A Note on Reswitching and Intertemporal Prices

References

• Bliss, C. J. 1970. ‘Comment on Garegnani.’ The Review of Economic Studies 37 (3): 437–438. doi:10.2307/2296730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliss, C. J. 1975. Capital Theory and Distribution of Income. Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, C. J. 1990. ‘Equal Rates of Profit.’ In Capital Theory, edited by J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman, 148–154. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Burmeister, E. 1976. ‘Real Wicksell Effects and Regular Economies.’ In Essays in Modern Capital Theory, edited by M. Brown, K. Sato and P. Zaremka, 145–164. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Burmeister, Edwin. 1980. Capital Theory and Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burmeister, Edwin and A. Rodney Dobell. 1970. Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. and G. C. Harcourt. 2003. ‘Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (1): 199–214. doi:10.1257/089533003321165010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratini, S. M. 2007. ‘Reswitching of Techniques in an Intertemporal Equilibrium Model with Overlapping Generations.’ Contributions to Political Economy 26 (1): 43–59. doi:10.1093/cpe/bzm018.
   Google Scholar
• Fratini, S. M. 2013a. ‘Real Wicksell Effect, Demand for Capital and Stability.’ Metroeconomica 64 (2): 346–360. doi:10.1111/meca.12010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratini, S. M. 2013b. ‘Malinvaud on Wicksell's Legacy to Capital Theory: Some Critical Remarks.’ In Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory, edited by E. S. Levrero, A. Palumbo and A. Stirati. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P. 1966. ‘Switching of Techniques.’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (4): 554–567. doi:10.2307/1882915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P. 1970. ‘Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution.’ The Review of Economic Studies 37 (3): 407–36. doi:10.2307/2296729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P. 1976. ‘On a Change in the Notion of Equilibrium in Recent Work on Value and Distribution.’ In Essays in Modern Capital Theory, edited by M. Brown, K. Sato and P. Zaremka, 25–45. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P. 1990. ‘Quantity of Capital.’ In Capital Theory, edited by J. Eatwell, M. Millgate and P. Newman, 1–78. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P. 2003. ‘Saving, Investment and the Quantity of Capital in General Intertemporal Equilibrium.’ In General Equilibrium. Problems and Prospects, edited by F. Hahn and F. Petri, 117–172. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geanakoplos, J. 1989. ‘Arrow-Debreu Model of General Equilibrium.’ In General Equilibrium, edited by J. Eatwell, M. Millgate and P. Newman, 43–61. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, F. H. 1975. ‘Revival of Political Economy: The Wrong Issues and the Wrong Argument.’ The Economic Record 51 (3): 360–364. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.1975.tb00262.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, F. H. 1982. ‘The neo-Ricardians.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 6 (4): 353–362. doi: 10.1016/0147-5967(82)90045-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, F. H. 1985. ‘In praise of economic theory.’ Jevons Memorial Lecture, London University College.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, Geoffrey C. 1972. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, H. D. 2000. ‘Wicksell and the Problem of the “Missing” Equation.’ History of Political Economy 32 (4): 765–788. doi:10.1215/00182702-32-4-765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurz, Heinz D. and Neri Salvadori. 1995. Theory of Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, H. D. and N. Salvadori. 2001. ‘The Aggregate Neoclassical Theory of Distribution and the Concept of A Given Value of Capital: A Reply.’ Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 12 (4): 479–485. doi:10.1016/S0954-349X(01)00015-7.
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, M. 2002. ‘Classical and Neoclassical Indeterminacy in one-Shot Versus Ongoing Equilibria.’ Metroeconomica 53 (3): 203–222. doi:10.1111/1467-999X.00141.
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, M. 2005 ‘Well-behaved Production Economies.’ Metroeconomica 56 (4): 477–494. doi:10.1111/j.1467-999X.2005.00225.x.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Alfred. 1920. Principles of Economics. 8th ed. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell, Andreu, Michael D. Whinston and Jerry Green. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petri, F. 1978. ‘The Difference Between Long-Period and Short-Period General Equilibrium and the Capital Theory Controversy.’ Australian Economic Papers 17 (31): 246–260. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8454.1978.tb00629.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potestio, P. 1999. ‘The Aggregate Neoclassical Theory of Distribution and the Concept of A Given Value of Capital: Toward A More General Critique.’ Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 10 (3–4): 381–394. doi:10.1016/S0954-349X(99)00015-6.
   Google Scholar
• Schefold, B. 2005. ‘Reswitching as A Cause of Instability of Intertemporal Equilibrium.’ Metroeconomica 56 (4): 438–476. doi:10.1111/j.1467-999X.2005.00224.x.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, Piero. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar