The effects of R&D cooperation on innovation performance in the knowledge-intensive business services industry: focusing on the moderating effect of the R&D-dedicated labor ratio

References

• Ahuja, G. 2000. “Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study.” Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (3): 425–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anzola-Roman, P., C. Bayona-Saez, and T. Garcia-Marco. 2018. “Organizational Innovation, Internal R&D and Externally Sourced Innovation Practices: Effects on Technological Innovation Outcomes.” Journal of Business Research 91 (C): 233–247.
   Google Scholar
• Arranz, N., and J. C. F. de Arroyabe. 2008. “The Choice of Partners in R&D Cooperation: An Empirical Analysis of Spanish Firms.” Technovation 28 (1–2): 88–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltas, G. 2004. “A Model for Multiple Brand Choice.” European Journal of Operational Research 154 (1): 144–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A., T. Calabrese, and B. S. Silverman. 2000. “Don’t Go it Alone: Alliance Network Composition and Startups’ Performance in Canadian Biotechnology.” Strategic Management Journal 21 (3): 267–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayona, C., T. García-Marco, and E. Huerta. 2001. “Firms’ Motivations for Cooperative R&D: An Empirical Analysis of Spanish Firms.” Research Policy 30 (8): 1289–1307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, W., and J. Dietz. 2004. “R&D Cooperation and Innovation Activities of Firms–Evidence for the German Manufacturing Industry.” Research Policy 33 (2): 209–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belderbos, R., M. Carree, and B. Lokshin. 2004. “Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance.” Research Policy 33 (10): 1477–1492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, T., M. Capasso, M. Duschl, K. Frenken, and T. Treibich. 2018. “Causal Relations between Knowledge-intensive Business Services and Regional Employment Growth.” Regional Studies 52 (2): 172–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunswicker, S., and W. Vanhaverbeke. 2015. “Open Innovation in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs): External Knowledge Sourcing Strategies and Internal Organizational Facilitators.” Journal of Small Business Management 53 (4): 1241–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappellari, L., and S. P. Jenkins. 2003. “Multivariate Probit Regression Using Simulated Maximum Likelihood.” The Stata Journal 3 (3): 278–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., and R. Veugelers. 1998. “R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence.” Working Paper 328, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
   Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., and R. Veugelers. 2002. “R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium.” American Economic Review 92 (4): 1169–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cătoiu, I., L. Tudor, and C. Bisa. 2016. “Knowledge-Intensive Business Services and Business Consulting Services in Romanian Changing Economic Environment.” Amfiteatru Economic Journal 18 (41): 40–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. 2006. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chichkanov, N., I. Miles, and V. Belousova. 2019. “Drivers for Innovation in KIBS: Evidence from Russia.” The Service Industries Journal, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, K., Y. R. Cho, H. J. Kang, S. Sohn, and M. J. Kim. 2016. Report on the Korean Innovation Survey 2016: Service Sector. Sejong: Science and Technology Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. Y., Y. Kim, Y. Jun, and Y. Kim. 2011. “A Bayesian Multivariate Probit Analysis of Korean Firms’ Information System Adoption.” Industrial Management & Data Systems 111 (9): 1465–1480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, T. A., and C. Y. Tseng. 2019. “The Knowledge Intensity and the Economic Performance in Taiwan’s Knowledge Intensity Business Services.” Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 32 (1): 797–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeds, D. L. 2001. “The Role of R&D Intensity, Technical Development and Absorptive Capacity in Creating Entrepreneurial Wealth in High Technology Start-ups.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 18 (1): 29–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., D. Defazio, and D. Randrol. 2010. “The Socio-economic and Innovation Landscape of Knowledge-intensive Business Services in the Ottawa Region.” In Knowledge-intensive Business Services: Geography and Innovation, edited by M. Freel, D. Doloreux, and R. Shearmur, 187–210. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., R. Shearmur, and M. Rodriguez. 2018. “Internal R&D and External Information in Knowledge-intensive Business Service Innovation: Complements, Substitutes or Independent?” Technological and Economic Development of Economy 24 (6): 2255–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, Y. D., and G. M. Allenby. 2003. “Multivariate Analysis of Multiple Response Data.” Journal of Marketing Research 40 (3): 321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escribano, A., A. Fosfuri, and J. A. Tribó. 2009. “Managing External Knowledge Flows: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity.” Research Policy 38 (1): 96–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, H., T. Zhao, and Y. Q. Zhang. “Research on the Interaction of China’s Knowledge-Intensive Business Services and Manufacturing Upgrading.” Paper Presented at the 2016 Joint International Conference on Economics and Management Engineering (ICEME 2016) and International Conference on Economics and Business Management (EBM 2016). Accessed 14 May 2017. http://goo.gl/6oGc3r.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, C., and K. Sivakumar. 2016. “The Role of Collaboration in Service Innovation across Manufacturing and Service Sectors.” Service Science 8 (3): 263–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, C. I., and J. J. Ferreira. 2013. “Knowledge Spillovers: Cooperation between Universities and KIBS.” R&D Management 43 (5): 461–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueroa-Armijos, M. 2019. “Does Public Entrepreneurial Financing Contribute to Territorial Servitization in Manufacturing and KIBS in the United States?” Regional Studies 53 (3): 341–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., and R. Lukas. 2001. “Who Cooperates on R&D?” Research Policy 30 (2): 297–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, S., K. Xu, and J. Yang. 2008. “Managerial Ties, Absorptive Capacity, and Innovation.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 25 (3): 395–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., and H. Singh. 1998. “The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances.” Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (4): 781–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J. 1993. “Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering: Inter-organizational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences.” Strategic Management Journal 14 (5): 371–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J., H. v. Kranenburg, and R. N. Osborn. 2003. “Joint Patenting Amongst Companies-exploring the Effects of Inter-firm R&D Partnering and Experience.” Managerial and Decision Economics 24 (23): 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hermelin, B. 1998. “Professional Business Services. Conceptual Framework and a Swedish Case Study.” Dissertation, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Hertog, P. d. 2000. “Knowledge-intensive Business Services as Co-producers of Innovation.” International Journal of Innovation Management 4 (4): 491–528.
   Google Scholar
• Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. 2011. “Enabling Collaborative Innovation–knowledge Protection for Knowledge Sharing.” European Journal of Innovation Management 14 (3): 303–321.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, U. 2002. “An Empirical Test of Models Explaining Research Expenditures and Research Cooperation: Evidence for the German Service Sector.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 20 (6): 747–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B. K., and S. K. Park. 2014. “The Effect of Incoming Knowledge Spillover, Technological Collaborations, and Appropriability Mechanisms on the Innovation Performance of SMEs: Moderating Effect of Patent.” Korean Management Review 43 (1): 95–120.
   Google Scholar
• Klomp, L., and G. van Leeuwen. 1999. “The Importance of Innovation for Firm Performance.” Working Paper LNM-series 9902, Statistics Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kogut, B. 1988. “Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.” Strategic Management Journal 9 (4): 319–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotabe, M., and K. Scott Swan. 1995. “The Role of Strategic Alliances in High-technology, New Product Development.” Strategic Management Journal 16 (8): 621–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, R., N. Amara, and M. Lamari. 2002. “Does Social Capital Determine Innovation? To What Extent?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 69 (7): 681–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, P. J., and M. Lubatkin. 1998. “Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning.” Strategic Management Journal 19 (5): 461–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., and A. Salter. 2006. “Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among UK Manufacturing Firms.” Strategic Management Journal 27 (2): 131–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, D. 2006. “The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-based View.” Academy of Management Review 31 (3): 638–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. 1995. “Small Firms’ Innovation in Two Technological Settings.” Research Policy 24 (3): 391–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. H. 2013. Industrial Concentration and Market Structure in Korea. Seoul: Korea Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. H., and B. K. Kim. 2016. “Determinants of Technological Innovation Performance of Knowledge-Intensive Business Service Industries in Korea.” Journal of Korea Service Management Society 17 (3): 267–290.
