References
- Agiwal, M., A. Roy, and N. Saxena. 2016. “Next Generation 5G Wireless Networks: A Comprehensive Survey.” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 18 (3): 1617–1655.
- An, X., J. H. Li, S. Xu, L. Chen, and W. Sun. 2021. “An Improved Patent Similarity Measurement Based on Entities and Semantic Relations.” Journal of Informetrics 15 (2): 1–16.
- Barbieri, N., G. Manco, E. Ritacco, M. Carnuccio, and A. Bevacqua. 2013. “Probabilistic Topic Models for Sequence Data.” Machine Learning 93 (1): 5–29.
- Bharadwaj, A., and S. Jain. 2020. “A Comparative Study of the Evolving Jurisprudence on Standard Essential Patent Licensing.” The Journal of World Intellectual Property 23 (3-4): 310–327.
- Blei, D. M., A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. 2003. “Latent Dirichlet Allocation.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 3: 993–1022.
- Blind, K., E. Filipović, and L. K. Lazina. 2022. “Motives to Publish, to Patent and to Standardize: An Explorative Study Based on Individual Engineers’ Assessments.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 175: 1–15.
- Blind, K., and S. Gauch. 2009. “Research and Standardisation in Nanotechnology: Evidence from Germany.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 34 (3): 320–342.
- Blind, K., J. Pohlisch, and A. Zi. 2018. “Publishing, Patenting, and Standardization: Motives and Barriers of Scientists.” Research Policy 47 (7): 1185–1197.
- Blind, K., F. Ramel, and C. Rochell. 2022. “The Influence of Standards and Patents on Long-Term Economic Growth.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 47 (4): 979–999.
- Byun, J., T. E. Sung, and H. W. Park. 2018. “Technological Innovation Strategy: How do Technology Life Cycles Change by Technological Area.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 30 (1): 98–112.
- Chang, S. H. 2021. “Analyses of the Key Technologies and Development Trends of Optical Networks from the Perspective of Standard Essential Patents.” Applied Sciences 11 (4): 1–10.
- Chen, H., G. Zhang, D. Zhu, and J. Lu. 2017. “Topic-based Technological Forecasting Based on Patent Data: A Case Study of Australian Patents from 2000 to 2014.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 119: 39–52.
- Feng, J., and X. Jaravel. 2020. “Crafting Intellectual Property Rights: Implications for Patent Assertion Entities, Litigation, and Innovation.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 12 (1): 140–181.
- Gan, J., and Y. Qi. 2021. “Selection of the Optimal Number of Topics for LDA Topic Model—Taking Patent Policy Analysis as an Example.” Entropy 23 (10): 1–45.
- Hagen, L. 2018. “Content Analysis of e-Petitions with Topic Modeling: How to Train and Evaluate LDA Models?” Information Processing & Management 54 (6): 1292–1307.
- Huang, J. Y., and K. W. Tan. 2020. “An Extension-Based Classification System of Cloud Computing Patents.” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 19 (4): 1149–1172.
- Lafond, F., and D. Kim. 2019. “Long-run Dynamics of the U.S. Patent Classification System.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 29 (2): 631–664.
- Lakshmi, R., and S. Baskar. 2019. “Novel Term Weighting Schemes for Document Representation Based on Ranking of Terms and Fuzzy Logic with Semantic Relationship of Terms.” Expert Systems with Applications 137: 493–503.
- Lee, H., and P. Kang. 2018. “Identifying Core Topics in Technology and Innovation Management Studies: A Topic Model Approach.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 43 (5): 1291–1317.
- Mimno, D. M., H. M. Wallach, E. M. Talley, M. Leenders, and A. Mccallum. 2011. “Optimizing Semantic Coherence in Topic Models.” Proceedings of the 2011 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Newman, D., Y. Noh, E. M. Talley, S. Karimi, and T. Baldwin. 2010. “Evaluating Topic Models for Digital Libraries.” Proceedings of the 2010 joint international conference on Digital libraries, Association for Computing Machinery.
- Papagiannopoulou, E., and G. Tsoumakas. 2018. “Local Word Vectors Guiding Keyphrase Extraction.” Information Processing & Management 54 (6): 888–902.
- Röder, M., A. Both, and A. Hinneburg. 2015. “Exploring the Space of Topic Coherence Measures.” Proceedings of the 8th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, Association for Computing Machinery.
- Song, B., and Y. Suh. 2019. “Identifying Convergence Fields and Technologies for Industrial Safety: LDA-Based Network Analysis.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 138: 115–126.
- Spulber, D. F. 2020. “Licensing Standard Essential Patents with FRAND Commitments: Preparing for 5G Mobile Telecommunications.” Colorado Technology Law Journal 18: 79–160.
- Suominen, A., H. Toivanen, and M. Seppänen. 2017. “Firms’ Knowledge Profiles: Mapping Patent Data with Unsupervised Learning.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 115: 131–142.
- Venugopalan, S., and V. Rai. 2015. “Topic Based Classification and Pattern Identification in Patents.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 94: 236–250.
- Wang, B., S. B. Liu, K. Ding, Z. Y. Liu, and J. Xu. 2014. “Identifying Technological Topics and Institution-Topic Distribution Probability for Patent Competitive Intelligence Analysis: A Case Study in LTE Technology.” Scientometrics 101 (3): 685–704.
- Wang, X. F., X. M. Yang, X. L. Wang, M. G. Xia, and J. Y. Wang. 2020. “Evaluating the Competitiveness of Enterprise’s Technology Based on LDA Topic Model.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 32 (2): 208–222.
- Yun, J., and Y. Geum. 2019. “Analysing the Dynamics of Technological Convergence Using a Co-classification Approach: A Case of Healthcare Services.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 31 (12): 1412–1429.
- Zhang, W., T. Yoshida, and X. J. Tang. 2011. “A Comparative Study of TF*IDF, LSI and Multi-Words for Text Classification.” Expert Systems with Applications 38 (3): 2758–2765.
- Zi, A., and K. Blind. 2015. “Researchers’ Participation in Standardisation: A Case Study from a Public Research Institute in Germany.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 40 (2): 346–360.
- Zirn, C., and H. Stuckenschmidt. 2014. “Multidimensional Topic Analysis in Political Texts.” Data & Knowledge Engineering 90: 38–53.