A World of Contrasted but Interdependent Inequality Regimes: China, United States and the European Union

References

• Aglietta, M. 1979. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience. New York: Schocken Books.
   Google Scholar
• André, C., and R. Delorme. 1983. ‘Matériaux pour une comparaison internationale des dépenses publiques.’ Statistiques et Etudes Financières, 350.
   Google Scholar
• Artus, P. 2008. ‘Trois méthodes pour réduire le levier d'endettement.’ Flash Economie, Septembre 23, Natixis, Paris, 414.
   Google Scholar
• Artus, P. 2009. ‘Emprunt d’Etat Français : priorités stratégiques et opportunités d’investissement’, Flash Economie, n° 549, Décembre 16, Natixis, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Artus, P. 2013. ‘La crise de la zone euro ne peut pas être finie.’ Flash Economie, Janvier 25, Natixis, Paris, 76.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Asia's next revolution. Reinventing the welfare state.’ 2012a. The Economist, September 8-14, 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. B., T. Piketty, and E. Saez. 2011. ‘Top Incomes in the Long run of History.’ Journal of Economic Literature 49 (1): 3–71. doi: 10.1257/jel.49.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baran, P. A., and P. M. Sweezy. 1966. Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American Economic and Social Order. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O., and D. Leigh. 2013. Growth Forecast Errors and Fiscal Multipliers. IMF Working Paper Research Department, January.
   Google Scholar
• Bourguignon, F. 2012. La mondialisation de l'inégalité. Paris: Editions Le Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. 1994. ‘Do Labour Institutions Matter for Economic Development? A ‘régulation’ Approach for the OECD and Latin America with an Extension to Asia.’ In Workers, Institutions and Economic Growth in Asia, edited by G. Rodgers. Geneva: ILO/ILLS.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. 2000. ‘The French welfare: An Institutional and Historical Analysis in European Perspective.’ CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange), n° 2000–07.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. 2006. La flexicurité danoise: quels enseignements pour la France? Opuscule Cepremap, n° 2, Mai, Editions de l'ENS, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. 2011. ‘A New Epoch but Still Diversity within and Between Capitalism. China in Comparative Perspective.’ In Capitalist Diversity and Diversity within Capitalism, edited by C. Lane and G. T. Wood. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. 2013. ‘The Euro Crisis: Undetected by Conventional Economics, Favoured by Nationally Focused Polity.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 37: 553–569.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. 2015. ‘The welfare-innovation Institutional Complementarity: Making Sense of Scandinavian History.’ In Sources of National Institutional Competitiveness. Sense-making and Institutional Change, edited by Susana Borras and Leonard Seabrooke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. Forthcoming. ‘A World of Contrasted but Interdependent Inequality Regimes: The Latin American Paradox.’ Review of Political Economy, 28 (1) (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., J. Hall, and O. K. Pedersen. 2008. National Identity and the Varieties of Capitalism. The Danish Experience. Copenhagen: DJOF publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. 2001. ‘The Social Construction of an Imperative. Why Welfare Reform Happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but Not in Germany.’ World Politics 53 (3): 463–498. doi: 10.1353/wp.2001.0008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crotty, J., and G. Epstein. 2008. Proposals for Effectively Regulating the U.S. Financial System to Avoid Yet Another Meltdown, University of Massachusetts - Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst, Economics Department Working Paper Series Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. 2008. ‘Schumpeter Meeting Keynes: A Policy Friendly Model of Endogenous Growth and Business Cycles.’ LEM Paper series, Santa Ana School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Fellman, S., M. Iversen, H. Sjögren and L. Thue, eds. 2008. Creating Nordic Capitalism. The Business History of a Competitive Periphery. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 2012. ‘The Future of History. Can Liberal Democracy Survive the Decline of the Middle Class.’ Foreign Affairs, January/February.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. K. 2007. ‘Global Inequality and Global Macro Economics.’ In Global Inequality, edited by D. Held and A. Kaya. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. S., and P. Pierson. 2011. Winner-Take-all Politics. How Washington Made the Rich Richer and Turned its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. 1947. Economic Policy and Full Employment. New York: Whittlesey House (McGraw-Hill Book Company).
   Google Scholar
• Korsgraad, O. 2000. ‘Learning and the Changing Concept of Enlightenment: Danish Adult Education Over Five Centuries.’ International Review of Education 46 (4): 305–325. doi: 10.1023/A:1004078416861
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, T., and B. Rothstein. 1994. ‘State Building in Scandinavia.’ Comparative Politics 26 (2): 203–220. doi: 10.2307/422268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznets, S. 1955. ‘Economic Growth and Income Inequality.’ American Economic Review XLV (1): 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, D. 1978. ‘Conservatism and Tradition in Danish Social Welfare Legislation, 1890-1933: A Comparative View.’ Comparative Studies in Society and History 20 (1): 54–69. doi: 10.1017/S0010417500008823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. 2011, September. ‘The Changing Global Knowledge Landscape and the Financial Crisis.’ Presentation at the Pufendorf Institute, Lund.
   Google Scholar
• Montagne, S. 2006. Les fonds de pension : entre protection sociale et spéculation. Paris: Odile Jacob.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, D. 2010. ‘Comments on Bank Failure/Regulation/Inequality Chart.’ August WP.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, O. 2008. ‘Corporatism and Beyond: The Negotiated Economy.’ In National Identity and the Varieties of Capitalism. The Danish Experience, edited by Campbell J., J. Hall, and O. K. Pedersen. Copenhagen: DJOF publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T., and E. Saez. 2003. ‘Income Inequality in the United States 1913-1998.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 1–41. doi: 10.1162/00335530360535135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piketty, T., and E. Saez. 2007. ‘How Progressive is the U.S. Federal Tax System? A Historical and International Perspective.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (1): 3–24. doi: 10.1257/jep.21.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi. K. 1944. La grande transformation, Aux origines politiques et économiques de notre temps. Paris: Gallimard. 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, M. J., ed. 2002. The New Knowledge Economy in Europe: A Strategy for International Competitiveness and Social Cohesion. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, M. J., ed. 2009. Europe, Globalization and the Lisbon Agenda. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. 1948. Economics: An Introductory. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schor, J. 1992. The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, M. R., and F. Block. 2005. ‘From Poverty to Perversity: Ideas, Markets, and Institutions over 200 years of Welfare Debate.’ American Sociological Review 70: 260–287. doi: 10.1177/000312240507000204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. 2012. The Price of Inequality. How Today's Divided Society Endangers our Future. New York, London: WW Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Tello, C. 2010. Sobre la desigualdad en México. México: Facultad de Economía, UNAM.
   Google Scholar
• ‘True progressivism. The New Politics of Capitalism and Inequality.’ 2012b. The Economist, October 13-19, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, J., and A. Hemerijck. 1997. ‘A Dutch Miracle' - Job Growth, Welfare Reform and Corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., and K. Pickett. 2010. The Spirit Level. Why Equality is better for Everyone. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar