Distributed leadership, open innovation, and organisational ambidexterity: the moderating roles of connectedness and environmental dynamism

References

• Ahn, J. M., T. Minshall, and L. Mortara. 2017. “Understanding the Human Side of Openness: The Fit Between Open Innovation Modes and Ceo Characteristics.” R&D Management 47 (5): 727–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardito, L., A. M. Petruzzelli, L. Dezi, and S. Castellano. 2020. “The Influence of Inbound Open Innovation on Ambidexterity Performance: Does It Pay to Source Knowledge from Supply Chain Stakeholders?” Journal of Business Research 119: 321–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarek, R., G. Burke, P. Jarzabkowski, and M. Smets. 2016. “Dynamic Client Portfolios as Sources of Ambidexterity: Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Client Relationships.” Long Range Planning 49 (3): 324–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berraies, S., K. A. Hamza, and R. Chtioui. 2020. “Distributed Leadership and Exploratory and Exploitative Innovations: Mediating Roles of Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Trust.” Journal of Knowledge Management 25 (5): 1287–1318.
   Google Scholar
• Bogers, M., H. Chesbrough, S. Heaton, and D. J. Teece. 2019. “Strategic Management of Open Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective.” California Management Review 62 (1): 77–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannatelli, B., B. Smith, A. Giudici, J. Jones, and M. Conger. 2017. “An Expanded Model of Distributed Leadership in Organizational Knowledge Creation.” Long Range Planning 50 (5): 582–602.
   Google Scholar
• Canterino, F., S. Cirella, B. Piccoli, and A. B. R. Shani. 2020. “Leadership and Change Mobilization: The Mediating Role of Distributed Leadership.” Journal of Business Research 108: 42–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., and M. Y. Halevi. 2009. “How Top Management Team Behavioral Integration and Behavioral Complexity Enable Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Contextual Ambidexterity.” The Leadership Quarterly 20 (2): 207–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterji, A. K., and K. R. Fabrizio. 2015. “Using Users: When Does External Knowledge Enhance Corporate Product Innovation?” Strategic Management Journal 35 (10): 1427–1445.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., and Z. Liu. 2018. “How Does Openness to Innovation Drive Organizational Ambidexterity? The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Goal Orientation.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 66 (2): 156–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. 2017. “The Future of Open Innovation: The Future of Open Innovation Is More Extensive, More Collaborative, and More Engaged with a Wider Variety of Participants.” Research-Technology Management 60 (1): 35–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W., and A. R. Garman. 2009. “How Open Innovation Can Help You Cope in Lean Times.” Harvard Business Review 87 (12): 68–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Y., K. Du, G. Byun, and X. Zhu. 2017. “Ambidexterity in New Ventures: The Impact of New Product Development Alliances and Transactive Memory Systems.” Journal of Business Research 75: 77–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dess, G. G., and D. W. Beard. 1984. “Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments.” Administrative Science Quarterly 29 (1): 52–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enkel, E., O. Gassmann, and H. Chesbrough. 2009. “Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon.” R&D Management 39 (4): 311–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, L., and Z. Liu. 2018. “Distributed Leadership in Organizations: An Investigation of Antecedent Conditions.” Chinese Management Studies 12 (4): 682–700.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, L., Z. Liu, and S. Liao. 2018. “Is Distributed Leadership a Driving Factor of Innovation Ambidexterity? An Empirical Study with Mediating and Moderating Effects.” Leadership & Organization Development Journal 39 (3): 388–405.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., and J. Birkinshaw. 2004. “The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity.” Academy of Management Journal 47 (2): 209–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. 2002. “Distributed Leadership as a Unit of Analysis.” The Leadership Quarterly 13 (4): 423–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannigan, T. R., V. P. Seidel, and B. Yakis-Douglas. 2018. “Product Innovation Rumors as Forms of Open Innovation.” Research Policy 47 (5): 953–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z. L., and P. K. Wong. 2004. “Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis.” Organization Science 15 (4): 481–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., F. Sempere-Ripoll, and C. Boronat-Moll. 2021. “Technological Innovation Typologies and Open Innovation in Smes: Beyond Internal and External Sources of Knowledge.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 162: 120338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, L., L. J. Song, G. Zheng, and B. Lyu. 2021. “Linking Identity Leadership and Team Performance: The Role of Group-Based Pride and Leader Political Skill.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 676945.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hristov, D., and A. Zehrer. 2019. “Does Distributed Leadership Have a Place in Destination Management Organisations? A Policy-Makers Perspective.” Current Issues in Tourism 22 (9): 1095–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulpia, H., G. Devos, and H. Van Keer. 2009. “The Influence of Distributed Leadership on Teachers’ Organizational Commitment: A Multilevel Approach.” The Journal of Educational Research 103 (1): 40–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, K. P., and C. Chou. 2013. “The Impact of Open Innovation on Firm Performance: The Moderating Effects of Internal R&D and Environmental Turbulence.” Technovation 33 (10-11): 368–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. J., M. P. Tempelaar, F. A. Van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda. 2009. “Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms.” Organization Science 20 (4): 797–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. J., F. A. Van Den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda. 2006. “Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators.” Management Science 52 (11): 1661–1674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Z., and Z. Liu. 2022. “Policies and Exploitative and Exploratory Innovations of the Wind Power Industry in China: The Role of Technological Path Dependence.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 177: 121519.
   Google Scholar
• Ketchen, D. J., G. T. M. Hult, and S. F. Slater. 2007. “Toward Greater Understanding of Market Orientation and the Resource-Based View.” Strategic Management Journal 28 (9): 961–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondakci, Y., M. Zayim, K. Beycioglu, M. Sincar, and C. T. Ugurlu. 2016. “The Mediating Roles of Internal Context Variables in the Relationship Between Distributed Leadership Perceptions and Continuous Change Behaviours of Public School Teachers.” Educational Studies 42 (4): 410–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, D., and L. Rosenkopf. 2006. “Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation.” Academy of Management Journal 49 (4): 797–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzarotti, V., R. Manzini, A. Nosella, and L. Pellegrini. 2017. “Innovation Ambidexterity of Open Firms. The Role of Internal Relational Social Capital.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 29 (1): 105–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, U. 2009. “Outbound Open Innovation and Its Effect on Firm Performance: Examining Environmental Influences.” R&D Management 39 (4): 317–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., MŞ Bellibaş, and S. Gümüş. 2021. “The Effect of Instructional Leadership and Distributed Leadership on Teacher Self-Efficacy and Job Satisfaction: Mediating Roles of Supportive School Culture and Teacher Collaboration.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 49 (3): 430–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. 1991. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 2 (1): 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mention, A.-L. 2011. “Co-Operation and Co-Opetition as Open Innovation Practices in the Service Sector: Which Influence on Innovation Novelty?” Technovation 31 (1): 44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihalache, O. R., J. J. Jansen, F. A. Van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda. 2014. “Top Management Team Shared Leadership and Organizational Ambidexterity: A Moderated Mediation Framework.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 8 (2): 128–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mom, T. J., Y.-Y. Chang, M. Cholakova, and J. J. Jansen. 2019. “A Multilevel Integrated Framework of Firm Hr Practices, Individual Ambidexterity, and Organizational Ambidexterity.” Journal of Management 45 (7): 3009–3034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y., P. A. Pavlou, and N. Saraf. 2020. “Configurations for Achieving Organizational Ambidexterity with Digitization.” Information Systems Research 31 (4): 1376–1397.
   Google Scholar
• Popa, S., P. Soto-Acosta, and I. Martinez-Conesa. 2017. “Antecedents, Moderators, and Outcomes of Innovation Climate and Open Innovation: An Empirical Study in Smes.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 118: 134–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritala, P., and I. Stefan. 2021. “A Paradox Within the Paradox of Openness: The Knowledge Leveraging Conundrum in Open Innovation.” Industrial Marketing Management 93: 281–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, R., and J.-H. Park. 2022. “When is Interorganizational Learning Beneficial for Inbound Open Innovation of Ventures? A Contingent Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation.” Technovation 116: 102514.
   Google Scholar
• Serban, A., and A. J. Roberts. 2016. “Exploring Antecedents and Outcomes of Shared Leadership in a Creative Context: A Mixed-Methods Approach.” The Leadership Quarterly 27 (2): 181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., and M. L. Tushman. 2005. “Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams.” Organization Science 16 (5): 522–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stettner, U., and D. Lavie. 2014. “Ambidexterity Under Scrutiny: Exploration and Exploitation Via Internal Organization, Alliances, and Acquisitions.” Strategic Management Journal 35 (13): 1903–1929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, W., B. Lyu, H. Chen, and Y. Zhang. 2020. “How Does Servant Leadership Influence Employees’ Service Innovative Behavior? The Roles of Intrinsic Motivation and Identification with the Leader.” Baltic Journal of Management 15 (4): 571–586. doi:10.1108/BJM-09-2019-0335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, W., B. Lyu, and M. London. 2022. “Relationships Between Developmental Feedback, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Personality and Performance.” Psihologija 55 (1): 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, M., and M. A. Youndt. 2005. “The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities.” Academy of Management Journal 48 (3): 450–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. 2007. “Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 28 (13): 1319–1350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, M., M. Risku, and K. Collin. 2016. “A Meta-Analysis of Distributed Leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory Development, Empirical Evidence and Future Research Focus.” Educational Management Administration Leadership 44 (1): 146–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, D. G. 2019. “Distributed Leadership, Professional Collaboration, and Teachers’ Job Satisfaction in Us Schools.” Teaching and Teacher Education 79: 111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venugopal, A., T. Krishnan, R. S. Upadhyayula, and M. Kumar. 2020. “Finding the Microfoundations of Organizational Ambidexterity-Demystifying the Role of Top Management Behavioural Integration.” Journal of Business Research 106: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadhwa, A., C. Phelps, and S. Kotha. 2016. “Corporate Venture Capital Portfolios and Firm Innovation.” Journal of Business Venturing 31 (1): 95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, J., W. J. Qualls, and D. Zeng. 2021. “To Explore or Exploit: The Influence of Inter-Firm R&D Network Diversity and Structural Holes on Innovation Outcomes.” Technovation 100: 102178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J., and M. J. I. Bogers. 2017. “Open Innovation: Current Status and Research Opportunities.” Innovation 19 (1): 43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, Q., M. Tan, Q. Cao, and L. Li. 2022. “The Microfoundations of Open Innovation: Ceo Overconfidence and Innovation Choices.” R&D Management, doi:10.1111/radm.12544.
   Google Scholar
• Yi, R., H. Wang, B. Lyu, and Q. Xia. 2021. “Does Venture Capital Help to Promote Open Innovation Practice? Evidence from China.” European Journal of Innovation Management, doi:10.1108/EJIM-03-2021-0161.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M. J., Y. Zhang, and K. S. Law. 2021. “Paradoxical Leadership and Innovation in Work Teams: The Multilevel Mediating Role of Ambidexterity and Leader Vision as a Boundary Condition.” Academy of Management Journal, doi:10.5465/amj.2017.1265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zobel, A.-K., and J. Hagedoorn. 2020. “Implications of Open Innovation for Organizational Boundaries and the Governance of Contractual Relations.” Academy of Management Perspectives 34 (3): 400–423.
   Google Scholar