   Google Scholar
• Le Roy, F., M. Robert, and F. Lasch. 2016. “Choosing the Best Partner for Product Innovation.” International Studies of Management & Organization 46 (2–3): 136–158.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., C. Lattemann, Y. Xing, and D. Dorawa. 2019. “The Emergence of Collaborative Partnerships between Knowledge-Intensive Business Service (KIBS) and Product Companies: The Case of Bremen, Germany.” Regional Studies 53 (3): 376–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medda, G., C. Piga, and D. S. Siegel. 2006. “Assessing the Returns to Collaborative Research: Firm-level Evidence from Italy.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (1): 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Mention, A. L. 2011. “Co-operation and Co-opetition as Open Innovation Practices in the Service Sector: Which Influence on Innovation Novelty?” Technovation 31 (1): 44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, I., V. Belousova, and N. Chichkanov. 2017. “Innovation Configurations in Knowledge-intensive Business Services.” Foresight and STI Governance 11 (3): 94–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, I. D., V. Belousova, and N. Chichkanov. 2018. “Knowledge Intensive Business Services: Ambiguities and Continuities.” Foresight (Los Angeles, Calif ) 20 (1): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, I., N. Kastrinos, K. Flanagan, R. Bilderbeek, P. den Hertog, R. Huitink, and M. Bouman. 1995. Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: Users, Carriers and Sources of Innovation. Brussels: European Innovation Monitoring System (EIMS) Reports, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Miotti, L., and F. Sachwald. 2003. “Co-operative R&D: Why and with Whom?: An Integrated Framework of Analysis.” Research Policy 32 (8): 1481–1499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monjon, S., and P. Waelbroeck. 2003. “Assessing Spillovers from Universities to Firms: Evidence from French Firm-level Data.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 (9): 1255–1270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nählinder, J. 2005. Innovation and Employment in Services: The Case of Knowledge Intensive Business Services in Sweden. Linköping: Department of Technology and Social Change, Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Najafi-Tavani, S., Z. Najafi-Tavani, P. Naudé, P. Oghazi, and E. Zeynaloo. 2018. “How Collaborative Innovation Networks Affect New Product Performance: Product Innovation Capability, Process Innovation Capability, and Absorptive Capacity.” Industrial Marketing Management 73: 193–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. 1994. “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation.” Organization Science 5 (1): 14–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd ed. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2007. Globalisation and Structural Adjustment. Summary Report of the Study of Globalisation and Innovation in the Business Services Sector. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pippel, G. 2014. “R&D Cooperation for Non-technological Innovations.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 23 (7): 611–630.
   Google Scholar
• Rachelle, C. S. 2007. “R&D Alliances, Firm Performance: The Impact of Technological Diversity and Alliance Organization on Innovation.” The Academy of Management Journal 50 (2): 364–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothaermel, F. T., and M. T. Alexandre. 2009. “Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity.” Organization Science 20 (4): 759–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargon, B., and S. Katircioğlu. 2019. “The Role of Innovation in Venture Capital: Empirical Evidence from European Union and EFTA Countries.” Applied Economics Letters 26 (4): 335–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, H., Y. Chung, and H. Yoon. 2017. “R&D Cooperation and Unintended Innovation Performance: Role of Appropriability Regimes and Sectoral Characteristics.” Technovation 66–67: 28–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R., and D. Doloreux. 2019. “KIBS as Both Innovators and Knowledge Intermediaries in the Innovation Process: Intermediation as a Contingent Role.” Regional Science 98 (1): 191–209.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, B. S., and J. A. Baum. 2002. “Alliance-based Competitive Dynamics.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (4): 791–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. 2000. “The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (4): 1441–1478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, G. N., N. P. Greis, and W. A. Fischer. 2001. “Absorptive Capacity and New Product Development.” The Journal of High Technology Management Research 12 (1): 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, J., P. Quintas, P. Taylor, and W. Fowle. 2002. “Flexible Employment Contracts and their Implications for Product and Process Innovation.” International Journal of Human Resource Management 13 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tether, B. S. 2002. “Who Co-operates for Innovation, and Why: An Empirical Analysis.” Research Policy 31 (6): 947–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., P. Lehner, and A. Kaufmann. 2009. “Do Different Types of Innovation Rely on Specific Kinds of Knowledge Interactions?” Technovation 29 (1): 59–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, P. R. 2010. “Co-operative Ties and Innovation: Some New Evidence for UK Manufacturing.” Research Policy 39 (6): 762–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, M., and I. Miles. 1999. “The Career Trajectories of Knowledge Workers.” Paper Presented at OECD Workshop on S&T Labour Markets, Paris, France: 17 May 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Turpin, T., S. Garrett-Jone, and N. Rankin. 1996. “Bricoleurs and Boundary Riders: Managing Basic Research and Innovation Knowledge Networks.” R&D Management 26 (3): 267–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. 1997. “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (2): 35–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., and G. George. 2002. “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension.” Academy of Management Review 27 (2): 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and H. Li. 2010. “Innovation Search of New Ventures in a Technology Cluster: The Role of Ties with Service Intermediaries.” Strategic Management Journal 31 (1): 88–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar