Ecological Political Economy: Towards a Strategic-Relational Approach

References

• AR5 Scenarios Database. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. 2014. https://secure.iiasa.ac.at/web-apps/ene/AR5DB/.
   Google Scholar
• Barbier, E. 2010. A Global Green New Deal: Rethinking the Economic Recovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, C. 1993. Critical Theories of the State: Marxist, Neomarxist, Postmarxist. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennet, J. 2015. ‘We Need an Energy Miracle’. The Atlantic. November 2015. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/11/we-need-an-energy-miracle/407881/.
   Google Scholar
• Block, F., and M. Keller, eds. 2011. State of Innovation: The U.S. Government's Role in Technology Development. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., J. Peck, and N. Theodore. 2010. ‘Variegated Neoliberalization: Geographies, Modalities, Pathways.’ Global Networks 10: 182–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkett, P. 2006. Marxism and Ecological Economics: Towards a Red and Green Political Economy. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Burkett, P., and J. Foster. 2006. ‘Metabolism, Energy, and Entropy in Marx's Critique of Political Economy: Beyond the Podolinsky Myth.’ Theory and Society 35: 109–156. doi: 10.1007/s11186-006-6781-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceballos, G., P. Ehrlich, A. Brnosky, A. Gracia, R. Pringe, and T. Palmer. 2015. ‘Accelerated Modern Human–Induced Species Losses: Entering the Sixth Mass Extinction.’ Science Advances 1: e1400253–e1400253. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1400253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chester, L. 2010. ‘Determining the Economic-Environment Relation: A Regulationist Approach.’ International Journal of Green Economics 4: 17–42. doi: 10.1504/IJGE.2010.032599
   Google Scholar
• Clarke L., K. Jiang, K. Akimoto, M. Babiker, G. Blanford, K. Fisher-Vanden, J.-C. Hourcade, et al. 2014. ‘Assessing Transformation Pathways’ In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• D'Alisa, G., G. Demaria, and G. Kallis, eds. 2014. Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, S. 2012. ‘The Insuperable Imperative: A Critique of the Ecologically Modernizing State.’ Capitalism Nature Socialism 23: 31–50. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2012.674147
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J., C. Hunold, D. Schlosberg, and H. Hernes. 2003. Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. 2004. The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. 2000. Marx's Ecology: Materialism and Nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. 2002. ‘Capitalism and Ecology: The Nature of the Contradiction.’ Monthly Review 54: 6–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J. 2009. Ecological Revolutions: Making Peace with the Planet. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J., B. Clark, and R. York. 2010. The Ecological Rift: Capitalism's War on the Earth. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gowdy, J., and L. Krall. 2015. ‘The Economic Origins of Ultrasociality.’ Behavioural and Brain Sciences. forthcoming.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N. 2009. ‘Environment Law, Regulation and Governance: Shifting Architectures.’ Journal of Environmental Law 2: 57–90.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., and D. Soskice. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2014. Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. 2007. Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry: Activism: Innovation, and the Environment in an Era of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. 2009. Prosperity without Growth: The Transition to a Sustainable Economy. London: UK Sustainable Development Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 1990. State Theory. Pittsburgh: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2002. Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2006. ‘Spatial Fixes, Temporal Fixes and Spatio-Temporal Fixes.’ In The David Harvey Reader, edited by N. Castree and D. Gregory, 143–165. Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2007a. ‘Political Economy, Political Ecology, and Democratic Socialism.’ Nicos Poulantzas Memorial Lecture, Nicos Poulantzas Institute, Panteios University, 7 December.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2007b. ‘Knowledge as a Fictitious Commodity: Insights and Limits of a Polanyian Perspective.’ In Reading Karl Polanyi for the Twenty-First Century: Market Economy as Political Project, edited by A. Bugra and K. Agartan, 113–134. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2008. State Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2009. ‘Cultural Political Economy and Critical Policy Studies.’ Critical Policy Studies 3: 336–356. doi: 10.1080/19460171003619741
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2012a. ‘Economic and Ecological Crises: Green New Deals and No-Growth Economies.’ Development 55: 17–24. doi: 10.1057/dev.2011.104
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2012b. ‘Obstacles to a World State in the Shadow of the World Market.’ Cooperation and Conflict 47: 200–219. doi: 10.1177/0010836712443172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2012c. ‘Left Strategy’. Transform! 10: 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2013. ‘Recovered Imaginaries, Imagined Recoveries: A Cultural Political Economy of Crisis Construals and Crisis Management in the North Atlantic Financial Crisis.’ In Before and Beyond the Global Economic Crisis: Economics, Politics, Settlement, edited by M. Benner. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.th.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., and N.-L. Sum. 2006. Beyond the Regulation Approach: Putting Capitalist Economies in Their Place. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A. 2015. ‘Pathways of Urban Nature: Diversity in the Greening of the Twenty-First-Century City.’ In Now Urbanism: The Future City is Here, edited by J. B. Hou, T. Spencer, T. Way, and K. Yocom, 274–286. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D. 1985. ‘The Role of Law in Economic Thought; Essays on the Fetishism of Commodities.’ American University Law Review 34: 939–1001.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N. 2014. This Changes Everything. Capitalism vs. the Climate. Toronto: Alfred Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Krey, V., G. Luderer, L. Clarke, and E. Kriegler. 2014. ‘Getting from Here to There – Energy Technology Transformation Pathways in the EMF27 Scenarios.’ Climatic Change 123: 369–382. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Leap Manifesto. 2015. https://leapmanifesto.org/en/the-leap-manifesto/.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1964. The Poverty of Philosophy. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2015. ‘The Innovative State: Governments Should Make Markets, Not Just Fix Them.’ Foreign Affair 94: 61–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClintock, N. 2014. ‘Radical, Reformist, and Garden-Variety Neoliberal: Coming to Terms with Urban Agriculture's Contradictions.’ Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 19: 147–171. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.752797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, J. 1994. ‘Is Sustainable Capitalism Possible?.’ In Is Capitalism Sustainable? Political Economy and the Politics of Ecology, edited by M. O'Connor. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parenti, C. 2014. ‘Climate Change: What Role for Reform?’ Monthly Review 11: 49–51.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M., P. Doran, and J. Barry. 2006. ‘Green Theory.’ In The State: Theories and Issues, edited by C. Hay, M. Lister, and D. Marsh, 135–154. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pollin, R., H. Garrett-Peltier, J. Heintz, and H. Scharber. 2008. Green Recovery: A Program to Create Good Jobs and Start Building a Low-Carbon Economy. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Pooley, E. 2010. The Climate War: True Believers, Power Brokers, and the Fight to Save the Earth. New York: Hachette Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pope Francis. 2015. ‘Laudato Si.’ [Encyclical Letter on Care for Our Common Home]. Accessed November 20. http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html.
   Google Scholar
• Prudham, W. 2009. ‘Commodification.’ In Companion to Environmental Geography, edited by N. Castree, D. Demeritt, D. Liverman, and B. Rhoads, 123–142. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, P., T. Banuri, G. Gallopin, P. Gutman, A. Hammon, R. Kates, and R. Swrt. 2002. Great Transition: The Promise and Lure of the Times Ahead. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. 2006. ‘The Nature that Capital Can See: Science, State, and Market in the Commodification of Ecosystem Services.’ Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24: 367–387. doi: 10.1068/d3304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sum, N., and B. Jessop. 2013. Towards a Cultural Political Economy: Putting Culture in its Place in Political Economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• While, A., A. Jonas, and D. Gibbs. 2004. ‘The Environment and the Entrepreneurial City: Searching for the Urban “Sustainability Fix” in Manchester and Leeds.’ International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28: 549–569. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00535.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar