Psychological factors influencing patent filing among faculty in Higher Educational Institutions in India

References

• Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. 1983. “The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45: 357–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. 1996. Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., and J. S. Mueller. 2008. “Studying Creativity, Its Processes, and Its Antecedents: An Exploration of the Componential Theory of Creativity.” In Handbook of Organizational Creativity, edited by J. Zhou, and C. E. Shalley, 33–64. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Anders Ericsson, K., R. W. Roring, and K. Nandagopal. 2007. “Giftedness and Evidence for Reproducibly Superior Performance: An Account Based on the Expert Performance Framework.” High Ability Studies 18: 3–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annual Report 2017-18. (2019). Intellectual Property India. The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs, Trademarks and Geographical Indications. http://www.ipindia.nic.in/writereaddata/Portal/IPOAnnualReport/1_110_1_Annual_Report_2017-18_English.pdf. Accessed on May 27, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Azoulay, P., W. Ding, and T. Stuart. 2007. “The Determinants of Faculty Patenting Behavior: Demographics or Opportunities?” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 63: 599–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badawy, M. K. (1988). “What We've Learned: Managing Human Resources.” Research-Technology Management 31: 19–35, September–October.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldini, N. 2008. “Negative Effects of University Patenting: Myths and Grounded Evidence.” Scientometrics 75: 289–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldini, N., R. Grimaldi, and R. Sobrero. 2006. “Institutional Changes and the Commercialization of Academic Knowledge. A Study of Italian Universities Patenting Activities between 1965 and 2002.” Research Policy 35: 518–532.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, R., and D. Harrington. 1981. “Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality.” In Annual Review of Psychology, edited by M. R. Rosenzweig, and L. W. Porter, Vol. 32, 439–476. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D. 1987. “Prosocial Motivation: Is It Ever Truly Altruistic?” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by L. Berkowitz, Vol. 20, 65–122. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• BodasFreitas, I. M., and A. Nuvolari. 2012. “Traditional Versus Heterodox Motives for Academic Patenting: Evidence from the Netherlands.” Industry and Innovation 19: 671–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brettel, M., R. Mauer, and T. Walter. 2013. “High-profile Employees at Universities and Their Intentions of Commercializing Research Results.” Journal of Business Economics 83 (4): 357–382.
   Google Scholar
• Busse, T. V., and R. S. Mansfield. 1984. “Selected Personality Traits and Achievement in Male Scientists.” The Journal of Psychology 116: 117–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderini, M., C. Franzoni, and A. Vezzulli. 2007. “If Star Scientists Do Not Patent: The Effect of Productivity, Basicness and Impact on the Decision to Patent in the Academic World.” Research Policy 36: 303–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayol, N. 2007. “Academic Incentives, Research Organization, and Patenting at a Large French University.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 16 (2): 119–138.
   Google Scholar
• Carayol, N., and M. Matt. 2004. “Does Research Organization Influence Academic Production?.” Research Policy 33: 1081–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. Creativity. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L., M. T. Larsen, and P. Lotz. 2011. “Scientists’ Perspectives Concerning the Effects of University Patenting on the Conduct of Academic Research in the Life Sciences.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 36 (1): 14–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., and M. Perkmann. 2011. “Why Do Academics Engage with Industry? The Entrepreneurial University and Individual Motivations.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 36: 316–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, J. S., and B. Bozeman. 2005. “Academic Careers, Patents, and Productivity: Industry Experience as Scientific and Technical Human Capital.” Research Policy 34: 349–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., and S. Chaiken. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. 1996. The Road to Expert Performance: Empirical Evidence from the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Foo, M.-D., M. Knockaert, E. T. Chan, and T. Erikson. 2016. “The Individual Environment Nexus: Impact of Promotion Focus and the Environment on Academic Scientists’ Entrepreneurial Intentions.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 63 (2): 213–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcıa-Rodrıguez, F. J., E. Gil-Soto, I. Ruiz-Rosa, and D. Gutierrez-Tano. 2017. “Entrepreneurial Process in Peripheral Regions: The Role of Motivation and Culture.” European Planning Studies 25 (11): 2037–2056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuri, P., Mariani, M., Brusoni, S. Crespi, G. Francoz, D. Gambardella, A. Garcia-Fontes, W. et al. 2007. “Inventors and Invention Processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU Survey.” Research Policy 36: 1107–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goethner, M., M. Obschonka, R. K. Silbereisen, and U. Cantner. 2012. “Scientists’ Transition to Academic Entrepreneurship: Economic and Psychological Determinants.” Journal of Economic Psychology 33 (3): 628–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göktepe, D. and C. Edquist. 2006. “A Comparative Study of University Scientists’ Motivations for Patenting: A Typology of University Inventors.” in SPRU 40th anniversary conference, 11–13 September 2006 (University of Sussex).
   Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G. 1979. “A Creative Personality Scale for the Adjective Check List.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 1398–1405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G., and A. B. Heilbrun, Jr., 1965. The Adjective Check List Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. 2007. “Relational job Design and the Motivation to Make a Prosocial Difference.” Academy of Management Review 32: 393–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. 2008. “Does Intrinsic Motivation Fuel the Prosocial Fire? Motivational Synergy in Predicting Persistence, Performance, and Productivity.” Journal of Applied Psychology 93: 48–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., and J. W. Berry. 2011. “The Necessity of Others Is the Mother of Invention: Intrinsic and Prosocial Motivations, Perspective Taking, and Creativity.” Academy of Management Journal 54: 73–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., and J. J. Sumanth. 2009. “Mission Possible? The Performance of Prosocially Motivated Employees Depends on Manager Trustworthiness.” Journal of Applied Psychology 94: 927–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., and R. A. Beghetto. 2009. “Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity.” Review of General Psychology 13 (1): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lach, S., and M. Schankerman. 2008. “Incentives and Invention in Universities.” The RAND Journal of Economics 39: 403–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockett, A., D. Siegel, M. Wright, and M. D. Ensley. 2005. “The Creation of Spinoff Firms at Public Research Institutions: Managerial and Policy Implications.” Research Policy 34: 981–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. W. 1978. In Search of Human Effectiveness: Identifying and Developing Creativity. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Madjar, N., E. Greenberg, and Z. Chen. 2011. “Factors for Radical Creativity, Incremental Creativity, and Routine, Noncreative Performance.” Journal of Applied Psychology 96: 730–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, M., M. McKelvey, and M. Versiglioni. 2009. “The Forgotten Individuals: Attitudes and Skills in Academic Commercialization in Sweden.” In Learning to Compete in European Universities – From Social Institution to Knowledge Business, edited by M. McKelvey, and M. Holmén, 219–250. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mangenmatin, V., S. Lemarie, J. P. Boissin, D. Catherine, F. Corolleur, and R. Coromini. 2003. “Development of SMEs and Heterogeneity of Trajectories: The Case of Biotechnology in France.” Research Policy 32: 621–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. J. 2007. “University Perspective on Commercialization of IP.” Research-Technology Management 50: 13–16, September–October.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale, C. 1989. Personality, Situation, and Creativity. Handbook of Creativity. New York: Plenum, pp. 211–232.
   Google Scholar
• Oldham, G. R., and A. Cummings. 1996. “Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work.” Academy of Management Journal 39: 607–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith, J., and W. W. Powell. 2001. “To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 26: 99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, M. G., M. A. West, R. Lawthom, and S. Nickell. 1997. Impact of People Management Practices on Performance. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., and K. Walsh. 2008. “Engaging the Scholar: Three Types of Academic Consulting and Their Impact on Universities and Industry.” Research Policy 37: 1884–1891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perumal, S., S. Sreekumaran Nair, and R. Unnikrishnan. 2020. “Triple Helix in Practice in Indian HEIs Using Lens of Academic Patenting.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 32 (11): 1322–1334. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1768234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, A. S., and S. Saha. 2010. Drivers of Academic Research and Patenting in India: Econometric Estimation of the Research Production Function. Working Paper No. 247, April, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., and G. Bohner. 2001. “The Construction of Attitudes.” In Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intrapersonal Processes, edited by A. Tesser, and N. Schwarz, 436–157. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1985. “What We Know About the Creative Process.” In Frontiers in Creative and Innovative Management, edited by R. L. Kuhn, 3–20. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. W., and R. L. Ellison. 1967. “Biographical Predictors of Scientific Performance.” Science 155: 1075–1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. A., and J. S. Bunderson. 2003. “Violations of Principle: Ideological Currency in the Psychological Contract.” The Academy of Management Review 28: 571–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., S. M. Farmer, and G. B. Graen. 1999. “An Examination of Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Relevance of Traits and Relationships.” Personnel Psychology 52: 591–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. 1986. “Central Problems in the Management of Innovation.” Management Science 32 (5): 590–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallmark, J. T. 1997. “Inventions and Patents at Universities: The Case of Chalmers University of Technology.” Technovation 17: 127–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., D. Soetanto, J. Cai, and H. Munir. 2021. “Scientist or Entrepreneur? Identity Centrality, University Entrepreneurial Mission, and Academic Entrepreneurial Intention.” Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09845-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington, B. K., and L. Smith-Doerr. 2005. “Gender and Commercial Science: Women’s Patenting in the Life Sciences.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 30: 355–370.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, R. W., and L. F. Schoenfeldt. 1989. “Individual Differences in Creativity: An Interactionist Perspective.” In Handbook of Creativity, edited by J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, and C. R. Reynolds, 77–91. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M., and P. Phan. 2018. “The Commercialization of Science: From Determinants to Impact.” Academy of Management Perspectives 32 (1): 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S., and G. George. 2002. “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension.” The Academy of Management Review 27 (2): 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby, and M. B. Brewer. 1998. “Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S.Biotechnology Enterprises.” American Economic Review 88: 290–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwick, T., K. Frosch, K. Hoisl, and D. Harhoff. 2017. “The Power of Individual-Level Drivers of Inventive Performance.” Research Policy 46: 121–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar