385
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Symposium on the Classical Surplus Approach and Demand-Led Growth, Part II

Studying Growth in the Modern Classical Approach: Theoretical and Empirical Implications for the Analysis of Potential Output

Pages 282-307 | Received 06 Jul 2014, Accepted 03 Nov 2014, Published online: 02 Nov 2015

References

  • Amadeo, E. J. 1986. ‘The Role of Capacity Utilization in Long-Period Analysis.’ Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach 2 (2): 147–160.
  • Ball, L. M. 1996. ‘Disinflation and the NAIRU,’ NBER Working Paper 5520.
  • Ball, L. M. 2009. ‘Hysteresis in Unemployment: Old and New Evidence,’ NBER Working Paper 14818.
  • Bassanetti, A., M. Caivano and A. Locarno. 2010. ‘Modelling Italian Potential Output and the Output Gap.’ Banca d'Italia, Temi di discussione 771: 1–51.
  • Beckerman, W. and T. Jenkinson. 1986. ‘What Stopped the Inflation? Unemployment or Commodity Prices?’ Economic Journal 96: 39–54. doi: 10.2307/2233425
  • Bernanke, B. 2010. ‘Monetary Policy Objectives and Tools in a Low-Inflation Environment.’ [http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/Bernanke20101015a.htm ].
  • Billmeier, A. 2009. ‘Ghostbusting: Which Output Gap Really Matters?’ International Economics and Economic Policy 6: 391–419. doi: 10.1007/s10368-009-0144-1
  • Blanchard, O. J. and L. H. Summers. 1986. ‘Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem.’ NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1 (Fall): 15–78. doi: 10.2307/3585159
  • Bortis, H. 1997. Institutions, Behaviour and Economic Theory: A Contribution to Classical-Keynesian Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Carlin, W. and D. Soskice. 1990. Macroeconomics and the Wage Bargain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Centro Studi Confindustria. 2013. Scenari industriali (Giugno) 4 [http://www.confindustria.it/indcong.nsf/0/8ad3391967a62bbfc1257b810031f02a/$FILE/Scenari%20industriali%20n.%204%20-%202013.pdf].
  • Cesaratto, S. 2012. ‘Neo-Kaleckian and Sraffian Controversies on Accumulation Theory.’ Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica e Statistica, Università di Siena.
  • Ciccone, R. 1986. ‘Accumulation and Capacity Utilization: Some Critical Considerations on Joan Robinson's Theory of Distribution.’ Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach 2 (1): 17–36.
  • Ciccone, R. 1987. ‘Accumulation, Capacity Utilization and Distribution: A Reply.’ Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach 3 (1): 97–111.
  • Ciccone, R. 2011. ‘Capacity Utilization, Mobility of Capital and the Classical Process of Gravitation.’ In Sraffa and Modern Economics, Vol. II, edited by R. Ciccone, C. Gehrke and G. Mongiovi. London: Routledge.
  • Committeri, M. 1986. ‘Some Comments on Recent Contributions on Capital Accumulation, Income Distribution and Capacity Utilization.’ Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach 2 (2): 161–186.
  • Cotis, J. P., J. Elmeskov and A. Mourougane. 2005. ‘Estimates of Potential Output: Benefits and Pitfalls from a Policy Prospect.’ In The Euro Area Business Cycle: Stylised Facts and Measurement Issues, edited by L. Reichlin. London: CEPR.
  • D'Auria, F., C. Denis, K. Havik, K. McMorrow, C. Planas, R. Raciborski, W. Roger and A. Rossi. 2010. ‘The Production Function Methodology for Calculating Potential Growth Rates and Output Gaps.’ European Economy Economic Paper 420.
  • Dejuàn, Ó. 2005. ‘Paths of Accumulation and Growth: Towards a Keynesian Long-Period Theory of Output.’ Review of Political Economy 17: 231–252. doi: 10.1080/09538250500067270
  • De Masi, P. R. 1997. ‘IMF Estimates of Potential Output: Theory and Practice.’ IMF Working Paper, 177.
  • Dickens, W. 2011. ‘Has the Recession Increased the NAIRU?’ [http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2011/6/29%20recession%20nairu%20dickens/0629_recession_nairu_dickens.pdf ].
  • Eatwell, J. 2012. ‘The Theory of Value and the Foundations of Economic Policy: In Memoriam Pierangelo Garegnani.’ Contributions to Political Economy 31: 1–18. doi: 10.1093/cpe/bzs005
  • European Central Bank. 2011. Monthly Bulletin (November).
  • European Commission. 2009. ‘Impact of the Current Economic and Financial Crisis on Potential Output.’ European Economy Occasional Paper, 49.
  • European Commission. 2012. Labour Market Developments in Europe.
  • European Commission. 2013. Labour Market Developments in Europe.
  • Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis. 2012. Economic Synopses 11.
  • Franz, W. 2005. ‘Will the (German) NAIRU please stand up?’ Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung Discussion Paper 03–35.
  • Freitas, F. and E. Dweck. 2013. ‘The Pattern of Economic Growth of the Brazilian Economy 1970–2005: A Demand-Led Perspective.’ In Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory, Vol. II, edited by E. S. Levrero, A. Palumbo and A. Stirati. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Friedman, M. 1968. ‘The Role of Monetary Policy.’ American Economic Review 58: 1–17.
  • Friedman, M. 1977. ‘Nobel Lecture: Inflation and Unemployment.’ Journal of Political Economy 85: 451–472. doi: 10.1086/260579
  • Garegnani, P. 1962. Il problema della domanda effettiva nello sviluppo economico italiano. Roma: SVIMEZ.
  • Garegnani, P. 1964–65. ‘Note su consumi, investimenti e domanda effettiva.’ Economia Internazionale 17 and 18: 591–631, 575–617.
  • Garegnani, P. 1978–79. ‘Notes on Consumption, Investment and Effective Demand, Parts I and II.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 2 and 3: 335–353, 63–82.
  • Garegnani, P. 1984. ‘Value and Distribution in the Classical Economists and Marx.’ Oxford Economic Papers 36: 291–325.
  • Garegnani, P. 1990. ‘Sraffa: Classical versus Marginalist Analysis.’ In Essays on Piero Sraffa: Critical Perspectives on the Revival of Classical Theory, edited by K. Bharadwaj and B. Schefold. London: Unwin-Hyman.
  • Garegnani, P. 1992. ‘Some Notes for an Analysis of Accumulation.’ In Beyond the Steady-State, edited by J. Halevi, D. Laibman and E. J. Nell. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  • Giorno, C., P. Richardson, D. Roseveare and P. van den Noord. 1995. ‘Estimating Potential Output, Output Gaps and Structural Budget Balances.’ OECD Economic Department Working Paper 152: 1–53.
  • Gordon, R. J. 1989. ‘Hysteresis in History: Was There Ever a Phillips Curve?.’ American Economic Review 79: 220–225.
  • Gordon, R. J. 1997. ‘The Time-Varying NAIRU and Its Implications for Economic Policy.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (1): 11–32. doi: 10.1257/jep.11.1.11
  • Gros, D., C. Alcidi, M. Biggs, T. Mayer and B. van Ark. 2010. ‘Forum: The Impact of the Financial Crisis on the Real Economy.’ Intereconomics 45: 4–20. doi: 10.1007/s10272-010-0320-0
  • Guichard, S. and E. Rusticelli. 2011. ‘Reassessing the NAIRUs after the Crisis.’ OECD Economics Department Working Papers 918.
  • Hein, E., M. Lavoie and T. van Treeck. 2011. ‘Some Instability Puzzles in Kaleckian Models of Growth and Distribution: A Critical Survey.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 35: 587–612. doi: 10.1093/cje/beq026
  • Hodrick, R. J. and E. C. Prescott. 1997. ‘Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation.’ Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 29: 1–16. doi: 10.2307/2953682
  • International Monetary Fund. 2006, April. World Economic Outlook.
  • ISTAT. 2008. Rapporto Annuale. La situazione del Paese nel 2007. Roma: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica.
  • ISTAT. 2014. Rapporto sulla compettività dei settori produttivi. Roma: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica.
  • Jahan, S. and A. S. Mahmud. 2013. ‘What is the Output Gap? Economists Look for the Difference between What an Economy is Producing and What It Can Produce.’ Finance and Development 50 (3): 38–39.
  • Jenkinson, T. J. 1988. ‘The NAIRU: Statistical Fact or Theoretical Straitjacket?.’ In Unemployment, Hysteresis and the Natural Rate Hypothesis, edited by R. Cross. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Kaldor, N. 1981. ‘The Role of Increasing Returns, Technical Progress and Cumulative Causation in the Theory of International Trade and Economic Growth.’ Economie Appliquée 34: 593–617.
  • Kocherlakota, N. 2010. ‘Inside the FOMC’ [http://www.minneapolisfed.org/newsevents/pres/speech_display.cfm?id=4525].
  • Kurz, H. D. 1986. ‘“Normal” Positions and Capital Utilization.’ Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach 2 (1): 37–54.
  • Layard, R., S. Nickell and R. Jackman. 1991. Unemployment. Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lazear, E. P. and J. R. Spletzer. 2012. ‘The United States Labor Market: Status Quo or a New Normal?’ NBER Working Paper 18386.
  • Lipsey, R. G. 1960. ‘The Relation between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 1862–1957: A Further Analysis.’ Economica 27: 1–31. doi: 10.2307/2551424
  • Malgarini, M. and A. Paradiso. 2010. ‘Measuring Capacity Utilization in the Italian Manufacturing Sector: A Comparison between Time Series and Survey Models in Light of the Actual Economic Crisis.’ ISAE Working Paper, 129.
  • Martin, B. 2011. ‘Is the British Economy Supply Constrained? A critique of Productivity Pessimism.’ Centre for Business Research and UK–IRC.
  • Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze. 2008. Documento di programmazione economico-finanziaria per gli anni 2009–2013.
  • Mourre, G., G. M. Isbasoiu, D. Paternoster and M. Salto. 2013. ‘The Cyclically-Adjusted Budget Balance Used in the EU Fiscal Framework: An Update.’ European Commission, European Economy, Economic Paper, 478.
  • Palumbo, A. 2010. ‘La teoria del salario monetario di Phillips e la curva di Phillips.’ In Il ritorno dell'economia politica. Saggi in ricordo di Fernando Vianello, edited by G. Bonifati and A. Simonazzi. Roma: Donzelli.
  • Palumbo, A. 2013. ‘Potential Output and Demand-Led Growth.’ In Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory, Vol. II, edited by E. S. Levrero, A. Palumbo and A. Stirati. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Palumbo, A. and A. Trezzini. 2003. ‘Growth Without Normal Capacity Utilisation.’ European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 10: 109–135. doi: 10.1080/0967256032000043814
  • Park, M-S. 1995. ‘A Note on the “Kalecki-Steindl” Steady-State Approach to Growth and Income Distribution.’ The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies 63: 297–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.1995.tb00285.x
  • Park, M.S. 1997. ‘Accumulation, Capacity Utilisation and Distribution.’ Contributions to Political Economy 16: 87–101. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cpe.a014058
  • Parrinello, S. 2014. ‘A Search for Distinctive Features of Demand-Led Growth Models.’ Centro Sraffa Working Paper, 2.
  • Richardson, P., L. Boone, C. Giorno, M. Meacci, D. Rae and D. Turner. 2000. ‘The Concept, Policy Use and Measurement of Structural Unemployment: Estimating a Time-Varying NAIRU across 21 OECD Countries.’ OECD Economics Department Working Paper 250.
  • Rowthorn, R. 1981. ‘Demand, Real Wages and Economic Growth.’ Thames Papers in Political Economy 1–39.
  • Schreiber, S. and J. Wolters. 2007. ‘The Long-Run Phillips Curve Revisited: Is the NAIRU Framework Data-Consistent?.’ Journal of Macroeconomics 29: 355–367. doi: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2005.08.003
  • Serrano, F. 1995. ‘Long-Period Effective Demand and the Sraffian Supermultiplier.’ Contributions to Political Economy 14: 67–90.
  • Shaikh, A. and J. Moudud. 2004. ‘Measuring Capacity Utilization in OECD Countries: A Cointegration Method.’ Jerome Levy Economics Institute Working Paper 415.
  • Smith, M. 2013. ‘A Historical Approach to Demand-Led Growth Theory.’ In Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory, Vol. II, edited by E. S. Levrero, A. Palumbo and A. Stirati. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Solow, R. M. 2000. ‘Unemployment in the United States and in Europe. A Contrast and the Reasons.’ CESifo Working Paper 231.
  • Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Trezzini, A. 1998. ‘Capacity Utilization in the Long Run: Some Further Considerations.’ Contributions to Political Economy 17: 53–67. doi: 10.1093/cpe/17.1.53
  • Trezzini, A. 2011. ‘Steady State and the Analysis of Long-Run Tendencies: The Case of Kaleckian Models.’ In Sraffa and Modern Economics, Vol. II, edited by R. Ciccone, C. Gehrke and G. Mongiovi. London: Routledge.
  • Trezzini, A. 2013. ‘The Meaning of Output Trends in the Analysis of Growth.’ In Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory, Vol. II, edited by E. S. Levrero, A. Palumbo and A. Stirati. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Trezzini, A. and A. Palumbo. 2014. ‘The Theory of Output in the Modern Classical Approach.’ Paper presented at the Conference on What Have We Learnt on Classical Economy since Sraffa?, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre.
  • Vianello, F. 1985. ‘The Pace of Accumulation.’ Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach 1 (1): 69–87.
  • Vianello, F. 1989. ‘Effective Demand and the Rate of Profits: Some Thoughts on Marx, Kalecki and Sraffa.’ In Kalecki's Relevance Today, edited by M. Sebastiani. London: Macmillan.
  • White, G. 1996. ‘Capacity Utilization, Investment and Normal Prices: Some Issues in the Sraffa-Keynes Synthesis.’ Metroeconomica 47: 281–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-999X.1996.tb00393.x
  • White, G. 2006. ‘Demand-Led Growth and the Classical Approach to Value and Distribution: Are They Compatible?.’ In Economic Growth and Distribution: On the Nature and Cause of the Wealth of Nations, edited by N. Salvadori. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.