Performance drivers of the R&D activities in the chemical sector in Spain: a balanced scorecard approach

References

• Barclay, D., C. Higgins, and R. Thompson. 1995. “The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modelling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration.” Technology Studies, Special Issue on Research Methodology 2: 285–309.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, W., and J. Dietz. 2004. “R&D Cooperation and Innovation Activities of Firms – Evidence for the German Manufacturing Industry.” Research Policy 33 (2): 209–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisbe, J., J. M. Batista-Foguet, and R. Chenhall. 2007. “Defining Management Accounting Constructs: A Methodological Note on the Risks of Conceptual Misspecification.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 32 (7–8): 789–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremser, W. G., and N. P. Barsky. 2004. “Utilizing the Balanced Scorecard for R&D Performance Measurement.” R&D Management 34 (3): 229–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. G., and R. A. Svenson. 1988. “Measuring R&D Productivity.” Research Technology Management 31 (4): 30–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, L., and L. Sheery. 2006. “Cause and Effect.” Marketing Management, May–June 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Eliat, H., B. Golany, and A. Shtub. 2008. “R&D Project Evaluation: An Integrated DEA and Balanced Scorecard Approach.” Omega, The International Journal of Management Science 36 (5): 895–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ģağlar, M., and S. Gürel. 2019. “Impact Assessment Based Sectorial Balancing in Public R&D Project Portfolio Selection.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 66: 68–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Valderrama, T., E. Mulero Mendigorri, and D. Revuelta Bordoy. 2008. “A Balanced Scorecard Framework for R&D.” European Journal of Innovation Management 11 (2): 241–281.
   Google Scholar
• García-Valderrama, T., E. Mulero Mendigorri, and D. Revuelta Bordoy. 2009. “Relating the Perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard for R&D by Means of DEA.” European Journal of Operational Research 196: 1177–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez Vieites, A. V. 2009. “Estudio de los factores que inciden en el desarrollo de las actividades de I + D+i y de su impacto en los resultados empresariales. Aplicación a las empresas manufactureras españolas [Study of the factors that affect the development of R + D + i activities and their impact on business results. Application to Spanish manufacturing companies].” Tesis Doctoral/PhD thesis. UNED. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (Spain).
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, A., and J. R. Hauser. 1996. “Integrating R&D and Marketing: A Review, and Analysis of the Literature.” The Journal of Product Innovation Management 13: 277–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, K. H. 2005. “Using Balanced Scorecard and Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis for Multinational R & D Project Performance Assessment.” The Journal of American Academy of Business 7 (1): 189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H. C., W. Chu, M. C. Lai, and L. H. Lin. 2009. “Strategic Linkage Process and Value-Driven System. A Dynamic Analysis of High-Tech Firms in a Newly-Industrialized Country.” Expert Systems with Applications 36: 3965–3974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hult, G. T., J. F. Hair, D. Proksch, M. Sarstedt, A. Pinkwart, and C. M. Ringle. 2018. “Addressing Endogeneity in International Marketing Applications of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of International Marketing 26 (3): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1992. “The Balanced Scorecard Measures that Drive Performance”. Harvard Business Review, Jan–Feb, 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton 1996. “Using the Balanced scorecard as a Strategic Management System.” Harvard Business Review, Jan–Feb, 75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 2001. The Strategy-Focused Organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 2004. Mapas estratégicos: convirtiendo los activos intangibles en resultados tangibles [Strategy Maps: Turning Intangible Assets Into Tangible Results]. Barcelona: Gestión 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kerssens-Van Drongelen, I. C., and A.  Cook. 1997. “Design Principles for the Development of Measurement Systems for Research and Development Processes.” R&D Management 27: 345–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerssens-van drongelen, I. C., B. Nixon, and A. Pearson. 2000. “Performance Measurement in Industrial R&D.” International Journal of Managements Reviews 2: 111–143.
   Google Scholar
• Khoshnevis, P., and P. Teirlink. 2018. “Performance Evaluation of R&D Firms.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 61: 16–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenders, M., and B. Wierenga. 2002. “The Effectiveness of Different Mechanisms for Integrating Marketing and R&D.” The Journal of Product Innovation Management 19: 305–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, K.-H., and C. Warden. 2004. “Managing and Reporting Knowledge-Based Resources and Processes in Research Organisations: Specifics, Lessons Learned and Perspectives.” Management Accounting Resarch 15 (1): 33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Naldi, M., G. Nicosia, A. Pacifici, and V. Pferschy. 2019. “Profit Fairness Trade-Off in Project Selection.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 67: 133–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othman, R. 2006. “Balanced Scorecard and Causal Model Development: Preliminary Findings.” Management Decision 44: 690–702.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., H. Lee, and S. W. Chae. 2017. “Rethinking Balanced Scorecard (BSC) Measures: Formative Versus Reflective Measurement Models.” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 66 (1): 92–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueda, A., J. Aragón, and I. Martín. 2006. “La medición de las capacidades organizacionales de la empresa: validación de un instrumento de medida de la gestión medioambiental proactiva [The Measurement of the Organizational Capacities of the Company: Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Proactive Environmental Management].” Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 130: 563–582.
   Google Scholar
• Saghaei, A., and R. Ghasemi. 2009. “Using Structural Equation Modeling in Causal Relationship Design for Balanced ScorecardśStrategic Map.” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 49: 1032–1038.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, S. Y., Y. G. Joo, and H. K. Han. 2007. “Structural Equation Model for the Evaluation of National Funding on R&D Project of SMEs in Consideration with MBNQA Criteria.” Evaluating and Progam Planning 30: 10–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenenhaus, M., V. E. Vinzi, Y. M. Chatelin, and C. Lauro. 2004. “PLS Path Modeling.” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 48: 159–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipping, J. W., E. Zeffren, and A. Fusteld. 1995. “Assessing the Value of Your Technology.” Research Technology Management 38 (5): 22–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weggeman, M. P., and M. J. Groneveld. 2005. “Applying the Business Excellence Model to a Research Organization.” Research Technology Management, July-August, 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Zahoor, A., and M. A. Sahof. 2018. “Investigating Causal Linkages in the Balanced Scorecard: An Indian Perspective.” International Journal of Bank Marketing 36 (1): 184–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar