Theory of errors in innovation failure and strategic management of winning by failing

References

• Ackoff, R. L. 1971. “Towards a System of Systems Concepts.” Management Science 17 (11): 661–671. doi:10.1287/mnsc.17.11.661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anacleto, T. A., E. Perini, M. B. Rosa, and C. C. César 2005. “Medication Errors and Drug-Dispensing Systems in the Hospital Pharmacy.” Clinics 60 (4): 325–332. doi:10.1590/S1807-59322005000400011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anastopoulos, Ioannis, Elza Bontempi, Mario Coccia, Margarida Quina, and Muhammad Shaaban. 2023. “Sustainable strategic materials recovery, what’s next?.” Next Sustainability 1: 100006. doi:10.1016/j.nxsust.2023.100006.
   Google Scholar
• Ardito, L., M. Coccia, and A. Messeni Petruzzelli. 2021. “Technological exaptation and crisis management: Evidence from COVID‐19 outbreaks.” R&D Management 51 (4): 381–392. doi:10.1111/radm.v51.4.
   Google Scholar
• Arkes, H. R., and P. Ayton. 1999. “The Sunk Cost and Concorde Effects: Are Humans Less Rational Than Lower Animals?” Psychological Bulletin 125 (5): 591–600. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, M., and M. Artz. 2015. “Target Difficulty, Target Flexibility, and Firm Performance: Evidence from Business Units’ Targets.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 40 (C): 61–77. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.002.
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., and W. Marx. 2012. “The Anna Karenina Principle: A Way of Thinking About Success in Science.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (10): 2037–2051. doi:10.1002/asi.22661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon, M. D., and A. C. Edmondson. 2005. “Failing to Learn and Learning to Fail (Intelligently): How Great Organizations Put Failure to Work to Innovate and Improve. Long Range Planning.” International Journal of Strategic Management 38 (3): 299–319. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2005.04.005.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, J., and R. R. Murphy. 2005. “How UGVs Physically Fail in the Field.” IEEE Transactions on Robotics 21 (3): 423–437. doi:10.1109/TRO.2004.838027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, E, E. Ferrari, L Bollani, and M. Coccia. 2013. “Strategic management implications for the adoption of technological innovations in agricultural tractor: the role of scale factors and environmental attitude.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26 (7): 765–779. doi:10.1080/09537325.2014.890706.
   Google Scholar
• Cavallo, E., E. Ferrari, L. Bollani, and M. Coccia. 2014. “Attitudes and behaviour of adopters of technological innovations in agricultural tractors: A case study in Italian agricultural system.” Agricultural Systems 130: 44–54. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2014.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, E., E. Ferrari, and M. Coccia. 2015. “Likely Technological Trajectories in Agricultural Tractors by Analysing Innovative Attitudes of Farmers.” International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management 15 (2): 158–177. doi:10.1504/IJTPM.2015.069203.
   Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2010. “Spatial Metrics of the Technological Transfer: Analysis and Strategic Management.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 16 (1): 31–51. doi: 10.1080/0953732032000175490.
   Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2012. “Evolutionary trajectories of the nanotechnology research across worldwide economic players.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (10): 1029–1050. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.705117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2013. “Converging scientific fields and new technological paradigms as main drivers of the division of scientific labour in drug discovery process: the effects on strategic management of the R&D corporate change.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26 (7): 733–749. doi:10.1080/09537325.2014.882501.
   Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2015. “Radical innovations as drivers of breakthroughs: characteristics and properties of the management of technology leading to superior organisational performance in the discovery process of R&D labs.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 28 (4): 381–395. doi:10.1080/09537325.2015.1095287.
   Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2016. “Problem-driven innovations in drug discovery: Co-evolution of the patterns of radical innovation with the evolution of problems.” Health Policy and Technology 5 (2): 143–155. doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2016.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2017. “Sources of Technological Innovation: Radical and Incremental Innovation Problem-Driven to Support Competitive Advantage of Firms.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 29 (9): 1048–1061. doi:10.1080/09537325.2016.1268682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2018a. “Classification of Innovation Considering Technological Interaction.” Journal of Economics Bibliography 5 (2): 76–93. doi:10.1453/jeb.v5i2.1650.
   Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2018. “General Properties of the Evolution of Research Fields: A Scientometric Study of Human Microbiome, Evolutionary Robotics and Astrobiology.” Scientometrics 117 (2): 1265–1283. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2902-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2018. “A theory of classification and evolution of technologies within a Generalised Darwinism.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 31 (5): 517–531. doi:10.1080/09537325.2018.1523385.
   Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2020a. “Fishbone Diagram for Technological Analysis and Foresight.” International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 14 (2/3/4): 225–247. doi:10.1504/IJFIP.2020.111221.
   Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2020. “Asymmetry of the Technological Cycle of Disruptive Innovations.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 32 (12): 1462–1477. doi:10.1080/09537325.2020.1785415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2020b. “Comparative Concepts of Technology for Strategic Management.” In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, edited by A. Farazmand, 1996–2002. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3970-1.
   Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2021. “Technological Innovation.” In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by George Ritzer and Chris Rojek. Malden, MA (USA): John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781405165518.wbeost011.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2021. “Evolution of technology in replacement of heart valves: Transcatheter aortic valves, a revolution for management of valvular heart diseases.” Health Policy and Technology 10 (2): 100512. doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2022. “Probability of discoveries between research fields to explain scientific and technological change.” Technology in Society 68: 101874. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2023. “New Perspectives in Innovation Failure Analysis: A Taxonomy of General Errors and Strategic Management for Reducing Risks.” Technology in Society 75: 02384. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102384.
   Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2024a. “Converging Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Technologies: Accelerated Growth Effects in Technological Evolution.” Technologies 12 (5): 66. doi:10.3390/technologies12050066.
   Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2024b. “The General Theory of Scientific Variability for Technological Evolution.” Sci 6 (2): 31. doi:10.3390/sci6020031.
   Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2024c. “Technological trajectories in quantum computing to design a quantum ecosystem for industrial change.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 36 (8): 1733–1748. doi:10.1080/09537325.2022.2110056.
   Google Scholar
• Coccia, M. 2024d. “Digital Pathology Ecosystem: Basic Elements to Revolutionize the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Diseases in Health Sector.” In Digital Entrepreneurship. Contributions to Management Science, edited by N. Faghih, 111–134, Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-58359-9_5, 202484.
   Google Scholar
• Coccia, M., and S. Roshani. 2024. “Evolutionary Phases in Emerging Quantum Technologies: General Theoretical and Managerial Implications for Driving Technological Evolution.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 71: 8323–8338. doi:10.1109/TEM.2024.3385116.
   Google Scholar
• Coccia, M., S. Roshani, and M. Mosleh. 2021. “Scientific Developments and New Technological Trajectories in Sensor Research.” Sensors 21 (23): 7803. doi:10.3390/s21237803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coccia, M., S. Roshani, and M. Mosleh. 2022. “Evolution of Sensor Research for Clarifying the Dynamics and Properties of Future Directions.” Sensors 22 (23): 9419. doi:10.3390/s22239419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coccia, M., S. Roshani, and M. Mosleh. 2024. “Evolution of Quantum Computing: Theoretical and Innovation Management Implications for Emerging Quantum Industry.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 71: 2270–2280. doi:10.1109/TEM.2022.3175633.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G. 2022. “The 5-th Generation Stage-Gate Idea-to-Launch Process.” IEEE Engineering Management Review 50 (4): 43–55. doi:10.1109/EMR.2022.3222937.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G. 2023. “Chapter 1: New Products: What Separates the Winners from Losers and What Drives Success”.” In The PDMA Handbook of Innovation and New Product Development. 4th ed., edited by L. Bstieler and Noble C. H. Noble, 3–44. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Danneels, E., and A. Vestal. 2020. “Normalizing vs. Analyzing: Drawing the Lessons from Failure to Enhance Firm Innovativeness.” Journal of Business Venturing 35 (1): 105903. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delavoipière, E., C. Fourage, M. Macro, P. Olivier-Abbal, C. Fleck, C. Mouchel, M. Gavard, et al. 2021. “Medication Errors Reporting in Drug Clinical Trials: Role of the Clinical Research Pharmacist?” Therapies 76 (6): 735–742. doi:10.1016/j.therap.2021.02.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desai, V. 2015. “Learning Through the Distribution of Failures Within an Organization: Evidence from Heart Bypass Surgery Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 58 (4): 1032–1050. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., N. Amara, and J. Olmos-Penuela. 2016. “Fostering Novelty While Reducing Failure: Balancing the Twin Challenges of Product Innovation.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 113: 280–292. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. 1994. “Zebras and the Anna Karenina Principle.” Natural History 103 (9): 4–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowden, H., and J. Munro. 2019. “Trends in Clinical Success Rates and Therapeutic Focus.” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 18: 495–496. doi:10.1038/d41573-019-00074-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R., and A. Weiss. 1979. “Organizational Learning: Implications for Organizational Design.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by B. Staw, Vol. 1, 75–123. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, C. 2023. “Patients Launch Legal Action Against AstraZeneca Over Its Covid-19 Vaccine.” BMJ 380: 725. doi:10.1136/bmj.p725.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C. 2011. “Strategies for Learning from Failure.” Harvard Business Review 89 (4): April.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. 2019, 181. Coccia M. 2019. Comparative Incentive Systems. A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 1–5. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3706-1
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. J. M., C. I. Fernandes, and F. A. F. Ferreira. 2020. “Wearing Failure as a Path to Innovation.” Journal of Business Research 120: 195–202. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluud, C. 1999. “Trials and Errors in Clinical Research.” Lancet 354 (Suppl): SIV59. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)90459-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen, S. C., and W. A. Van der Stede. 2004. “Multiple Facets of Budgeting: An Exploratory Analysis.” Management Accounting Research 15 (4): 415–439. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2004.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, M. K., and S. M. Lowy. 1990. “The Linear Additive and Interactive Effects of Budgetary Goal Difficulty and Feedback on Performance.” Accounting Organizations and Society 15 (5): 425–436. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(90)90026-Q.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högman, U., and H. Johannesson. 2013. “Applying Stage-Gate Processes to Technology Development – Experience from Six Hardware-Oriented Companies.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 30: 264–287. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Hyll, W., and G. Pippel. 2016. “Types of Cooperation Partners as Determinants of Innovation Failures.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 28 (4): 462–476. doi:10.1080/09537325.2015.1100292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenson, I., P. Leith, R. Doyle, J. West, and M. P. Miles. 2016. “Innovation System Problems: Causal Configurations of Innovation Failure.” Journal of Business Research 69 (11): 5408–5412. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, E., and S. R. Jeong. 2016. “Development and Application of a Stage-Gate Process to Reduce the Underlying Risks of It Service Projects.” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 93 (2): 233–245.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. 2022. “Innovation Failure and Firm Growth: Dependence on Firm Size and age.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 34 (2): 166–179. doi:10.1080/09537325.2021.1892622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klutke, A., P. C. Kiessler, and M. A. Wortman. 2003. “A Critical Look at the Bathtub Curve.” IEEE Transactions on Reliability 52 (1): 125–129. doi:10.1109/TR.2002.804492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kono, T., and L. Lynn. 2007. “Why New Products Fail.” In Strategic New Product Development for the Global Economy, 19–45. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230599383_2.
   Google Scholar
• Lampel, J., J. Shamsie, and Z. Shapira. 2009. “Experiencing the Improbable: Rare Events and Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 20 (5): 835–845. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laprie, J.-C. 1995. “Dependable Computing and Fault Tolerance: Concepts and Terminology.” Twenty-Fifth International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing, 1995, 2. Pasadena, CA, USA: Highlights from Twenty-Five Years. doi:10.1109/FTCSH.1995.532603.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, S. L., and C. C. J. Cheng. 2014. “Brand Equity and the Exacerbating Factors of Product Innovation Failure Evaluations: A Communication Effect Perspective.” Journal of Business Research 67 (1): 2919–2925. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, D. 1993. “On the Scope and Limits of Generalizations in the Social Sciences.” Synthese 97: 183–207. doi:10.1007/BF01064114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., and G. P. Latham. 1990. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A, and G. P. Latham. 2002. “Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey.” American Psychologist 57 (9): 705–717. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., and G. P. Latham. 2006. “New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 15: 265–268. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, P. M., and V. Desai. 2010. “Failing to Learn? The Effects of Failure and Success on Organizational Learning in the Global Orbital Launch Vehicle Industry.” Academy of Management Journal 53 (3): 451–476. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.51467631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magazzini, L., F. Pammolli, and M. Riccabon. 2012. “Learning from Failures or Failing to Learn? Lessons from Pharmaceutical R&D.” European Management Review 9 (1): 45–58. doi:10.1111/j.1740-4762.2012.01027.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzocchi, C., and R. Ramlogan. 2019. “Forsaking Innovation: Addressing Failure and Innovation Behaviour Variety.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 31 (12): 1462–1473. doi:10.1080/09537325.2019.1628937.
   Google Scholar
• Maslach, D. 2016. “Change and Persistence with Failed Technological Innovation.” Strategic Management Journal 37 (4): 714–723. doi:10.1002/smj.2358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihm, J., C. H. Loch, and A. Huchzermeier. 2003. “Problem-Solving Oscillations in Complex Engineering Projects.” Management Science 49 (6): 733–750. doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.6.733.16021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, C. 2019. “Critical Knowledge inSight: Innovation from Failure.” NASA. Accessed September 21, 2023. https://appel.nasa.gov/2019/12/13/critical-knowledge-insight-innovation-from-failure/.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. A., T. Leighton, J. T. Ostrowsky, C. J. Anderson, R. N. Danila, A. K. Ulrich, E. M. Lackritz, et al. 2023. “A Research and Development (R&D) Roadmap for Broadly Protective Coronavirus Vaccines: A Pandemic Preparedness Strategy.” Vaccine 41 (13): 2101–2112. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.032.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osakwe, O. 2016. “Pharmaceutical Formulation and Manufacturing Development: Strategies and Issues.” In Social Aspects of Drug Discovery, Development and Commercialization, edited by O. Osakwe and S. A. A. Rizvi, 169–187. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-802220-7.00008-9.
   Google Scholar
• Pangione, L., R. Skilton, and R. Powell. 2020. “A Taxonomy Approach to Failure Mode Analysis for Use in Predictive Condition Monitoring.” Fusion Engineering and Design 153: 111506. doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111506.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, S. 2015. “8 Successful Products That Only Exist Because of Failure.” Forbes. Accessed on October 24, 2023. https://www.forbes.com/sites/sujanpatel/2015/01/16/8-successful-products-that-only-exist-because-of-failure/?sh=e3694221c8c8.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. 1999. Normal Accidents: Living With High-Risk Technologies. Princeton, United States: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pich, M. T., C. H. Loch, and A. De Meyer. 2002. “On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management.” Management Science 48 (8): 1008–1023. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pich, M. T., C. H. Loch, and A. De Meyer. 2002. “On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management.” Management Science 48 (8): 1008–1023. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhaiem, K., and N. Amara. 2021. “Learning from Innovation Failures: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Research Agenda.” Review of Managerial Science 15: 189–234. doi:10.1007/s11846-019-00339-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhaiem, K., and N. Halilem. 2023. “The Worst is not to Fail, but to Fail to Learn from Failure: A Multi-Method Empirical Validation of Learning from Innovation Failure.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 190: 122427. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122427.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, J., T. Sorbello, and K. Unsworth. 2008. “Innovation Implementation: The Role of Technology Diffusion Agencies.” Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 3 (3): 1–10. doi:10.4067/S0718-27242008000100001.
   Google Scholar
• Sagonowsky, R. 2023. “Johnson & Johnson Cuts Production of Underperforming COVID Vaccine: WSJ.” Fierce Pharma. https://www.fiercepharma.com/manufacturing/johnson-johnson-cuts-production-underperforming-covid-vaccine-wsj.
   Google Scholar
• Sauser, B. J., R. R. Reilly, and A. J. Shenhar. 2009. “Why Projects Fail? How Contingency Theory Can Provide New Insights – a Comparative Analysis of NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter Loss.” International Journal of Project Management 27: 665–679. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A., and Charles W. L. Hill. 1998. “Managing the New Product Development Process: Strategic Imperatives.” The Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005) 12 (3): 67–81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4165478.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, D. A., J. G. Covin, and D. F. Kuratko. 2009. “Project Failure from Corporate Entrepreneurship: Managing the Grief Process.” Journal of Business Venturing 24 (6): 588–600. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1962. “The Architecture of Complexity.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106: 467–482.
   Google Scholar
• Sosna, M., R. N. Trevinyo-Rodríguez, and S. Ramakrishna Velamuri. 2010. “Business Model Innovation Through Trial-and-Error Learning: The Naturhouse Case.” Long Range Planning 43 (2–3): 383–407. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starbuck, W. H., and B. Hedberg. 2001. “How Organizations Learn from Success and Failure.” In Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge, edited by M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child, and I. Nonaka, 327–350. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbauer, G. 2013. “A Survey about Faults of Robots Used in RoboCup.” In RoboCup 2012: Robot Soccer World Cup XVI. RoboCup 201 2, edited by X. Chen, P. Stone, L. E. Sucar, T. van der Zant. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7500. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, D., W. Gao, H. Hu, and S. Zhou. 2022. “Why 90% of Clinical Drug Development Fails and How to Improve It?” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 12 (7): 3049–3062. doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2022.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. 2021. 2020s Top 10 Clinical Trial Flops. https://www.fiercebiotech.com/special-report/2020-s-top-10-clinical-trial-flops.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. 2022. 2021s Top 10 Clinical Trial Flops. https://www.fiercebiotech.com/special-reports/2021s-top-10-clinical-trial-flops.
   Google Scholar
• Teng, E., P. T. Manser, K. Pickthorn, F. Brunstein, M. Blendstrup, S. Sanabria Bohorquez, K. R. Wildsmith, et al. 2022. “Safety and Efficacy of Semorinemab in Individuals with Prodromal to Mild Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.” JAMA Neurology 79 (8): 758–767. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.1375.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Panne, G., Cees van Beers, and Alfred Kleinknecht. 2003. “Success and Failure of Innovation: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Innovation Management 7 (3): 309–338. doi:10.1142/S1363919603000830.
   Google Scholar
• Vial. 2023. “Top 5 Clinical Trial Mistakes and How to Avoid Them.” https://vial.com/blog/articles/top-5-clinical-trial-mistakes-and-how-to-avoid-them/?utm_source=organic.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, R. A., M. G. Williamson, and Y. Zhang. 2013. “Productivity-Target Difficulty, Target-Based Pay, and Outside-the-Box Thinking.” The Accounting Review 88 (4): 1433–1457. doi:10.2308/accr-50436.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1991. “The Nontraditional Quality of Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 2 (1): 116–124. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzman, M. L. 1980. “The ‘Ratchet Principle’ and Performance Incentives.” The Bell Journal of Economics 11 (1): 302–308. doi:10.2307/3003414.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, D. T., and L. D. Ordóñez. 2014. “The Dark Side of Consecutive High Performance Goals: Linking Goal Setting, Depletion, and Unethical Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 123: 79–89. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wezel, F. C., and A. van Witteloostuijn. 2006. “From Scooters to Choppers: Product Portfolio Change and Organizational Failure.” Long Range Planning 39 (1): 11–28. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2005.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xhignesse, M. 2020. “Failures of Intention and Failed-Art.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50: 905–917. doi:10.1017/can.2020.39.
   Google Scholar
• Zahoor, N., and Samuel A. 2023. “Be Open to Failure: Open Innovation Failure in Dynamic Environments.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 193: 122632. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Y. Liu, J. Liu, S. Lan, and J. Yang. 2022. “Causes and Statistical Characteristics of Bridge Failures: A Review.” Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) 9 (3): 388–406. doi:10.1016/j.jtte.2021.12.003.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, B., Y. Lu, X. Wang, and L. Pang. 2024. “Challenge Stressors and Learning from Failure: The Moderating Roles of Emotional Intelligence and Error Management Culture.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 36 (2): 238–251. doi:10.1080/09537325.2022.2028765.
   Google Scholar