porter, J. Youtie, and P. L. Shapira. 2013. “Capturing new Developments in an Emerging Technology: an Updated Search Strategy for Identifying Nanotechnology Research Outputs.” Scientometrics 95: 351–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartol, T., and K. Stopar. 2015. “Nano Language and Distribution of Article Title Terms According to Power Laws.” Scientometrics 103 (2): 435–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., S. Jacobsson, B. Carlsson, S. Lindmark, and A. Rickne. 2008. “Analyzing the Functional Dynamics of Technological Innovation Systems: A Scheme of Analysis.” Research Policy 37 (3): 407–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beumer, K., and S. Bhattacharya. 2013. “Emerging Technologies in India: Developments, Debates and Silences About Nanotechnology.” Science and Public Policy 40: 628–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhushan, B. 2010. Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y., Y. Liu, W. Fan, Z. Yan, and X. Ye. 2017. “Triple Helix on Globalization: A Case Study of China International Nanotech Innovation Cluster.” Information Development 33 (1): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S., J. Yang, and H. Park. 2015. “Quantifying the Triple Helix Relationship in Scientific Research: Statistical Analyses on the Dividing Pattern Between Developed and Developing Countries.” Quality & Quantity 49 (4): 1381–1396. doi:10.1007/s11135-014-0052-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, C. 2014. “An Analysis of the Status of the Triple Helix and University–Industry–Government Relationships in Asia.” Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1100-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, K. B., and T. Fujimoto. 1991. Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry. Boston: HBS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danell, R., and O. Persson. 2003. “Regional R&D Activities and Interactions in the Swedish Triple Helix.” Scientometrics. doi:10.1023/A:1026228425125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P., and D. Foray. 1995. Accessing and Expanding the Science and Technology Knowledge Base. Paris: STI Review 16, OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and J. Dzisah. 2008. “Rethinking Development: Circulation in the Triple Helix.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. doi:10.1080/09537320802426309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. “The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations.” Research Policy. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eun, J. H., K. Lee, and G. Wu. 2006. “Explaining the “University-run Enterprises” in China: A Theoretical Framework for University–Industry Relationship in Developing Countries and its Application to China.” Research Policy. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 1988. “Japan: A New National System of Innovation?” In Technical Change and Economic Theory, edited by G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete, 330–348. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 1994. The new Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grupp, H. 1990. “The Concept of Entropy in Scientometrics and Innovation Research.” Scientometrics 18 (3): 219–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, J., and N. Liu. 2014. “Measuring Scientific Research in Emerging Nano-Energy Field.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 16: 23–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, J., and N. Liu. 2016. “Exploitative and Exploratory Innovations in Knowledge Network and Collaboration Network: A Patent Analysis in the Technological Field of Nano-Energy.” Research Policy 45: 97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, J., and N. Ma. 2007. “China’s Emerging Presence in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology A Comparative Bibliometric Study of Several Nanoscience ‘Giants’.” Research Policy 36: 880–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., R. A. Suurs, S. O. Negro, S. Kuhlmann, and R. E. Smits. 2007. “Functions of Innovation Systems: A new Approach for Analysing Technological Change.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74 (4): 413–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, M. D., J. Moon, H. Kang, S. Lee, and Y. Choe. 2012. “Mapping the Dynamics of Knowledge Base of Innovations of R&D in Bangladesh: Triple Helix Perspective.” Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0507-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hullmann, A., and M. Meyer. 2003. “Publications and Patents in Nanotechnology.” Scientometrics 58: 507–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, N., and K. Miyazaki. 2009. “NanoSI: Exploring Nanotechnology Research Conflation and Nano-Innovation Dynamism in the Case of Japan.” Sciecne and Public Policy 36 (3): 170–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari, M., and H. R. Zarghami. 2016. “Measuring Nanotechnology Development Through the Study of the Dividing Pattern Between Developed and Developing Countries During 2000-2014.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research. doi:10.1007/s11051-016-3431-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., E. A. Corley, and D. A. Scheufele. 2012b. “Classifying US Nano Scientists: of Cautions Innovators, Regulators and Technology Optimists.” Science and Public Policy 39 (1): 30–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., M. Huang, F. Jin, D. Bodoff, J. Moon, and Y. Choe. 2012a. “Triple Helix in the Agricultural Sector of Northeast Asian Countries: A Comparative Study Between Korea and China.” Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0517-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostoff, R. N. 2012. “China/USA Nanotechnology Research Output Comparison—2011 Update.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 79: 986–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostoff, R. N., S. Bhattacharya, and M. Pecht. 2007. “Assessment of China's and India's Science and Technology Literature-Introduction, Background, and Approach.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74 (9): 1519–1538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, K. S., H. Park, M. So, and L. Leydesdorff. 2012. “Has Globalization Strengthened South Korea’s National Research System? National and International Dynamics of the Triple Helix of Scientific co-Authorship Relationships in South Korea.” Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0512-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and H. Etzkowitz. 1996. “Emergence of a Triple Helix of University—Industry—Government Relations.” Science and Public Policy 23 (5): 279–286.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and H. Etzkowitz. 1998. “The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies.” Science and Public Policy 25 (3): 195–203.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and H. Park. 2014. “Can Synergy in Triple Helix Relations be Quantified? A Review of the Development of the Triple Helix Indicator.” Triple Helix 1 (4): 1-18.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., H. Park, and B. Lengyel. 2014. “A Routine for Measuring Synergy in University–Industry–Government Relations: Mutual Information as a Triple-Helix and Quadruple-Helix Indicator.” Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1079-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., E. Perevodchikov, and A. Uvarov. 2015. “Measuring Triple-Helix Synergy in the Russian Innovation Systems at Regional, Provincial, and National Levels.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.23258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and Y. Sun. 2009. “National and International Dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University–Industry–Government Versus International Coauthorship Relations.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.20997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and G. Zawdie. 2010. “The Triple Helix Perspective of Innovation Systems.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22 (7): 789–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, N., and J. Guan. 2015. “Dynamic Evolution of Collaborative Networks: Evidence From Nano-Energy Research in China.” Scientometrics 102: 1895–1919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., P. Z. Zhang, X. Li, H. C. Chen, Y. Dang, C. Larson, M. C. Roco, and X. W. Wang. 2009. “Trends for Nanotechnology Development in China, Russia, and India.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 11 (8): 1845–1866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: An Analytical Framework. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Maghrebi, M., A. Abbasi, S. Amiri, R. Monsefi, and A. Harati. 2011. “A Collective and Abridged Lexical Query for Delineation of Nanotechnology Publications.” Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0304-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdavi Mazdeh, M., S. M. Razavi, R. Hesamamiri, M. Zahedi, and B. Elahi. 2013. “An Empirical Investigation of Entrepreneurship Intensity in Iranian State Universities.” Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9539-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki, E. J. 2010. “Everywhere? The Geography Of Knowledge.” Journal of Regional Science. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00640.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. 2006. “Knowledge Integrators or Weak Links? An Exploratory Comparison of Patenting Researchers with their Non-Inventing Peers in Nano-Science and Technology.” Scientometrics 68 (3): 545–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momaya, K. S., and L. Lalwani. 2017. “Systems of Technological Innovation: A Review of Research Activities Taking the Case of Nanotechnology and India.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 29 (6): 626–641. doi:10.1080/09537325.2016.1220516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. 1988. “Institutions Supporting Technical Change in the United States.” In Technical Change and Economic Theory, edited by G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete, 312–329. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., ed. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozcan, S., and N. Islam. 2017. “Patent Information Retrieval: Approaching a Method and Analysing Nanotechnology Patent Collaborations.” Scientometrics 111 (2): 941–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. W., H. D. Hong, and L. Leydesdorff. 2005. “A Comparison of the Knowledge-Based Innovation Systems in the Economies of South Korea and the Netherlands Using Triple Helix Indicators.” Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0257-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. W., and L. Leydesdorff. 2010. “Longitudinal Trends in Networks of University–Industry–Government Relations in South Korea: The Role of Programmatic Incentives.” Research Policy. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. M., D. Rotolo, and L. Leydesdorff. 2016. “A Triple Helix Model of Medical Innovation: Supply, Demand, and Technological Capabilities in Terms of Medical Subject Headings.” Research Policy 45 (3): 666–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponomariov, B. 2013. “Government-sponsored University-Industry Collaboration and the Production of Nanotechnology Patents in US Universities.” Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-013-9301-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 1985. The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. L., J. Garner, N. C. Newman, S. F. Carley, J. Youtie, S. Kwon, and Y. Li. 2018. “National Nanotechnology Research Prominence.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. doi:10.1080/09537325.2018.1480013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, A. L., J. Youtie, P. Shapira, and D. J. Schoeneck. 2008. “Refining Search Terms for Nanotechnology.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 10 (5): 715–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razak, A. A., and M. Saad. 2007. “The Role of Universities in the Evolution of the Triple Helix Culture of Innovation Network: The Case of Malaysia.” International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development 6 (3): 211–225.
   Google Scholar
• Roco, M. C., and W. S. Bainbridge. 2005. “Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Maximizing Human Benefit.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7 (1): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, T. H., T. H. Aas, and A. Stead. 2015. “Knowledge Flow in Technological Business Incubators: Evidence From Australia and Israel.” Technovation. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2015.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. 1948. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell System Technical Journal 27 (379): 623–656.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., S. Lee, and Y. Kim. 2012. “Knowledge-based Innovation and Collaboration: A Triple-Helix Approach in Saudi Arabia.” Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0518-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn, T. 2002. “The Triple Helix and New Production of Knowledge: Prepackaged Thinking on Science and Technology.” Social Studies of Science 32 (4): 599–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SJR (SCImago Journal & Country Rank). 2015. Country Rank. Accessed 10 July 2015. http://www.scimagojr.com/aboutus.php.
   Google Scholar
• Soltani, A., S. Tabatabaeian, P. Hanafizadeh, and J. Bamdad Soofi. 2011. “An Evaluation Scheme for Nanotechnology Policies.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (12): 7303–7312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StatNano. 2015a. “Average Citation Per Nano-Article (Citation Per Article).” Accessed August 26, 2015. http://statnano.com/report/s55.
   Google Scholar
• StatNano. 2015b. “Top 20 in Share of Nanotechnology Articles in 2014.” Accessed 5 August 2015. http://irannano.org/filereader.php?p1=main_943a7f177f865647eadd67f2faa68af3.jpg&p2=news&p3=1&p4=1.
   Google Scholar
• StatNano. 2015c. “Number of Nanotechnology Papers in 2015.” Accessed 13 July 2015. http://statnano.com/report/r59.
   Google Scholar
• StatNano. 2015d. “Ratio of Nanotechnology Patents to Nano-Articles (Patents Per 100 Articles).” Accessed 26 August 2015. http://irannano.org/filereader.php?p1=main_943a7f177f865647eadd67f2faa68af3.jpg&p2=news&p3=1&p4=1.
   Google Scholar
• Stopar, K., D. Drobne, K. Eler, and T. Bartol. 2016. “Citation Analysis and Mapping of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Identifying the Scope and Interdisciplinarity of Research.” Scientometrics 106 (2): 563–581. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1797-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., and M. Negishi. 2010. “Measuring the Relationships among University, Industry and Other Sectors in Japan’s National Innovation System: a Comparison of new Approaches with Mutual Information Indicators.” Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0179-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiss Confederation. 2016. Higher Education and Research in Switzerland. Federal Department of Economic Affairs. https://www.usi.ch/sites/default/files/storage/attachments/press-higher-education-and-research-switzerland-sefri.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson Reuters. 2015. “Funding Acknowledgements.” Accessed July 01, 2015. http://wokinfo.com/products_tools/multidisciplinary/webofscience/fundingsearch/.
   Google Scholar
• Villarreal, O., and N. Calvo. 2015. “From the Triple Helix Model to the Global Open Innovation Model: A Case Study Based on International Cooperation for Innovation in Dominican Republic.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2014.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., A. Notten, and A. Surpatean. 2013. “Interdisciplinarity of Nano Research Fields: a Keyword Mining Approach.” Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0856-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., and P. Shapira. 2011. “Funding Acknowledgement Analysis: an Enhanced Tool to Investigate Research Sponsorship Impacts: the Case of Nanotechnology.” Scientometrics 87 (3): 563–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., H. Etskowitz, S. Yin, and Y. Lou. 2018. “Dynamics of Triple Helix Relations in the Development of Cleaner Technologies: Case of a Chinese Power Equipment Manufacturer.” Innovation and Development. doi:10.1080/2157930X.2018.1463095.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, J., and H. W. Park. 2016. “Triple Helix Dynamics of South Korea’s Innovation System: a Network Analysis of Inter-Regional Technological Collaborations.” Quality and Quantity 51 (3): 989–1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., G. Wang, and D. Lin. 2015. “High Support for Nanotechnology in China: a Case Study in Dalian.” Science and Public Policy 43: 115–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., X. Zhou, A. Porter, J. V. Gomila, and A. Yan. 2014. “Triple Helix Innovation in China’s dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Industry: Hybrid Methods with Semantic TRIZ and Technology Roadmapping.” Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1090-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., and L. Leydesdorff. 2006. “The Emergence of China as a Leading Nation in Science.” Research Policy 35 (1): 83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar