Technology adoption: an analysis of the major models and theories

References

• Ahn, T., S. Ryu, and I. Han. 2004. “The Impact of the Online and Offline Features on the User Acceptance of Internet Shopping Malls.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 3 (4): 405–420. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2004.05.001.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mamary, Y. H., M. Al-nashmi, Y. A. G. Hassan, and A. Shamsuddin. 2016. “A Critical Review of Models and Theories in Field of Individual Acceptance of Technology.” International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology 9 (6): 143–158. doi:10.14257/ijhit.2016.9.6.13.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A., and G. Premkumar. 2004. “Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test.” MIS Quarterly 28 (2): 229–254. doi:10.2307/25148634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G. 1979. “The Role of Theory in Uses and Gratifications Studies.” Communication Research 6 (1): 9–36. doi:10.1177/009365027900600102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. A., and V. Venkatesh. 2005. “Model of Adoption of Technology in Households: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle.” MIS Quarterly 29 (3): 399–426. doi:10.2307/25148690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Channell, D. F. 2019. “Changing Relationships Between Science and Technology.” In The Rise of Engineering Science, edited by Marco Ceccarelli, 3–9. Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95606-0_1.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., M. Gillenson, and D. Sherrel. 2002. “Enticing Online Consumers: An Extended Technology Acceptance Perspective.” Information & Management 39: 705–719. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00127-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compeau, D. R., and C. A. Higgins. 1995. “Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills.” Information Systems Research 6 (2): 118–143. doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, R. C., and C. Leake. 2002. “The Pareto Principle in Organizational Decision Making.” Management Decision 40 (8): 729–733. doi:10.1108/00251740210437699.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw. 1992. “Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22 (14): 1111–1132. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. 1962. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. 2 vols. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Goodhue, D. L., and R. L. Thompson. 1995. “Task-technology Fit and Individual Performance.” MIS Quarterly 19 (2): 213–236. doi:10.2307/249689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igbaria, M., N. Zinatelli, P. Cragg, and A. L. Cavaye. 1997. “Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model.” MIS Quarterly 21 (3): 279, doi:10.2307/249498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jen, W., T. Lu, and P.-T. Liu. 2009. “An Integrated Analysis of Technology Acceptance Behaviour Models: Comparison of Three Major Models.” MIS REVIEW: An International Journal 15 (1): 89–121. doi:10.6131/MISR.200909_15(1).0004.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., A. M. Cruz, and A. M. R. Rincon. 2019. “Technology Acceptance, Adoption, and Usability: Arriving at Consistent Terminologies and Measurement Approaches.” In Everyday Technologies in Healthcare, edited by Christopher M. Hayre, Dave J. Muller, and Marcia J. Scherer, 319–338. BocaRaton, FL: Taylor and Francys Groups. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
   Google Scholar
• Marangunić, N., and A. Granić. 2015. “Technology Acceptance Model: A Literature Review from 1986 to 2013.” Universal Access in the Information Society 14 (1): 81–95. doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miguel Cruz, A., C. Daum, A. Comeau, J. D. G. Salamanca, L. McLennan, N. Neubauer, and L. Liu. 2021. “Acceptance, Adoption, and Usability of Information and Communication Technologies for People Living with Dementia and Their Care Partners: A Systematic Review.” Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1–15. doi:10.1080/17483107.2020.1864671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and Prisma Group. 2009. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.” PLoS Medicine 6 (7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momani, A. M., and M. Jamous. 2017. “The Evolution of Technology Acceptance Theories.” International Journal of Contemporary Computer Research 1 (1): 51–58. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2971454.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. C., and I. Benbasat. 1991. “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation.” Information Systems Research 2 (3): 192–222. doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, R. L. 1980. “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions.” Journal of Marketing Research 17 (4): 460–469. doi:10.1177/002224378001700405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renaud, K., and J. Van Biljon. 2008. Predicting Technology Acceptance and Adoption by the Elderly: A Qualitative Study. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries: Riding the Wave of Technology, 210–219. doi:10.1145/1456659.1456684.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. 1983. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The free press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. 2003. “Elements of Diffusion.” Diffusion of Innovations 5: 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 2010. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers Everett, M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. Vol. 12. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rondan-Cataluña, F. J., J. Arenas-Gaitán, and P. E. J. K. Ramírez-Correa. 2015. “A Comparison of the Different Versions of Popular Technology Acceptance Models: A non-Linear Perspective.” Kybernetes 44 (5): 788–805. doi:10.1108/K-09-2014-0184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salahshour Rad, M., M. Nilashi, and H. Mohamed Dahlan. 2018. “Information Technology Adoption: A Review of the Literature and Classification.” Universal Access in the Information Society 17 (2): 361–390. 10.1007/s10209-017-0534-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, A., and W. Chin. 2007. “Looking Forward: Toward an Understanding of the Nature and Definition of IT Acceptance.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8 (4): 230–243. 10.17705/1jais.00123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarhini, A., N. A. G. Arachchilage, and M. S. Abbasi. 2015. “A Critical Review of Theories and Models of Technology Adoption and Acceptance in Information System Research.” International Journal of Technology Diffusion (IJTD) 6 (4): 58–77. 10.4018/IJTD.2015100104.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., and P. Todd. 1995a. “Decomposition and Crossover Effects in the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Study of Consumer Adoption Intentions.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 12 (2): 137–155. doi:10.1016/0167-8116(94)00019-K.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., and P. Todd. 1995b. “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models.” Information Systems Research 6 (2): 144–176. doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. L., C. A. Higgins, and J. M. Howell. 1991. “Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization.” MIS Quarterly 5 (1): 125–143. doi:10.2307/249443.
   Google Scholar
• Tornatzky, L. G., M. Fleischer, and A. K. Chakrabarti. 1990. Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington books.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. 1977. Interpersonal Behavior. CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company Monterey.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., and H. Bala. 2008. “Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions.” Decision Sciences 39 (2): 273–315. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 2000. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Science 46 (2): 186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly 27 (3): 425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., J. Y. Thong, and X. Xu. 2012. “Consumer Acceptance and use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.” MIS Quarterly 36 (1): 157–178. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2002388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Z. Fu, and Y. Duan. 2011. Understanding ICTs adoption from an evolutionary process perspective. In 2011 International Conference on Management and Service Science, 1–4. IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICMSS.2011.5998984.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J., and R. T. Watson. 2002. “Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review.” MIS Quarterly 26 (2): xiii–xxiii. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar